I am creating kubernetes cluster which include: 1 master node (M1), 2 worker nodes (W1 and W2)
Using deployment to create pods with replica count 5.
If pod dies kubernetes is re creating the pods. Count remains 5.
Lets suppose if W2 worker node dies due to any reason.
In this case does kubernetes will create a new node or just run all the replicas on the same node W1.
If i want to restore the died node automatically how can i do that?
This mostly depends on how you deployed things. Most cloud-integrated installers and hosted providers (GKE, EKS, AKS, Kops) use a node group of some kind so a fully failed node (machine terminated) would be replaced at that level. If the node is up but jammed, that would generally be solved by cluster-autoscaler starting a new node for you. Some installers that don't make per-cloud assumptions (Kubespray, etc) leave this up to you to handle yourself.
Related
My situation is ,I have 5 nodes having K8 cluster .Initially pods are distributed across the 5 node. Sometime we need to restart particular node server. Then that node goes down and and pod will created on another node. But once failed/down node comes up ,no pods are creating in it automatically, as replica number already reached .We need all node have minimum 1 pods to run .Could please help on this
We need all node have minimum 1 pods to run
Instead of running the Deployment, you can run the Daemon set if you want to run a minimum of one 1 pod to run on the node.
So if anytime new comes to the cluster it will have one replica running of your POD.
Read more daemon set : https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/workloads/controllers/daemonset/
You can spread also replicas if running as deployment however it would be tricky to manage with Affinity, POD topology spread
I have setup GKS in free trail access.
here is screenshot of cluster
I have already setup vm instance in gce. So my kubernets cluster is having less resource for testing i have setup it but i want to know if i delete 1 node out of 3 what will happened
my pods are running in all 3 nodes(disturbed)
So i delete one node will it create a new node with deploy my running pods into another 2 nodes it will become heavy
how do i know its HA using and Scale Up and Scale Down
Please clear my questions
So i delete one node will it create a new node with deploy my running
pods into another 2 nodes it will become heavy
GKE will manage the Nodes using Node pool config.
if inside your GKE you have set 3 nodes and manually remove 1 instance it will auto create new Node in cluster.
You pod might get moved to another node if space is left there or else it will go to pending state and wait for new node to join the GKE cluster.
If you want to redice nodes in GKE you have to redice minimum count in GKE node pool.
If you want to test scale up and down, you can enable auto scaling on Node pool and increase the POD count on cluster, GKE will auto add nodes. Make sure you have set correctly min and max nodes into node pool section for autoscaling.
When you delete a node, its pods are also deleted. Depending on your deployment, i.e. you have Pod scale of 3, one node will hold 2 pods and the other 1. If your app will suffer or not it depends on the actual traffic.
I am new to the Kubernetes and cluster.
I would like to bring up an High Availability Master Only Kubernetes Cluster(Need Not to!).
I have the 2 Instances/Servers running Kubernetes daemon, and running different kind of pods on both the Nodes.
Now I would like to somehow create the cluster and if the one of the host(2) down, then all the pods from that host(2) should move to the another host(1).
once the host(2) comes up. the pods should float back.
Please let me know if there is any way i can achieve this?
Since your requirement is to have a 2 node master-only cluster and also have HA capabilities then unfortunately there is no straightforward way to achieve it.
Reason being that a 2 node master-only cluster deployed by kubeadm has only 2 etcd pods (one on each node). This gives you no fault tolerance. Meaning if one of the nodes goes down, etcd cluster would lose quorum and the remaining k8s master won't be able to operate.
Now, if you were ok with having an external etcd cluster where you can maintain an odd number of etcd members then yes, you can have a 2 node k8s cluster and still have HA capabilities.
It is possible that master node serves also as a worker node however it is not advisable on production environments, mainly for performance reasons.
By default, kubeadm configures master node so that no workload can be run on it and only regular nodes, added later would be able to handle it. But you can easily override this default behaviour.
In order to enable workload to be scheduled also on master node you need to remove from it the following taint, which is added by default:
kubectl taint nodes --all node-role.kubernetes.io/master-
To install and configure multi-master kubernetes cluster you can follow this tutorial. It describes scenario with 3 master nodes but you can easily customize it to your needs.
We are still in a design phase to move away from monolithic architecture towards Microservices with Docker and Kubernetes. We did some basic research on Docker and Kubernetes and got some understanding. We still have couple of open question considering we will be creating K8s cluster with multiple Linux hosts (due to some reason we can't think about Cloud right now) .
Consider a scenario where we have K8s Cluster spanning over multiple linux hosts (5+).
1) If one of the linux worker node crashes and once we bring it back, does enabling kubelet as part of systemctl in advance will be sufficient to bring up required K8s jobs so that it be detected by master again?
2) I believe once worker node is crashed (X pods), after the pod eviction timeout master will reschedule those X pods into some other healthy node(s). Once the node is UP it won't do any deployment of X pods as master already scheduled to other node but will be ready to accept new requests from Master.
Is this correct ?
Yes, should be the default behavior, check your Cluster deployment tool.
Yes, Kubernetes handles these things automatically for Deployments. For StatefulSets (with local volumes) and DaemonSets things can be node specific and Kubernetes will wait for the node to come back.
Better to create a test environment and see/test the failure scenarios
From this article(https://cloudplatform.googleblog.com/2018/06/Kubernetes-best-practices-upgrading-your-clusters-with-zero-downtime.html) I learnt that it is possible to create a new node pool, and cordon and drain old nodes one by one, so that workloads get re-scheduled to new nodes in the new pool.
To me, a new node pool seems to indicate a new cluster. The reason: we have two node pools in GKE, and they're listed as two separate clusters.
My question is: after the pods under a service get moved to a new node, if that service is being called from other pods in the old node, will this inter-cluster service call fail?
You don't create a new cluster per se. You upgrade the master(s) and then you create a new node pool with nodes that have a newer version. Make sure the new node pool shares the same network as the original node pool.
If you have a service with one replica (one pod) if that pod is living in one of the nodes you are upgrading you need to allow time for Kubernetes to create a new replica on a different node that is not being upgraded. For that time, your service will be unavailable.
If you have a service with multiple replicas chances are that you won't see any downtime unless for some odd reason all your replicas are scheduled on the same node.
Recommendation: scale your resources which serve your services (Deployments, DaemonSets, StatefulSets, etc) by one or two replicas before doing node upgrades.
StatefulSet tip: You will have some write downtime if you are running something like mysql in a master-slave config when you reschedule your mysql master.
Note that creating a new node Pool does not create a new cluster. You can have multiple node pools within the same cluster. Workloads within the different node pools will still interact with each other since they are in the same cluster.
gcloud container node-pools create (the command to create node pools) requires that you specify the --cluster flag so that the new node pool is created within an existing cluster.
So to answer the question directly, following the steps from that Google link will not cause any service interruption nor will there be any issues with pods from the same cluster communicating with each other during your migration.