Hello I am working on a project where I want to show high polygon 3D-objects. I figured out the Holographic Remoting Player is the easiest and fastest way to get it running. My question is: Does Holographic Remoting need a powerful CPU or GPU? On the official site of Microsoft it says it needs at least a GTX 970, but it still doesn't run smoothely. What CPU is the minimum requirement?
In addition to computer hardware requirements, you also need to pay attention to your wireless network environment, please ensure the Bit rate and stability of your wireless network. Check out what Microsoft suggested here: PC System Requirements.
If you cannot confirm the reason for the holographic stuttering, you can follow this doc to enable Diagnostics, the number of FPS and Latency will show you(in HoloLens1), the former number dependent on your hardware device, and the latter number is largely dependent on your Wi-Fi network.
Thank you for your help. It turns out the problem lies with the Unity Engine, which is really not ressource efficient. When the app gets built in Visual Studio it runs nearly without flaws. Unity requires a very powerful CPU. https://www.pugetsystems.com/recommended/Recommended-Systems-for-Unity-188/Hardware-Recommendations
Related
We are doing research into running a server on a Pi, and communicating with it via a webapp (over a local network) to control 2-3 servos. It appears that the Rpi has only one hardware configured PWM pin, but this can be worked around via servoblaster. However, since Servoblaster utilizes the Rpi's DMA, will it interfere with the Pi's ability to operate a web server? I apologize if this question is unclear i am somewhat unfamiliar with the software/network concepts involved. Additionally, is there a good resource for understanding the DMA function further?
Thanks in advance for any help.
You can control Servos using Software PWM, which will not require any further hardware or using DMA
If you care about performance and want more powerful hardware consider ODROID-X, it has 1.4GHz processor and 1GB RAM and cost $130, it is the best value for the price.
For other alternatives check Small low cost linux pc's
There are free projects/examples of wol (wake on LAN) for iOS?
I've found this one [openwol][1] but it's old and has no signs of recents updates.
Also I've been digging on it and it's not working as expected, the main purpose of it is wake a computer but it's not working. I've spent some time on it and still no work.
Maybe there are other examples or someone else may join on me and solve/update this code to work?
Wake-on-LAN generally doesn't work for machines on wireless networks, as the wireless hardware is typically powered down when the machine is off or asleep -- it's usually only supported for wired Ethernet. As such, wake-on-LAN is unlikely to give acceptable results on an iOS device, as it'll only work for some specific network configurations (i.e, networks where the wireless segment is bridged to a wired segment that the target system is connected to).
We are in the process of developing an method of caching so that our app can continue to operate in an area with very little/no signal.
Obviously users will try to continue to use functions that require data and we need to handle the inevitable failure of these requests appropriately.
Essentially we are sat in the office, switching airplane mode on and off to simulate entering/exiting signal then adjusting our app to fix any issues this may arise.
What I'd like to know is, is using airplane mode going to give us a reasonable simulation of entering/exiting an area with no data or are there other implications?
I've seen questions raising the issue that the 3G/EDGE connection may not always wake up after airplane mode is switched on - while I appreciate this method is no way as good as actually being out in the field testing, if we can get a reasonable simulation and account for the majority of the problems that arise then I think this is an acceptable tradeoff.
I apologise if this has been asked before, I did do a search on here & on google but couldn't find any appropriate results.
You should try the Network Link Conditioner
There is a WWDC 2012 session called Networking Best Practices that mentions it (but he does not explain how to use it there).
To get it, you have to go to XCode/Open Developer Tool/More Developer Tools.. and download the latest Hardware IO Tools for XCode.
Once you install it from the IO Tools pkg, "Network Link Conditioner" will appear in System Preferences
You can then do something like 100% packet loss to simulate one of those routers that pretends you are connected but actually doesn't work.
On iOS, the network link conditioner is under Settings / Developer (you must have enabled Developer mode in XCode first to see it)
The main problem is that in the Airplane Mode the networking operations fail fast, while spotty mobile signal will lead to timeouts and a-few-bytes-an-hour speeds. This is usually a significant difference from the UI viewpoint. (It might be worth a try to use some bandwidth throttle to starve the testing machine and see how it behaves when the network starts to break?)
A few years back, when testing remote devices which used the cell network to communicate with the 'home base', we did things like move them into a shielded room (make shift), place large shields on three of four sides to force them to connect to a certain tower (and therefore, network), etc. Brute force physical methods. Since this actually cuts off the signal, it may be a more realistic approach.
You may also want to try this through your wlan-router. First, disable data roaming on your iPhone. Then, let the iPhone be connected to the internet through your wlan network. Then, disconnect the gateway on your wlan router while your iPhone is still connected to the wlan network.
This depends on what failure modes you are trying to test.
I use Airplane mode as a first pass check to make sure an app submission isn't quickly rejected.
Other network failure handling checks might include:
3G only (no wifi).
WIFI only (in Airplane mode).
Pulling the power cord on the WIFI access point.
Pulling the network cable from the back of the WIFI access point after connecting to it (Reachability may falsely say yes).
Walking in and out of a basement
elevator (or other Faraday cage) in the middle of a transfer.
Driving between 2 cell towers during a data transfer.
Walking between 2 enabled WIFI access points between connection and data transfer.
Starting the app after more than 30 minutes of device inactivity (radios may be idle).
Running the app while another app (Safari, Mail) is downloading in the background.
etc.
I need a product to simulate network latency for testing mobile applications (in particular iphone and android). I plan to set up a wifi router connected to a linux box, and write a number of scripts to approximate different types of connectivity issues.
So far, I've taken a cursory look at Netem and ns-2 (or its offspring ns-3). Netem looks very easy to deploy and configure, but they both look like they'll require some in-depth investigation.
Does anyone have positive/negative experiences with either of those solutions that they could share? Or maybe used a different solution for this problem?
If anyone comes here looking for tips, I've found a solution that seems to work well.
Ubuntu comes with Netem installed, so I went ahead and just made use of that. Basically, I got a computer with two ethernet ports, forwarded one to the other and applied Netem latency settings to the connection. Then I attached a wireless router to one, and LAN to the other. Netem lets me play with all kinds of latency and packet loss settings.
Btw, I also tried to use a few different laptops and set the internal wireless card up as an ad-hoc wireless router. I got it working for the most part, but finding a laptop with an internal wireless card that plays nice with ad-hoc in Linux is tricky at best... can't recommend it.
What is the best way to realize wireless communication between an embedded system (based on an AVR controller) and the iPhone? I think there are only two options: either WiFi or BlueTooth. The range is not really a problem, since both devices should stay in the same room.
I have no idea, if there are any useful WiFi boards that can be connected to an AVR based microcontroller system (or any small microcontroller), any hints would be highly welcome.
I guess the better solution would be BlueTooth, but there is also the problem: which BlueTooth board is best suited for attachment to an AVR system, and is it possible to use the iPhone BlueTooth stack for (serial) communication over BlueTooth with the AVR device.
I hope that somebody already realized such a system and can give some helpful tips...
You can get modules for both WiFi and Bluetooth that will connect to an embedded system through a UART interface, however a WiFi module will have far more processing power than your AVR microcontroller, often with spare capacity and I/O to execute additional user code, so connecting one to an AVR maybe somewhat redundant in many cases.
Bluetooth modules are simpler, less expensive, and the data-rate is better matched to the AVR's capabilities. For example these Parani modules. I have used them between an embedded system and a Laptop PC's Bluetooth, so given appropriate communications software, there is no technical reason why it could not be used with an iPhone I think. However this may be the flaw, on the PC the device was recognised as a virtual serial port, I don't know whether iPhone supports 'legacy' communications in quite the same way.
For comparison, a WiFi solution
From what I know, BlueTooth is very limited on the iPhone: There is only very few BlueTooth-Profiles implemented, and - even if they can be extended with a jailbroken iPhone - I doubt this is easy to use from the application layer.
On the other side, transferring via WiFi requires a lot of processing power and memory since much more things have to be implemented before you can even start transferring data: 802.11, cdma/ca, arp, tcp. That's a big task.
Is it an option to build a hardware extension to the iPhone ? You might be able to get the serial connection and power out of the dock connector. Then even ZigBee could be very helpful.
Here's an article you might find helpful. I would lean toward a WiFi solution just because of the added flexibility available.
http://www.embedded.com/design/networking/215801088
-t
Some of the other people at the office have done AVR <- Bluetooth -> Symbian and AVR <- Bluetooth -> PC solutions without trouble. There is lots of info, reference designs and source available. I have no idea of how hard it would be to use Bluetooth on Iphone.
The exact module is probability also not important as long as it got some type of serial interface (I2C,SPI) to interface to the AVR and some source code show how to use the module.
Is it an 8-bit or 32-bit AVR? For the AVR32 processors there's support
for WiFi in the Atmel 1.5.0 Software Framework using SD-card-mounted
WiFi modules from HD Wireless (http://www.hd-wireless.se), including
an IP stack (lwIP). Be aware that you need Ad-Hoc (IBSS) support to
connect directly to the iPhone.
There is WiSnap kit. It can connect directly to a standard RS232 interface or through the TTL UART interface to embedded processors. We are planning to use it in our project. It also has Ad-Hoc support.
There are some usage examples and an iPhone application for connection setup.
http://serialio.com/products/mobile/wifi/WiSnapKit1.php
What are you trying to communicate between your AVR and the Iphone? The Iphone is made for the web along with everything apple (which AVR's are decidedly not). So what works well is an embedded device that exposes a web-interface. Like the Transmission bittorrent client on Linux. Also nowadays many low-power small form-factor linux platforms exist that will allow you to do this.
For instance Gumstix has an ARM based platform that runs linux and includes WiFi (Overo Fire).