We are in the process of developing an method of caching so that our app can continue to operate in an area with very little/no signal.
Obviously users will try to continue to use functions that require data and we need to handle the inevitable failure of these requests appropriately.
Essentially we are sat in the office, switching airplane mode on and off to simulate entering/exiting signal then adjusting our app to fix any issues this may arise.
What I'd like to know is, is using airplane mode going to give us a reasonable simulation of entering/exiting an area with no data or are there other implications?
I've seen questions raising the issue that the 3G/EDGE connection may not always wake up after airplane mode is switched on - while I appreciate this method is no way as good as actually being out in the field testing, if we can get a reasonable simulation and account for the majority of the problems that arise then I think this is an acceptable tradeoff.
I apologise if this has been asked before, I did do a search on here & on google but couldn't find any appropriate results.
You should try the Network Link Conditioner
There is a WWDC 2012 session called Networking Best Practices that mentions it (but he does not explain how to use it there).
To get it, you have to go to XCode/Open Developer Tool/More Developer Tools.. and download the latest Hardware IO Tools for XCode.
Once you install it from the IO Tools pkg, "Network Link Conditioner" will appear in System Preferences
You can then do something like 100% packet loss to simulate one of those routers that pretends you are connected but actually doesn't work.
On iOS, the network link conditioner is under Settings / Developer (you must have enabled Developer mode in XCode first to see it)
The main problem is that in the Airplane Mode the networking operations fail fast, while spotty mobile signal will lead to timeouts and a-few-bytes-an-hour speeds. This is usually a significant difference from the UI viewpoint. (It might be worth a try to use some bandwidth throttle to starve the testing machine and see how it behaves when the network starts to break?)
A few years back, when testing remote devices which used the cell network to communicate with the 'home base', we did things like move them into a shielded room (make shift), place large shields on three of four sides to force them to connect to a certain tower (and therefore, network), etc. Brute force physical methods. Since this actually cuts off the signal, it may be a more realistic approach.
You may also want to try this through your wlan-router. First, disable data roaming on your iPhone. Then, let the iPhone be connected to the internet through your wlan network. Then, disconnect the gateway on your wlan router while your iPhone is still connected to the wlan network.
This depends on what failure modes you are trying to test.
I use Airplane mode as a first pass check to make sure an app submission isn't quickly rejected.
Other network failure handling checks might include:
3G only (no wifi).
WIFI only (in Airplane mode).
Pulling the power cord on the WIFI access point.
Pulling the network cable from the back of the WIFI access point after connecting to it (Reachability may falsely say yes).
Walking in and out of a basement
elevator (or other Faraday cage) in the middle of a transfer.
Driving between 2 cell towers during a data transfer.
Walking between 2 enabled WIFI access points between connection and data transfer.
Starting the app after more than 30 minutes of device inactivity (radios may be idle).
Running the app while another app (Safari, Mail) is downloading in the background.
etc.
Related
I'm researching and trying to building a RC car that can be controlled by the internet. I've started looking into how communication over the web works, but I seem to be going nowhere. My goal for the project is straight forward:
The RC car has an on-board camera and 4g wifi router that enables communication (driving commands, video streaming) over the internet. A Raspberry Pi will serve as the on-board computer.
I will be able to control the car with my PC even across the globe, as long as I'm connected.
I want to preferably do as much by myself as possible without relying too much on other people's code.
So here are my questions:
How does an application communicate over the internet? What is the interface between the application's logic (e.g pressing "w" to go forward), and transmitting/receiving that command over the internet?
How is video data stream handled?
I've looked into WebRTC and WebSockets for communication, but they are aimed at providing real time communication to web browsers and mobile, not something like a raspberry pi, and I'm still in the blind as for exactly what technology should I use, and in general the overview and architecture of real time communication.
All I've achieved so far was an app that sends text messages between devices through a server on my network, with very primitive reading/writing using java Socket.
In short, what does messenger/skype/zoom do in the background when you send a message or video call?
Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.
First things first. You cannot do real-time control over Internet, period. There is absolutely no way to guarantee the delivery latency. Your control commands can arrive with a delay from milliseconds to seconds, or never. No way around it.
Now, you can still do a number of reasonable steps to absorb that unpredictable latency as much as possible and safe-guard your remote robot from the consequences of the unreliable communication.
For example, instead of sending the drive commands directly - as in, acceleration, deceleration, turn angle, etc., you can send a projected trajectory that is calculated from your drive commands locally on a model. Your RC car must be sufficiently smart to do some form of localisation - at the very least, wheel odometry, and with a good enough time sync between the sender and the RC car you'll be able to control the behaviour remotely without nasty consequences of drive commands executed at an unpredictable delay.
You can add a heart-beat to your protocol, to monitor the quality of the communication line, and if hear-beat is delayed or missing, initiate emergency stop.
Also, don't bother with TCP, use UDP only and maintain your own sequence counter to monitor missing packets. Same applies to the telemetry stream, not just command channel.
I have an Arduino based device interfaced to a 3G modem which I use to record data from several sensors in a remote environment. I would like to be able to send commands and stream some data from the device every now and then back to my standard network connected PC. If the remote device was connected to a WIFI or other local area network this would be relatively straightforward, but as the device connects over 3G this means that it is behind the 3G carriers NAT and so establishing a connection to the device becomes difficult.
The device can, of course, open a TCP connection to my host PC any time it wishes, the problem is telling the device when i want it to do so. I need some way of getting some kind of message to the device to notify it that I would like it to initiate a connection to my PC.
I've been reading up on NAT traversal techniques that app developers use to initiate P2P comms between 2 devices both behind NATs such as UDP and TCP 'hole punching' but this method seems rather too complex for my arduino system. Another general idea is to have the device polling a web server periodically looking for a signal to initiate a connection, but I'm not sure how much traffic (and data usage costs) this would generate as the device would have to poll every 10 seconds or so in order to make sure it initiates it's connection within a reasonable time frame of the request being set on the web server that it polls.
Is there any commonly used method of achieving something like this? Any general ideas or insight would be much appreciated
Thanks,
James
I think the solution will depend largely on your particular applications and requirements.
There are several ways to achieve this type of functionality and it looks like you have covered some of them already. The most common are:
have the device poll the server. This may be ok depending on the response times you need. If you need to poll as regularly as you suggest above then I imagine power may be more important to you than data rates, especially if you are battery connected. With a typical 3G data plan the polling itself will have a negligible data overhead, I would think.
have the server send a SMS which then triggers the device to contact the server. You need to make sure the SMS variable delivery time is ok for you and you also have to be aware that SMS delivery is not guaranteed so you would have to build in some sort of check for delivery at a higher layer (or into your application).
use some low cost Android based device for your 3G connectivity and leverage the Google push notifications mechanism
It is worth noting that server polling typically gets very bad press as it is seems intuitively wasteful to have the client and the server constantly checking for messages, especially when the actual messages are fairly infrequent. However, underneath most push solutions there is still a pull mechanism in the background, albeit generally a very efficient one that may, for example, piggy back on other messages between the network and the mobile device and hence have minimal power and data overhead. Personally, I would say that if you do not have major concerns with battery/power or with the load polling might generate for your servers, then it is worth exploring if the simplicity benefits of a polling solution outweigh its other disadvantages.
What is the best way to COMPLETELY restart the iOS Bluetooth BTLE central and peripheral managers, after communication stops between two iOS devices (iPad-mini)?
Sometimes after a few minutes, my BTLE communication stops (central can not get response from peripheral, though debug output of each device shows app still running and central app still is trying to scan peripheral, and peripheral is still advertising), and will not start again:
after stopping scanning and stopping advertising, comm still doesn't work;
after re-opening the app, comm still doesn't work(!);
after POWER CYCLING the iPads comm works again, but then after a few minutes dies.
Therefore, something I'm doing is clobbering maybe the iOS core Bluetooth software.
Sometimes there are error messages from the underlying BTLE layer.
BACKGROUND:
Each iPad in this system alternately works as central, to read/write data to others, and then as peripheral, to be read by others. Never at the same time, and with a 1 second delay between transistions.
The bluetooth stack is not the most robust part of iOS. This may have improved in iOS7 but issues have always existed. You most probably are stressing the system so that this hang happens more often. You should create a bug report and send it to Apple. Or create a TSI, as a developer you have two of those every year. They are the only ones who can do something about it.
To solve the issue, restarting the app usually helps but sometimes bluetooth needs to be turned on/off or worst case the device needs to be power cycled. Unfortunately, there is not programmatic way to do any of these.
I have developed an application for iPhone, which is continuously interacting with database ... I have observed that it is running fine in 3G environment but in wifi its performance is not good.
Can someone suggest what can be the reason for it? or can I do anything to resolve it?
I'd rather expect the contrary, given that 3G cellular signal may fluctuate wildly, while WIFI signal should stay almost the same even if you move within the room served by the access point.
The reason may be the particular wireless connection you are using for testing purposes. Try using a different WIFI network and see if the behavior you are experiencing changes.
I was wondering what amount of time is required to convey information regarding the tilt and position (not gps) of one particular iphone to another. Could 2 iphones send and receive this information simultaneously? What about 3 iphones? I'm interested in an application that is able to simultaneously send and receive and make conditional decisions based on this information received all within a half a second-ish.
Any shot this is possible? If so, is bluetooth or wifi better?
Thanks a ton,
Jake
This is currently not possible without an intermediate server. (Without a jailbreak, which would make it possible, but extremely difficult)
I'm assuming your purpose is gaming, in which case, the latency associated with a trip to a server and back over a cellular data network, is likely to take too long for any satisfactory gaming experience. I don't believe it would be within half a second.
This will be possible via Bluetooth in the upcoming 3.0 iPhone software, but that is still under NDA, so you are not likely to be able to get any reliable performance numbers until it is released. If I were guessing, I would certainly guess that the latency associated with a direct Bluetooth connection would be FAR under half a second.
All you've got as an option right now is Wi-Fi or the Cell Network. If you use Bonjour over Wi-Fi, you'd have latencies in the milliseconds, but all the phones would have to be connected to the same access point. Take a look at the WiTap example.
It is definitely possible, you'd want to connect your peers over WiFi for best performance and reliability, but Bluetooth would be ok as long as your data packets were constrained to small sizes (< 1k). Check out this documentation and sample code to see how to access UIAccelerometer:
http://developer.apple.com/iphone/library/documentation/UIKit/Reference/UIAccelerometer_Class/Reference/UIAccelerometer.html
http://developer.apple.com/iphone/library/samplecode/AccelerometerGraph/index.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/DTS40007410
The trick is that the update frequency is controlled in part by the systems needs, so there may be a window (while the system is attempting to update device orientation) wherein your application receives no updates.