I am trying to generate documentation for some 'Error Codes' implemented in the code.
To start my work, I used the reference from:
Custom tags with Doxygen
Using the \xrefitem and ALIASES option, I did the following.
ALIASES = "error{1}=\ref ErrorCode-\1 \"ErrorCode-\1\" " \
"implement{1}=\xrefitem implement \"Implements ErrorCode\" \"ErrorCode Implementation\" \1" \
In the code I write the comment in FUNC1, for example:
#implement{#error{001}} Error Code 001
Using the above, I can generate a page where it shows the function name and which error codes are implemented in it.
Now, what I have is multiple sources of same Error Code in my project. So, in the documentation I would also like to have a page, where I can see the Error Code and where it is implemented (with links to the function).
What I have on page "ErrorCode Implementation":
FUNC1
Implements ErrorCode-001, ErrorCode-003
FUNC2
Implements ErrorCode-002
What I want on page "ErrorCode Tracing":
ErrorCode-001
Implemented in FUNC1, FUNC3
ErrorCode-002
Implemented in FUNC2
How can this be done in Doxygen?
Related
I'm trying to execute javascript on QQuickWebEngineView object in c++ and get returned value. In QML it's easy
view.runJavaScript("document.documentElement.outerHTML", function(result){//do smth})
in c++ method signature for executing js is this:
void runJavaScript(const QString&, const QJSValue & = QJSValue());
and I believe I could use QJSValue to get returned data, but I'm not finding anything on how to use it... maybe someone has an example of how to use QJSValue here. Thanks.
Firstly, Karate UI automation is really awesome tool. I am kind of enjoying it while writing the UI tests using Karate. I ran into a situation where in, i was trying to fetch the shadowRoot elements. I read few similar posts related to javascript executor with karate and learnt that it is already answered. it is recommended to use driver.eval. But in Karate 0.9.5 there is no eval, it has script() or scriptAll(). I have gone through documentation couple of times to figure out how i can fetch element inside an element but no luck.
Using traditional selenium+java, we can fetch shadowRoot like this way:
something like shadowRoot which sits inside a parent element like div or body.
//downloads-manager is the tagname and under that downloads-manager, a shadowRoot element exists
The HTML looks like this. it is from chrome://downloads.
<downloads-manager>
#shadow-root(open)
</download-manager>
WebElement downloadManager =driver.findElement(By.tagName("downloads-manager");
WebElement shadowRoot= (WebElement)((JavaScriptExecutor)driver)
.executeScript("return arguments[0].shadowRoot",downloadManager);
So i tried the following in Karate UI
script("downloads-manager","return _.shadowRoot"); //js injection error
script('downloads-manager', "function(e){ return e.shadowRoot;}"); // same injection error as mentioned above.
def shadowRoot = locate("downloads-manager").script("function(e){return e.shadowRoot};"); //returns an empty string.
I bet there is a way to get this shadowRoot element using Karate UI but i am kind of running out of options and not able to figure out this.
Can someone please look into this & help me?
-San
Can you switch to XPath and see if that helps:
* def temp = script('//downloads-manager', '_.innerHTML')
Else please submit a sample in this format so we can debug: https://github.com/intuit/karate/tree/develop/examples/ui-test
EDIT: after you posted the link to that hangouts example in the comments, I figured out the JS that would work:
* driver 'http://html5-demos.appspot.com/hangouts'
* waitFor('#hangouts')
* def heading = script('hangout-module', "_.shadowRoot.querySelector('h1').textContent")
* match heading == 'Paul Irish'
It took some trial and error and fiddling with the DevTools console to figure this out. So the good news is that it is possible, you can use any JS you need, and you do need to know which HTML element to call .shadowRoot on.
EDIT: for other examples of JS in Karate: https://stackoverflow.com/a/60800181/143475
Let's say I have a bunch of functions below:
library.object1.function1()
library.object1.function2()
library.object2.function1()
library.object2.function2()
library.object3.function1()
library.object3.function2()
With what they provide in current custom snippet, when I type lib, it will show all those above functions, which will be a mess if there are too many functions.
I want to make my snippets work like what they did in default code completion:
When I type lib, it only shows:
library
When I type library., it shows:
object1
object2
object3
When I type library.object1., it shows
function1()
function2()
Also, if I type lib, and leave it there, then comeback and add rary, the snippet doesn't work at all, I want it to continue the completion.
Is there a way to achieve it?
I think the closest you can get is something like this (using javascript.json snippet file as an example):
"my library": {
"prefix": "lib",
"body": [
"library.${1|object1,object2,object3|}.${2|function1,function2,function3,function4|}()",
],
"description": "my library functions"
}
With that, when you type lib you get only the library suggested completion. Tab and you will get all the object choices you included in the snippet in the suggestion panel. Tab again and will get the function options that you listed in the snippet.
See snippet choices.
I am getting an error when I try to extract a user from a form with validation errors.
I have the following route configured in my routes file:
GET /users/:user controllers.UsersController.viewUser(user: models.User)
GET /users/:user/edit controllers.UsersController.editUser(user: models.User)
This is fine at this point, and I can render a link to the user view from my scala templates:
routes.UsersController.viewUser(myUserObject)
My problem is that in my user edition form I need to get myUserObject from a Form[User] object. What I am currently doing is:
routes.UsersController.viewUser(userForm.get)
However, when the userForm has any errors, the get method raises an exception, as shown in the documentation.
The approach I have taken is passing an additional User parameter to the scala view, together with the Form[User] parameter I was passing up to now, I mean,
userEdit.render(user, userForm)
instead of just
userEdit.render(userForm)
However, I would like to know if there is a more suitable solution that does not involve including an additional parameter.
The documentation states that you can prefill a form with existing data:
val filledForm = userForm.fill(User("Bob", 18))
Given the preexisting User, it should be trivial to adapt to your example.
in one extension file: I run below code:
var_dump($GLOBALS['TSFE']->tmpl->setup['plugin.']['tx_watermark_pi1.']);
the result is :
["hooks."]=> array(4) { ["dagou_post."]=> array(1) { ["view."]=> array(2) { ["state."]=> array(1) { ["template"]=> string(11) "###INPUT###" }...
and I can tell it outputs this file: ext_typoscript_setup.txt inside extension:watermark and also the ts settings from global and local pages.
Question:
I checked file: typo3\sysext\cms\tslib\class.tslib_fe.php, and trying to figure out how does this work: $GLOBALS['TSFE']->tmpl->setup['plugin.']['tx_watermark_pi1.'], but only saw var $tmpl='';
from this code: $GLOBALS['TSFE']->tmpl->setup['plugin.']['tx_watermark_pi1.'], tmpl should be an object, and setup['plugin.']['tx_watermark_pi1.'] should be the property. So anyone can give me some explanation on how does $GLOBALS['TSFE']->tmpl->setup['plugin.']['tx_watermark_pi1.'] work? thanks.
$GLOBALS['TSFE']->tmpl->setup is the cumulative recursive TS setup of your compete website. It gathers all TS templates, found in rootline from your current selected page, parses it and compiles into array.
Obviously, you will find nothing about tx_watermark_pi1 in class.tslib_fe.php, because tslib_fe knows nothing about it - it just creates FE, and one of the tasks is to create tmpl object, that contains complete setup of all TS, found in rootline.
You can find more info on TS parsing here
The typoscript code you write and also the ts-files delivered with the extensions you have installed are parsed to php and then cached. When the frontend is built up, this very big php array is written to this global object and then read from there by several other classes like extension plugins and so on.
You can find that code in the t3lib/class.t3lib_tsparser*.php classes if you want to take a look (although I don't think that will help you).