GDPR and personal data [closed] - flutter

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
I have an application mobile developed by the flutter and Firestore dB.
I read somewhere that the app must respect the GDPR.
My Firestore content infos user (email, PhoneNumber, image,) and infos for their stores (phones, images, position...)
which data have I to encrypt to respect this GDPR and what also I have to do,
Thanks in advance

You can find most relevant information here.
The GDPR applies to:
a company or entity which processes personal data as part of the activities of one of its branches established in the EU, regardless of where the data is processed;
or
a company established outside the EU and is offering goods/services (paid or for free) or is monitoring the behaviour of individuals in the EU.
So it most likely applies to you.
The GDPR is not about encryption, it is about consent. I strongly suggest you read the whole page I linked, there is no way I could explain the GDPR in a single post here.
If in doubt, ask a local lawyer.

Related

What resources are allocated to a medium sized business's cloud implementation? [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
Jump to the accepted answer to see why the question doesn't actually have a distinct answer. And (LFMM) remember not to google too specifically when you don't know what you're looking for.
When a business purchases 200 licenses and is using the enterprise Salesforce CRM, what resources are allocated to that instance, and what operations within Salesforce are handled outside those dedicated resources?
Edit:
This can be helpful to know for interacting with an instance in numerous circumstances, least of which is their APIs.
This is actually a pretty difficult question to answer. Just by doing a little googling the only thing I am sure of is that record limits are the only thing tied to the amount of user licenses an organization buys. - Page 10
All orgs are still bound by the specified limits
The key here is cpu time is used as a limit. Does an organization with 1k license have a better CPU than an org with 20 users? I can't find documentation to support that, but you would have to imagine some resources would scale. But then you also look at Memory usage and that's the same across the board regardless of users.
You might want to search more on salesforce multi-tenancy. Here are some links to browse
https://developer.salesforce.com/page/Multi_Tenant_Architecture
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrKA3cJmoms

Are there any international address validation providers? trying to avoid google map api [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I am being tasked to find a address validation engine for our company's database. The preferred method is through API feeds, and we are trying to avoid Google as it was deemed highly inaccurate for non-US address. We are looking for providers for international addresses, especially those which can give highly accurate street address with just a postal code.
Hope to hear responses soon! Thank you in advance!
Google was probably deemed "highly inaccurate" for international addresses because Google doesn't verify addresses. Google Maps will place a pin on an address where it would exist if it did exist, but doesn't mean that it does exist. (Trust me, I work at SmartyStreets.)
Only 5% of countries in the world actually support complete address verification. The accuracy level of verification varies from country to country. See: https://smartystreets.com/docs/international#countries
All the other countries just don't carry delivery-point-level data.
But you can try some services like SmartyStreets, Cdyne, Melissa Data, QAS, or Postcode Anywhere, for international "validation". Be careful, though, I've seen QAS and Postcode Anywhere give back a "valid" result when actually the address isn't valid. Some companies only use "range" or street-level data even if delivery point data is available, meaning that they assume/guess it's right, even if it's not.
I guess it depends what your needs are.

user pay for premium content using sms [closed]

Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
My site which have premium content should grant access to privileged users. These users should be assigned into privileged group only when they send sms to some number. How can I collect money from these user sms on my paypal account.
I have premium content and paypal account. Already spend too much time looking for decent explanation of this approach, but I didnt find any useful tutorial.
So, please share some links or thoughts which explains what steps I should complete in order to set this like explained above.
Thanks
SMS transactions are suitable if you offer services or content at a very low price, bellow dolar and up to 10$, otherwise it makes no sense. You should consider to remove user membership based on this payment, mainly for reason that this method of payment is used for anonymous users.
Google is your friend, some better investigation and right keywords and you should find answers.
Hope this helps, good luck.

publish iphone app that requires user to register [closed]

Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
I created iPhone app that requires the user to register and log in before open the app.
This application has been rejected from App Store and they gave me this message:
We found that your app requires customers to register with personal
information to access non-account-based features, which is not in
compliance with the App Store Review Guidelines.
Apps cannot require user registration prior to allowing access to app
features and content that are not associated specifically to the
user. User registration that requires the sharing of personal
information must be optional or tied to account-specific
functionality. Additionally, the requested information must be
relevant to the features.
I payed all my efforts and time in this app. So, my question is: Is there is any Solution to make the App Store accept my app without changing anything in its structure ??
Thanks in Advance.
You have two options:
Make the neccessary changes to the app.
Contact Apple, and explain why your application needs the user to register, and that the application is indeed in compliance with the rules.
Option 2 works best if the application actually conforms to the rules, but depending on what the app actually does, there might be a grey area. Unfortunately the outcome of this option can also be closely correlated to communication skills - so prepare your arguments before calling or mailing Apple.

App Store guidelines 2.6 Apps that read or write data outside its designated container area will be rejected [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
I was wondering if the following guideline:
2.6 "Apps that read or write data outside its designated container area will be rejected"
means that you cannot read data retrieved from a NSUrlConnection. In my app I download the page source from my website and parse it into usable data. That won't disobey the guideline, will it?
No, that's not what it means at all. You're fine. Guideline 2.6 is intended to refer to applications that try to access system files (i.e, on the phone) outside the app sandbox.
I have published a couple of apps that do exactly what you describe: they get data from a web server, parse it into some data, and cache it locally. So I can confirm from my experience that this is fully supported behavior as per the App Store guidelines.