I made 2 yml and when i run docker-compose -f postgresql.yml up its starts ok
and then when i run docker-compose -f postgresql2.yml up first exist code 0.
Is it even possible to run same image twice?
My main purpose to run same web app source twice with different db on the same server pc.
1 web app source 2 instances with self db each on one server(maybe its clearer definition).
Maybe there is better approach and I do and think everything in wrong way.
# This configuration is intended for development purpose, it's **your** responsibility to harden it for production
version: '3.8'
services:
freshhipster-postgresql:
image: postgres:13.1
environment:
- POSTGRES_USER=FreshHipster
- POSTGRES_PASSWORD=
- POSTGRES_HOST_AUTH_METHOD=trust
# If you want to expose these ports outside your dev PC,
# remove the "127.0.0.1:" prefix
ports:
- 5432:5432
and this no big difference
postgresql2.yml
# This configuration is intended for development purpose, it's **your** responsibility to harden it for production
version: '3.8'
services:
freshhipster-postgresql:
image: postgres:13.1
container_name: postgres2
volumes:
- pgdata:/var/lib/postgresql/data_vol2/
environment:
- POSTGRES_USER=FreshHipster
- POSTGRES_PASSWORD=
- POSTGRES_HOST_AUTH_METHOD=trust
# If you want to expose these ports outside your dev PC,
# remove the "127.0.0.1:" prefix
ports:
- 5433:5432
volumes:
pgdata:
external: true
Just use another service name freshhipster-postgresql2 on postgresql2.yml
version: '3.8'
services:
freshhipster-postgresql2:
image: postgres:13.1
container_name: postgres2
volumes:
- pgdata:/var/lib/postgresql/data_vol2/
environment:
- POSTGRES_USER=FreshHipster
- POSTGRES_PASSWORD=
- POSTGRES_HOST_AUTH_METHOD=trust
# If you want to expose these ports outside your dev PC,
# remove the "127.0.0.1:" prefix
ports:
- 5433:5432
volumes:
pgdata:
external: true
Related
I have been using docker for a postgres database as I work on my project. I used this docker-compose file to spin it up
version: '3'
services:
postgres:
image: postgres
ports:
- "4001:5432"
environment:
- POSTGRES_DB=4x4-db
- POSTGRES_USER=postgres
- POSTGRES_PASSWORD=postgres
volumes:
- pgdata-4x4:/var/lib/postgresql/data
volumes:
pgdata-4x4: {}
I now want to containerise my back and front ends together with the database. I made this docker-compose file to do so
version: '3.8'
services:
frontend:
build: ./4x4
ports:
- "3000:3000"
backend:
build: ./server
ports:
- "8000:8000"
db:
image: postgres
ports:
- "4001:5432"
environment:
- POSTGRES_DB=4x4-db
- POSTGRES_USER=postgres
- POSTGRES_PASSWORD=postgres
volumes:
- pgdata-4x4:/var/lib/postgresql/data
volumes:
pgdata-4x4:
external: true
However, when I execute the command docker-compose up on the second file, I do not access the same data as the first one -- the database is blank. If I spin up the first one again, I return to the old data (i.e. nothing is overwritten).
I presumed that the same postgres database would be connected to
I would appreciate any elucidation
I would like to be able to deploy my app in a pre-prod environment for integration testing using a Docker volume that will expose an instance of PostgreSQL. I'm using Scala v2.12.8 and Play v2.7.
Looking at the environment settings of the SBT native packager it seems possible to define dockerExposedVolumes in order to attach a DB.
Using a normal Docker compose file I would do something like that:
version: "3"
services:
db:
image: postgres
environment:
- POSTGRES_USER=postgres
- POSTGRES_PASSWORD=postgress
- POSTGRES_DB=postgres
ports:
- "5433:5432"
volumes:
- pgdata:/var/lib/postgresql/data
networks:
- suruse
volumes:
pgdata:
This configuration has been taken from this SO answer.
I tried searching for config examples but I didn't find anything useful so far. Now I'm wondering how I should define a new docker volume and then expose it to the Docker image created by SBT exactly?
THE WORKING SOLUTION
The final version. I've fully tested it and it works exposing the DB on the TCP port 5433.
# https://docs.docker.com/samples/library/postgres/
version: "3"
services:
app-pgsql:
image: postgres:9.6
restart: always
environment:
- POSTGRES_USER=postgres
- POSTGRES_PASSWORD=yourPasswordHere
- POSTGRES_DB=yourDatabaseNameHere
- POSTGRES_INITDB_ARGS="--encoding=UTF8"
ports:
- "5433:5432"
volumes:
- pgdata:/var/lib/postgresql/data
volumes:
pgdata:
driver: local
Launch the docker compose using sbt dockerComposeUp -useStaticPorts and then check if the containers have been actually exposed using docker ps -a. Also, check the log files using the command provided by dockerComposeUp or dockerComposeInstances.
There is a sbt Plugin that helps you to achieve this:
sbt-docker-compose
With that you can add your database to a docker compose file and you can run everything within sbt.
This is a Docker standard. Here is an explaination how to do it for Postgres:
[run_postgresql_docker_compose][2]
The docker-compose.yml from that example:
version: '3'
services:
mydb:
image: postgres
volumes:
- db-data:/var/lib/postgresql/data
ports:
- 5432:5432/tc
volumes:
db-data:
driver: local
As this is a standard way of Docker you will find more examples.
So i currently can use "docker-compose up test" which only runs my database and my testing scripts. I want to be able to us say docker-compose up app" or something like that that runs everything besides testing. That way Im not running unnecessary containers. Im not sure if theres a way but thats what I was wondering. If possible Id appreciate some links to some that already do that and I can figure out the rest. Basically can I only run certain containers with a single command without running the others.
Yaml
version: '3'
services:
webapp:
build: ./literate-app
command: nodemon -e vue,js,css start.js
depends_on:
- postgres
links:
- postgres
environment:
- DB_HOST=postgres
ports:
- "3000:3000"
networks:
- literate-net
server:
build: ./readability-server
command: nodemon -L --inspect=0.0.0.0:5555 server.js
networks:
- literate-net
redis_db:
image: redis:alpine
networks:
- literate-net
postgres:
restart: 'always'
#image: 'bitnami/postgresql:latest'
volumes:
- /bitnami
ports:
- "5432:5432"
networks:
- literate-net
environment:
- "FILLA_DB_USER=my_user"
- "FILLA_DB_PASSWORD=password123"
- "FILLA_DB_DATABASE=my_database"
- "POSTGRES_PASSWORD=password123"
build: './database-creation'
test:
image: node:latest
build: ./test
working_dir: /literate-app/test
volumes:
- .:/literate-app
command:
npm run mocha
networks:
- literate-net
depends_on:
- postgres
environment:
- DB_HOST=postgres
networks:
literate-net:
driver: bridge
I can run docker-compose up test
Which only runs the postgres. Though I'd like to be able to just run my app without having to run my testing container.
Edit
Thanks to #ideam for the link
I was able to create an additional yaml file for just testing.
For those that dont want to look it up simply create a new yaml file like so
docker-compose.dev.yml
replace dev with whatever you like besides override which causes docker-compose up to automatically run that unless otherwise specified
To run the new file simply call
docker-compose -f docker-compose.dev.yml up
The -f is a flag for selecting a certain file to run. You can run multiple files to have different enviornments set-up
Appreciate the help
docker-compose up <service_name> will start only the service you have specified and its dependencies. (those specified in the dependends_on option.)
you may also define multiple services in the docker-compose up command:
docker-compose up <service_name> <service_name>
note - what does it mean "start the service and its dependecies"?
usually your production services (containers) are attached to each other via the dependes_on chain, therefore you can start only the last containers of the chain. for example, take the following compose file:
version: '3.7'
services:
frontend:
image: efrat19/vuejs
ports:
- "80:8080"
depends_on:
- backend
backend:
image: nginx:alpine
depends_on:
- fpm
fpm:
image: php:7.2
testing:
image: hze∂ƒxhbd
depends_on:
- frontend
all the services are chained in the depends_on option, while the testing container is down bellow the frontend. so when you hit docker-compose up frontend docker will run the fpm first, then the backend, then the frontend, and it will ignore the testing container, which is not required for running the frontend.
Starting with docker-compose 1.28.0 the new service profiles are just made for that! With profiles you can mark services to be only started in specific profiles:
services:
webapp:
# ...
server:
# ...
redis_db:
# ...
postgres:
# ...
test:
profiles: ["test"]
# ...
docker-compose up # start only your app services
docker-compose --profile test up # start app and test services
docker-compose run test # run test service
Maybe you want to share your docker-compose.yml for a better answer than this.
For reusing docker-compose configurations have a look at https://docs.docker.com/compose/extends/#example-use-case which explains the combination of multiple configuration files for reuse of configs for different use cases (test, production, etc.)
How to access postgres-docker container other docker container without ip address?
I want to store data in postgres by using myweb. in jar given host like localhost:5432/db..
Here my compose file:
version: "3"
services:
myweb:
build: ./myweb
container_name: app
ports:
- "8080:8080"
- "9090:9090"
networks:
- front-tier
- back-tier
depends_on:
- "postgresdb"
postgresdb:
build: ./mydb
image: ppk:postgres9.5
volumes:
- dbdata:/var/lib/postgresql
ports:
- "5432:5432"
networks:
- back-tier
volumes:
dbdata: {}
networks:
front-tier:
back-tier:
Instead of localhost:5432/db.. use postgresdb:5432/db.. connection string.
By default the container has the same hostname as the service name.
Here is my minimal working example, which is connecting a java client (boxfuse/flyway) with postgres server. The most important part is the heath check, which is delaying the start of the myweb container to the time when postgres is ready to accept connections.
Note that this can be directly executed by docker-compose up, it dosen't have any other dependencies. Both the images are from docker hub.
version: '2.1'
services:
myweb:
image: boxfuse/flyway
command: -url=jdbc:postgresql://postgresdb/postgres -user=postgres -password=123 info
depends_on:
postgresdb:
condition: service_healthy
postgresdb:
image: postgres
environment:
- POSTGRES_PASSWORD=123
healthcheck:
test: "pg_isready -q -U postgres"
That is the Docker Networking problem. The solution is to use postgresdb:5432/db in place of localhost:5432/db because the two service is in the same network named back-tier and docker deamon will use name service like a DNS name to make communication between the two container. I think that my solution will help you so.
I am playing around with Docker Desktop for Windows (just starting out) and have this simple docker-compose.yml which works great:
version: '2.1'
services:
db:
image: mysql:latest
container_name: wordpresslab_db
volumes:
- db_data:/var/lib/mysql
restart: always
environment:
MYSQL_ROOT_PASSWORD: wordpress
MYSQL_USER: wordpress
MYSQL_DATABASE: wordpress
MYSQL_PASSWORD: wordpress
phpmyadmin:
image: phpmyadmin/phpmyadmin
container_name: wordpresslab_phpmyadmin
volumes:
- /sessions
ports:
- "8090:80"
depends_on:
- db
wordpress:
image: wordpress:latest
container_name: wordpresslab_wordpress
volumes:
- ./:/var/www/html
ports:
- "8080:80"
depends_on:
- db
restart: always
environment:
WORDPRESS_DB_HOST: db:3306
WORDPRESS_DB_PASSWORD: wordpress
volumes:
db_data:
Once I run docker-compose up -d it creates the containers for database, phpmyadmin and wordpress website and are accessible and working OK.
My question is, how could I setup "project.dev" instead of a "localhost:8080" to access wordpress site and "phpmyadmin.dev" instead of a "localhost:8090" to access phpmyadmin? What other tools do I need? Note that I am using Windows 10 as host.
I think you want to use port mapping as described in the networking doc.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/virtualization/windowscontainers/manage-containers/container-networking#network-creation
There's also a Docker doc on ports in compose files.
https://docs.docker.com/compose/compose-file/#long-syntax
Please note that there are differences in syntax depending on which version of docker compose you are using. You can check your version by running this command in a command prompt:
docker-compose --version
Let me know if you're still running into trouble!