I've got a Flexible PostgreSQL Cluster hosted on MS Azure Database for PostgreSQL. This server requires TLS/SSL access like shown in the docs, e.g.:
psql "sslmode=verify-full sslrootcert=c:\ssl\DigiCertGlobalRootCA.crt.pem host=mydemoserver.postgres.database.azure.com dbname=postgres user=myadmin"
or without "verify-full" it works as well:
psql "sslmode=require host=mydemoserver.postgres.database.azure.com dbname=postgres user=myadmin"
Everything works fine when I connect directly, not using a proxy server. But at office we have a corporate HTTP proxy / Firewall configured like http://192.168.X.X:3128. When the proxy is activated, connection to Azure fails.
I was trying to use ssh to set up a proxy tunnel, like so:
ssh -p 5432 <Azure DB username>#<Azure DB host: ....database.azure.com> -L 3128:192.168.X.X:5432
But that didn't work (connection time out error). Also tried to configure connection via PuTTY using some examples from the web, but also to no avail.
Question is: is it at all possible to connect to a remote cluster (both Azure and Google Cloud enforce SSH access) from behind an HTTP proxy?
Related
Is it possible possible to connect to Fly.io Postgres from a NEXT.js API route served from a Vercel severless function, and if so, how?
I've read and reread the Fly.io Postgres docs, focusing especially on Connecting from outside Fly.io and (since my API routes use Prisma to connect to Postgres) Connecting with Prisma, but it seems I would need to either install flyctl or a set up a WireGuard Tunnel in Vercel, neither of which I could figure out how to do from web searches.
I found essentially the same question on the Fly.io community forum, but unfortunately, no one has answered it after 26 days (as of this writing).
To add a bit more detail, I'm familiar with Heroku Postgres, where a connection string is essentially all that's needed to connect, but it seems connecting to Fly.io Postgres requires a connection string plus a proxy created with flyctl. This was easy to get working on my local machine, but it's not clear how to do this on a remote host like Vercel.
One of the solutions is to allocate an ip address to your app with link here
fly ips allocate-v4 --app <pg-app-name>
Then add these service configurations to the fly.toml file
[[services]]
internal_port = 5432 # Postgres instance
protocol = "tcp"
[[services.ports]]
handlers = ["pg_tls"]
port = 5432
Redeploy your app with fly deploy
Go to your fly dashboard you will be able to see Ip Addresses that you can use as host to connect to the database
I created a Single Zone postgres db instance on Cloud Sql, and I am trying to connect by cloud sql proxy.
/cloud_sql_proxy -instances=<PROJECT_ID>:us-central1:staging=tcp:5432 -credential_file=./<SERVICE_ACCOUNT_KEY_FILE>
This is running well. But when i run below command,
psql "host=127.0.0.1 sslmode=disable dbname=postgres user=postgres"
the proxy shows this error:
2019/11/14 15:20:10 using credential file for authentication; email=<SERVICE_ACCOUNT_EMAIL>
2019/11/14 15:20:13 Listening on 127.0.0.1:5432 for <PROJECT_ID>:us-central1:staging
2019/11/14 15:20:13 Ready for new connections
2019/11/14 15:20:34 New connection for "<PROJECT_ID>:us-central1:staging"
2019/11/14 15:22:45 couldn't connect to "<PROJECT_ID>:us-central1:staging": dial tcp 34.70.245.249:3307: connect: connection timed out
Why is this happening?
I am doing this from my local.
I've just followed this tutorial step by step and it worked perfectly for me.
I did not have to do any extra steps(whitelisting ip, opening port etc...) and this was done in a clean project.
Are you trying to do this from local with the SDK or from Cloud Shell? Do you have any firewall restrictions in place?
Any further information about specific setup from your side that might affect will surely help.
Let us know.
EDIT:
Make sure your port 3307 is not blocked by anything.
Have a look at this official documentation specifying that.
Make sure you have all the required IAM roles attached to the service account before you connect to it:
For instance, the list of roles for cloudsql can be retrieved from gcloud with:
$ gcloud iam roles list --filter 'name~"roles/cloudsql"' --format 'table(name, description)'
NAME DESCRIPTION
roles/cloudsql.admin Full control of Cloud SQL resources.
roles/cloudsql.client Connectivity access to Cloud SQL instances.
roles/cloudsql.editor Full control of existing Cloud SQL instances excluding modifying users, SSL certificates or deleting resources.
roles/cloudsql.instanceUser Role allowing access to a Cloud SQL instance
roles/cloudsql.serviceAgent Grants Cloud SQL access to services and APIs in the user project
roles/cloudsql.viewer Read-only access to Cloud SQL resources.
If your service account is lacking the appropriate roles, it won't be able to connect to the instance for IAM authentication to work.
The issue is probably that you are not in the VPC network, like when you connect from localhost, so what happens is the cloud proxy showing it cannot connect to the remote IP.
Read this carefully if you use a private IP :
https://cloud.google.com/sql/docs/postgres/private-ip
Note that the Cloud SQL instance is in a Google managed network and the proxy is meant to be used to simplify connections to the DB within the VPC network.
In short: running cloud-sql-proxy from a local machine will not work, because it's not in the VPC network. It should work from a Compute Engine VM that is connected to the same VPC as the DB.
What I usually do as a workaround is use gcloud ssh from a local machine and port forward over a small VM in compute engine, like:
gcloud beta compute ssh --zone "europe-north1-b" "instance-1" --project "my-project" -- -L 5432:cloud_sql_server_ip:5432
Then you can connect to localhost:5432 (make sure nothing else is running or change first port number to one that is free locally)
What should also work is to setup a VPN connection to the VPC network and then run the cloud proxy in node in that network.
I have to say I found this really confusing because it gives the impression the proxy does similar magic like gloud does. It's beyond me why some Google engineers have not wired that together yet, can't be too hard.
I had this issue previously when I didn't specify the port argument to psql for some reason, try this:
psql "host=127.0.0.1 port=5432 sslmode=disable user=postgres"
Don't specify the db, and see if that lets you get to the prompt.
I've set up a PostgreSQL instance on Google Cloud SQL and have set it up now to only allow SSL connections. I'm able to connect from my workstation via psql and from some apps like R Studio.
However I'm trying to connect via the GCloud Shell and don't seem to see any options to connect with SSL. There are options to manage certifications and I've created another client key and downloaded the files for it in my cloud shell account, I just don't see options for using them to make a connection. Without it just tells me there isn't an HBA for a "No SSL" connection.
Here is what I see (some things obfuscated):
don#cloudshell:~ (xxx)$ gcloud sql connect foo --user=postgres
Whitelisting your IP for incoming connection for 5 minutes...done.
Connecting to database with SQL user [postgres].Password for user postgres:
psql: FATAL: connection requires a valid client certificate
FATAL: pg_hba.conf rejects connection for host "a.b.c.d", user "postgres", database "postgres", SSL off
As per Cloud SQL GCP docs:
Cloud Shell connections do not support SSL. Connections from Cloud
Shell fail if the instance is configured to accept only SSL
connections.
Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
I have followed the guides which all say the same thing; to enable remote connection to a postgres server, update the postgresql.conf file, update the pg_hba.conf file and make sure the port (5432) is open and firewall is not blocking.
When I attempt to connect to my server from the remote machine using the following command, I receive no response (for example, 'Connection refused...'). It hangs as if the firewall has DROP policy, but I checked and the host's firewall is ACCEPT all. Here is the command:
psql -h 45.67.82.123 -U postgres -p 5432 -d mydatabase
I have googled extensively and can't find anyone else who's psql request sits with no response from the host server.
Edit: I should mention I have been connecting locally on the host machine. I should also mention that the data directory on the host machine is in a non-default location. I have my cluster on a mounted drive, in case this could affect the remote connection.
Solution:
It is my first AWS instance and I didn't know they have their own firewall rules on the platform. So I was highly confused by the fact all my policies were ACCEPT on my server. Turns out you are behind AWS firewall and you have to go onto the platform to add/change security groups etc. In the past when I've used Digital Ocean droplets or Linodes, the firewall policy on the vps is all I need to change. AWS threw me another curveball there.
I am trying to connect AWS RDS PostgreSql from PgAdmin 3. I followed the below link
http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/UserGuide/USER_ConnectToPostgreSQLInstance.html
In Security Group, I also added PostgreSQL and All traffic as below
The "publicly accessible" flag was enabled (updated after Mark B's comment)
I got the error from PGAdmin3
Very appreciate for any suggestion
******UPDATE*******
I can connect pgAdminIII to AWS RDS successfully using home wifi, but cannot connect using office wifi.
My concern is:
Was the port 5432 blocked by office wifi?
How can I configure/update the port without impacting to current API?
Note: My current API is working well (CRUD)
Can you can test your connection to a DB instance using common Linux or Windows tools first?
From a Linux or Unix terminal, you can test the connection by typing the following (replace with the endpoint and with the port of your DB instance):
$nc -zv DB-instance-endpoint port
For example, the following shows a sample command and the return value:
$nc -zv postgresql1.c6c8mn7tsdgv0.us-west-2.rds.amazonaws.com 8299
Connection to postgresql1.c6c8mn7tsdgv0.us-west-2.rds.amazonaws.com
8299 port [tcp/vvr-data] succeeded!
Windows users can use Telnet to test the connection to a DB instance. Note that Telnet actions are not supported other than for testing the connection. If a connection is successful, the action returns no message. If a connection is not successful, you receive an error message such as the following:
C:>telnet sg-postgresql1.c6c8mntzhgv0.us-west-2.rds.amazonaws.com
8299
Connecting To sg-postgresql1.c6c8mntzhgv0.us-west-2.rds.amazonaws.com...Could not
open connection to the host, on port 819: Connect failed
If Telnet actions return success, then you are good to go.
If you are trying to access it from a network which is not listed for that port. you need to add inbound rules for those network IPs from AMAZON RDS system
You will also need to set Public accessibility true under Connect & security tab in RDS console.
Read this post.In your security group go to unbound rules and add my ip.
and make sure your database is public.
https://serverfault.com/questions/656079/unable-to-connect-to-public-postgresql-rds-instance