I have a k8s cluster with 3 nodes.
With kubectl command i enter in a pod shell and make some file editing:
kubectl exec --stdin --tty <pod-name> -- /bin/bash
at this point i have one pod wit correct editing and other 2 replicas with old file.
My question is:
There is a kubectl commend for, starting from a specific pod, overwrite current replicas in cluster for create n equals pods?
Hope to be clear
So many thanks in advance
Manuel
You can use a kubectl plugin called: kubectl-tmux-exec.
All information on how to install and use this plugin can be found on GitHub: predatorray/kubectl-tmux-exec.
As described in the How to Install Dependencies documentation.
The plugin needs the following programs:
gnu-getopt(1)
tmux(1)
I've created a simple example to illustrate you how it works.
Suppose I have a web Deployment and want to create a sample-file file inside all (3) replicas.
$ kubectl get deployment,pods --show-labels
NAME READY UP-TO-DATE AVAILABLE AGE LABELS
deployment.apps/web 3/3 3 3 19m app=web
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE LABELS
pod/web-96d5df5c8-5gn8x 1/1 Running 0 19m app=web,pod-template-hash=96d5df5c8
pod/web-96d5df5c8-95r4c 1/1 Running 0 19m app=web,pod-template-hash=96d5df5c8
pod/web-96d5df5c8-wc9k5 1/1 Running 0 19m app=web,pod-template-hash=96d5df5c8
I have the kubectl-tmux_exec plugin installed, so I can use it:
$ kubectl plugin list
The following compatible plugins are available:
/usr/local/bin/kubectl-tmux_exec
$ kubectl tmux-exec -l app=web bash
After running the above command, Tmux will be opened and we can modify multiple Pods simultaneously:
Related
When we run kubectl get pod => it is listing the count of containers running inside a pod and restart count. So I am not sure which container gets restarted. Either I need to login to UI or using kubectl describe pods.
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
test-pod 2/2 Running 5 14h
But I need to see each container names and its restart count using kubectl command somethings as below.
NAME STATUS RESTARTS AGE
container-1 Running 2 14h
container-2 Running 3 14h
It would be helpful if someone helps me on this. Thanks in advance!
You can try something like this:
kubectl get pods <pod-name> -o jsonpath='{.spec.containers[*].name} {.status.containerStatuses[*].restartCount} {.status.containerStatuses[*].state}'
You will get in result container-name, restartCount and state.
Then you will be able to format it in such way as you need.
I am new to Kubernetes, and trying to get apache airflow working using helm charts. After almost a week of struggling, I am nowhere - even to get the one provided in the apache airflow documentation working. I use Pop OS 20.04 and microk8s.
When I run these commands:
kubectl create namespace airflow
helm repo add apache-airflow https://airflow.apache.org
helm install airflow apache-airflow/airflow --namespace airflow
The helm installation times out after five minutes.
kubectl get pods -n airflow
shows this list:
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
airflow-postgresql-0 0/1 Pending 0 4m8s
airflow-redis-0 0/1 Pending 0 4m8s
airflow-worker-0 0/2 Pending 0 4m8s
airflow-scheduler-565d8587fd-vm8h7 0/2 Init:0/1 0 4m8s
airflow-triggerer-7f4477dcb6-nlhg8 0/1 Init:0/1 0 4m8s
airflow-webserver-684c5d94d9-qhhv2 0/1 Init:0/1 0 4m8s
airflow-run-airflow-migrations-rzm59 1/1 Running 0 4m8s
airflow-statsd-84f4f9898-sltw9 1/1 Running 0 4m8s
airflow-flower-7c87f95f46-qqqqx 0/1 Running 4 4m8s
Then when I run the below command:
kubectl describe pod airflow-postgresql-0 -n airflow
I get the below (trimmed up to the events):
Events:
Type Reason Age From Message
---- ------ ---- ---- -------
Warning FailedScheduling 58s (x2 over 58s) default-scheduler 0/1 nodes are available: 1 pod has unbound immediate PersistentVolumeClaims.
Then I deleted the namespace using the following commands
kubectl delete ns airflow
At this point, the termination of the pods gets stuck. Then I bring up the proxy in another terminal:
kubectl proxy
Then issue the following command to force deleting the namespace and all it's pods and resources:
kubectl get ns airflow -o json | jq '.spec.finalizers=[]' | curl -X PUT http://localhost:8001/api/v1/namespaces/airflow/finalize -H "Content-Type: application/json" --data #-
Then I deleted the PVC's using the following command:
kubectl delete pvc --force --grace-period=0 --all -n airflow
You get stuck again, so I had to issue another command to force this deletion:
kubectl patch pvc data-airflow-postgresql-0 -p '{"metadata":{"finalizers":null}}' -n airflow
The PVC's gets terminated at this point and these two commands return nothing:
kubectl get pvc -n airflow
kubectl get all -n airflow
Then I restarted the machine and executed the helm install again (using first and last commands in the first section of this question), but the same result.
I executed the following command then (using the suggestions I found here):
kubectl describe pvc -n airflow
I got the following output (I am posting the event portion of PostgreSQL):
Type Reason Age From Message
---- ------ ---- ---- -------
Normal FailedBinding 2m58s (x42 over 13m) persistentvolume-controller no persistent volumes available for this claim and no storage class is set
So my assumption is that I need to provide storage class as part of the values.yaml
Is my understanding right? How do I provide the required (and what values) in the values.yaml?
If you installed with helm, you can uninstall with helm delete airflow -n airflow.
Here's a way to install airflow for testing purposes using default values:
Generate the manifest helm template airflow apache-airflow/airflow -n airflow > airflow.yaml
Open the "airflow.yaml" with your favorite editor, replace all "volumeClaimTemplates" with emptyDir. Example:
Create the namespace and install:
kubectl create namespace airflow
kubectl apply -f airflow.yaml --namespace airflow
You can copy files out from the pods if needed.
To delete kubectl delete -f airflow.yaml --namespace airflow.
I'm very beginner with K8S and I've a question about the labels with kubernetes. On youtube video (In french here), I've seen that :
The man create three deploys with these commands and run the command kubectl get deployment then kubectl get deployment --show-labels :
kubectl run monnginx --image nginx --labels "env=prod,group=front"
kubectl run monnginx2 --image nginx --labels "env=dev,group=front"
kubectl run monnginx3 --image nginx --labels "env=prod,group=back"
root#kubmaster:# kubectl get deployments
NAME READY UP-TO-DATE AVAILABLE AGE
monnginx 1/1 1 1 46s
monnginx2 1/1 1 1 22s
monnginx3 1/1 1 1 10s
root#kubmaster:# kubectl get deployments --show-labels
NAME READY UP-TO-DATE AVAILABLE AGE LABELS
monnginx 1/1 1 1 46s env=prod,group=front
monnginx2 1/1 1 1 22s env=dev,group=front
monnginx3 1/1 1 1 10s env=prod,group=back
Currently, if I try to do the same things :
root#kubermaster:~ kubectl run mynginx --image nginx --labels "env=prod,group=front"
pod/mynginx created
root#kubermaster:~ kubectl run mynginx2 --image nginx --labels "env=dev,group=front"
pod/mynginx2 created
root#kubermaster:~ kubectl run mynginx3 --image nginx --labels "env=dev,group=back"
pod/mynginx3 created
When I try the command kubectl get deployments --show-labels, the output is :
No resources found in default namespace.
But if I try kubectl get pods --show-labels, the output is :
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE LABELS
mynginx 1/1 Running 0 2m39s env=prod,group=front
mynginx2 1/1 Running 0 2m32s env=dev,group=front
mynginx3 1/1 Running 0 2m25s env=dev,group=back
If I follow every steps from the videos, there is a way to put some labels on deployments... But the command kubectl create deployment does not accept the flag --labels :
Error: unknown flag: --labels
There is someone to explain why I've this error and How put some label ?
Thanks a lot !
Because $ kubectl create deployment doesn't support --labels flag. But you can use $ kubectl label to add labels to your deployment.
Examples:
# Update deployment 'my-deployment' with the label 'unhealthy' and the value 'true'.
$ kubectl label deployment my-deployment unhealthy=true
# Update deployment 'my-deployment' with the label 'status' and the value 'unhealthy', overwriting any existing value.
$ kubectl label --overwrite deployment my-deployment status=unhealthy
It works with other Kubernetes objects too.
Format: kubectl label [--overwrite] (-f FILENAME | TYPE NAME) KEY_1=VAL_1 ... KEY_N=VAL_N
I think the problem is something different.
Until Kubernetes 1.17 the command kubectl run created a deployment.
Since Kubernetes 1.18 the command kubectl run creates a pod.
Release Notes of Kubernetes 1.18
kubectl run has removed the previously deprecated generators, along with flags
unrelated to creating pods. kubectl run now only creates pods. See specific
kubectl create subcommands to create objects other than pods. (#87077,
#soltysh) [SIG Architecture, CLI and Testing]
As of 2022 you can use the following imperative command to create a pod with labels as:-
kubectl run POD_NAME --image IMAGE_NAME -l myapp:app
where, myapp:app is the label name.
We have 2 clusters on GKE: dev and production. I tried to run this command on dev cluster:
gcloud beta container clusters update "dev" --update-addons=NodeLocalDNS=ENABLED
And everything went great, node-local-dns pods are running and all works, next morning I decided to run same command on production cluster and node-local-dns fails to run, and I noticed that both PILLAR__LOCAL__DNS and PILLAR__DNS__SERVER in yaml aren't changed to proper IPs, I tried to change those variables in config yaml, but GKE keeps overwriting them back to yaml with PILLAR__DNS__SERVER variables...
The only difference between clusters is that dev runs on 1.15.9-gke.24 and production 1.15.11-gke.1.
Apparently 1.15.11-gke.1 version has a bug.
I recreated it first on 1.15.11-gke.1 and can confirm that node-local-dns Pods fall into CrashLoopBackOff state:
node-local-dns-28xxt 0/1 CrashLoopBackOff 5 5m9s
node-local-dns-msn9s 0/1 CrashLoopBackOff 6 8m17s
node-local-dns-z2jlz 0/1 CrashLoopBackOff 6 10m
When I checked the logs:
$ kubectl logs -n kube-system node-local-dns-msn9s
2020/04/07 21:01:52 [FATAL] Error parsing flags - Invalid localip specified - "__PILLAR__LOCAL__DNS__", Exiting
Solution:
Upgrade to 1.15.11-gke.3 helped. First you need to upgrade your master-node and then your node pool. It looks like on this version everything runs nice and smoothly:
$ kubectl get daemonsets -n kube-system node-local-dns
NAME DESIRED CURRENT READY UP-TO-DATE AVAILABLE NODE SELECTOR AGE
node-local-dns 3 3 3 3 3 addon.gke.io/node-local-dns-ds-ready=true 44m
$ kubectl get pods -n kube-system -l k8s-app=node-local-dns
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
node-local-dns-8pjr5 1/1 Running 0 11m
node-local-dns-tmx75 1/1 Running 0 19m
node-local-dns-zcjzt 1/1 Running 0 19m
As it comes to manually fixing this particular daemonset yaml file, I wouldn't recommend it as you can be sure that GKE's auto-repair and auto-upgrade features will overwrite it sooner or later anyway.
I hope it was helpful.
In my professional environment it is common for "completed" pods to outnumber active ones and they often clutter the output of kubectl get pods like so:
$ kubectl get pods
finished-pod-38163 0/1 Completed 2m
errored-pod-83023 0/1 Error 2m
running-pod-20899 1/1 Running 2m
I can filter them out using --show-all=false:
$ kubectl get pods --show-all=false
running-pod-20899 1/1 Running 2m
However I would prefer not to have to type out --show-all=false every time I want to see my running pods. Is it possible to configure kubectl to disable --show-all by default rather than having it enabled by default?
From kubectl get pods --help:
-a, --show-all=true: When printing, show all resources (default show all pods
including terminated one.)
I know I could create some shell alias kgetpo, but this would remove support for tab-completion so I'd prefer native solutions if they exist.
You can try something like this:
kubectl get pods --field-selector=status.phase==Running