I've been looking at organisation and project settings but I can't see a setting that would prevent users from creating work items in an Azure DevOps project.
I have a number of users who refuse to follow the guidelines we set out for our projects so I'd like to inconvenience them and the wider project team so that they find it better to follow the guidelines than not - at the moment we've got one-word user stories and/or tasks with estimates of 60-70 hours which isn't reflective of the way that we should be planning.
I'd still want them to be able to edit the stories or tasks and moving statuses, but that initial creation should be off-limits for them (for a time at least). Is there a way to do this??
The Azure DevOps Aggregator project allows you to write simple scripts that get triggered when a work item is created or updated. It uses a service hook to trigger when such an event occurs and abstracts most of the API specific stuff away, providing you with an instance of the work item to directly interact with.
You can't block the creation or update from, such a policy, Azure DevOps will inform the aggregator too late in the creation process to do so, but you can revert changes, close the work item etc. There are also a few utility functions to send email.
You need to install the aggregator somewhere, it can be hosted in Azure Functions and we provide a docker container you can spin up anywhere you want. Then link it to Azure DevOps using a PAT token with sufficient permissions and write your first policy.
A few sample rules can be found in the aggregator docs.
store.DeleteWorkItem(self);
should put the work item in the Recycle Bin in Azure DevOps. You can create a code snippet around it that checks the creator of the work item (self.CreatedBy.Id) against a list of known bad identities.
Be mindful that when Azure DevOps creates a new work item the Created and Updated event may fire in rapid succession (this is caused by the mechanism that sets the backlog order on work items), so you may need to find a way to detect what metadata tells you a work item should be deleted. I generally check for a low Revision number (like, < 5) and the last few revisions didn't change any field other than Backlog Priority.
I'd still want them to be able to edit the stories or tasks and moving statuses, but that initial creation should be off-limits for them (for a time at least). Is there a way to do this??
I am afraid there is no such out of setting to do this.
That because the current permission settings for the workitem have not yet been subdivided to apply to the current scenario.
There is a setting about this is that:
Project Settings->Team configuration->Area->Security:
Set this value to Deny, it will prevent users from creating new work items. But it also prevent users from modify the workitem.
For your request, you could add your request for this feature on our UserVoice site (https://developercommunity.visualstudio.com/content/idea/post.html?space=21 ), which is our main forum for product suggestions.
Related
This may really be more a QA question. I'm sort of hamstrung in my organization, I don't have API access for some of the Azure REST calls. I've got a number of test plans with various suites, and reporting the overall current status in terms of passed, failed, etc. is straightforward.
What I'm not able to do easily is get a historical view of all the runs of a given test case. So I can't seem to easily get a metric that says (as an example) we had to run this test case 12 times before we got a pass. Most of the help I'm seeing online references some great ways to get all test IDs if you have API access, I'm not sure if there's another way outside of it.
There is New Test Plans Page in azure devops Previous Features, which allows you to view the historical test result of a test case.
First you need go to "User setting-->Previous Features of your azure devops and Turn on New Test Plans Page
Then Go to your Test plan-->Go to Execute page-->Click 3dot-->Choose View execution History
Then you will see the historical test results in a new page. You can also filter the execution
history as below highlighted
Feature cycle time is a very important metric, but in ADO there doesn't seem to be a way to get the State of a Feature to automatically update when the first story moves into Active (or the last child is closed). Does anyone know of a way to have this happen?
No, that will never happen. This area for custom application and solutions. You can try the following:
TFS Aggregator
Write your own solution through rest api: Automation of state changing for Azure DevOps work items based on states of child work items
Use additional solutions: Automation of state changing with Azure Logic App
As the image shows, for each task that is created in my backlog, devops generates an Id for each task. In my implantation studies, the Id grew and now that I'm going to implant it, I would need it to start from 1 and not based on my last one. How do I do a reset?
I would need it to start from 1 and not based on my last one. How do I
do a reset?
Sorry but we can't reset WIT ID. There's no option in Azure Devops supports the reset of Work Item ID.
Please check this: Each work item is based on a work item type and is assigned an identifier which is unique within an organization(Service) or project collection(Server).
Azure Devops Service doesn't re-use unique identifier, because that makes nasty problems to troubleshoot. So the ID won't be reset even after we delete all the work Items and Projects in Organization.
Just as DevOpsy suggests, you should create one new organization for your final usage. And then the WIT ID will start at 1.
Similar discussions about WIT ID number see here and here. Hope it helps to resolve your puzzle and provides correct direction :)
When I try to add new completed state to user story or task in inherited process of my azure devops project, I get the following error :
VS403093: Team Services currently does not support changes to
'Completed' category. Choose a different category.
I have looked all over the web and it seems like this is the desired behaviour as mentioned in this link, which I think is very weird.
Are there any workarounds?
I want to create a Done state for my work items, and I think that it's dumb to keep only the closed state for all completed work items since Completed fits better with tickets not with user stories in my sense...
As mentioned below, I could modify all the states except for completed
Any help would be appreciated.
Like you said, at this time Microsoft not allow to change or add states in Complete category.
From Microsoft Docs:
Completed: Assigned to states that represent work has finished. work items whose state is in this category don't appear on the backlog and do appear in the last column of the Kanban board. Note that you can't modify states in this category nor can you add states to this category.
If you want the state "Done" you can use Scrum template (in Scrum the complete state is Done and not Closed).
I have created and added some workflows to CRM 2011 RU13, through the UI
Through not fault of my own my development environment is completely air gapped from my production environment.
I added these workflows to my solution and exported the solution as managed and given the solution to the production admin.
When he deploys it fails with this message.
The workflow cannot be published or unpublished by someone who is not it's owner
How do I fix this. There is no way to not give workflows an owner. or say that the owner is the solution.
The production admin gets that message because he is not the owner (inside the target CRM environment) of one or more active workflows included in your solution.
This happens in these situations:
First time you give your solution to be imported, is USER_A to
perform the operation and all the workflows are assigned automatically
to him. If later USER_B try to import an updated version of the
solution he gets the error message because is not the owner of the
workflow(s).
First time you give your solution to be imported, is USER_A to
perform the operation and all the workflows are assigned
automatically to him. Meanwhile one or more workflows are assigned to
USER_C. If later USER_A try to import an updated version of the
solution he gets the error message because is not the owner of the
workflow(s).
Before a workflow can be updated must be first deactivated, and only the owner can deactivate a workflow. This is by design.
In your case the production admin must be the owner of the processes (he can assign temporarily the workflows to himself, import the solution and after assign back to the right user) or needs to be the owner of the workflows to import the solution (if he has the rights)
A couple of additional points for clarity for the OP:
The owner of the workflows in your dev environment is not relevant, the importing user in prod will become the owner (this does not contradict Guido, I'm just making sure you don't follow a red herring). It is quite right for their to be an "air gap" between dev and prod.
If you know which workflows are in your solution, assign those in prod to yourself, then import, then if and only if you need to, reassign them to the original owner(s).
You may not need to if that owner is just an equivalent system admin user, but if it is a special user (eg "Workflow daemon" so users can see why it updated their records) you will want to re-assign.
Note that after re-assigning them, that user has to activate the workflows. You cannot activate a workflow in someone else's name (or users could write workflows to run as admins and elevate their priviledges).
If the workflows have not actually been changed in this version of your solution, take them out of the solution and ignore them - often I find that a workflow has been written, carried across to production in the original "go live" and is then working perfectly fine, but is left in the solution which is constantly updated and re-published (ie export / imported).
Personally I often have a "go live" solution (or more than one, but that's a different thread...) and then we start all over again with a new solution which only contains incremental changes thereafter. This means that all your working workflows, plugins, web resources etc do not appear in that solution so this avoids confusion as to versions, reduces solution bloat, and avoids this problem of workflow ownership. If a workflow is actually updated, then you need to deal with the import, but don't make this a daily occurrence for unrelated changes.