Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 1 year ago.
Improve this question
Both
https://dl.bintray.com/apache/ignite-rpm/ and https://dl.bintray.com/apache/ignite-deb/
Is "Forbidden!".
Where i can get "apache-ignite-2.8.1-1.noarch.rpm" for example... now? :(
Old link looks like : https://dl.bintray.com/apache/ignite-rpm/apache-ignite-2.8.1-1.noarch.rpm.
Latest documentaion still points to Bintray (EOL).
// https://ignite.apache.org/docs/latest/installation/deb-rpm
Searching for apache-ignite-2.8.1-1.noarch.rpm will find https://github.com/apache/ignite/blob/master/packaging/rpm/apache-ignite.spec → apache-ignite.spec → "
ignite/packaging/rpm/"
https://github.com/apache/ignite/tree/master/packaging/rpm with files for rpm packaging.
Searching for apache-ignite-2.8.1 will find https://ignite.apache.org/download.cgi#binaries and https://archive.apache.org/dist/ignite/2.8.1/ with the package apache-ignite-2.8.1-bin.zip
Move / copy the files to rpmbuild/SOURCES/:
SOURCES/
├── apache-ignite-2.8.1-bin.zip
├── apache-ignite.spec # edit to Version: 2.8.1
├── name.service
└── service.sh
Example, CentOS 8
$ rpmbuild -bb apache-ignite.spec
.
Wrote: /home/knudfl/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/apache-ignite-2.8.1-1.noarch.rpm
The package apache-ignite-2.8.1-1.noarch.rpm 394MB can be downloaded at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1U1_VeHA4-JX-Rp_813_1LnkreJtElfOk/view?usp=sharing
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 1 year ago.
Improve this question
I'm trying to install an executable but it gives me the error -jailshell: d-linux-x86-64.so.2: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory, I have already checked if I have the glib 32-bit version with the command rpm -qf /lib/ld-linux.so.2 and rpm -qa | grep glibc | grep i686 and it seems to be ok (it prints me glibc-2.17-324.el7_9.i686).
I'm trying to install an executable but it gives me the error
This executable is corrupt.
It is trying to use d-linux-x86-64.so.2 as an interpreter, and such a file doesn't exist (nor should it exist) on your machine.
Chances are this executable was transferred over FTP in ASCII mode, or corrupted in some other way.
I have already checked if I have the glib 32-bit version
That is irrelevant: the binary you are trying to build is a 64-bit binary.
Also, there is a difference between glib and glibc.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I have installed sbt as told in following statements:
Download sbt from here: http://scalasbt.artifactoryonline.com/scalasbt/sbt-native-packages/org/scala-sbt/sbt/0.12.4/sbt.tgz
Unpack the archive to a directory of your choice
Add the bin/ directory to the PATH environment variable. Open the file ~/.bashrc in an editor (create it if it doesn’t exist) and add the following line export PATH=/PATH/TO/YOUR/sbt/bin:$PATH
But, when I type scala in terminal, it says scala in not installed! Though, sbt -h works fine.
How to resolve the issue?
you have to run sbt consolecommand to run scala REPL from sbt.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
So, I have compiled an ASM boot program like this :
nasm -f bin -o bootsect bootsect.asm
And now I need to run the next UNIX command to generate a floppy image from the output, but i'm using MS Windows...
cat bootsect /dev/zero | dd of=floppyA bs=512 count=2880
Does someone know how can I do the equivalent in the Windows' cmd ?
There is a port of Unix dd to the Win32 environment. Or you could use rawwrite. Both are available for download at http://www.chrysocome.net.
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
I need to build & install GTK library so i need source code for it. So i searched & come to this link which contains its GIT hub path.
http://www.gtk.org/download/
Is this procedure correct ?
git clone git://git.gnome.org/gtk+
cd gtk+
./configure
make
make install
1> As per link it states it requires some libraries. Do i need to perform the same step for ---> glib, pango, gdk-pixbuf and atk.
2> Does cairo comes with pango or have to be downloaded, build & install seprately ?
3> Does i need xlib ?
Please suggest what all dependency packages are required by GTK ? which i have to compile & install seprately.
This post should give you a full idea of what you need to build GTK+
http://developer.gnome.org/gtk3/stable/gtk-building.html
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 11 years ago.
Improve this question
Is there any difference between rpm and yum? I know the recent system prefer yum, but want to know if there is need for rpm also.
to expand on the Udo's answer, there is the program, "rpm", which manipulates specifically the packages it is asked to manipulate, and there is "yum", which is a more intelligent management system that can find dependencies and download .rpm files even if they're not in the system.
with the "rpm" command, you need to know the exact location of the .rpm package, but with "yum", you just need to know the name of it, and as long as it's available through your repositories list, it will be installed along with its dependencies
Yum is a package manager and rpms are the actual packages.
With yum you can add or remove software. The software itself comes within a rpm.
The package manager allows you to install the software from hosted repositories and it will usually install dependencies as well.