I have a use case where I want to consume from a kafka topic and depending on some logic if I am not able to process the message right now, I want to enqueue the message back to the same topic from where it had been read
Something like this
Topic1 ---> Consumer ---> Can't process now
^
|Re-enqueues________|
Is it possible ?
Yes, this is possible.
However, be aware that depending on your retention settings the re-ingested message might exist in the topic multiple times. Also, the consumer will consume all messages as long as it is running which could lead to the case that it has consumed all valid messages but keeps on re-ingesting the other messages over and over again.
The typical pattern to deal with messages that should be re-ingested into your pipeline is to send them to a dedicated Kafka topic. Once your consumer is fixed to be able to process those messages you can then have your consumer read that dedicated topic just once.
Related
I'm looking at using Kafka for dealing with a system that handles large amounts of data, I'm planning on reading messages from a topic and upon processing these messages similar results will be returned, I will then produce these new results back into the same Kafka topic so that they can eventually be processed.
Could there be any issues with reading/writing into the same topic in this way? If each message was picked by two consumers would you still be able to identify if it had been consumed by a particular consumer? I'm concerned about this as I want to avoid processing the same messages multiple times by any given consumer (process once per consumer).
Example
User action triggers first message in Topic foo.
Topic now contains a message with value "/bar"
"/bar" message consumed and processed, "/bar/baz" discovered during processing
"/bar/baz" produced into topic foo
"/bar/baz" message consumed and processed....
Process continues until no further work is found
I'm new at using Kafka and I have one question. Can I delete only ONE message from a topic if I know the topic, the offset and the partition? And if not is there any alternative?
It is not possible to remove a single message from a Kafka topic, even though you know its partition and offset.
Keep in mind, that Kafka is not a key/value store but a topic is rather an append-only(!) log that represents a stream of data.
If you are looking for alternatives to remove a single message you may
Have your consumer clients ignore that message
Enable log compaction and send a tompstone message
Write a simple job (KafkaStreams) to consume the data, filter out that one message and produce all messages to a new topic.
When I have a kafka console producer message produce some messages and then start a consumer, I am not getting the messages.
However i am receiving message produced by the producer after a consumer has been started.Should Kafka consumers be started before producers?
--from- beginning seems to give all messages including ones that are consumed.
Please help me with this on both console level and java client example for starting producer first and consuming by starting a consumer.
Kafka stores messages for a configurable amount of time. Default is a week. Consumers do not need to be "available" to receive messages, but they do need to know where they should start reading from
The console consumer has the default option of looking at the latest offset for all partitions. So if you're not actively producing data you see nothing as a consumer. You can specify a group flag for the console consumer or a Java client, and that's what tracks what offsets are read within the Kafka protocol and where a read request will resume from if you stopped that consumer in a group
Otherwise, I think you can only give an offset along with a single partition to consume from
I'm managing a kafka queue using a common consumer group across multiple machines. Now I also need to show the current content of the queue. How do I read only those messages within the group which haven't been read, yet making those messages again readable by other consumers in the group which actually processes those messages. Any help would be appreciated.
In Kafka, the notion of "reading" messages from a topic and that of "consuming" them are the same thing. At a high level, the only thing that makes a "consumed" message unavailable to a consumer is that consumer setting its read offset to a value beyond that of the message in question. Thus, you can turn off the autocommit feature of your consumers and avoid committing offsets in cases where you'd like only to "read" but not to "consume".
A good proxy for getting "all messages which haven't been read" is to compare the latest committed offset to the highwater mark offset per partition. This provides a notion of "lag" that indicates how far behind a given consumer is in its consumption of a partition. The fetch_consumer_lag CLI function in pykafka is a good example of how to do this.
In Kafka, a partition can be consumed by only one consumer in a group i.e. if your topic has 10 partitions and you spawned 20 consumers with same groupId, then only 10 will be connected to Kafka and remaining 10 will be sitting idle. A new consumer will be identified by Kafka only in case one of the existing consumer dies or does not poll from the topic.
AFAIK, I don't think you can do what I understand you want to do within a consumer group. You can obviously create another groupId and process message based on the information gathered by first consumer group.
Kafka now has a KStream.peek() method
See proposal "Add KStream peek method".
It's not 100% clear to me from the docs that this prevents consuming of message that's peeked from the topic, but I can't see how you could use it in any crash-safe, robust way unless it does.
See also:
Handling consumer rebalance when implementing synchronous auto-offset commit
High-Level Consumer and peeking messages
I think that you can use publish-subscribe model. Then each consumer has own offset and could consume all messages for itself.
If one kafka consumer application is reading message from kafka, another was not able to read and vice-versa.
We are running two independent applications, one will process message and another will read and put into a database.
Message which is been processing in first application is not available in the second application
Without seeing the code I can only guess ... :-)
I think that you have a topic with only one partition and both consumer applications are in the same consumer group. In this case only one consumer gets messages from the only one partition in the topic.
If you want both applications receiving messages from same topic, you need to put them into different consumer groups (group.id parameter for the consumer properties).