Based on the answer given by Martineau in this question
reading boolean condition from config file
is it possible to specify an extra command?
[mysettings]
other=stuff
conds=
x >= 10
y < 5
x + y >= 6
if all above true z = z*2
Sorry for this question , i am new to python
Related
See the code and error. I have already tried Do, For,...and it is not working.
CODE + Error from Mathematica:
Import of survival probabilities _{k}p_x and _{k}p_y (calculated in excel)
px = Import["C:\Users\Eva\Desktop\kpx.xlsx"];
px = Flatten[Take[px, All], 1];
NOTE: The probability _{k}p_x can be found on the position px[[k+2, x -16]
i = 0.04;
v = 1/(1 + i);
JointLifeIndep[x_, y_, n_] = Sum[v^k*px[[k + 2, x - 16]]*py[[k + 2, y - 16]], {k , 0, n - 1}]
Part::pkspec1: The expression 2+k cannot be used as a part specification.
Part::pkspec1: The expression 2+k cannot be used as a part specification.
Part::pkspec1: The expression 2+k cannot be used as a part specification.
General::stop: Further output of Part::pkspec1 will be suppressed during this calculation.
Part of dataset (left corner of the dataset):
k\x 18 19 20
0 1 1 1
1 0.999478086278185 0.999363078716059 0.99927911905056
2 0.998841497412202 0.998642656911039 0.99858030519133
3 0.998121451605207 0.99794428814123 0.99788275311401
4 0.997423447323642 0.997247180349674 0.997174407432264
5 0.996726703362208 0.996539285828369 0.996437857252448
6 0.996019178300768 0.995803204773039 0.99563600297737
7 0.995283481416241 0.995001861216016 0.994823584922968
8 0.994482556091416 0.994189960607964 0.99405569519175
9 0.993671079225432 0.99342255996206 0.993339856748282
10 0.992904079096455 0.992707177451333 0.992611817294026
11 0.992189069953677 0.9919796017009 0.991832027835091
Without having the exact same data files to work with it is often easy for each of us to make mistakes that the other cannot reproduce or understand.
From your snapshot of your data set I used Export in Mathematica to try to reproduce your .xlsx file. Then I tried the following
px = Import["kpx.xlsx"];
px = Flatten[Take[px, All], 1];
py = px; (* fake some py data *)
i = 0.04;
v = 1/(1 + i);
JointLifeIndep[x_, y_, n_] := Sum[v^k*px[[k+2,x-16]]*py[[k+2,y-16]], {k,0,n-1}];
JointLifeIndep[17, 17, 12]
and it displays 362.402
Notice I used := instead of = in my definition of JointLifeIndep. := and = do different things in Mathematica. = will immediately evaluate the right hand side of that definition. This is possibly the reason that you are getting the error that you do.
You should also be careful with your subscript values and make sure that every subscript is between 1 and the number of rows (or columns) in your matrix.
So see if you can try this example with an Excel sheet containing only the snapshot of data that you showed and see if you get the same result that I do.
Hopefully that will be enough for you to make progress.
I have a question about removing duplicates in a table (rexx language), I am on netphantom applications that are using the rexx language.
I need a sample on how to remove the duplicates in a table.
I do have a thoughts on how to do it though, like using two loops for these two tables which are A and B, but I am not familiar with this.
My situation is:
rc = PanlistInsertData('A',0,SAMPLE)
TABLE A (this table having duplicate data)
123
1
1234
12
123
1234
I need to filter out those duplicates data into TABLE B like this:
123
1234
1
12
You can use lookup stem variables to test if you have already found a value.
This should work (note I have not tested so there could be syntax errors)
no=0;
yes=1
lookup. = no /* initialize the stem to no, not strictly needed */
j=0
do i = 1 to in.0
v = in.i
if lookup.v <> yes then do
j = j + 1
out.j = v
lookup.v = yes
end
end
out.0 = j
You can eliminate the duplicates by :
If InStem first element, Move the element to OutStem Else check all the OutStem elements for the current InStem element
If element is found, Iterate to the next InStem element Else add InStem element to OutStem
Code Snippet :
/*Input Stem - InStem.
Output Stem - OutStem.
Array Counters - I, J, K */
J = 1
DO I = 1 TO InStem.0
IF I = 1 THEN
OutStem.I = InStem.I
ELSE
DO K = 1 TO J
IF (InStem.I ?= OutStem.K) & (K = J) THEN
DO
J = J + 1
OutStem.J = InStem.I
END
ELSE
DO
IF (InStem.I == OutStem.K) THEN
ITERATE I
END
END
END
OutStem.0 = J
Hope this helps.
This question already has answers here:
Get list of elements that are divisible by 3 or 5 from 1 - 1000
(6 answers)
Closed 7 years ago.
How to do it this problem in Scala? Do it in For-loop.
sum of all the multiples of 3 and 5 below 1000;
Example: 1*3+2*5+3*3+4*5+5*3+6*5 ... so on 999*3+1000*5 = How much?
I don't think that 1000*5 is a multiple of 5 below 1000. 1000*5 is 5000 which is not below 1000.
It seems like what you want is:
(1 to 1000).filter(x => x % 3 = 0 || x % 5 == 0).sum
Which doesn't use a "for-loop". A lot of people would cringe at such a term, scala doesn't really have for-loops. if MUST use the for construct, perhaps you would write
(for (x <- 1 to 1000 if x % 3 == 0 || x % 5 == 0) yield x).sum
which is exactly the same thing as above.
you could also (though I would not recommend it) use mutation:
var s = 0
for { x <- 1 to 1000 } { if(x % 3 == 0 || x % 5 == 0) s += x }
s
which could also be
var s = 0
for { x <- 1 to 1000 if (x % 3 == 0 || x % 5 == 0) } { s += x }
s
If you want to use the principles of functional programming you would do it recursive - better you can use tail recursion (sorry that the example is not that good but it's pretty late).
def calc(factorB:Int):Int = {
if(factorB+1 >= 1000)
3*factorB+5*(factorB+1)
else
3*factorB+5*(factorB+1)+calc(factorB+2)
}
In a for-loop you can do it like
var result = 0
for(i <- 1 to 1000){
result += i*(i%2==0?5:3)
}
After the for-loop result yields the calculated value. The downside is that you're using a var instead of val. Iam not sure if the statement i%2==0?5:3 is valid in scala but I don't see any reasons why it shouldn't.
I'm quite new to Matlab so excuse me for the basic question.
I need to make a for-loop that repeats it's self 384 times.
So :
for i=1:384
I now need the for loop to check if 2 certain variables have the value 1 through 10, and then let them store this in a new variable with that value.
So:
if x==1
somevariable = 1
elseif x== 2
saomevariable = 2
..
..
..
elseif y = 1
someothervariable = 1
etc etc.
Is there a way to write this more efficient?
Thank you!
The first think you can do is:
if(x >= 1 && x <= 10)
somevariable=x;
end
if(y >= 1 && y <= 10)
someohtervariable=y;
end
If you could post more information about "x" and "y", perhaps your script can be further "improved".
Hope this helps.
In finding the values of x and y, if (x567) + (2yx5) = (71yx) ( all in base 8) I proceeded as under.
I assumed x=abc and y=def and followed.
(abc+010 def+101 110+abc 111+101)=(111 001 def abc) //adding ()+()=() and equating LHS=RHS.
abc=111-010=101 which is 5 in base 8 and then def=001-101 which is -4
so x=5 and y=-4
Now the Question is that the answer mentioned in my book is x=4 and y=3.
Is the above method correct.If so,then what's issue here ??
you can't compare the digits beginning with the most significant digit, because you don't know the carry from the digit below. Also a digit cannot have a negative value.
You can start with the least significant digit, because there is no carry:
7 + 5 = 14
so x = 4 with a carry of 1 at the next digit.
now you can rewrite your equation to:
(4567) + (2y45) = (71y4)
now you can look at the second least significant digit (the carry in mind):
6 + 4 + 1 (carry) = 13
so y = 3, also with a carry of 1.
the whole equation is:
(4567) + (2345) = (7134)
which is true for the octal system.