Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 11 months ago.
Improve this question
A change was made to have links in our emails changed from a token-based format to JWTs. After enabling this feature in production we started seeing a percentage of errors on our servers about not being able to decode the JWT as it was not valid. Looking at the invalid JWTs they appear to be totally different than what we were sending out (not even a subset of the JWT appears to be the same). Our best guess is something along the way was mangling the base64 encoding of the token parameter in our URL querystring. Every invalid request came from an IP associated with a "Microsoft Corporation" data center, widely spread across the US, not just a single data center or two. Also the user agent is predominately windows, although we have seen one or two linux. Interestingly no errors from OSX yet.
Is there some kind of link prefetch/virus scanner/etc somewhere in azure/microsoft/outlook/live.com land that I don't know about that may be causing this?
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
Sorry this is a n00bish question, but desperate times... I'm an admin on a Facebook page, been up for years. I'm consistently getting a redirect to what appears to be a page related to Facebook's GDPR "changes." I use the word 'changes' loosely - I have no idea what this is about. Now, I'm personally admining the page from Ireland, for an organization based in the US, I don't know if that matters.
This all worked up until a couple days ago. I change nothing, but now I get 'too many redirects', from every browser I try on various computers (Chrome, Firefox, even Edge.) Yes, all running Win10.
Here are some of the pages that come up, can't quite discern the loop but it seems like the problems with the 'facebook.com/gdpr' page, which I think is bogus, somehow.
https://www.facebook.com/pages/American-Killifish-Association/441507139269126
https://www.facebook.com/gdpr/consent/?consent_mode=5&entry_product=cg_block&from_messenger=0
https://www.facebook.com/upgradeaccount/?next=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fgdpr%2Fconsent%2F%3Fconsent_mode%3D5%26entry_product%3Dcg_block%26from_messenger%3D0
https://www.facebook.com/pages/manage
https://www.facebook.com/gdpr/consent/?consent_mode=5&entry_product=cg_block&from_messenger=0
....
Am I correct in assuming that the problem's on Facebook's side? Could there be something in my pages config (it's a dirt simple page) that's causing this? And, as admin, how can I fix this since I can't log in! Thanks for your patience in reading this.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
I've been seeing email that's not directly addressed to me land up in my inbox.
My email is something#domain.com, the emails that are delivered are like something+anything#domain.com. After seeing these, I tried other suffixes after the + symbol and all of them land up in my inbox. Does anyone know why that is the case? What happens if someone else registers one of the addresses like something+1#domain.com.
I saw this reliably work for both gmail and outlook, I'm curious to know why that is the case? Is there is a technical reason why mailservers drop off these suffixes.
I'm not sure if StackOverflow is the best place for this question, please move this to another site on the network which may be a better fit if that is the case.
This is called sub-addressing. + part is treated for filtering and all.You can read about it on wiki with page title Email Address.
Also known as plus addressing ortagged addressing. Some mail services support a tag appended to the local part, such that the modified address is an alias to the unmodified address. For example, the address joeuser+tag#example.com denotes the same delivery address asjoeuser#example.com.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I’m setting up a server on openshift. I’m on the Bronze Plan and have a pretty common setup, I assume. Tomcat 7 with a MySQL database, scalable cartridge, so nothing fancy. I’ve been able to setup the custom domain and I am aware of the missing SSL certificate. That stuff is pretty well documented.
But I could not figure out how to get mails working. I’m not talking about sending mails from the application itself, I’ve seen questions covering that topic. I mean mail in general, all mails from and to the domain (I’m more concerned with to the domain for now). I for example need a working info#speedapp.io mail address.
Sorry if that is bluntly obvious to anyone else. But I’m coming from a shared Tomcat hosting provider, where the web frontend for mails was already configure.
You need to sign up for email services at a third party host, you can not use OpenShift to host your email.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I am trying to embed a survey into an email (outlook 2007). When they complete the survey the answers are stored somewhere I can manage (Like the use of forms in Google drive).
I have tried creating a custom form, I do not have access to the organizational form library.
I have tried using the voting system inbuilt in out look which would work if only multiple answers could be selected rather than just 1.
The Google forms does exactly what I need, I just have to use outlook.
I'm hoping I am just missing something because I cannot see a way to do this.
Thanks in advance!
I don't think this will work. Check out the list at the bottom of this page: https://www.campaignmonitor.com/resources/will-it-work/forms/
Edit: From the same article:
Given the sporadic support for forms in emails, we recommend linking
to a form on a website rather than embedding it in the email. This is
the safest, most reliable solution to pairing an email message with a
form. More people will see it and be able to use it, and as a result
participation will increase.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
When I browse my home network with a bonjour browser, I see this _acp-sync._tcp bonjour service beeing advertised by all my AirPort base stations. Can anyone give me any insights on what this is for?
The only likely reference I can find for an ACP protocol is in the man page for natutil:
natutil uses the ACP protocol to detect, configure, and extract status information from Internet gate-way gateway way devices (IGDs) (such as AirPort Base Stations) on the local network.
I doubt you'll find out much further about it without firing up a packet sniffer as the dearth of information about it is a good indicator that Apple want to keep it proprietary.
Of course, I'd quite forgotten about that feature of Server. And Lion now contains the natutil(8) utility in the client, with more documentation (but inaccurate control of Airport base stations). _airport._tcp uses same port number (5009). Sadly, the IANA registry contains very sparse information on the formats of the TXT records in either case, so we lose beyond this point. :-(