I have a cloudformation stack that's creating an ACM Certificate. The code worked fine yesterday, and so I move it into being a nested stack.
The template is from a pretty nifty example. I have a hosted zone, and that's where I'm requesting the certificate, and the template has a Lambda function which is supposed to look at the Cloudformation events, get the request for the magic DNS entry, and write that DNS entry into the hosted zone to effect DNS validation of the cert request.
The Lambda instances, gets the info from CF, and writes it to the hosted zone. Everything it's supposed to have done (and did fine yesterday) has happened.
And it's not even timing out. The error I get is:
Waiter StackCreateComplete failed: Max attempts exceeded
Any ideas? I've seen AWS take it's sweet time marking certs as good doing this by hand in the GUI.
Upon closer examination it became clear that this message was from the boto3 client, not AWS, and that the default timeout for the client was the same as on the template.
Modifying the template timeout to 12 hours and rerunning the command still results in that message being generated, but the GUI shows that it's still running.
Related
I am trying to configure or setup the production environment of whatsapp business api as mentioned in the link https://developers.facebook.com/docs/whatsapp/installation/prod-single-instance
I have done everything mentioned in this my dockers are also running on port:9090 as can be seen in the image
still I can't access it. Whenever I try to call https://localhost:9090 the error with "This site can’t be reached" occurs. Whatsapp business api does not have good documentation or tutorials till now. So this site is the only last way for me.
I had a similar problem which could be your case, I saw the docker containers OK but nothing was working. After a day searching I saw where it happened, my problem was I installed mysql MANUALLY (not docker container) in the same instance where docker is running and in db.env I just used 127.0.0.1, this was passed literally to docker container, then looking at a the wait_on_mysql.sh script, the whastapp docker containers were waiting util the mysql ip has conectivity to actually do something and was printing "MySQL is not up yet - sleeping" each second, of course they wouldn't find any conectivity.
Since my instalation is for development, and I am already using such database to other stuff, my solution was to use the 172.17.0.1(docker gateway of the containers) IP instead, then add two sets of network iptables rules to the host to redirect from the docker containers IP to the IP binded by mysql when using such port (3306, the default in my case). After that everything works well. I think there are better solutions, but I didn't want to go far on it, you should evaluate you case if apply.
check the command:
docker-compose logs > debug_output.txt
That gives you insight about whats happening, hope it can helps someone.
I think your setup is already complete. You just need to start with the registration process and start sending messages. The containers are up and running but calling https://localhost:9090 won't send you any response as this is not any specified API endpoint expected to be used.
Since you're using prod single instance, the documentation can be found here which seems pretty straight forward. https://developers.facebook.com/docs/whatsapp/installation/prod-single-instance
You seem to have completed till the 7 steps. The next step can be to perform a health check to make sure it is healthy. The API endpoint for that would be https://localhost:9090/v1/health https://developers.facebook.com/docs/whatsapp/api/health
Has your db also been setup?
I cannot see it in the docker screenshot.
Also - you have to accept the certificate, as it does not have a public CA issues certificate.
I used the Sophos UTM 9.510 ha_standalone Cloudformation template (https://github.com/sophos-iaas/aws-cf-templates/blob/master/utm/9.510/standalone.template) and used defaults when possible. I did not use an existing ElasticIP, so it created it's own at (scrubbed) 50.12.12.123.
I gave a hostname at (for example) vpn.example.com and after creation, I created an A record for vpn.example.com to point to 50.12.12.123.
I don't have a license and just pay hourly for the AMI.
I understand that I should be able to hit https://vpn.example.com:4444 or https://50.12.12.123:4444 to see the admin panel. However, it times out and doesn't load anything.
When I deployed the stack, I got an email at the admin email I provided and it said REST daemon not running - restarted. I assume it restarted fine, since I have received no new emails, and the EC2 instance is running.
Has anyone else experienced this? Is there a step I'm missing? Aside from creating the Route53 record, I thought the Cloudformation Template should just work right out of the box.
The default security groups blocked traffic. I modified one of them to accept all traffic and the dashboard became accessible. I will now refine access further.
I am using Web IDE and want to see the log by clicking on the arrow.I can only see an empty "Untitled" page. The Node.js app is running normally. Live edit is switch off.
After some minutes:
Gateway Timeout
The proxy server did not receive a timely response from the upstream server.
Reference #1.45bf1402.1511018717.3dddb8b
I'm not for sure what Web IDE you are referring to. The only one I'm aware of is the DevOps (which works for me below):
It seems to me like this error that you posted would indicate a temporary outage. Is it still an issue?
In any case, I would advise opening a support ticket if you encounter this issue again (more details about your account would help). I think the Bluemix proxy will time out requests if they take too long.
I have a node-red flow in bluemix that uses dash-db nodes also. So each time some dash db maintenance or some other reason, this db connection gets lost and all writes fail. When i redeploy, everything is fine again. Bluemix shows only logs of last few hours hence I am finding it very difficult to debug. Meanwhile i was thinking of doing an automatic redeploy after i detect this issue to avoid losing writes.
Can this be done using GET /flows followed by POST /flows in the same node-red app itself?
it would be worth raising this as an issue with the dash-db nodes so the author can help address it - https://github.com/smchamberlin/node-red-nodes-cf-sqldb-dashdb
Yes, you can post back the flows. The full admin http api is documented here: http://nodered.org/docs/api/admin/ - have a look at the 'reload' option on /flows.
I posted on friday regarding this issue and received no response, however since then some updates have occurred which might affect whether people have an answer to my question or not.
I'm trying to deploy an MVC website to Azure, and in this particular project the web deploy receives a Socket Error 10054 and gives up after 10 attempts saying it was Unable to write data to the transport connection. It makes varying progress in between the socket failures but never completes within the 10 attempts.
I have since had a play around with other projects which are deployed to different url locations within this same Azure Account and they deploy fine! I think this means the problem is not on my end, i.e. port 8172 is open and deployment can be achieved with my current local settings.
What are the problems that can cause this socket error 10054? I saw somewhere that I should enable the "Allow untrusted certificate" option when deploying but I can't find that option within VS 2013.
Any ideas are welcome please,
This issue is driving me mad, it seems there's a real mixed bag of solution ideas which have worked for others but not me.
JK