Attempting to declare production of an assembly using the assembly build. As far as I can tell we have enough item inventory to assign the lots-bins-item-quantities to everything in the BOM. Cannot declare. Usually get an error about a particular item. Have seen that item be different on different attempts. Have looked at that item and appears we have enough. I've even decremented the BOM blow out to a lower quantity to assign inventory detail that matches.
I do notice that the "Buildable" quantity populates as about a half unit less than the build quantity I enter. This matches the "buildable" quantity shown on the WO. I don't know if these two issues are related. I can't tell how it's coming up with the buildable number or the constraint from matching the WO quantity.
Thank you.
You don't indicate if this is via SuiteScript, or via the user interface, so I'll assume this is the client interface.
The Builable figure is based on the minimum quantity of each component committed to the work order (if committment is enabled). Given that you are seeing a .5 less than the quantity required, then this item is buildable to a degree, but requires more component stock.
The message you are seeing on the assembly build can be because :
The quantity entered on one or more components doesn't match the bin location quantities e.g 7 are required but only 5 have been provided in bins ; and/or;
One or more items are serialised or lot controlled, and the inventory detail has not been completed to include this information. e.g. 5 are required, but the lot numbers XX and YY are used to a quantity of 4; and/or
The item being built is serialised or lot controlled, and the lot/serial reference of the built assembly has not been entered, e.g the serial number 5 are being built and serial numbers 123, 124, 125, 126 & 127 should be provided to create the serialised assembly.
See SuiteAnswer 28169 and SuiteAnswer 28170 for information on creating a build of serial & lot assemblies.
Related
Here's the thought process and believe it or not I had it working and then it broke, now I am not sure why or how to fix it.
I have a secondary data source that is housed in a SharePoint list that contains billing rates for various tiers depending on the customer.
When you initially select a Tier and then the subsequent Positions under the daily billing area all is fine and dandy and values look up as they should.
However as is often the case someone will input the wrong Tier for the billing sheet and it would need to be changed to reflect the actual Tier. When this happens InfoPath is grabbing the value from the first row for the lookup and making it the value for all the position rate fields in the repeating table.
You can change them back, by selecting a different position and going back to the original position, however that is another step.
Seriously, this is the last bit for me to sort out before I can put this project behind me. I've included some screenshots of the groups and how they are laid out and the rules I have setup.
[Rules for Rate Tier field](https://i.stack.imgur.com/DO7e4.png)
[Rules for Position field](https://i.stack.imgur.com/JF8bh.png)
[Groups and Fields layout](https://i.stack.imgur.com/7etEq.png)
[Example of issue I am having](https://i.stack.imgur.com/aKD3t.gif)
I've tried everything from filtering the rate returned by the Position in the secondary source matching to the Position in the form which is activated conditionally when the Rate Tier equals a specific Tier. I've tried eval which I am not familiar with so I either got true or false but it never returned field contents.
I am trying to use parameter variation in AnyLogic. My inputs are 3 parameters, each varying 5 times. My output is water demand. What I need from parameter variation is the way in which demand changes according to the different combinations of the three parameters. I imagine something like: there are 10,950 rows (one for each day), the first column is time (in days), the second column are the values for the first combination, the second column is the second combination, and so on and so forth. What would be the best way to track this metadata to then be able to export it to excel? I have added a "dataset" to my main to track demand through each simulation, but I am not sure what to add to the parameter variation experiment interface to track the output across the different iterations. It would also be helpful to have a way to know which combination of inputs produced a given output (for example, have the combination be the name for each column). I see that there are Java Actions, but I haven't been able to figure out the code to do what I need. I appreciate any help with this matter.
The easiest approach is just to track this in output database tables which are then exported to Excel at the end of your run. As long as these tables include outputs from multiple runs (and are, for example, only cleared at the start of the experiment not the run), your Parameter Variation experiment will end up with an Excel file having outcomes from all the runs. (You will probably need to turn off parallel execution in the PV experiment so you don't run into issues trying to write to the same Excel file in parallel.)
So, for example, you might have tables:
run_details with columns id, parm1, parm2 and parm3 (with proper column names given your actual parameters and some unique ID generated for each run)
output_demand with columns run_id, sim_time_hrs and demand_value (if, say, you're storing some demand value each hour of simulated time) where run_id cross-references the run's ID in run_details
(There is extra complexity in how you could allocate a unique run ID and how and when you write to/clear those tables, but I'm just presenting the core design. You can also get round the need-serial-execution point by programmatically controlling when you export to Excel, rather than using the built-in "Export tables at the end of model execution" capability, but that's also more complicated.)
In Anylogic 8.5.1, I am doing a simulation for library evacuation, I have set and agent with Option-list that contains different types of users: students, organizers, graduates, and others. Also, I have set 'custom distribution' parameter to set the distribution values for each user. Until now, I have run the model and every thing is working well.
What I want is:
1. to use 'pedFlowStatistics' line in particular places (I can do this);
2. want to count the users that pass this line (I do not know how to do it);
3. then draw a chart to highlight the different number of users that passes that particular line space (I do not know how to do it).
I need help in the above situation, thanks in advance.
I do not have a Java background.
It's not possible to count based on conditions with pedFlowStatistics... you can only count the total pedestrians using:
pedFlowStatistics.countPeds(); // counts total number of pedestrians
pedFlowStatistics.traffic(); //shows the number of pedestrians per hour
You can use these functions directly in your chart.
But since you want to count based on conditions (the type of user they are), you will need to be smart about this and depending on your model, you will have to count pedestrians in a different place... or maybe use 2 ped go to blocks and count in between... it depends on your layout and model.
I'm been using FM for the first time and have a need to use Get Summary on a financial information table. This generates various summaries of different income by customer, year and type. The layout generated from this table is good. The use of Get Summary allows me to do math with the various results, whereas sub summary totals by income type (as far as I know) cannot be added and divided by each other.
The problem I'm facing is that I wish now to create a layout based on customers and include some of the Get Summary detail from the financial table. Because my new layout is based on customers, I understand I cannot use Get Summary from financial as either a related field or in a portal.
The end game is simply to scroll through customer records, one after the other, and have key financial information show on their 'home' screen if you will, for years and type.
Any help gratefully appreciated. Thanks
I understand I cannot use Get Summary from financial as either a
related field or in a portal.
No, that's not quite correct. The GetSummary() function returns the sub-summary value by breakfield - if records are sorted by breakfield. Thus if the portal (or the underlying relationship) sorts the related records by type, you will see sub-summary values in the portal. However, you won't be able to see only sub-summary values, since a portal has no sub-summary parts.
There are other ways to show summarized related data. If you don't have (and don't expect to have) a large amount of records, considering filtering a (one-row) portal to show only a specific type of related records, then place the summary field inside it. Of course, this assumes the types are known in advance and unchanging.
I am working on a new web app which is based in ExpressionEngine and for the most part I am basing the content on channel entries. However I am experiencing some very weird issues with the exp channel entries tag in that it is not returning all relevant entries each time. I can't figure out what's going on with it as the entries are definitely available when viewing them in the control panel, and they will also show up as requested in my template, but sometimes they just disappear and/or are not processed properly. This is the case for large and small sets of entries also, ranging from 3 channel entries which fit the criteria specified within the exp tag to 500 entries.
Any thoughts or feedback would be greatly appreciated.
There could be a number of things going on here so here are some things to look at, just in case;
If the entries have entry dates in the future - you'll need your channel entries tag to have the parameter show_future_entries = "yes"
Likewise if the entries are closed, or expired, you'll need to add show="open|closed"
Are you looking at a particular category and these entries aren't assigned to the category?
Are you looking at a particular category but have exlcuded category data from the entries tag
Are you retrieving more than 100 entries? There is a default limit of 100 entries returned unless you specify a limit parameter.