The title is pretty self explanatory. I'm using REST Client#0.23.2 by Huachao Mao (Visual Studio Code extension) and a POST request doesn't recognize the body I passed.
By the way, the backend is spring boot with OAuth2.
client.rest
###
POST http://localhost:8082/oauth/token HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/json
Authorization: Basic trusted:secret
{
"grant_type": "password",
"username": "admin",
"password": "123456"
}
returns the following error. Which means it doesn't recognize the arguments I passed.
{
"error": "invalid_request",
"error_description": "Missing grant type"
}
Whereas the request below works fine.
###
POST http://localhost:8082/oauth/token HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Authorization: Basic trusted:secret
grant_type=password
&username=admin
&password=123456
What's wrong? I saw examples in their documentation but I kinda don't find the different between mine and theirs.
I have an API Gateway integration for a method/resource which works when I call it from the API but not when I actually call it:
$ aws apigateway test-invoke-method --rest-api-id $REST_API_ID \
--resource-id $RESOURCE_ID --http-method GET | jq -r .log,.body
This works out fine and I get the following output:
Tue May 16 17:46:42 UTC 2017 : Starting execution for request: test-invoke-request
Tue May 16 17:46:42 UTC 2017 : HTTP Method: GET, Resource Path: /status.json
Tue May 16 17:46:42 UTC 2017 : Method request path: {}
Tue May 16 17:46:42 UTC 2017 : Method request query string: {}
Tue May 16 17:46:42 UTC 2017 : Method request headers: {}
Tue May 16 17:46:42 UTC 2017 : Method request body before transformations:
Tue May 16 17:46:42 UTC 2017 : Endpoint response body before transformations:
Tue May 16 17:46:42 UTC 2017 : Endpoint response headers: {}
Tue May 16 17:46:42 UTC 2017 : Method response body after transformations: { "statusCode": 200 }
Tue May 16 17:46:42 UTC 2017 : Method response headers: {Content-Type=application/json}
Tue May 16 17:46:42 UTC 2017 : Successfully completed execution
Tue May 16 17:46:42 UTC 2017 : Method completed with status: 200
{ "statusCode": 200 }
However, I cannot access this at my URL, which is api.naftuli.wtf/v1/status.json. I have stages defined at glhf, stable, and v1, so by replacing that, you will see different responses. I just simply want a dummy response that returns a 200 JSON blob.
My Terraform for the resources is here as a Gist. Hopefully this fully shows my API Gateway configuration.
If I test invoke this from the CLI or from the web console, I get back what is expected. However, if I curl this from my deployed API at api.naftuli.wtf, I don't get anything nice:
$ for stage in glhf stable v1 ; do
> url="https://api.naftuli.wtf/${stage}/status.json"
> echo "${url}:"
> curl -i -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
> https://api.naftuli.wtf/${stage}/status.json
> echo -e '\n
> done
https://api.naftuli.wtf/glhf/status.json:
HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error
Content-Type: application/json
Content-Length: 36
Connection: keep-alive
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 21:41:38 GMT
x-amzn-RequestId: 712ba52b-3a80-11e7-9fec-b79b62d3bf7f
X-Cache: Error from cloudfront
Via: 1.1 da7a5d0ed7f424609000879e43743066.cloudfront.net (CloudFront)
X-Amz-Cf-Id: hBwlbPCP9n2rlz53I-Qb9KoffHB_FoxUCZUaJYNnU3XhCWuMpQTP1Q==
{"message": "Internal server error"}
https://api.naftuli.wtf/stable/status.json:
HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
Content-Type: application/json
Content-Length: 23
Connection: keep-alive
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 21:41:38 GMT
x-amzn-RequestId: 71561066-3a80-11e7-9b00-6700be628328
x-amzn-ErrorType: ForbiddenException
X-Cache: Error from cloudfront
Via: 1.1 0c146399837c7d36c1f0f9d2636f8cf8.cloudfront.net (CloudFront)
X-Amz-Cf-Id: ITX765xD8s4sNuOdXaJ2kPvqPo-w_dsQK3Sq_No130FAHxFuoVhO8w==
{"message":"Forbidden"}
https://api.naftuli.wtf/v1/status.json:
HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error
Content-Type: application/json
Content-Length: 36
Connection: keep-alive
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 21:41:39 GMT
x-amzn-RequestId: 7185fa99-3a80-11e7-a3b1-2f9e659fc361
X-Cache: Error from cloudfront
Via: 1.1 586f1a150b4ba39f3a668b8055d4d5ea.cloudfront.net (CloudFront)
X-Amz-Cf-Id: dvnOa1s-YlwLSNzBfVyx5tSL6XrjFJM4_fES7MyTofykB3ReU5R1fg==
{"message": "Internal server error"}
My understanding of stages were that they were additional path prefixes to the base path under which all API resources were available. If I had a stage called v1 with a path of /v1, I'd expect that an API Gateway resource for status.json will be basically mapped under /v1, yielding /v1/status.json.
I may be misunderstanding how API Gateway base path mappings and stages work, but CloudWatch tells me that the call is at least happening, though failing for some obscure reason:
21:41:39(c5be3842-6af4-4725-a34f-d6eea8042d17) Verifying Usage Plan for request: c5be3842-6af4-4725-a34f-d6eea8042d17. API Key: API Stage: tcips69qx2/prod_v1
21:41:39(c5be3842-6af4-4725-a34f-d6eea8042d17) API Key authorized because method 'GET /status.json' does not require API Key. Request will not contribute to throttle or quota limits
21:41:39(c5be3842-6af4-4725-a34f-d6eea8042d17) Usage Plan check succeeded for API Key and API Stage tcips69qx2/prod_v1
21:41:39(c5be3842-6af4-4725-a34f-d6eea8042d17) Starting execution for request: c5be3842-6af4-4725-a34f-d6eea8042d17
21:41:39(c5be3842-6af4-4725-a34f-d6eea8042d17) HTTP Method: GET, Resource Path: /v1/status.json
21:41:39(c5be3842-6af4-4725-a34f-d6eea8042d17) Execution failed due to configuration error: statusCode should be an integer which defined in request template
21:41:39(c5be3842-6af4-4725-a34f-d6eea8042d17) Method completed with status: 500
Apparently only traffic across the V1 stage is getting through to CloudWatch logs. I have a misconfiguration somewhere and I can't seem to find it.
Can you try and change you request template in the integration request setup to this:
{
"statusCode": 200
}
API Gateway looks for the status code to return in the response in your integration request template. The response is generated by the mapping template in the integration response. I can see from your terraform setup that you are loading the output json file in the integration request template. This is content API Gateway does not expect.
With Mock Integration Amazon API Gateway there are 2 common reasons for 500 Internal Server error.
Check the mapping template in Integration Request and ensure that you are passing statusCode as an integer to the MOCK Integration endpoint.
{
"statusCode": <Integer_Status_code>
}
Note: Make sure that status code is passed as integer not string.
Correct : 200 Incorrect : "200"
Mock Integrations do not support the binary content. If the API is enabled with bixnary support and has application/json or */* set as binaryMediaTypes, MOCK Integration endpoints would throw a 500 Internal server error when trying to transform the content.
A workaround is to update the contentHandling property of the MOCK Integration to CONVERT_TO_TEXT
Read more here :- https://cloudnamaste.com/500-internal-server-error-mock-integration/
For my case, when I deploy the lambda with serverless framework, the OPTIONS returns 200 when called. However, when I configure manually on AWS API Gateway, it returns 500 Internal Server Error.
When I check the execution log of API gateway, it said
(ee0a42d9-2cfc-4788-8679-00fbd7938cf1) Method request body before transformations: [Binary Data]
(ee0a42d9-2cfc-4788-8679-00fbd7938cf1) Execution failed due to configuration error: Unable to transform request
(ee0a42d9-2cfc-4788-8679-00fbd7938cf1) Gateway response body:
{
"message": "Internal server error"
}
After you create the Resources and OPTIONS methods, select the OPTIONS method then
At Method Execution --> Integration Request --> expand the Mapping Templates, choose "When no template matches the request Content-Type header". Add or select "application/json" in the Content-Type. Click the "application/json", and in the Generate template, paste
{statusCode: 200} without any double quote. Note, if the {"statusCode": 200} exists but with double quote, remove it to be the same as above. Then Save it
At Method Execution --> Integration Response --> expand the 200 response status --> Mapping Template --> Add or select "application/json" in the Content-Type. Make sure that the Generate template box is empty. Then Save it
At Method Execution --> Method Response --> expand the 200 response. In Response Headers for 200, add three headers: Access-Control-Allow-Headers, Access-Control-Allow-Methods, and Access-Control-Allow-Origin. Leave the Response Body for 200 to be empty
Action --> Enable CORS for the Resource
Action --> Deploy API
You have at least two distinct problems with your configuration.
First, one of your three base path mappings doesn't match the way you're trying to invoke your API. Note that the base paths don't have to be the same as your stage names, but they can be if you desire. Since your base path mappings include base paths and stage names, API Gateway is expecting the invoke path to include a base path mapping and not a stage, so it is interpreting the [glhf stable v1] portion of your path as a base path and looking for the corresponding base path mapping entry to determine the API and stage to use. This works fine for the v1 and glhf base paths which return 500 (indicating a different problem). The stable base path (in https://api.naftuli.wtf/stable/status.json) returns a 403 Forbidden because there is no base path of "stable" defined for the domain name api.naftuli.wtf. The stable stage is mapped to the "latest" base path, so calling https://api.naftuli.wtf/latest/status.json should be the way to call the stable stage. This doesn't currently work, and I don't know why. If you tell me what region your running this in, I can look-up the config and do more digging.
The second problem is indicated by the following entry from your CloudWatch logs:
Execution failed due to configuration error: statusCode should be an integer which defined in request template
Can you check that your integration request template (in the file your reference in "${file("${path.module}/files/status.json")}") contains "statusCode: 200" as a top level attribute.
I also found it surprising that you're using the same file for a request template and a response template.
Having had the identical errors I found what helped me solve this issue was to delete my OPTIONS request definition in the AWS Console. I then followed the console's "Enable CORS" form which created a new OPTIONS method.
I subsequently ran terraform plan and looked at the diff between my OPTIONS defintion and theirs. Given that the AWS Console created OPTIONS method worked I applied the changes.
Using terraform 0.12 or greater makes this possible as the terraform plan output detail is more fine grained.
I was doing this in CloudFormation.
It took me a while to get it and the accepted answer here was extremely helpful, but a little vague, so adding some more info.
Stefano Buliani's answer, in CloudFormation YAML, looks like:
RequestTemplates:
application/json: |
{ statusCode: 200 }
What was especially weird here was apparently, the fix was simply to create a deployment using the AWS CLI for each of the stages. Apparently, Terraform was not updating or re-kicking deployments on changes, and so my changes never got out.
I had a similar problem and eventually figured out that my client was using a different content type than I expected. I had foolishly assumed it would use application/json, but it was some custom json thing. In my setup, API Gateway is logging to cloudwatch, which is where I found the content type it received from the client. Once I updated the content type in the request template of the mock integration, things worked as expected.
I have tried using the /requests endpoint with my Uber developer account's owner and developer accounts, but I get this error:
401 unauthorized,
{
"message": "This endpoint requires at least one of the following scopes: request.delegate.tos_accept, request, request.delegate", "code": "unauthorized"
}
My HTTP call is as follows:
POST https://sandbox-api.uber.com/v1.2/requests
Headers:
Authorization: Bearer ACCESS_TOKEN_OF_MY_DEVELOPER_ACCOUNT
Accept-Language: en_US
Content-Type: application/json
Parameters:
{"start_latitude":"21.1741125","start_longitude":"72.8121804","end_latitude":"21.2048986","end_longitude":"72.8386455"}
Whereas I get proper response from /requests/estimate endpoint with the same access token, for the same location parameters.
Please help with this.
The problem is you have not requested the 'request' scope during the oauth authorization process.
I'm invoking a REST service from an OSB Proxy Service, which is working fine if the rest service response is a valid response, i.e., there's no errors. However if the rest service replies with an http error code (e.g. 400 Bad Request), I'm not able to capture anything else except the http error code:
$fault variable in OSB:
<con:fault xmlns:con="http://www.bea.com/wli/sb/context">
<con:errorCode>BEA-382502</con:errorCode>
<con:reason>
OSB Service Callout action received an error response
</con:reason>
<con:details>
<con1:ErrorResponseDetail xmlns:con1="http://www.bea.com/wli/sb/stages/transform/config">
<con1:http-response-code>400</con1:http-response-code>
</con1:ErrorResponseDetail>
</con:details>
<con:location>
<con:node>PipelinePairNode1</con:node>
<con:pipeline>PipelinePairNode1_request</con:pipeline>
<con:stage>stage1</con:stage>
<con:path>request-pipeline</con:path>
</con:location>
</con:fault>
But the rest service, is not only replying with 400 Bad Request, but also adding a message:
<Error>
<Message>The message header contains an invalid brand code.</Message>
</Error>
Which I'm not able to process in my proxy service. Does anyone knows if it is possible to access this message details in OSB or is it a limitation?
The rest service is clearly sending the message, because invoking it directly through soap-ui I'll get the following response:
HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request
Cache-Control: no-cache
Pragma: no-cache
Content-Length: 84
Content-Type: application/xml; charset=utf-8
Expires: -1
Server: Microsoft-IIS/8.5
X-AspNet-Version: 4.0.30319
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 16:15:32 GMT
<Error><Message>The message header contains an invalid brand code.</Message></Error>
Thanks
I've just found out this is an OSB bug, in case of an HTTP Error code 400 being returned, if the http-content is "Application/XML" the message is ignored.
Oracle released a Patch at the end of last month to fix this issue, which I've tested and it works. I can get the message details in the $body variable now.
Patch: 16986497
If I understand your question, you want to get in addition to the http code, the message error?
I think you should use, in your message flow, an errorHandler , so that you can catch the error and do whatever you want with.
The proxy service operation selection algorithm cannot determine the operation name from the request or returns an invalid operation (one which is not in the WSDL or null). Possible reasons include the following:
An error occurs while computing the operation.
The operation selection algorithm returns null.
The operation selection algorithm returns an operation that is not of the of the operations declared by the WSDL.
Source
I am trying to test a Rest service through HTTP sampler using Jmeter. The first sampler generates a token and I am using this token for authorization in the header manager of another HTTP sampler "GetUserandPolicies"(Rest WS request) using RegEx and ForEach controller. I can see in the view results tree that RegEx is working fine passing the actual token to the next request. But the Rest Request is failing giving a response message as Forbidden and Response Code 403 which means that the server is able to recognise the request but denying the access.There is no port number for this HTTP sampler which I suspect would be the culprit. But, the same test is passing with another tool (iTKO LISA) without any port value. Both the samplers "TokenGeneration" and "GetUserandPolicies" have no port values. I need some help on this. I am using the POST method in the HTTP sampler
Please find the sampler result:
Thread Name: Thread Group 1-1
Sample Start: 2014-01-13 12:12:29 IST
Load time: 1390
Latency: 1390
Size in bytes: 382
Headers size in bytes: 354
Body size in bytes: 28
Sample Count: 1
Error Count: 1
Response code: 403
Response message: Forbidden
Response headers:
HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
Server: Apache-Coyote/1.1
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *
Access-Control-Allow-Methods: GET, POST, PUT, OPTIONS
Access-Control-Allow-Credentials: true
Access-Control-Allow-Headers: Authorization, X-Requested-With, Content-Type
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8
Content-Length: 28
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 06:42:30 GMT
HTTPSampleResult fields:
ContentType: text/plain;charset=UTF-8
DataEncoding: UTF-8
Looking into Access-Control-Allow-Headers: Authorization, X-Requested-With, Content-Type stanza I guess that you're missing proper Authorization header.
In regards to empty port everything is fine, it defaults to port 80 in case of HTTP and 443 in case of HTTPS
There are 2 options on how you can deal with Basic HTTP Authentication:
Pass username and password in URL like protocol://username:password#host:port/path
i.e. http://user:pass#your.server.com/somelocation
Use JMeter HTTP Authorization Manager to construct required "Authorization" header for you.
In case if your authentication system uses other approaches, i.e. Cookie-based, NTLM or Kerberos it's still possible but a little bit more tricky. If so - update this post with all details you can get (i.e. request details) and don't hesitate to leave a comment requesting for more input