I have such a logic (attributes column's type is JSONB - array of objects) that works:
But I want to implement logical OR here if trait_type is equal ... not AND:
JSONB's column structure:
[
{
"value":"Standard Issue Armor 1 (Purple)",
"trait_type":"Clothes"
},
{
"value":"Standard Issue Helmet 1 (Red)",
"trait_type":"Full Helmet"
},
{
"value":"Chrome",
"trait_type":"SmartSkin"
},
{
"value":"Base Drone (Blue)",
"trait_type":"Drone"
},
{
"value":"Thick",
"trait_type":"Eyebrows"
}
]
How that could be done?
Thanks in advance!
I didn't verify the code, so might not work, but I believe at least is in the right direction. You can use the .or() filter to connect multiple filters with logical or operator. For contains(), you can use the cs keyword inside the or filter like this:
const { data, error } = await supabase.from('NTFs')
.select('name, id_in_collection, owner_address')
.eq('collection_id', Number(id))
.contains('attributes', JSON.stringify([{trait_type: 'SmartSkin', value: 'Chrome'}]))
.or(`attributes.cs.${JSON.stringify([{trait_type: 'Drone', value: 'Armed Drone (Blue)'}])}`, `attributes.cs.${JSON.stringify([{trait_type: 'Drone', value: 'Armed Drone (Green)'}])}`)
.order('id_in_collection')
.range(fromIndex, toIndex)
Related
I am trying to query the database (Postgres) through Prisma. My query is
const products = await prisma.products.findMany({
where: { category: ProductsCategoryEnum[category] },
include: {
vehicles: {
include: {
manufacturers: { name: { in: { manufacturers.map(item => `"${item}"`) } } },
},
},
},
});
The error message is
Type '{ name: { in: { manufacturers: string; "": any; }; }; }' is not assignable to type 'boolean | manufacturersArgs'.
Object literal may only specify known properties, and 'name' does not exist in type 'manufacturersArgs'.ts(2322)
Manufacturers have the field name and it is unique; I am not sure why this is not working or how I can update this code to be able to query the database. It is like I should cast the values into Prisma arguments.
The TypeScript error is pretty self-explanatory: the name property does not exist in manufacturersArgs. The emitted Prisma Client does a great job of telling you what properties do and do not exist when filtering.
If you are trying to perform a nested filter, you need to use select instead of include.
Documentation: https://www.prisma.io/docs/concepts/components/prisma-client/relation-queries#filter-a-list-of-relations
Your query is going to look something like this:
const products = await prisma.products.findMany({
where: { category: ProductsCategoryEnum[category] },
select: {
// also need to select any other fields you need here
vehicles: {
// Updated this
select: { manufacturers: true },
// Updated this to add an explicit "where" clause
where: {
manufacturers: { name: { in: { manufacturers.map(item => `"${item}"`) } } },
},
},
},
});
The final code ultimately depends on your Prisma schema. If you are using an editor like VS Code, it should provide Intellisense into the Prisma Client's TypeScript definitions. You can use that to navigate the full Prisma Client and construct your query based on exactly what is and is not available. In VS Code, hold control [Windows] or command [macOS] and click on findMany in prisma.products.findMany. This lets you browse the full Prisma Client and construct your query!
The in keyword isn't working for me. I use hasSome to find items in an array. hasEvery is also available depending what the requirements are.
hasSome: manufacturers.map(item => `"${item}"`),
See https://www.prisma.io/docs/reference/api-reference/prisma-client-reference#scalar-list-filters
I just started using Primsa 2 so I am still a noob at this but all I am trying to do is create a flat array of strings(Array<number>) based on the values I get from a specific field. Right now when I target that field it gives me an array of objects like this: userIds: [{ issueId: 1, userId: 1 }]
All I want is the value I get from the userId key and the array to return like this userIds: [ 1 ]. I was able to fix this with some formatting code after the query which was done like so:
const issues = project.issues.map(issue => ({ ...issue, userIds: [...issue.userIds.map((id) => id.userId)] }))
const _project = { ...project, issues }
However, this doesn't seem like the most optimal solution. If this is the only way that is fine but I assume with the power that Prisma has for querying, this is something I can do just in the query alone?
For reference, my query currently looks like this:
const project = await prisma.project.findFirst({
where: { id: req.currentUser.projectId },
include: { users: true, issues: { include: { userIds: true } } },
})
Thanks in advance!
Can you show your schema? Perhaps you can model the relation differently. However, unless if you provide a field, userIds, that is a flat array and not a field of a an other relation it will be returned as a list of objects as you have already.
I hate to risk asking a duplicate question, but perhaps this is different from Passing Variables to a MongoDB View which didn't have any clear solution.
Below is a query to find the country for IP Address 16778237. (Outside the scope of this query, there is a formula that turns an IPV4 address into a number.)
I was wondering if we could abstract away this query out of NodeJS code, and make a view, so the view could be called from NodeJS. But the fields ipFrom and ipTo are indexed to get the query to run fast against millions of documents in the collection, so we can't return all the rows to NodeJS and filter there.
In MSSQL maybe this would have to be a stored procedure, instead of a view. Just trying to learn what is possible in MongoDB. I know there are functions, which are written in JavaScript. Is that where I need to look?
db['ip2Locations'].aggregate(
{
$match:
{
$and: [
{
"ipFrom": {
$lte: 16778237
}
},
{
"ipTo": {
$gte: 16778237
}
},
{
"active": true
}
],
$comment: "where 16778237 between startIPRange and stopIPRange and the row is 'Active',sort by createdDateTime, limit to the top 1 row, and return the country"
}
},
{
$sort:
{
'createdDateTime': - 1
}
},
{
$project:
{
'countryCode': 1
}
},
{
$limit: 1
}
)
Part 2 - after more research and experimenting, I found this is possible and runs with success, but then see trying to make a view below this query.
var ipaddr = 16778237
db['ip2Locations'].aggregate(
{
$match:
{
$and: [
{
"ipFrom": {
$lte: ipaddr
}
},
{
"ipTo": {
$gte: ipaddr
}
},
{
"active": true
}
],
$comment: "where 16778237 between startIPRange and stopIPRange and the row is 'Active',sort by createdDateTime, limit to the top 1 row, and return the country"
}
},
{
$sort:
{
'createdDateTime': - 1
}
},
{
$project:
{
'countryCode': 1
}
},
{
$limit: 1
}
)
If I try to create a view with a "var" in it, like this;
db.createView("ip2Locations_vw-lookupcountryfromip","ip2Locations",[
var ipaddr = 16778237
db['ip2Locations'].aggregate(
I get error:
[Error] SyntaxError: expected expression, got keyword 'var'
In the link I provided above, I think the guy was trying to figure how the $$user-variables work (no example here: https://docs.mongodb.com/manual/reference/aggregation-variables/). That page refers to $let, but never shows how the two work together. I found one example here: https://www.tutorialspoint.com/mongodb-query-to-set-user-defined-variable-into-query on variables, but not $$variables. I'm
db.createView("ip2Locations_vw-lookupcountryfromip","ip2Locations",[
db['ip2Locations'].aggregate(
...etc...
"ipFrom": {
$lte: $$ipaddr
}
I tried ipaddr, $ipaddr, and $$ipaddr, and they all give a variation of this error:
[Error] ReferenceError: $ipaddr is not defined
In a perfect world, one would be able to do something like:
get['ip2Locations_vw-lookupcountryfromip'].find({$let: {'ipaddr': 16778237})
or similar.
I'm getting that it's possible with Javascript stored in MongoDB (How to use variables in MongoDB query?), but I'll have to re-read that; seems like some blogs were warning against it.
I have yet to find a working example using $$user-variables, still looking.
Interpretation
You want to query a view from some server side code, passing a variable to it.
Context
Can we use an external variable to recompute a View? Take the following pipeline:
var pipeline = [{ $group:{ _id:null, useless:{ $push:"$$NOW" } } }]
We can pass system variables using $$. We can define user variables too, but the user defined variables are made out of:
Collection Data
System Variables.
Also, respect to your Part2:
A variable var variable="what" will be computed only once. Redefine variable="whatever" makes no difference in the view, it uses "what".
Conclusion
Views can only be re-computed with system variables, or user variables dependant on those system variables or collection data.
Added an answer to the post you link too.
I have a situation where a model changed at some point in time and I am faced with (for argument sake) half my data liks like this
{
_id: OID,
things: [{
_id:OID,
arm: string,
body: string
}],
other: string
}
and the other half of my data look like this
{
_id: OID,
things: [{
_id:OID,
upper_appendage: string,
body: string
}],
other: string
}
I would like to 'correct' half of the data - so that I DON'T have to accommodate both names for 'arm' in my application code.
I have tried a couple different things:
The first errors
db.getCollection('x')
.find({things:{$exists:true}})
.forEach(function (record) {
record.things.arm = record.things.upper_appendage;
db.users.save(record);
});
and this - which destroys all the other data in
db.getCollection('x')
.find({things:{$exists:true}})
.forEach(function (record) {
record.things = {
upper_appendage.arm = record.things.upper_appendage
};
db.users.save(record);
});
Keeping in mind that there is other data I want to maintain...
How can I do this???
the $rename operator should have worked for this job but unfortunately it doesn't seem to support nested array fields (as of mongodb server 4.2). instead you'd need a forEach like the following:
db.items.find({
things: {
$elemMatch: {
arm: {
$exists: true
}
}
}
}).forEach(function(item) {
for (i = 0; i != item.things.length; ++i)
{
item.things[i].upper_appendage = item.things[i].arm;
delete item.things[i].arm; ;
}
db.items.update({
_id: item._id
}, item);
})
note: i've assumed you want to make all records have upper_appendageand get rid of 'arm' field. if it's the other way you want, just switch things around.
how do i accomplish multiple value inside query 'contains' ?
eg.
{
name: {
contains: [
'west',
'lob'
]
},
address : {
contains: 'york'
}
}
Having checked up on it via the gitter channel you need to do...
If you wanna use contains then you need to use LIKE! if you want a straight match then use a normal query.
Model.query("SELECT whatever FROM MyTable WHERE someFielding LIKE '%THEVALUE%'", function(error, myRows) {
// do some stuff
});
http://sailsjs.org/documentation/reference/waterline-orm/models/query