R, Group By in Subquery - group-by

I was practicing on some subqueries and I got stuck on a problem. This is for the table below (snippet). The question is "From the following tables, write a SQL query to find those employees whose salaries exceed 50% of their department's total salary bill. Return first name, last name."
My query is this below, but it does not run. I ran the subquery by itself, and it ran fine. I think it's something to do with the GROUP BY in the subquery.
SELECT first_name, last_name
FROM employees
WHERE salary >
(
SELECT (sum(salary)) / 2
FROM employees
GROUP BY department_id
)
The correct answer from the practice is below. Is creating table e2 necessary?
SELECT e1.first_name, e1.last_name
FROM employees e1
WHERE salary >
( SELECT (SUM(salary))*.5
FROM employees e2
WHERE e1.department_id=e2.department_id);
+-------------+-------------+-------------+----------+--------------------+------------+------------+----------+----------------+------------+---------------+
| EMPLOYEE_ID | FIRST_NAME | LAST_NAME | EMAIL | PHONE_NUMBER | HIRE_DATE | JOB_ID | SALARY | COMMISSION_PCT | MANAGER_ID | DEPARTMENT_ID |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+----------+--------------------+------------+------------+----------+----------------+------------+---------------+
| 100 | Steven | King | SKING | 515.123.4567 | 2003-06-17 | AD_PRES | 24000.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 90 |
| 101 | Neena | Kochhar | NKOCHHAR | 515.123.4568 | 2005-09-21 | AD_VP | 17000.00 | 0.00 | 100 | 90 |
| 102 | Lex | De Haan | LDEHAAN | 515.123.4569 | 2001-01-13 | AD_VP | 17000.00 | 0.00 | 100 | 90 |
| 103 | Alexander | Hunold | AHUNOLD | 590.423.4567 | 2006-01-03 | IT_PROG | 9000.00 | 0.00 | 102 | 60 |
| 104 | Bruce | Ernst | BERNST | 590.423.4568 | 2007-05-21 | IT_PROG | 6000.00 | 0.00 | 103 | 60 |
| 105 | David | Austin | DAUSTIN | 590.423.4569 | 2005-06-25 | IT_PROG | 4800.00 | 0.00 | 103 | 60 |
| 106 | Valli | Pataballa | VPATABAL | 590.423.4560 | 2006-02-05 | IT_PROG | 4800.00 | 0.00 | 103 | 60 |
| 107 | Diana | Lorentz | DLORENTZ | 590.423.5567 | 2007-02-07 | IT_PROG | 4200.00 | 0.00 | 103 | 60 |
| 108 | Nancy | Greenberg | NGREENBE | 515.124.4569 | 2002-08-17 | FI_MGR | 12008.00 | 0.00 | 101 | 100 |
| 109 | Daniel | Faviet | DFAVIET | 515.124.4169 | 2002-08-16 | FI_ACCOUNT | 9000.00 | 0.00 | 108 | 100 |
| 110 | John | Chen | JCHEN | 515.124.4269 | 2005-09-28 | FI_ACCOUNT | 8200.00 | 0.00 | 108 | 100
SELECT first_name, last_name
FROM employees
WHERE salary >
(
SELECT (sum(salary)) / 2
FROM employees
GROUP BY department_id
)
I expected this to run, but it did not execute. The editor on the website I'm practicing from does not give error info.

Related

Do multiple UPDATE using CTE

I'm trying to use a CTE to do two update statements in Postgres and I'm not sure if there is a better approach to what I'm trying to do.
-- This script will update user records where the duplicate record value will overwrite the old value
WITH
update_users_Cte
AS
(
SELECT
new.id new_user_id,
old.id old_user_id,
new.employee_id new_employee_id,
old.employee_id old_employee_id,
new.display_name new_display_name,
old.display_name old_display_name,
new.first_name new_first_name,
old.first_name old_first_name,
new.last_name new_last_name ,
old.last_name old_last_name,
new.phone_number new_phone_number,
old.phone_number old_phone_number,
new.job_type new_job_type,
old.job_type old_job_type,
new.department_id new_department_id,
old.department_id old_department_id
FROM users old
JOIN users new ON (CONCAT(0, new.employee_id) = old.employee_id)
WHERE LENGTH(new.employee_id) = 5 AND
new.display_name != old.display_name OR
new.first_name != old.first_name OR
new.last_name != old.last_name OR
new.phone_number != old.phone_number OR
new.job_type != old.job_type OR
new.department_id != old.department_id
)
UPDATE
users
SET
phone_number = NULL
FROM
update_users_Cte
WHERE
employee_id = update_users_Cte.new_employee_id
UPDATE
users
SET
display_name = update_users_Cte.new_display_name,
first_name = update_users_Cte.new_first_name,
last_name = update_users_Cte.new_last_name,
phone_number = update_users_Cte.new_phone_number,
job_type = update_users_Cte.new_job_type,
department_id = update_users_Cte.new_department_id
FROM
update_users_Cte
WHERE
employee_id = update_users_Cte.old_employee_id
This is the error:
ERROR: syntax error at or near "UPDATE"
LINE 41: UPDATE
I would like to be able to do both UPDATEs and use the CTE as I need to check it in both cases. I'm not sure if I have to wrap the whole thing in a transaction.
Any help would be appreciated.
new_user_id | old_user_id | new_employee_id | old_employee_id | new_display_name | old_display_name | new_first_name | old_first_name | new_last_name | old_last_name | new_phone_number | old_phone_number | new_updated_at | old_updated_at | new_job_type | old_job_type | new_department_id | old_department_id
-------------+-------------+-----------------+-----------------+------------------+------------------+----------------+----------------+---------------+---------------+------------------+------------------+---------------------+---------------------+--------------+---------------+-------------------+-------------------
474 | 19710 | 35275 | 035275 | | | David | David | Coyle | Coyle | +447584208902 | | 2017-06-22 17:09:43 | 2021-01-27 15:14:43 | | | 418 | 418
19701 | 432 | 21239 | 021239 | | | Piotr | Piotr | Mierniczek | Mierniczek | | +447404050330 | 2021-02-08 14:36:59 | 2017-06-22 17:09:42 | | | 249 | 73
19702 | 479 | 35568 | 035568 | | | Manjita | Manjita | Kunwar | Kunwar | | +447847370860 | 2021-01-15 15:51:44 | 2021-01-15 15:45:20 | | | 317 | 317
19707 | 19680 | 11111 | 011111 | | Sarika | Sarika | Sarika | Sharma | Sharma | | +447700000000 | 2021-01-20 12:46:09 | 2021-01-20 12:45:12 | | C.S. Employee | |

How to group MVA field for faceted in sphinx

I have an index where some data's has duplicate, all fields are similar except for latitude,longitude and id (field id is not realy ID, just generated row_number() OVER () AS id).
it's example:
mysql> select id,vacancy_id,prof_area_ids,latitude,longitude from jobVacancy;
+------+------------+---------------+----------+-----------+
| id | vacancy_id | prof_area_ids | latitude | longitude |
+------+------------+---------------+----------+-----------+
| 1 | 917 | 11,199,202 | 0.973178 | 0.743566 |
| 2 | 916 | 17,283,288 | 0.973178 | 0.743566 |
| 3 | 915 | 17,288 | 0.973178 | 0.743566 |
| 4 | 914 | 30,482 | 0.973178 | 0.743566 |
| 5 | 919 | 15,243 | 0.825153 | 0.692837 |
| 6 | 919 | 15,243 | 0.825162 | 0.692828 |
| 7 | 918 | 8,154 | 0.825153 | 0.692837 |
| 8 | 918 | 8,154 | 0.825162 | 0.692828 |
| 9 | 920 | 17,283,288 | 0.958914 | 1.282161 |
| 10 | 920 | 17,283,288 | 0.958915 | 1.282215 |
| 11 | 924 | 12,208 | 0.97333 | 0.658246 |
| 12 | 924 | 12,208 | 0.973336 | 0.658237 |
| 13 | 923 | 21,365 | 0.97333 | 0.658246 |
| 14 | 923 | 21,365 | 0.973336 | 0.658237 |
| 15 | 922 | 20,359 | 0.97333 | 0.658246 |
| 16 | 922 | 20,359 | 0.973336 | 0.658237 |
| 17 | 921 | 19,346 | 0.97333 | 0.658246 |
| 18 | 921 | 19,346 | 0.973336 | 0.658237 |
| 19 | 926 | 12,17,208,292 | 0.88396 | 2.389868 |
| 20 | 925 | 12,208 | 0.88396 | 2.389868 |
+------+------------+---------------+----------+-----------+
20 rows in set (0.00 sec)
Now I want to group data by vacancy_id
mysql> select id,vacancy_id,prof_area_ids,latitude,longitude from jobVacancy group by vacancy_id;
+------+------------+---------------+----------+-----------+
| id | vacancy_id | prof_area_ids | latitude | longitude |
+------+------------+---------------+----------+-----------+
| 1 | 917 | 11,199,202 | 0.973178 | 0.743566 |
| 2 | 916 | 17,283,288 | 0.973178 | 0.743566 |
| 3 | 915 | 17,288 | 0.973178 | 0.743566 |
| 4 | 914 | 30,482 | 0.973178 | 0.743566 |
| 5 | 919 | 15,243 | 0.825153 | 0.692837 |
| 7 | 918 | 8,154 | 0.825153 | 0.692837 |
| 9 | 920 | 17,283,288 | 0.958914 | 1.282161 |
| 11 | 924 | 12,208 | 0.97333 | 0.658246 |
| 13 | 923 | 21,365 | 0.97333 | 0.658246 |
| 15 | 922 | 20,359 | 0.97333 | 0.658246 |
| 17 | 921 | 19,346 | 0.97333 | 0.658246 |
| 19 | 926 | 12,17,208,292 | 0.88396 | 2.389868 |
| 20 | 925 | 12,208 | 0.88396 | 2.389868 |
| 21 | 961 | 4,105 | 0.959217 | 1.280721 |
| 23 | 960 | 8,155 | 0.959217 | 1.280721 |
| 25 | 959 | 12,208 | 0.959217 | 1.280721 |
| 27 | 928 | 1,60 | 0.963734 | 1.070297 |
| 29 | 927 | 32,513 | 0.963734 | 1.070297 |
| 31 | 929 | 6,140 | 0.786553 | 0.678649 |
| 33 | 932 | 1,40,46 | 0.824627 | 0.694182 |
+------+------------+---------------+----------+-----------+
20 rows in set (0.00 sec)
Result is awesome! But problem begins when I want to get all grouped data with faceted
mysql> select id,vacancy_id,prof_area_ids,latitude,longitude from jobVacancy where prof_area_ids=199 group by vacancy_id facet prof_area_ids;
+------+------------+-----------------+----------+-----------+
| id | vacancy_id | prof_area_ids | latitude | longitude |
+------+------------+-----------------+----------+-----------+
| 1 | 917 | 11,199,202 | 0.973178 | 0.743566 |
| 191 | 1004 | 11,196,199 | 0.925335 | 2.768874 |
| 313 | 1072 | 1,11,60,197,199 | 0.963968 | 1.070624 |
| 318 | 1136 | 11,196,199 | 0.96071 | 1.448998 |
| 374 | 1097 | 11,199 | 0.785255 | 0.678504 |
+------+------------+-----------------+----------+-----------+
5 rows in set (0.00 sec)
+---------------+----------+
| prof_area_ids | count(*) |
+---------------+----------+
| 202 | 1 |
| 199 | 12 |
| 11 | 12 |
| 196 | 5 |
| 197 | 3 |
| 60 | 3 |
| 1 | 3 |
+---------------+----------+
7 rows in set (0.02 sec)
Faceted result is incorrect. Because in fact data's count where prof_area_ids=199 must be 5 and not 12. So how I can group field for faceted?
Additionaly
I fount here http://sphinxsearch.com/blog/2013/06/21/faceted-search-with-sphinx/ but just written "If you have a MVA facet, you need to use the GROUPBY() function which returns the actual value on which the grouping was made." and without examle.
mysql> select id,vacancy_id,prof_area_ids,latitude,longitude,GROUPBY() as selected,COUNT(*) from jobVacancy where prof_area_ids=199 group by vacancy_id facet prof_area_ids;
+------+------------+-----------------+----------+-----------+----------+----------+
| id | vacancy_id | prof_area_ids | latitude | longitude | selected | count(*) |
+------+------------+-----------------+----------+-----------+----------+----------+
| 1 | 917 | 11,199,202 | 0.973178 | 0.743566 | 917 | 1 |
| 191 | 1004 | 11,196,199 | 0.925335 | 2.768874 | 1004 | 2 |
| 313 | 1072 | 1,11,60,197,199 | 0.963968 | 1.070624 | 1072 | 3 |
| 318 | 1136 | 11,196,199 | 0.96071 | 1.448998 | 1136 | 3 |
| 374 | 1097 | 11,199 | 0.785255 | 0.678504 | 1097 | 3 |
+------+------------+-----------------+----------+-----------+----------+----------+
5 rows in set (0.00 sec)
+---------------+----------+
| prof_area_ids | count(*) |
+---------------+----------+
| 202 | 1 |
| 199 | 12 |
| 11 | 12 |
| 196 | 5 |
| 197 | 3 |
| 60 | 3 |
| 1 | 3 |
+---------------+----------+
7 rows in set (0.02 sec)
Also faceted result is wrong.
Seems, wanting effectively COUNT(DISTINCT vacancy_id) on the FACET rather than the default COUNT(*), but alas it turns out
... FACET prof_area_ids,COUNT(DISTINCT vacancy_id) AS vacancies BY prof_area_ids
doesnt work. The bit before BY only supports attributes, not custom functions.
... will just have to write it out the long way, with full queries...
select id,vacancy_id,prof_area_ids,latitude,longitude from jobVacancy
where prof_area_ids=199 group by vacancy_id;
SELECT GROUPBY() AS prof_area_id, COUNT(DISTINCT vacancy_id) FROM jobVacancy
WHERE prof_area_ids=199 GROUP BY prof_area_id;
Same results, just slightly more verbose. ie rather than using FACET shorthand, write it
out in full, as multiple seperate queries.
Faceted result is incorrect. Because in fact data's count where prof_area_ids=199 must be 5 and not 12. So how I can group field for faceted?
It looks like you misunderstand how FACET works. It seems to me, that you think it takes as a base the main query's result, but it actually just does another grouping. E.g. here:
mysql> select g, t from idx_mva where t = 11 group by g facet t;
+------+----------+
| g | t |
+------+----------+
| 1 | 11,12 |
| 2 | 11,13,15 |
| 3 | 9,11 |
| 5 | 11,12,15 |
+------+----------+
4 rows in set (0.00 sec)
+------+----------+
| t | count(*) |
+------+----------+
| 12 | 2 |
| 11 | 6 |
| 15 | 4 |
| 13 | 1 |
| 9 | 1 |
| 3 | 1 |
+------+----------+
6 rows in set (0.00 sec)
for t=11 you can see that as in your case it's found 3 times in the 1st query's result, but the count for that is 6 in the FACET's query result. This is because it actually occurs 6 times in the index:
mysql> select * from idx_mva where t = 11;
+------+------+----------+
| id | g | t |
+------+------+----------+
| 2 | 1 | 11,12 |
| 3 | 1 | 11,15 |
| 3 | 2 | 11,13,15 |
| 6 | 3 | 9,11 |
| 8 | 5 | 11,12,15 |
| 11 | 2 | 3,11,15 |
+------+------+----------+
6 rows in set, 1 warning (0.00 sec)
and it happens 3 times in the 1st case only because the t's value is returned only once for each of the groups. You can use group_concat() to see more values from the same group:
mysql> select g, group_concat(to_string(t)) from idx_mva where t = 11 group by g facet t;
+------+----------------------------+
| g | group_concat(to_string(t)) |
+------+----------------------------+
| 1 | 11,12,11,15 |
| 2 | 11,13,15,3,11,15 |
| 3 | 9,11 |
| 5 | 11,12,15 |
+------+----------------------------+
4 rows in set (0.00 sec)
+------+----------+
| t | count(*) |
+------+----------+
| 12 | 2 |
| 11 | 6 |
| 15 | 4 |
| 13 | 1 |
| 9 | 1 |
| 3 | 1 |
+------+----------+
6 rows in set (0.00 sec)
If you want to learn more about faceting here's an interactive course about that - https://play.manticoresearch.com/faceting/

faceted search for field with multiple value

I have a table where field with multiple value by comma:
+------+---------------+
| id | education_ids |
+------+---------------+
| 3 | 7,5 |
| 4 | 7,3 |
| 5 | 1,5 |
| 8 | 3 |
| 9 | 5,7 |
| 11 | 9 |
...
+------+---------------+
when I trying use faceted search:
select id,education_ids from jobResume facet education_ids;
I'm getting this response:
+---------------+----------+
| education_ids | count(*) |
+---------------+----------+
| 7,5 | 3558 |
| 7,3 | 3655 |
| 1,5 | 3686 |
| 3 | 31909 |
| 5,7 | 3490 |
| 9 | 31743 |
| 9,6 | 3535 |
| 8,2 | 3547 |
| 6,2,7 | 291 |
| 7,8,1 | 291 |
| 1,2 | 3637 |
| 7 | 31986 |
| 5,9,7 | 408 |
| 1,1,5 | 365 |
| 5 | 31768 |
| 3,8,3,7 | 32 |
| 3,7,6 | 431 |
| 2 | 31617 |
| 5,5 | 3614 |
| 9,9,2,2 | 6 |
+---------------+----------+
but that's not what I wanted to see. I would like to where each value had its own count, for example like here:
+---------------+----------+
| education_ids | count(*) |
+---------------+----------+
| 10 | 961 |
| 11 | 1653 |
| 12 | 1998 |
| 13 | 2090 |
| 14 | 1058 |
| 15 | 347 |
...
+---------------+----------+
can I get such a result with sphinx?
Make sure you use an MVA, not a string attribute:
index rt
{
type = rt
rt_field = f
rt_attr_multi = education_ids
path = rt
}
snikolaev#dev:$ mysql -P9306 -h0
Welcome to the MySQL monitor. Commands end with ; or \g.
Your MySQL connection id is 1
Server version: 3.2.2 62ea5ff#191220 release
Copyright (c) 2000, 2019, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Oracle is a registered trademark of Oracle Corporation and/or its
affiliates. Other names may be trademarks of their respective
owners.
Type 'help;' or '\h' for help. Type '\c' to clear the current input statement.
mysql> insert into rt(education_ids) values((7,5)), ((7,3)), ((7,1)), ((5,1)), ((5,3));
Query OK, 5 rows affected (0.00 sec)
mysql> select * from rt facet education_ids;
+---------------------+---------------+
| id | education_ids |
+---------------------+---------------+
| 2810610458032078849 | 5,7 |
| 2810610458032078850 | 3,7 |
| 2810610458032078851 | 1,7 |
| 2810610458032078852 | 1,5 |
| 2810610458032078853 | 3,5 |
+---------------------+---------------+
5 rows in set (0.00 sec)
+---------------+----------+
| education_ids | count(*) |
+---------------+----------+
| 7 | 3 |
| 5 | 3 |
| 3 | 2 |
| 1 | 2 |
+---------------+----------+
4 rows in set (0.00 sec)
BTW here's an interactive course about faceting in Sphinx / Manticore in case you want to learn more about that - https://play.manticoresearch.com/faceting/

Return unique grouped rows with the latest timestamp [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
Select first row in each GROUP BY group?
(20 answers)
Closed 3 years ago.
At the moment I'm struggling with a problem that looks very easy.
Tablecontent:
Primay Keys: Timestamp, COL_A,COL_B ,COL_C,COL_D
+------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+--------+--------+
| Timestamp | COL_A | COL_B | COL_C | COL_D | Data_A | Data_B |
+------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+--------+--------+
| 31.07.2019 15:12 | - | - | - | - | 1 | 2 |
| 31.07.2019 15:32 | 1 | 1 | 100 | 1 | 5000 | 20 |
| 10.08.2019 09:33 | - | - | - | - | 1000 | 7 |
| 31.07.2019 15:38 | 1 | 1 | 100 | 1 | 33 | 5 |
| 06.08.2019 08:53 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 7 |
| 06.08.2019 09:08 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 7 |
| 06.08.2019 16:06 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 23 |
| 07.08.2019 10:43 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 42 |
| 07.08.2019 13:10 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 24 |
| 08.08.2019 07:19 | 11 | 111 | 111 | 12 | 0 | 2 |
| 08.08.2019 10:54 | 2334 | 65464 | 565 | 76 | 1000 | 19 |
| 08.08.2019 11:15 | 232 | 343 | 343 | 43 | 0 | 2 |
| 08.08.2019 11:30 | 2323 | rtttt | 3434 | 34 | 0 | 2 |
| 10.08.2019 14:47 | - | - | - | - | 123 | 23 |
+------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+--------+--------+
Needed query output:
+------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+--------+--------+
| Timestamp | COL_A | COL_B | COL_C | COL_D | Data_A | Data_B |
+------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+--------+--------+
| 31.07.2019 15:38 | 1 | 1 | 100 | 1 | 33 | 5 |
| 06.08.2019 16:06 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 23 |
| 08.08.2019 07:19 | 11 | 111 | 111 | 12 | 0 | 2 |
| 08.08.2019 10:54 | 2334 | 65464 | 565 | 76 | 1000 | 19 |
| 08.08.2019 11:15 | 232 | 343 | 343 | 43 | 0 | 2 |
| 08.08.2019 11:30 | 2323 | rtttt | 3434 | 34 | 0 | 2 |
| 10.08.2019 14:47 | - | - | - | - | 123 | 23 |
+------------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+--------+--------+
As you can see, I'm trying to get single rows for my primary keys, using the latest timestamp, which is also a primary key.
Currently, I tried a query like:
SELECT Timestamp, COL_A, COL_B, COL_C, COL_D, Data_A, Data_B From Table XY op
WHERE Timestamp = (
SELECT MAX(Timestamp) FROM XY as tsRow
WHERE op.COL_A = tsRow.COL_A
AND op.COL_B = tsRow.COL_B
AND op.COL_C = tsRow.COL_C
AND op.COL_D = tsRow."COL_D
);
which gives me result that looks fine at first glance.
Is there a better or more safe way to get my preferred result?
demo:db<>fiddle
You can use the DISTINCT ON clause, which gives you the first record of an ordered group. Here your group is your (A, B, C, D). This is ordered by the Timestamp column, in descending order, to get the most recent record to be the first.
SELECT DISTINCT ON ("COL_A", "COL_B", "COL_C", "COL_D")
*
FROM
mytable
ORDER BY "COL_A", "COL_B", "COL_C", "COL_D", "Timestamp" DESC
If you want to get your expected order, you need a second ORDER BY after this operation:
SELECT
*
FROM (
SELECT DISTINCT ON ("COL_A", "COL_B", "COL_C", "COL_D")
*
FROM
mytable
ORDER BY "COL_A", "COL_B", "COL_C", "COL_D", "Timestamp" DESC
) s
ORDER BY "Timestamp"
Note: If you have the Timestamp column as part of the PK, are you sure, you really need the four other columns as PK as well? It seems, that the TS column is already unique.

Create Calculated Pivot from Several Query Results in PostgreSQL

I have question regarding how to make a calculated pivot table from several query results on PostgreSQL. I've managed to make three queries results but don't have any idea how to combine and calculate all the data into a single table. I've tried to google it but found out that most of the question is about how to make a pivot table from a single table, which I'm able to do using sum, case, and group by. Well, Here's the simplified version of my query results
Query from query 1 which contains gross value
| city | code | gross |
|-------|------|--------|
| city1 | 21 | 194793 |
| city1 | 25 | 139241 |
| city1 | 28 | 231365 |
| city2 | 21 | 282025 |
| city2 | 25 | 334458 |
| city2 | 28 | 410852 |
| city3 | 21 | 109237 |
Result from query 2 which contains positive adjustments
| city | code | adj_pos |
|-------|------|---------|
| city1 | 21 | 16259 |
| city1 | 25 | 13634 |
| city1 | 28 | 45854 |
| city2 | 25 | 18060 |
| city2 | 28 | 18220 |
Result from query 3 which contains negative adjustments
| city | code | adj_neg |
|-------|------|---------|
| city1 | 25 | 23364 |
| city2 | 21 | 27478 |
| city2 | 25 | 23474 |
And what I want to to is to create something like this
| city | 21_gross | 25_gross | 28_gross | 21_pos | 25_pos | 28_pos | 21_neg | 25_neg | 28_neg |
|-------|----------|----------|----------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| city1 | 194793 | 139241 | 231365 | 16259 | 13634 | 45854 | | 23364 | |
| city2 | 282025 | 334458 | 410852 | | 18060 | 18220 | 27478 | 23474 | |
| city3 | 109237 | | | | | | | | |
or probably final calculation which come from gross + positive adjustment -
negative adjustment from each city on each code like this
| city | 21_nett | 25_nett | 28_nett |
|-------|---------|---------|---------|
| city1 | 211052 | 129511 | 277219 |
| city2 | 254547 | 329044 | 429072 |
| city3 | 109237 | 0 | 0 |
Any suggestion will be appreciated. Thank you!
I think the best you can achieve is to get the pivoting part as JSON - http://sqlfiddle.com/#!17/b7d64/23:
select
city,
json_object_agg(
code,
coalesce(gross,0) + coalesce(adj_pos,0) - coalesce(adj_neg,0)
) as js
from q1
left join q2 using (city,code)
left join q3 using (city,code)
group by city