There are several options proposed on Team->Pull :
Rebase
Rebase preserving merge commits
Rebase interactively
Merge
However whenever there's a conflict, whatever the option, it just aborts the operation and does not propose an interactive session to resolve conflicts manually. All I have is a red "Conflicts" message and the list of conflicting files.
The only workaround I know is to switch branch and in this case it proposes me to "stash" the changes. When I switch back to the branch I wanted to pull, I manage to do the pull, and when I do Apply Stashed Changes from Git Repositories perspective under Stashed Commits, I can finally resolve conflicts for all files marked with the red icon.
Related
I have multiple commits (30+) on the same branch that are in conflict with another branch. The conflicts are reported during rebase.
I can resolve those conflicts once (in one commit), but repeating it 30 times does not make sense to me.
Any recommendations on how to do this in Eclipse (EGit)? For example, would you recommend using "Skip commit" button?
Try using merge instead of rebase.
If you have to use rebase, try using git rerere command.
Details:
Git rebase conflicts after successful merge?
I have Branch A and Branch B in the local branch folder.
Branch A is under working.
Now I want to switch to B.
The window pops out:
Checkout Conflicts
The files shown below have uncommitted changes which would be lost by checking out 'master'.
Either commit the changes, stash the changes, or discard the changes by resetting the current branch.
project.properties.
There are 3 options:
Commit..
Stash...
Reset
No matter which option I choose, it does not work.
For example, if I choose "Stash" option, it says:
"The repository does not contain any local changes to stash".
I suspect the egit records have some conflicts, so it cannot know how to do the next step.
The only way:
To remove the local branches, and clone the remote repository to the local?
This needs cost some time for downloading.
I had the same problem. EGit complaint about .class files which were not commited. I deleted the .class files and was able to switch to the desired branch without problems.
IMO removing local branch is not required.
I suggest first to pull the remote changes to local Branch A.
Resolve any conflicts while pulling the changes if any. Refer this video
Add your changes to Git staging area just by dragging the the files from unstaged area to staged area refer pic below.
Click on commit button, then push the changed to remote branch.
After doing this Branch A will be clean, then you can switch to Branch B just by double clicking on it or by right clicking on the repository node and selecting Switch to option in Git repository view.
Also I suggest to use the latest stable Egit plugin from here
I am using EGit 2.2.0.20-1212191850-r with GitHub. All of my local files are committed and pushed. There is only the master branch. I would like to permanently revert all of my files to a previous commit (not HEAD~1). How do I do it?
Here's what I have tried:
I opened the History pane, where I see all past commits.
I right-clicked on the earlier commit and selected Reset > Hard.
I see the old version. I try committing the old version but none of the changed files show up in the Commit Changes window, even if I explicitly add them to the index.
I also tried Checkout in step 2, with the same result.
Eclipse git checkout (aka, revert) is not relevant, since it is just about reverting to HEAD, not an earlier commit.
What I'd really like to do is create a new branch from the earlier commit, but I'll settle for reverting.
If you already pushed the commits, it is generally recommended to revert the commits. The reason for that is that revert will add new commits to the history instead of replacing the history, which makes it possible for other people to just pull instead of having to rebase on the replaced history.
So in the History view, select the newest commit you want to undo, open the context menu and select "Revert". Repeat for the parent commits. When you're done, push the result.
Also note that "git checkout" and "git revert" are different things, "git revert" creates a new commit that undos the changes of a previous commit. "git checkout" on the other hand changes the working directory or current branch to a commit. You may be confused because "svn revert" does what "git checkout" does, not "git revert".
We have two users working on the same class files in two separate git branches.
User A does nothing else but an "autoformat" Ctrl-Sift-F in Eclipse
User B just adds a space in a comment
Now we get a "conflicting change" and can't merge anymore.
Basically we are stuck just because of the autoformat.
How to resolve this situation in Eclipse git or on command line git bash?
You can use git merge -s ours or git merge -s their to decide which version of the file you wanna keep after the merge.
Resolve the conflict as you would with any merge conflict. It sounds like a pretty simple conflict to resolve. Or since the changes were trivial, the person doing the merge (i.e. the person who hasn't pushed their commit) can just reset back to a common commit, allowing them to pull the other person's changes.
git reset --hard THECOMMITID^
Where THECOMMITID is the unwanted formatting change. If it's just the most recent commit then you can use HEAD^.
Currently am working with Git Repo and i have a fellow team mate also ,after he commit to the remote repo and i get all the changes . I have couple of questions
When i merge the code with Changes then the changed file in my work space is marked as staged, do i need to commit to local repo?
I have a read lot of documentation and still am confused with the best way of sync,
Currently i do following steps:
Go to Team->Sync Workspace-> Fetch From Upstream->Mege . Please correct if am wrong
Note, the Egit manual includes a "pull" operation which would do the fetch+merge in one operation.
Right-click on a project in the Package Explorer and select Team > Pull or right-click on a repository in the Git Repositories view and select Pull to pull new changes from the upstream branch your local branch is tracking.
Doing a fetch + merge (as in Egit Merging) will result in a merge commit unless there is a conflict.
Real merge: When neither of the conditions above apply egit triggers a merge of the commits. There are two possible outcomes:
If no conflicts occur the current branch will point to a newly created merge commit;
if conflicts occur the conflicting files will be marked with label decorators (see Resolving a merge conflict for further actions in case of merge conflicts).
You should see staged changes only in the second case (merge conflict to resolve), or you would see stage changes because you previously added to the index files which are not part of the merge (they remain staged until you commit them)