I have a feature file where 6 scenarios are written.
I am running the feature file by a Test case and Run Feature File keyword.
So while the full feature file is executed, it is showing error in the Test case potion of Log Viewer, but every scenario and their inside steps are marked as pass(Showing green tick).
So how I can find the error/failure. Please help me.
Screenshots are below:
Click here to see reference image
Related
Is there anyway to log the lines sent to the Output tab?
I am having a problem with VS Code developing Salesforce
When I right click on the package.xml file in the manifest folder and request to retrieve source code,
I get the first Starting message:
18:59:20.788 Starting SFDX: Retrieve Source from Org
but then never see the ended message
19:01:08.612 ended SFDX: Retrieve Source from Org
Worse yet, the VS Code Output will clear automatically and I am left without any trace that I even ran the command. Argghhhh!!!!
I have found that when I commented out types for StaticResources the retrieve worked as normal.
It was very frustrating until I figured this out, as the system was automatically clearing the Output results.
Have tried "cucumber gherkin full support" extension, but it gives option to navigate to a step not to generate step". Is there any way i can generate step definition from feature file directly?
enter image description here
strong textenter image description here
If you have not implemented your step definitions, Cucumber will warn you asking to create them with the template.
You can copy paste them and implement your logic inside it.
To generate the steps instead of running it through protractor you can add another command to in your scripts like
"cuke-test": "cucumber-js -r outputjs/pathtoyourstepdeffolder/*.js", and give it a dry run. It should give you the snippets for the unimplemented steps. The tidy gherkin extension in chrome is quite good too.
In Visual Studio online, I have a big list of requirements on the board. All of them have Test Cases attached as linked items via a Tested By link. However, they're not showing up.
Both these items have a test attached, by the same link, but only one is recognized by VSO - illustrated by the potion icon.
I got the top one to pull through to the board by clicking on the ellipsis and choosing "add test" and then putting in a nonsense title. At this point the existing test appears with the requirement/bug and I can remove the nonsense one.
This is cumbersome and time-consuming. Is there another way to get VSO to recognize the attached tests for a test plan?
You need to have a test suite for that requirement. On the "Test" hub, you can add a requirement-based test suite for your work item. Any work items added to the test suite automatically appear on the backlog board.
What you're inadvertently doing when you add the "dummy" test is creating a requirement-based test suite.
I am trying to write my own UI based yocto build. But i am not getting clue how the hob/toaster project is able to show the console output in screen.
For example, if receipes are parsed its displayed in the progress bar. Also i am not much aware of python code, to look much more on toaster source code.
My findings:
1. There is a log directory getting created for every bitbake build(as per the bitbake.conf file). I am able to read the log file. But i am not exactly sure did the toaster/hob follow the same procedure.
Any help is appreciated.
Problem:
The formula name 'Decimals' gone missing after I comment-out the code block.
Step by step illustration:
1.When I open my crystal report file it prompt this error.
2.After that when I try to F5 (Refresh) to get the output, it shows this error.
3.Then I comment out the whole code block. The error didn't appear anymore but now I cannot find back the formula.
Please guide me on how to revert back the changes. Thanks in advance!!
The reason the report 'works', is because you are viewing a copy with saved data. When you refresh the report, CR tries to rebuild it. It can't find that DLL, so it raises an exception. Find a copy of that DLL and add it to the appropriate, shared directory (the directory is version-specific).
If you can describe the logic, perhaps we can help you eliminate the need for the UFL.