I am a student who has gotten a part time job embedded system programming. I am given a program the company uses, and asked to understand it. This is a working program. Therefore, the project can be built and flashed on ESP32 by the developers with no problem. So, the code and CMake files should have no issues. However, I cannot build the program either with VSCode extension nor with idf.py. In fact, I cannot build esp-idf examples from the official website, either.
Note: I am new to StackOverflow as well as to ESP32, so sorry if I made any mistakes here. If this post is problematic in any way, please inform me.
The error message from the terminal is shown here
I was initially using VSCode on Windows 10 (Windows is not activated). At first, ESP extension was completely failing to start the building process because it could not locate the tools. I was getting "could not be located" errors for all the tools. Below is a list of what I did in this setting:
I had v5.0.0 for esp-idf downloaded from Espressif server. I deleted it and tried v4.3.3 and then I tried to download from Github server. I downloaded the requirements for idf.py scripting environment and completed the settings for it as described by the Espressif's documentation.
I manually set the environment variables for IDF_PATH and PATH for both the user and for the system.
After 2, the initial error was gone. Unfortunately, I had a new error which indicated that ".elf" file for the project output could not be found. I do not exactly recall the error but if it is integral to the problem's solution I can try to replicate this issue.
I tried to delete and reinstall VSCode. I tried running VSCode with admin authority.
I tried changing the IDF_TOOLS_PATH in the VSCode esp-idf extension configurations from ".espressif" to "esp\esp-idf".
At this point, I moved to try to build the project on Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS:
In Ubuntu, I got the fatal error: esp_event.h: No such file or directory error.
It does not seem to be a common issue and I could not find much about it online.
I followed the Linux setup steps in the documentation. It said that only step 1 (Downloading the prerequisites) was necessary for the VSCode extension.
I decided to try the "master branch" from esp-idf configurations as well. After I downloaded the master branch, the error changed to the current version: 'fatal error: esp_wifi.h: No such file or directory'
I also tried the idf.py in Ubuntu but I got the same error.
Both in Ubuntu and in Windows, the Doctor Command returns nothing. It does not even open the terminal or any window. I am not sure what it should return but some online discussions were asking about its return so I wanted to note it here.
Edit: When I tried the examples on Ubuntu, they actually build just fine. Doctor Command also works with examples.
However, the main code has still issues. Initially, I assumed I made some mistakes with esp-idf configurations. But, perhaps that was not the case.
I had the same problem and ended up editing my project's CMakeLists.txt. When I added "esp_wifi" to the "REQUIRES" list, it worked for me:
idf_component_register(
SRCS "main.c"
INCLUDE_DIRS res
EMBED_FILES res/settings.html
REQUIRES esp_wifi
)
I'm trying to compile the SvnQuery project (https://github.com/kalyptorisk/svnquery.git) with the a version SharpSVN.dll which I created on my PC, but I keep seeing the error message CS0400: The type or namespace name 'SharpSvn' could not be found in the global namespace (are you missing an assembly reference?).
Using the SharpSVN.dll which comes with the SvnQuery source code, I do not see this error message, nor any other.
Both SharpSVN.dll files look the same when I open them in .NET Reflector, but there is one difference - the file which I created doesn't have version information. (To be exact: When you look at the file's properties in File Explorer, "File version" and "Product version" are empty.)
I followed these steps to create SharpSVN.dll:
Check out from https://ctf.open.collab.net/svn/repos/sharpsvn (tried trunk and the 1.1200x branch). Open VisualStudio command prompt (tried 2012, 2015 and 2017), cd to 'imports' folder, run 'nant build'. Result: no errors, but this doesn't create SharpSVN.dll (and I guess it shouldn't).
Now double-click SharpSvn.sln in the src folder. This opens VS2017. Compile Release|x86. Result: no errors, many warnings, SharpSVN.dll (with no version information) created in src\SharpSvn\bin\Win32\Release.
Any ideas about this issue?
Thanks...
I found the solution. My problem has nothing to do with the missing version number. In fact, I had compiled SharpSVN for a .NET version higher than that of the SvnQuery project. After increasing the .NET version number for SvnQuery and related projects, all compiled well. And SvnIndex.exe seems to run smoothly (test still ongoing).
I'm trying to run a simple example of OpenCV on Eclipse [which was perfectly buit and installed before (using CMake and MinGw), even libraries and all includes are in place !].
When building, I'm getting no errors or warning, all seems good, but when I try to run, I get a message as if the project had no Binaries, even if all binaries are there. I even specified the path to the ".exe" (run->run conf-> new launch-> browse ...etc.).
You can notice on the images attached that the project is built and the binaries are generated.
Notice: when I run an example of a (Hellow world) on the console ... it displays the messag without errors.
I read a lot on Internet before posting here, but I found nothing that matches to this case.
Thank you so much,
Error Capture
Build Capture
Regards
I'm struggling with building NLua from source on Windows.
It requires a modified Lua version, otherwise my code fails with a missing "lua52.dll".
https://github.com/NLua/NLua/issues/53
I tried to get it from here
https://github.com/NLua/lua
then used "cmake ." and built the resulting "lua.sln" in visual studio.
What happens is that I get a "lua52d.dll" (note the "d"). If I rename it, a "System.BadImageFormatException" is thrown by "KeraLua" (when I try with some "NLua.exe" executable I found in the "tests" folder of NLua).
Can anybody tell me how to build the modified lua52.dll required by NLua?
I already have a binary that works but need to be able to rebuild everything by myself. Possibly I'm simply using the wrong source tree.
You're using the right source tree, its just that you're compiling the debug version of the dll, not the release version of the dll. The added 'd' is to denote that it is the debug version of the dll, not the release version.
I have an ASP.NET MVC 2 application.
Web project contains a reference to SomeProject
SomeProject contains references to ExternalAssembly1 and ExternalAssembly2.
SomeProject explicitly calls into ExternalAssembly1, but NOT ExternalAssembly2.
ExternalAssembly1 calls into ExternalAssembly2
When I perform a local build everything is cool. All DLLs are included in the bin\debug folder. The problem is that when I use the Publish Web command in Visual Studio 2010, it deploys everything except ExternalAssembly2.
It appears to ignore assemblies that aren't directly used (remember, ExternalAssembly2 is only used by ExternalAssembly1).
Is there any way I can tell Visual Studio 2010 to include ExternalAssembly2?
I can write a dummy method that calls into ExternalAssembly2. This does work, but I really don't want to have dummy code for the sole purpose of causing VS2010 to publish the DLL.
None of these answers are sufficient in my mind. This does seem to be a genuine bug. I will update this response if I ever find a non-hack solution, or Microsoft fixes the bug.
Update:
Doesn't seem promising.
https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/731303/publish-web-feature-not-including-all-dlls
I am having this same problem (different assemblies though). If I reference the assemblies in my web project, then they will get included in the publish output, but they should be included anyway because they are indirect dependencies:
Web Project ---> Assembly A ---> Assembly B
On build, assemblies A and B are outputed to the \bin folder. On publish, only assembly A is outputed to the publish folder.
I have tried changing the publish settings to include all files in the web project, but then I have files in my publish output that shouldn't be deployed.
This seems like a bug to me.
I had the same problem with VS2010 and a WCF Service Application.
It turns out that if your (directly or indirectly) referenced DLL's are deployed to GAC, the VS publishing feature excludes them. Once I removed the assemblies from GAC, publishing feature started working as expected.
I guess VS is assuming that if your assemblies can be located in GAC on the machine you build, they will be located in GAC on the target machine as well. At least in my case this assumption is false.
My tests show that the external assemblies get published when I have a reference on them in the web project. I do not have to write any dummy code to make it work. This seems acceptable to me.
I agree with Nicholas that this seems to be a bug in visual studio. At least it escapes me what the reason for the behavior could be.
I have created this issue as a bug on Microsoft Connect. If anyone experiencing it could vote it up https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/637071/publish-web-feature-not-including-all-dlls then hopefully we'll get something done about it.
If you go into the ExternalAssembly2 reference property list and change the "Copy Local" to "True" i think that might solve your issue.
I don't know if you are watching this still but I found the solution (I had the exact same issue) via this MSDN article. Under "build action" for the file choose "Content" that should include it in the list of files publish brings over.
I have created a new Connect bug here https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/731303/publish-web-feature-not-including-all-dlls
I've also attached a solution and detailed steps to reproduce this issue. Lets hope this time they won't close it as Can't Reproduce.
Vote for this connect issue if you experience the missing dll problem.
Copy local did the trick. I had an issue that the Newtonsoft.Json assembly get included in the deploymeny package. Copy local was set to false.
I am experiencing the same type of issue with a web project. I have a web project that references assembly A which references assembly B. It worked fine for some time but today it was broken. I did a rebuild of the solution and this time it deployed everything correctly.
I had this same problem today. I published my web project and realized that not all of the reference DLL's were there. In particular, the indirect DLL references.
It turns out that the directory in which I was publishing to was out of disk space (network share). I had just enough space to publish all the files except for few indirect reference DLL's. The sad part is that VS08 didn't throw any errors. It just published the files are usual. I cleared out some HDD space and everything worked fine.
I didn't find the HDD space issue until I tried to manually move the DLL's over.
in my case it is quite tricky.
Reference to ExternalAssembly2 is not required to Build the project but vital for run-time since we use reflection to configure Unity container.
So, I delete the reference - build the project successfully, but get run-time error.
If I preserve the reference I can Build and Run the application but I cannot Publish it with ExternalAssembly2 - get run-time exception as well.
This is happen because of internal VS2010 assemblies optimization.
So, what we can do here?
1. Put some unrequired peice of code to use any ExternalAssembly2's class.
2. escape from reflection and use static assemblies linking.
Hope this helps to smbd.
I got the same problem and this is a VS2010 bug if there's a reference link like:
Web Project --> custom project --> assembly1 -->(indirectly) assembly2.
For now I find if I reference the Assembly1 in the web project, then assembly2 is included in the bin folder.
So I had to add an additional reference link like:
Web project --> assembly1 -->(indirectly) assembly2.
Then VS can recognize assembly2 and include its dll file in publish action.