I'm aggregating JavaScript resources like this
getResourceBundles().addJavaScriptBundle(MyWicketApplication.class,
"js_bundle.js",
wicketJQuery,
wicketAjax,
JavascriptResources.RESOURCE_1.getReference(),
JavascriptResources.RESOURCE_2.getReference(),
JavascriptResources.RESOURCE_3.getReference(),
JavascriptResources.RESOURCE_4.getReference(),
JavascriptResources.RESOURCE_5.getReference(),
JavascriptResources.RESOURCE_6.getReference(),
JavascriptResources.RESOURCE_7.getReference(),
JavascriptResources.RESOURCE_8.getReference());
What I get after a page is rendered is something like this
./wicket/resource/com.my.company.MyWicketApplication/js_bundle-ver-3CA0BF236223C36D08331F94E24FAAAE.js
I don't mind having the part
js_bundle-ver-3CA0BF236223C36D08331F94E24FAAAE.js
But how to hide / remove this part
./wicket/resource/com.my.company.MyWicketApplication
to something like this
/resources/js_bundle-ver-3CA0BF236223C36D08331F94E24FAAAE.js
You could use the result of getResourceBundles().addJavaScriptBundle(...) and mount it at specific path:
JavaScriptReferenceHeaderItem jsrhi = getResourceBundles().addJavaScriptBundle(...);
ResourceReference rr = jsrhi.getReference();
webApplication.mountResource("some/path", rr);
Related
What I'm trying to achieve is that if i have 2 components nodes :
component1
clientlib
component1.js
component2
clientlib
component2.js
and i drag them into page1, then when page1 is generated, only component1.js and component2.js will be loaded when navigating to page1 .
One approach i saw is to use custom Tag Library as described here : http://www.icidigital.com/blog/best-approaches-clientlibs-aem-part-3/
I have two questions :
1) is there an existing feature in AEM to do this ?
2) if not, what is the easiest way to create such custom Tag Library ?
EDIT:
Assume that there is no ability to just include all component clientLibs, rather load only those that are added to the page.
There is no built in feature to do this. Although I've heard that the clientlib infrastructure is being looked at for a re-write so I'm optimistic that something like this will be added in the future.
We have, and I know other company have, created a "deferred script tag." Ours is a very simple tag that take a chunk of html like a clientlib include, add it to a unique list and then on an out call at the footer, spits it all out one after another.
Here's the core of a simple tag implementation that extends BodyTagSupport. Then in your footer grab the attribute and write it out.
public int doEndTag() throws JspException {
SlingHttpServletRequest request = (SlingHttpServletRequest)pageContext.getAttribute("slingRequest");
Set<String> delayed = (Set<String>)request.getAttribute(DELAYED_INCLUDE);
if(delayed == null){
delayed = new HashSet<String>();
}
if(StringUtils.isNotBlank(this.bodyContent.getString())){
delayed.add(this.bodyContent.getString().trim());
}
request.setAttribute(DELAYED_INCLUDE, delayed);
return EVAL_PAGE;
}
Theoretically the possible way of doing is to write script in your page component/abstract page component that does something like this -
Step1 : String path = currentPage.getPath()
Step2 : Query this path for components (one way is to have a master list do a contains clause on sling:resourceType)
Step 3: User resource resolver to resolve the resourceType in Step 3, this will give you resource under your apps.
Step 4: From the above resource get the sub-resource with primary type as cq:ClientLibraryFolder
Step 5: from the client libs resource in Step 4 get the categories and include the JS from them
you could actually write a model to adapt a component resource to a clientLibrary to actually clean the code.
Let me know if you need actual code, I can write that in my free time.
I am playing with the new Azure API Apps (template in Visual Studio 2013 w/ the new SDK bits from 3/24/15) and I'd like have my Swagger UI group my calls by Version #. In my case, I'm currently versioning by URI (I realize REST purists will tell me not to do this - please don't try to "correct my error" here). For instance, I may have these calls:
http://example.com/api/Contacts <-- "latest"
http://example.com/api/1/Contacts
http://example.com/api/2/Contacts
http://example.com/api/Contacts{id} <-- "latest"
http://example.com/api/1/Contacts/{id}
http://example.com/api/2/Contacts/{id}
Functionally, this works great! (Yes, I know some of you will cringe. Sorry this hurts your feelings.) However, my problem is w/ Swagger UI organization. By default, Swagger UI groups these by the Controller Name (Contacts in this case). I see in the SwaggerConfig.cs file that I can change this:
// Each operation be assigned one or more tags which are then used by consumers for various reasons.
// For example, the swagger-ui groups operations according to the first tag of each operation.
// By default, this will be controller name but you can use the "GroupActionsBy" option to
// override with any value.
//
//c.GroupActionsBy(apiDesc => apiDesc.HttpMethod.ToString());
What I don't understand is how I can tweak this to group all of the "latest" together and then all of v1 together and then all of v2 together, etc.
How can I do this? If it absolutely must require that I add the word "latest" (or equiv) into the path in place of the version number, then I can do that but I'd prefer not have to do that.
I believe what you're looking to do is to uncomment a line a few lines below that one in SwaggerConfig.cs
c.OrderActionGroupsBy(new DescendingAlphabeticComparer());
except you'd change the name of the class to something like ApiVersionComparer() and then implement it as a new class:
public class ApiVersionComparer : IComparer<string>
{
public int Compare(string x, string y)
{
// Write whatever comparer you'd like to here.
// Yours would likely involve parsing the strings and having
// more complex logic than this....
return -(string.Compare(x, y));
}
}
If you've gotten far enough to ask this question, I'm sure I can leave the sort implementation for you. :-)
I've been working on this for sometime now, and I keep running into a wall. I think I'm close, but I figured someone out here in the land of SO might have some deeper insight if not a better way of doing what I'm trying to do.
Basically lets look at this scenario. I have a logo w/ some text that can be set from a few different places. If we look at the setup here is what it looks like.
Hiearchy:
Homepage [has designPath]
- Child Microsite Page [has designPath]
- Logo Component
Logic Flow (in logo component):
if properties.get("logoText") {
use this
} else if currentStyle.get("logoTextFromStyle") {
use this
} else if parentStyle.get("logoTextFromGlobal") {
use this
} else {
be blank
}
My query is with how to get the "parentStyle" of this page. Looking at the docs here: http://dev.day.com/docs/en/cq/5-5/javadoc/com/day/cq/wcm/api/designer/Style.html
I've been able to come up with the fact that I can get a Style object from the "designer" object made available via defineObjects. This is defined with the other utility objects like "pageManager, resourceUtil, resource, currentPage, etc".
With that being said this doesn't seem to work.
//assuming we have getting homePage earlier and it is a valid cq Page resource
Resource homePageResource.slingRequest.getResourceResolver().getResource(homePage.getPath());
Style homePageStyle = designer.getStyle(homePageResource);
at this point homePageStyle is null. To do some more testing I i tried passing currentPage.getPath() instead of homePage.getPath(). I assumed this would give me the currentPage resource and would in end yield the currentStyle object. This also resulted in a null Style object. From this I think I can safely conclude I'm passing the incorrect resource type.
I attempted to load the the cq:designPath into the resource hoping to get a Designer resourceType but to no avail.
I am curious if anyone has run into this problem before. I apologize if I've gone into too much detail, but I wanted to lay out the "why" to my question as well, just in case there was a better way overall of accomplishing this.
I've figured out how to return the style. Here is the rundown of what I did.
//get your page object
Page targetPage = pageManager.getPage("/path/to/target");
//get the Design object of the target page
Design homePageDesign = designer.getDesign(homePage);
//extract the style from the design using the design path
Style homePageStyle = homePageDesign.getStyle(homePageDesign.getPath());
it's very interesting the definition of "getStyle" is a little different from the designer.getStyle vs a Design.getStyle. designer.getStyle asks for a resource whereas Design.getStyle will take the path to a Design "cell" and return the appropriate Style.
I did some testing and it looks like it does work with inherited Styles/Designs. So if my cq:designPath is set at level 1 and I look up a page on at level 2 they will return the Design/Style at the cq:designPath set at level 1.
I hope this helps someone else down the way.
I tried this approach but was not getting the Styles in the Style object.
When we do this:
Design homePageDesign = designer.getDesign(homePage);
In this Design object we get the path till the project node i.e etc/design/myproject
After this if we try to extract the Style from the design path we do not get it.
However I implemented it in a different way.
In the design object, we also get the complete JSON of designs for(etc/design/myproject).
Get the sling:resourceType of the target page and get the value after last index of "/".
Check if this JSON contains the last value. If it contains, you can get your styles, i.e. image, etc.
I've just created an eID in Typo3. I can't figure out how to access the config data for my plugin from the Typo3 instance.
I've tried the code from the link but it doesn't want to work. I keep getting an exception "No TypoScript template found! " on the call " $TSFE->getConfigArray(); "
http://lists.typo3.org/pipermail/typo3-dev/2006-December/021392.html
Any ideas?
Thanks.
In eID mode, only a small part of the regular TYPO3 frontend is loaded. Unfortunately TypoScript is not loaded. To still access the TypoScript configuration you need manually load the components it needs to do so. Unfortunately this can be a bit of a pain in the butt. So in some cases it might be easier to just load a page containing a single plugin that doesn't contain anything else (without headers etc.).
If you do want to load the TypoScript templates yourself, you can try something like the following:
require_once(PATH_tslib.'class.tslib_fe.php');
require_once(PATH_t3lib.'class.t3lib_userauth.php' );
require_once(PATH_tslib.'class.tslib_feuserauth.php');
require_once(PATH_t3lib.'class.t3lib_cs.php');
require_once(PATH_tslib.'class.tslib_content.php') ;
require_once(PATH_t3lib.'class.t3lib_tstemplate.php');
require_once(PATH_t3lib.'class.t3lib_page.php');
$TSFEclassName = t3lib_div::makeInstanceClassName('tslib_fe');
$id = isset($HTTP_GET_VARS['id'])?$HTTP_GET_VARS['id']:0;
$GLOBALS['TSFE'] = new $TSFEclassName($TYPO3_CONF_VARS, $id, '0', 1, '','','','');
$GLOBALS['TSFE']->connectToMySQL();
$GLOBALS['TSFE']->initFEuser();
$GLOBALS['TSFE']->fetch_the_id();
$GLOBALS['TSFE']->getPageAndRootline();
$GLOBALS['TSFE']->initTemplate();
$GLOBALS['TSFE']->tmpl->getFileName_backPath = PATH_site;
$GLOBALS['TSFE']->forceTemplateParsing = 1;
$GLOBALS['TSFE']->getConfigArray();
$cObj = t3lib_div::makeInstance('tslib_cObj');
This initializes the TSFE and cObj but is also used to load and parse the TypoScript templates. You might need to make some modifications to (probably kick some things out)
The code came from one of the comments on the following blog post: http://sebastiaandejonge.com/blog/articles/2010/september/21/bringing-ajax-to-your-frontend-plugins/
Good luck!
Right now ZF defaults to /
I would really like / to redirect to /sort/all
I've changed my default route in routes.ini to
routes.default.route = "/:controller/:filter"
routes.default.defaults.controller = sort
routes.default.defaults.action = sort
routes.default.defaults.filter = all
which displays correctly but the URL doesn't change.
I don't want a user to bring up / , but i still have /contact /about so i can't just move the install path
Its probably an htaccess issue, but i didn't want to break zend default dispatching.
I would really like / to redirect to /sort/all
How about letting IndexController::indexAction() just contain:
return $this->_redirect('/sort/all');
That would be easy to maintain once you'd want to use the root uri for something else.