I have successfully flashed a nucleo-h743zi board with a small app that blinks an LED and sends strings through the UART.
I'm now trying to connect to it with gdb, using OpenOCD v 0.12.0.
After building it, I execute this:
$./build/bin/openocd -f tcl/interface/stlink.cfg -c "transport select hla_swd" -f tcl/target/stm32h7x.cfg
And I obtain this:
Open On-Chip Debugger 0.12.0-rc2+dev-00989-g9501b263e (2022-12-15-15:37)
Licensed under GNU GPL v2
For bug reports, read
http://openocd.org/doc/doxygen/bugs.html
hla_swd
Info : The selected transport took over low-level target control. The results might differ compared to plain JTAG/SWD
Info : Listening on port 6666 for tcl connections
Info : Listening on port 4444 for telnet connections
Info : clock speed 1800 kHz
(the command line returns after printing that)
I have tried as well
./build/bin/openocd -f ./build/share/openocd/scripts/board/st_nucleo_h743zi.cfg
and I obtain the same result.
I have double checked that the mentioned ports are not open with netstat -tulpn | grep LISTEN
As you can see, there is no gdb connection. I have tried telnet localhost 4444 as well, and I obtain:
Trying ::1...
Trying 127.0.0.1...
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused
What am I doing wrong?
The problem was that I had the STM32CubeProgrammer connected.
Whatever port I try to use I keep getting the error:
listen tcp 0.0.0.0:PORT_NUMBER: bind: address already in use
Environment
I also installed this using Brew if you need to know that
Bettercap 2.11.1
Mac OS High-Sierra
golang 1.11.4
Command line code used:
sudo bettercap -eval "set net.probe off; set arp.spoof.targets 0.0.0.0" -caplet beef-active.cap
beef-active.cap:
set http.proxy.script beef-inject.js
set http.proxy.port 8011
set https.proxy.port 8011
http.proxy on
https.proxy on
sleep 1
arp.spoof on
Expected behavior:
I am trying to inject some js into the browser of each computer connected to my router. I except to see a message that the beef-inject was successfully injected
Actual behavior: What actually happened
Stops when it hits my IP address. Here is the output:
[13:26:41] [sys.log] [inf] http.proxy started on 0.0.0.0:8011 (sslstrip disabled)
[13:26:41] [sys.log] [inf] loading proxy certification authority TLS key from /var/root/.bettercap-ca.key.pem
[13:26:41] [sys.log] [inf] loading proxy certification authority TLS certificate from /var/root/.bettercap-ca.cert.pem
[13:26:41] [sys.log] [inf] Enabling forwarding.
[13:26:41] [sys.log] [inf] https.proxy started on 0.0.0.0:8011 (sslstrip disabled)
[13:26:41] [sys.log] [!!!] listen tcp 0.0.0.0:8011: bind: address already in use
edit:
Changing the ports for both to be different stopped the error however it is still not injecting anything into the browsers. All I keep getting in the console is:
ok so I changed that and I am no longer getting that error however, it is still not injecting any JS into the browsers. I just keep getting new and lost endpoints like so:
0.0.0.0/24 > 0.0.0.0 » [08:33:17] [endpoint.new] endpoint 0.0.0.0 detected as 04:18:d6:d0:69:e7 (Apple, Inc.).
0.0.0.0/24 > 0.0.0.0 » [08:33:23] [endpoint.lost] endpoint 0.0.0.0 (Apple, Inc.) lost.
.... Then it keeps ticking through the same messages, new > lost > new > lost
Any ideas?
set http.proxy.port 8011
set https.proxy.port 8011
Those ports are set to the same thing, which means they're both trying to listen on 8011 and are stomping on each other.
Change one of them to a different port and the error should go away.
Cheers!
When I run the following command, I can get successfull result.
root#ubuntu:/home/can# radtest user password 127.0.0.1 1812 testing123
Sending Access-Request of id 78 to 127.0.0.1 port 1812
User-Name = "user"
User-Password = "password"
NAS-IP-Address = 127.0.1.1
NAS-Port = 1812
Message-Authenticator = 0x00000000000000000000000000000000
rad_recv: Access-Accept packet from host 127.0.0.1 port 1812, id=78, length=20
However When I run the "freeradius -X" , I get error message as following :
.....
Failed binding to authentication address * port 1812: Address already in use
/etc/freeradius/radiusd.conf[250]: Error binding to port for 0.0.0.0 port 1812
Please Help Me
Thank you for your efforts.
Can
radiusd is already running. sudo service freeradius stop will stop it, and allow freeradius -X to bind to the address/port that was previously used by the RADIUS daemon.
Run 'service freeradius restart' and 'service freeradius stop' commands
Then run the command,'freeradius -X'
you will not face binding issue anymore.
Even having finished the service, there were pending zombie process.
Searching for a zumbi process I´ve found one:
[root#localhost sites-enabled]# ps aux | grep radi
radiusd 25042 0.0 0.7 186360 14980 ? Ssl Fev17 0:00 /usr/sbin/radiusd -d /etc/raddb
[root#localhost sites-enabled]# kill -9 25042
Service was start sucessfully after this.
Basically the port freeradius is looking to use is already in use by another background running instance of freeradius. Ending the first instance of freeradius will allow you to use that same port for the newly run instance.
I'm using "Net::SFTP" in perl cgi file to put files to a windows M/C from my dev box.
After adding below new directory manually (with 0777 permissions) everything works fine:
bash-4.1$ pwd
/.ssh
-bash-4.1$ cd ..
-bash-4.1$ ls -ltra | grep .ssh
drwxrwxrwx 2 root root 4096 Jan 23 23:57 .ssh
Problem (if I don't add above directory manually ) here is as per my understanding:
Apache is running cgi with user as "nobody" which do not have permissions to make directory after connection is established via sftp and I'm getting below error messages in logs:
xxx.xxx.net: Reading configuration data /.ssh/config
xxx.xxx.net: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh_config
xxx.xxx.net: Connecting to xxx.xxx.xxx.com, port 22.
xxx.xxx.net: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version 5.17 FlowSsh: Bitvise SSH Server (WinSSHD) 5.58: free only for personal non-commercial use^M
Math::BigInt: couldn't load specified math lib(s), fallback to Math::BigInt::Calc at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Crypt/DH.pm line 6
xxx.xxx.net: Net::SSH::Perl Version 1.34, protocol version 2.0.
xxx.xxx.net: No compat match: 5.17 FlowSsh: Bitvise SSH Server (WinSSHD) 5.58: free only for personal non-commercial use^M.
xxx.xxx.net: Connection established.
xxx.xxx.net: Sent key-exchange init (KEXINIT), wait response.
xxx.xxx.net: Algorithms, c->s: 3des-cbc hmac-sha1 none
xxx.xxx.net: Algorithms, s->c: 3des-cbc hmac-sha1 none
xxx.xxx.net: Entering Diffie-Hellman Group 1 key exchange.
xxx.xxx.net: Sent DH public key, waiting for reply.
xxx.xxx.net: Received host key, type 'ssh-dss'.
xxx.xxx.net: Permanently added 'xxx.xxx.xxx.com' to the list of known hosts.
**mkdir //.ssh: Permission denied at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Net/SSH/Perl/Util/Hosts.pm line 92**
I tried to solve this problem with different methods given over internet but nothing is working for me.
Can anybody suggest possible solution?
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
I recently ran into the same problem myself and you are correct that it is a permissions issue. When your nobody process tries to connect to the remote server, it wants to write the remote host key to a file. This is the step that is failing in your error message (Hosts.pm line 92).
My solution was to create a nobody-writable location for the NET::SFTP to write the known_hosts file and to specify that location before you construct your NET::SFTP connection.
$ENV{HOME} = '/nobody/writable/location/';
You can find more information on this problem at http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=599078
Summary:
This is a 2 part question. A simple Samba share on one ISP with router doesn't work while another ISP with a different router setup the same and a similar server with same Samba configuration works.
It seems to be either the router not forwarding the ports, although it successfully forwards SSH and others, or the ISP somehow blocking the standard Samba ports. It still bugs me that I can't figure out why it doesnt work and I'll still try to narrow down the cause.
The second question is I'm looking for a business use, simple, easy to use (for end users), secure share for a small number of people and files, hosted internally and accessible externally on the internet, between Windows 7, XP, Mac, and linux servers with simple clients for end users.
A new friend outside of stackoverflow helped with sshfs as a solution. On CentOS ssh already supports sshfs. The Windows client win-sshfs is working well and I'll be trying OSXFUSE with MACFusion described at UO.
Additionally, setup linux users for each person. To allow write by everyone in the linux group, change the umask in /etc/ssh/sshd_config described in this question at serverfault. People get to their home directory first, where I placed links to a shared folder with sticky bit set so they can't delete the folder. They can delete the links but that's easy enough to put back. The only issues I can see are lack of file locking and lack of auto-refresh.
Original Question:
I can't seem to get Samba working on a Centos 6.3 server over the internet. I have a similar test server on another internet connection working fine with the exact same setup. I've gone through http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/diagnosis.html twice, made sure the ports are forwarded through to the internet (although not sure how to test they are really open), double checked samba configuration, its only sharing /tmp simply now. The user account is setup, it can ssh in and get to /tmp and the samba password is set the same. I can't ping the server but that is because the router or IP is set not pingable by the owner/work. SSH and HTTPS apache work well on the server with ports forwarded the same way. I haven't been able to test the share within the local network yet since I am not there, but I assume that it should work internally. When trying to connect from Windows 7 it just times out, no prompt and it has never connected, whereas my test server on my own internet connection is always working internally and externally.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
The requirement is a easy to use internally hosted shared folder alternative to using "dropbox" for use between Windows 7, XP, mac, and linux servers that works over external internet connection. It won't see heavy usage but should be quick, easy to access/setup on the client side, and secure for business. If there are any alternatives to install on CentOS that would be great as well.
Thank you!
Andrew
Edit, details:
Ports are forwarded:
(I had an image but as new user I cant post) 137, 138, 139, 445 are forwarded all with both TCP and UDP for testing now.
smb.conf is setup simply and exactly the same as the working test server:
# cat /etc/samba/smb.conf
[global]
workgroup=WORKGROUP
log level = 3
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
max log size = 50
security = user
passdb backend = tdbsam
[tmp]
comment = temporary files
path = /tmp
read only = yes
Samba restarted for good measure:
# service smb restart
Shutting down SMB services: [ OK ]
Starting SMB services: [ OK ]
Windows 7 times out when trying to access the share as \ which works fine with the test server:
(I had a screenshot but new users cant post)
A search for the error 0x80004005 results in http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_vista-networking/cannot-access-network-share-get-unspecified-error/9f840844-9d5b-e011-8dfc-68b599b31bf5
I've checked the workgroup, share settings, and restarted windows. Since the test share works I would think the Windows machine is working. I'll continue with the details.
Edit again:
Following the troubleshooting guide again:
Simplify the smb.conf to just:
# cat /etc/samba/smb.conf
[tmp]
comment = temporary files
path = /tmp
read only = yes
/etc/resolv.conf is using the ISPs servers and they work. They are different than the working server's DNS but that one is on a different ISP:
# nslookup google.com
Server: 71.242.0.12
Address: 71.242.0.12#53
Non-authoritative answer:
Name: google.com
Address: 74.125.228.2
I'm doing everything with IP addresses so I don't know that DNS would come into play.
I added dns proxy = no to smb.conf for fun but that didn't help.
/var/log/samba/log.smbd doesn't report anything different from the working server:
[2012/09/20 16:59:41, 0] smbd/server.c:1141(main)
smbd version 3.5.10-125.el6 started.
Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2010
[2012/09/20 16:59:41.484699, 0] param/loadparm.c:7648(lp_do_parameter)
Global parameter dns proxy found in service section!
[2012/09/20 16:59:41.486645, 0] printing/print_cups.c:109(cups_connect)
Unable to connect to CUPS server localhost:631 - Connection refused
[2012/09/20 16:59:41.486809, 0] printing/print_cups.c:468(cups_async_callback)
failed to retrieve printer list: NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL
[2012/09/20 16:59:41.507198, 0] smbd/server.c:501(smbd_open_one_socket)
smbd_open_once_socket: open_socket_in: Address already in use
[2012/09/20 16:59:41.507407, 0] smbd/server.c:501(smbd_open_one_socket)
smbd_open_once_socket: open_socket_in: Address already in use
[2012/09/20 17:00:39, 0] smbd/server.c:1141(main)
smbd version 3.5.10-125.el6 started.
Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2010
[2012/09/20 17:00:39.513793, 0] printing/print_cups.c:109(cups_connect)
Unable to connect to CUPS server localhost:631 - Connection refused
[2012/09/20 17:00:39.513955, 0] printing/print_cups.c:468(cups_async_callback)
failed to retrieve printer list: NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL
[2012/09/20 17:00:39.535458, 0] smbd/server.c:501(smbd_open_one_socket)
smbd_open_once_socket: open_socket_in: Address already in use
[2012/09/20 17:00:39.535689, 0] smbd/server.c:501(smbd_open_one_socket)
smbd_open_once_socket: open_socket_in: Address already in use
However the working server creates a log file in the directory named log. which the non working server does not.
testparm:
# testparm
Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf
rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (1024) to minimum Windows limit (16384)
Processing section "[tmp]"
Loaded services file OK.
Server role: ROLE_STANDALONE
Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions
[global]
[tmp]
comment = temporary files
path = /tmp
continuing...
Continued:
nmb is running as well:
# service nmb restart
Shutting down NMB services: [ OK ]
Starting NMB services: [ OK ]
"Respond to Ping on Internet Port" is normally turned off on the routers. I turned it on, on both the Windows client and the server. Each can ping the other, sharing still doesn't work.
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7601]
Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
C:\Users\xxxx>ping xxxx
Pinging xxxx with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from xxxx: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=51
Reply from xxxx: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=51
Reply from xxxx: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=51
Reply from xxxx: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=51
Ping statistics for xxxx:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 23ms, Maximum = 26ms, Average = 24ms
# ping xxxx -c 5
PING xxxx (xxxx) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from xxxx: icmp_seq=1 ttl=251 time=20.7 ms
64 bytes from xxxx: icmp_seq=2 ttl=251 time=24.6 ms
64 bytes from xxxx: icmp_seq=3 ttl=251 time=21.4 ms
64 bytes from xxxx: icmp_seq=4 ttl=251 time=25.3 ms
64 bytes from xxxx: icmp_seq=5 ttl=251 time=22.9 ms
--- xxxx ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4029ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 20.776/23.022/25.319/1.764 ms
continuing...
Continued:
iptables are off:
# iptables -L -v
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
SELinux is off:
# sestatus
SELinux status: disabled
smbclient using a user setup in samba works from the samba server to its local IP and to its external IP. The Windows client gets:
Connection to <ip addr> failed (Error NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL)
Samba is running as a daemon/service and netbios-ssn is in listen mode:
# netstat -a|grep netbios-ssn
tcp 0 0 *:netbios-ssn *:* LISTEN
Continuing...
Continued:
We're not restricting connections or using inetd.
log.nmbd does not report any problems.
nmblookup -B BIGSERVER SAMBA works using the server's name
nmblookup -B ACLIENT * fails on all log files using the windows client name OR the external IP address
nmblookup -d 2 `*'. fails
"If your PC and server aren't on the same subnet, then you will need to use the -B option to set the broadcast address to that of the PC's subnet.
This test will probably fail if your subnet mask and broadcast address are not correct. (Refer to test 3 notes above)."
Im not sure here, since we're going over the internet do we need these to match and work?
smbclient //BIGSERVER/TMP works
On the client:
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7601]
Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
C:\Users\xxxx>net view \\xxxx (ip addr)
System error 53 has occurred.
The network path was not found.
C:\Users\xxxx>
net use has the same problem, even with providing user and passwd.
nmblookup -M WORKGROUP returns a local windows machine on the network there, whereas on my test server it returns the client which is local to the test machine. Perhaps there is an issue here with workgroup being on another machine, but how would others connect from other networks if this was the issue?
I tried preferred master = yes as well.
Page 2 of samba howto next.
Update: A new friend said to try nmap to see check the ports:
# nmap -sS -P0 -sV -O xxxx
Starting Nmap 5.51 ( ) at 2012-09-21 11:09 EDT
Nmap scan report for xxxx (xxxx)
Host is up (0.024s latency).
Not shown: 995 filtered ports
PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION
22/tcp open ssh OpenSSH 5.3 (protocol 2.0)
25/tcp open smtp Postfix smtpd
110/tcp open pop3 Dovecot pop3d
443/tcp open ssl/http Apache httpd 2.2.15 ((CentOS))
9100/tcp open jetdirect?
Warning: OSScan results may be unreliable because we could not find at
least 1 open and 1 closed port
OS fingerprint not ideal because: Missing a closed TCP port so results
incomplete
No OS matches for host
Service Info: Host: xxxx
Since the Samba ports do not show up, I'm thinking the router or ISP is not forwarding/blocking the ports at this point.
As for a solution to sharing, I'm trying sshfs with a windows and mac client.
Answering your original question, the good way to test if your ISP is not blocking listed ports is this:
# yum -y install tcpdump
# tcpdump -i eth0 "port 137 or port 138 or port 139 or port 445"
(substitute eth0 with the name of the interface connected to the Internet).
Then you should try accessing the share (net view / net use / Windows Shell). If ports are forwarded correctly you should see something like that:
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes
01:25:48.631173 IP 192.168.0.10.54032 > 192.168.0.1.microsoft-ds: Flags [S], seq 4008761512, win 5840, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 136010468 ecr 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0
01:25:48.631198 IP 192.168.0.1.microsoft-ds > 192.168.0.10.54032: Flags [S.], seq 2220435566, ack 4008761513, win 14480, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 15507714 ecr 136010468,nop,wscale 7], length 0
01:25:48.631397 IP 192.168.0.10.54032 > 192.168.0.1.microsoft-ds: Flags [.], ack 1, win 46, options [nop,nop,TS val 136010468 ecr 15507714], length 0
01:25:48.642171 IP 192.168.0.10.54032 > 192.168.0.1.microsoft-ds: Flags [P.], seq 1:184, ack 1, win 46, options [nop,nop,TS val 136010479 ecr 15507714], length 183SMB PACKET: SMBnegprot (REQUEST)
...
If you see nothing at all it means that your ISP (or intermediate router) is blocking packets to those ports and it's most likely the case — SMB protocol proved to be quite insecure for open Internet deployments.
In the file /etc/samba/smb.conf, under the section [global], below the workgroup line add this two lines :
client min protocol = NT1
client max protocol = SMB3