Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 5 days ago.
Improve this question
We've tried all IntelliJ plugins (default & Jacoco) but they're not reporting correctly at all, we're very confident our code coverage is at least 90%, but the tooling is barely reporting 30%, and we can see the analysis is incorrect even w/ the 30%. How is everyone analyzing their code coverage?
We're on scala 2.11 & maven
Related
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 4 days ago.
Improve this question
While trying to replace some functionality in AOSP with something more suitable I got stuck in the mess of the Soong documentation. It seems, that there is some better edited documentation available, but only for those who have the honor to be within the oo-VPN. https://android.googlesource.com/platform/build/soong/
As the soong process is at the very heart of the AOSP project, it would be very helpful if the full documentation would be accessible.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 12 months ago.
Improve this question
I've been programming for a career and as a hobby for more than two years now. I want to start contributing to some projects on Git hub, but I'm not sure where to start. What advice do you have for me for first starting out on Git hub?
If you use projects hosted on Github in your programming, you'll eventually encounter typos and mistakes in documentation. Fixing these is an excellent way to get started with contributing.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
So after Eclipse Zebra comes out in the next foo or so years, what will happen to Eclipse? I understand that probably only an Eclipse dev could really answer this, but I'm sure some of them are on here!
Eclipse Aardvark?
Seriously, it won't happen until the year 2029 and by then I'm sure they will have come up with a new naming scheme to entertain the masses.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
Whats the best way to organize code in Rebol?
(Rebol2, not Rebol3. Rebol3 will have import, as it seems.)
Is the do %myfunctions.r-style all that is needed? There is no real package statement like in Java, or #include like in C?
Do community-approved naming conventions exist?
Could http://www.rebol.it/power-mezz/mezz/module.html be considered a standard?
I read somewhere that I could build my own module system as well. But this seems not like a sensible approach to me.
Is this discussion doomed as Rebol3 will be finished soon? ;-)
Some subjects I know use my include.r, released under Apache 2.0 now. It is not a module system but you may find it useful.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
From the Scala perspective, is there any advantage missed by using the Community version of IDEA over the Ultimate version.
I've checked the version comparison chart provided and don't really require many of the features and integrations specified. I'd be interested in things like the mentioned code coverage support, but suspect that it would be Java centric.
Coverage support is available for Scala in the Ultimate Edition. Otherwise, from the Scala perspective, functionality is the same.