I was used Zefyr package, and now migrate to Fleather package (zefyr's authors advised that)
but fleather can't read old documents which wrote with zefyr.
is any solution for this problem instead of using replaceAll function ?
using replaceAll function to documents
it takes a lot of time
There are most of the keys were changed like "bold", "italic", "underline", ...
changed with "b", "i", "u", ...
also video, image, collapsible, divider
fleather wrote video and image like that:
{
"insert": {
"source": "https://...",
"_type": "image",
"_inline": false
}
},
{
"insert": {
"source": "https://www.youtube.com/...",
"_type": "video",
"_inline": false
}
}
but zfyre wrote it like that:
{
"insert": "",
"attributes": {
"embed": {
"type": "image",
"source": "https://..."
}
}
},
{
"insert": "",
"attributes": {
"embed": {
"type": "video",
"source": "https://www.youtube.com/..."
}
}
}
I try to write code to convert zefyr document to fleather, I will publish it soon.
Related
I have the below mappings for a Copy activity in ADF:
"translator": {
"type": "TabularTranslator",
"mappings": [
{
"source": {
"path": "$['id']"
},
"sink": {
"name": "TicketID"
}
},
{
"source": {
"path": "$['summary']"
},
"sink": {
"name": "TicketSummary"
}
},
{
"source": {
"path": "$['status']['name']"
},
"sink": {
"name": "TicketStatus"
}
},
{
"source": {
"path": "$['company']['identifier']"
},
"sink": {
"name": "CustomerAccountNumber"
}
},
{
"source": {
"path": "$['company']['name']"
},
"sink": {
"name": "CustomerName"
}
},
{
"source": {
"path": "$['customFields'][74]['value']"
},
"sink": {
"name": "Landlord"
}
},
{
"source": {
"path": "$['customFields'][75]['value']"
},
"sink": {
"name": "Building"
}
}
],
"collectionReference": "",
"mapComplexValuesToString": false
}
The challenge I need to overcome is that the array indexes of the custom fields of the last two sources might change. So I've created an Azure Function which calculates the correct array index. However I can't work out how to use the Azure Function output value in the source path string - I have tried to refer to it using an expression like #activity('Get Building Field Index').output but as it's expecting a JSON path, this doesn't work and produces an error:
JSON path $['customFields'][#activity('Get Building Field Index').outputS]['value'] is invalid.
Is there a different way to achieve what I am trying to do?
Thanks in advance
I have a slightly similar scenario that you might be able to work with.
First, I have a JSON file that is emitted that I then access with Synapse/ADF with Lookup.
I next have a For each activity that runs a copy data activity.
The for each activity receives my Lookup and makes my JSON usable, by setting the following in the For each's Settings like so:
#activity('Lookup').output.firstRow.childItems
My JSON roughly looks as follows:
{"childItems": [
{"subpath": "path/to/folder",
"filename": "filename.parquet",
"subfolder": "subfolder",
"outfolder": "subfolder",
"origin": "A"}]}
So this means in my copy data activity within the for each activity, I can access the parameters of my JSON like so:
#item()['subpath']
#item()['filename']
#item()['folder']
.. etc
Edit:
Adding some screen caps of the parameterization:
https://i.stack.imgur.com/aHpWk.png
I want to achieve a proxy from another url with changing one value within the response
So having something like that (not working, just an idea)
{
"request": {
"method": "GET",
"urlPathPattern": "/api/search-service"
},
"response": {
"proxyBaseUrl" : "https://external-search-service",
"transformerParameters": {
"results[*].hasAccess": true
}
}
}
}
When you call GET https://external-search-service/api/search-service the response is
{
"meta": {
"results": 2
},
"results": [
{
"id": "1",
"path": "/path/1",
"hasAccess": false
},
{
"id": "2",
"path": "/path/2",
"hasAccess": false
}
]
}
And when I want to temper with response using wiremock when you call GET https://wiremock/api/search-service the response I expect is
{
"meta": {
"results": 2
},
"results": [
{
"id": "1",
"path": "/path/1",
"hasAccess": true
},
{
"id": "2",
"path": "/path/2",
"hasAccess": true
}
]
}
How this can be achieved with JSON notation?
This isn't achievable purely using JSON configuration, but you can create a Java extension to transform responses, which will work with proxied responses.
To do this you would need to create an implementation of ResponseTransformer and register it with WireMock on startup.
Full details of how to do this are here: https://wiremock.org/docs/extending-wiremock/#response-transformation
I have barebone Flutter 2.5 project and Figma design tokens which were exported via Figma Tokens.
Those design tokens look like this:
project\style_dictionary\properties\tokens.json
{
"borderWidth": {
"100": {
"value": "1.5",
"type": "borderWidth"
}
},
"opacity": {
"basic": {
"100": {
"value": "0.04",
"type": "opacity"
}
}
},
"colors": {
"basic": {
"red": {
"50": {
"value": "#ffebee",
"type": "color"
}
}
}
}
}
and Style Dictionary config which looks like this
project\style_dictionary\config.json
{
"source": [
"properties/*.json"
],
"platforms": {
"flutter": {
"transformGroup": "flutter",
"buildPath": "../lib/unique_file/",
"files": [
{
"destination": "style_dictionary.dart",
"format": "flutter/class.dart",
"className": "StyleDictionary"
}
]
},
"flutter-separate": {
"transformGroup": "flutter-separate",
"buildPath": "../lib/unique_file/",
"files": [
{
"destination": "style_dictionary_color.dart",
"format": "flutter/class.dart",
"className": "StyleDictionaryColor",
"type": "color",
"filter": {
"attributes": {
"category": "colors"
}
}
}
]
}
}
}
Running style-dictionary build in CMD in style_dictionary will generate next file
project\lib\unique_file\style_dictionary_color.dart
import 'dart:ui';
class StyleDictionaryColor {
StyleDictionaryColor._();
static const basicRed50 = #ffebee;
}
But in should be like that at the end
project\lib\unique_file\style_dictionary_color.dart
import 'dart:ui';
class StyleDictionaryColor {
StyleDictionaryColor._();
static const basicRed50 = Color(0xFFFFEBEE);
}
Question:
How and where can I create Style Dictionary transforms file to create right dart file with Color type of the static variable?
I cannot modify exported design tokens.
Create a project\build.js as a custom Transforms file. Logic of creation was used from default Flutter color transforms and Documentation
const StyleDictionary = require('style-dictionary')
const baseConfig = require('./style_dictionary/config.json')
const Color = require('tinycolor2')
StyleDictionary.registerTransform({
name: 'colors/hex8flutter',
type: 'value',
matcher: prop => {
return prop.attributes.category === 'colors'
},
transformer: prop => {
var str = Color(prop.value).toHex8().toUpperCase();
return `Color(0x${str.slice(6)}${str.slice(0, 6)})`;
},
})
const StyleDictionaryExtended = StyleDictionary.extend(baseConfig)
StyleDictionaryExtended.buildAllPlatforms()
Modify project\style_dictionary\config.json so it can be executed from project directory and include new transforms - "transformColorsToColor" together with other transforms from Flutter
{
"source": [
"style_dictionary/properties/*.json"
],
"platforms": {
"flutter": {
"transforms": ["attribute/cti", "name/cti/camel", "color/hex8flutter", "size/flutter/remToDouble", "content/flutter/literal", "asset/flutter/literal", "font/flutter/literal", "colors/hex8flutter"],
"buildPath": "lib/unique_file/",
"files": [
{
"destination": "style_dictionary.dart",
"format": "flutter/class.dart",
"className": "StyleDictionary"
}
]
},
"flutter-separate": {
"transforms": ["attribute/cti", "name/ti/camel", "color/hex8flutter", "size/flutter/remToDouble", "content/flutter/literal", "asset/flutter/literal", "font/flutter/literal", "colors/hex8flutter"],
"buildPath": "lib/unique_file/",
"files": [
{
"destination": "style_dictionary_color.dart",
"format": "flutter/class.dart",
"className": "StyleDictionaryColor",
"type": "color",
"filter": {
"attributes": {
"category": "colors"
}
}
}
]
}
}
}
Run npm init with all default answers
Run npm install --save tinycolor2
Run node build.js
I'm using graphQL to query a MongoDB database in React, using Strapi as my CMS. I'm using Apollo to handle the GraphQL queries. I'm able to get my objects by passing an ID argument, but I want to be able to pass different arguments like a name.
This works:
{
course(id: "5eb4821d20c80654609a2e0c") {
name
description
modules {
title
}
}
}
This doesn't work, giving the error "Unknown argument \"name\" on field \"course\" of type \"Query\"
{
course(name: "course1") {
name
description
modules {
title
}
}
}
From what I've read, I need to define a custom query, but I'm not sure how to do this.
The model for Course looks like this currently:
"kind": "collectionType",
"collectionName": "courses",
"info": {
"name": "Course"
},
"options": {
"increments": true,
"timestamps": true
},
"attributes": {
"name": {
"type": "string",
"unique": true
},
"description": {
"type": "richtext"
},
"banner": {
"collection": "file",
"via": "related",
"allowedTypes": [
"images",
"files",
"videos"
],
"plugin": "upload",
"required": false
},
"published": {
"type": "date"
},
"modules": {
"collection": "module"
},
"title": {
"type": "string"
}
}
}
and the
Any help would be appreciated.
Referring to Strapi GraphQL Query API
You can use where with the query courses to filter your fields. You will get a list of courses instead of one course
This should work:
{
courses(where: { name: "course1" }) {
name
description
modules {
title
}
}
}
I need to show an unknown number of buttons in a Watson Assistant dialogue node. The data for the buttons comes from a IBM Cloud Function.
If I manually set up a response type "option" answer in my node the JSON-object looks like this:
{
"output": {
"generic": [
{
"title": "Välj mötestyp",
"options": [
{
"label": "Rådgivning familjerätt 30 min",
"value": {
"input": {
"text": "447472"
}
}
},
{
"label": "Rådgivning familjerätt 60 min",
"value": {
"input": {
"text": "448032"
}
}
}
],
"description": "Välj typ av möte du vill boka",
"response_type": "option",
"preference": "dropdown"
}
]
}
}
My cloud function can create this JSON with x no of options. But how can I use this data in Assistant?
The easiest would be to let the cloud function generate the complete JSON and then just output the returned JSON like this:
{
$context.output"
}
..but that's not allowed.
Generated output-object from my function:
[{"serviceId":447472,"serviceName":"Rådgivning Familjerätt 30 min"},{"serviceId":448032,"serviceName":"Rådgivning Familjerätt 60 min"}]
Any advice on how to do this?
I don't see a simple way of generating the entire output and options. What you could do is this:
Generate the option labels and values
Pass them into a generic output node that has predefined structures for 1, 2, 3, etc. options. Check based on the array size of your context variable which predefined response structure to fill.
I tested the following:
{
"context": {"my": [ {
"label": "First option",
"value": "one"
},
{
"label": "Second",
"value": "two" }]},
"output": {
"generic": [
{
"title": "This is a test",
"options": [{"label": "<? $my[0].label ?>",
"value": {
"input": {
"text": "my[0].value"
}
}
},{"label": "<? $my[1].label ?>", "value": {
"input": {
"text": "<? $my[1].value ?>"
}
}
}],
"response_type": "option"
}
]
}
}
It defined a context variable with the options, analogous to the options structure. In the output access the labels and values, later modifying the to proove that they are used and can be modified.