Is there a good K++ Kode editor for Klingon? - unicode

Ok, I know this is a strange question, but there is a "standard" (fan-wise at least) Unicode support for the Klingon alphabet, and since code can be written in Unicode with no problem, that means it is possible to write Kode with Klingon tokens( vars, function names, etc...).
For the record I've written C++ in Japanese and it works, so K++ in Klingon should work too. But I don't know of any text editor with support for Klingon. Any suggestions?

Not likely, especially when you consider rule 9 of the KLINGON GUIDE To Writing Perfect Code
“Indentation?! I will show you how to indent when I indent your skull!”
and number 7 does not bode well for any editor:
“Klingon function calls do not have ‘parameters.’ They have ‘arguments’ . . . and they ALWAYS WIN THEM!”
[Seriously, this is an interesting Unicode editor problem]
After all, ITunes has a license agreement in Klingon!
And you need the right keyboard, off course \o/
Now... may be you can try to "Google it" ;-)

Number 1: “Our users will know fear
and cower before our software! Ship
it! Ship it and let them flee like the
dogs they are!”
Guess there's a lot more Klingon programmers out there than you'd think...

Cherry has manufactured a Klingon keyboard:
http://www.cherrykeyboardsrus.co.uk/Klingon+Language-Details.htm
And, from the press release:
"Cherry has launched a Klingon language personal computer (PC) keyboard enabling users to use the Klingon language and fonts on their computers running either Windows, OS-X (Mac) or Linux. According to Chancellor Stalker Zantai Subaiesh of the Klingon Imperial Diplomatic Corps on Earth, "PC users will now be able to work directly in Klingon and interface seamlessly with commercial Klingon systems, bringing Human and Klingon cultures closer together."
Michael Groom, General Sales Manager at Cherry Electrical Products, comments: "The Klingon keyboard is the first step in providing PC input devices for all Federation cultures and will aid communications between Earth and other cultures within the Federation that fall outside the domain of Starfleet command. Of course, this keyboard demonstrates our capability to deliver custom keyboard designs, keycaps and layouts - whether on this planet or elsewhere in the universe!" Key features of the device, part of a broad range of Cherry keyboards, is its space saving, compact design, long-life and comfortable actuation. It is also recycling-friendly. The keyboards also deliver uniform switching characteristics and have abrasion-proof inscription of key caps.
Options include smartcard and/or fingerprint recognition support, long life versions with individual keys providing over 50 million operations, low-profile keyboards, integrated USB hub, touchpad, bar code decoder and inscribable keys, among others."

important obviously support: Klingon
(to no use rejected by unicode 2000
in favor of comets,snowmen,4 scissors
and so) Comment 1 by gra...#gmail.com,
Sep 22, 2009 How can we use app engine
without Klingon support? :( Comment 2
, Today (27 minutes ago) recover the
Klingon fonts from imagefile will work
towards users, very sceptical it's ok
engineering. signs have different
sizes. we could agree serve Klingon
with dynamic images. Comment 3 , Today
(18 minutes ago)
knowledgebase
http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n1643/n1643.htm
http://wazu.jp/gallery/Test_Klingon.html
http://www.evertype.com/standards/csur/klingon.html

Related

I'm trying to print unicode characters from QPython

Trying to print unicode characters like ┌┌┝├ from QPython 3.6 (under Android on a Chromebook with Chrome OS 100) but print(u"┌┌┝├") prints nothing, and using \u doesn't work since \ is the line continuation character in QPython. Perhaps the sandwiching of Android-over-Chrome OS-over-Linux makes this impossible - it's certainly beyond my diagnostic abilities - but I was hoping that a high-level language like Python might be able to bridge that gap...
After a little more research it looks as though QPython 3.6's chr() function doesn't accept u"whatever" containing characters outside the ASCII set, ie. it isn't doing unicode at all
OK, have answer, both simple and humiliatingly ridiculous. After wasting hours reading docs and forums, I was running my Unicode test program when I noticed the 'preferences' button, at top-right corner of QPython console screen (but not of editor screen) greyed-out so as to be almost illegible. Among those preferences is a tick box 'Default to UTF-8' and ticking it instantly cured my problems. I do love QPython very much, but its documentation, help and UI design are simply appalling - it's taken me two years to find this box, and no-one has ever mentioned it.

Voice coding in Emacs on Mac OS X

I would like to be able to write code by voice recognition and him currently using Aquamacs 2.4 and Dragon Dictate 2 on Mac OS X 10.6.8. Does anybody know if this is possible and if so how? I've seen shorttalk, emacs listen, and voice code but they only work on windows machines with Dragon Naturally Speaking.
Any leads would be much appreciated.
Also I am writing in R via ESS.
Have a look at this presentation by Tavis Rudd : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SkdfdXWYaI
He runs Dragon Naturally Speaking inside a Windows VM, because the Windows version can be scripted with Python. Then the VM communicates with Emacs on his local machine.
He says in the presentation he will open source his code, but it doesn't seem to be there yet on his Github.
So yes, it's possible, but at this point there is no out of the box solution. If you really want this, prepare to invests weeks or months to get to a properly working setup.
I recently released the coding-by-voice solution I created to solve my own RSI issues. It can be found here: http://www.voicecode.io
I use it mostly for coding in Sublime Text and Xcode, but it works great with emacs or vim as well. The great thing about this solution is that all commands can be chained into "command phrases" so you don't have to pause between every individual command like you do with other voice command solutions.
It has builtin support for all standard variable-name formats (snake case, camel case, etc), has builtin commands for every permutation of keyboard shortcuts (ie command-shift-5, command-option-shift-T, and so on), has cursor movement commands, app switching commands, window switching commands, commands for symbol combos like "=>", "||", ">=", etc, and tons more. Plus it is very easy to add your own custom commands as well.

What exactly happens when Complex Script Support is enabled?

When we click the check box "Install files for complex script and right to left languages (including Thai)" in Regional and Language settings what exactly happens?
Changes to registry keys?
I noticed that it installs some .fon files and keyboard dlls.
Is this totally necessary if one just wish to read complex script on Windows XP? My test inside VirtualBox as Windows 7 as the host OS seems to indicate that for reading Complex Script need not be enabled. Yet that's not what all the literature on the subject says. What's going on?
Update:
http://hi.wikipedia.org should not be readable if Complex Script is not enabled
http://hi.wikipedia.org/wiki/विकिपीडिया:Devanagari_Help
Problem is that it is readable.
Font files. Rendering libraries ('Uniscript'). Input methods. Certainment beaucoup de cle-registry. (Certainly lots-o-registry-keys.)
Note that IE will tend to get things right even when other things don't, since it builds in a good deal of fancy-pants rendering. Try, oh, Outlook, or some simple sample Win32 program.

R character encodings across windows, mac and linux

I use OS X and I am currently cooperating with a windows user and deploying the scripts on a linux server. We use git for version control, and I keep getting R scripts from his end where the character encoding used has mixed latin1 and utf8 encodings. So I have a couple of questions.
Is there a simple to use editor for windows that handle UTF8 with more grace than Winedt that my coauthor currently uses? I use emacs, but I am having a hard time selling getting him to switch.
How to set up R in Windows so that it defaults to reading and writing UTF8?
This is driving me crazy. Has anyone found a solution for it (be it in the workflow or in the software used) who cares to share?
Take a look at ?Encoding to set the encoding for specific objects.
You might have luck with options(encoding = ) see ?options, (disclaimer, I don't have a windows machine)
As for editors, I haven't heard complaints about encoding issues with Crimson editor which lists utf-8 support as a feature.
TextPad is a well featured editor supporting R syntax that allows you to specify the target platform for files (Win/UNIX/Mac/keep current encoding) when you save them. The only problem with it is that some of the keyboard shortcuts are nonstandard (e.g. 'Find' is F5, not F3).

Young people using Emacs?

I am a college student that has fallen in love with Emacs. I have used IDEs in the past, and although features like Intellisense made the switch to Emacs very hard, I now think that Emacs is much more powerful, and features like Intellisense can be pretty closely matched by various modes depending on language (and I am not referring to M-/). I am happily writing Elisp code for everything that I need that isn't provided by modes or by Emacs itself and I love the way that it adapts and molds to my needs.
However, I do think that its main disadvantage is the fact that it has a pretty steep learning curve and that most new programmers will not even begin to learn it out of many common misconceptions.
So, I want to know the opinions of young people (or any person who didn't start using Emacs before there were IDEs) that are Emacs users. Just to get some reassurance that Emacs is not dead within our Eclipse-loving generation =). (Opinions of users of any other highly extensible editor like Jedit are also welcome)
My "highly extensible editor" of choice is vim. Started using vi 10 years ago, at age 17, and I haven't really looked back. I like to stay away from my mouse as much as possible.
I rarely work in compiled languages these days, so the only thing I feel like I'm missing from an IDE is syntax-completion. Constantly switching to a browser to look up the order of arguments to various PHP functions gets a bit tedious.
PS: I don't want to start a vi/Emacs war here. I suspect that Emacs and vi[m] users have more in common with each other than either group has with IDErs.
I'm 62 and I've been using emacs for 21 years. I am capable of using vim in a pinch, but I really prefer emacs.
I used to use TECO a long time ago (in the 1970's) and I liked that one too.
First off, why do you care what other people think? It is clear that
Emacs has a vibrant community, as there are lots of extensions and
lots of people working on the core. There is plenty of support to be
had for it.
If you are "worried" that other editors are better, then you should
try those editors and make the decision yourself. Only you can know
what you like.
That said, I am young (23) and use Emacs. I have used it for almost
15 years. I have tried other editors, including Vim, Eclipse,
Netbeans, and Textmate. None of those editors work as well as Emacs
as far as I'm concerned, so I feel I made the right choice. I can't,
however, tell you which choice to make. You will have to figure it
out for yourself.
It is important to note that I am pretty "invested" in Emacs. I
maintain a lot of extensions, and have spent a lot of time
understanding the Emacs core... so if I switch editors, I am throwing
away a lot of time and experience. This could theoretically cloud my
judgment, but I don't think it does. Textmate works like Emacs, but
has fewer features. (I try not to use my mouse, so the eyecandy and
OS X integration don't buy me much.) Netbeans and Eclipse are nice
for managing Java projects, but on the rare occasion that I have to do
Java, I still find Emacs easier to use. I even find that writing Ant
files myself gets me closer to "where I want to be" than relying on
Eclipse's auto-builds. That leaves Vim, which is certainly
featureful, but is still a "lesser" Emacs. Emacs has all the features
of Vim -- if you want modal editing, you can just invoke Viper. The
only reason to use Vim is that you have already learned Vim, and you
can't stand the keybinding and editing model differences between Vim
and Viper. (No, Viper is not a Vim clone. It's Emacs with modal
editing.)
Anyway, JMHO. I think Emacs will serve you well throughout your
programming career. (Or any career that involves text. Emacs is
great for writing books... and email.)
When i was young i heard this:
A good hacker must be expert in 4 editors and 4 languages.
And have taken it to heart since then....
I routinely use vi(m), (x)emacs, eclipse , sed/awk/perl ( yeah .. they are text editors ).
IMHO, mastering a range of tools is essential. One should subject his brain to move
out of comfort zone every once in a while.
I now found it amazing that i have hundreds of key combinations at my fingertip , and rarely type key sequence of one into other.
I'm 21 and started using Emacs at 15, only moving away for Textmate/E in recent years. I personally can't stand IDEs, feeling they get in the way far more than they help. Give me a good straight-up text editor any day.
I'm 19, started using emacs last year, and I'm liking it. Even though I don't know how to use its "advanced" features yet, I'm comfortable with the fact that they exist and I could learn them when needed.
In my college, there shouldn't be much more than 5 students using Emacs or Vi, though.
Fear not, young programmer, and take courage from this Editor or IDE analysis. Powerful editors like Emacs will be around as long as there are language mavens. And IDE's will continue to serve the tool mavens. And each camp will continue to be amazed at how [un]productive the other is. ;-)
Well, I started using Emacs in college, and I'm only 30, so I think I count as part of the "Eclipse-loving generation".
I don't use it every day, but Emacs is certainly near the top of my tools list. (And much higher than Eclipse, I can tell you that.)
The first proper editor I used was Brief and then a number of IDE based ones before someone convinced me to try emacs (on Windows no less). I made the decision then that I was going to learn that one editor well and when I needed it to do something different I'd learn how to do it.
The real benefit of choosing one editor and sticking to it is consistency. Whatever language or task you're doing, if you're in your favourite editor, everything is easily remembered. Added to that the extensibility makes things possible that are often not on the slick IDEs.
Of course the downside is that your emacs session is a well crafted environment. If I don't have my .emacs loaded up it can seem like a foreign environment. Things work almost but not quite like I'm used to. Fortunately with DVCS systems my perfect environment is a git clone away.
I'm a university student age 19, but I started learning Emacs a good 2-3 years ago. I tried vi(m) for a bit, but I couldn't stand the modal editing model.
Prior to my introduction to Emacs, I was using Gedit and nano to do all my coding.
If you go to most grad schools, you will find your share of UNIX hackers who stick with emacs, so it's definitely there.
I'm 28 and switched from vim to emacs a month or so ago. I learnt a bit of emacs while learning lisp. I switched from vim because having compiler / debugger / shell integration made a lot of sense to me and I like the idea of the extensibility / customization.
I've got a few die-hard eclipse / intellij people I work with that are young and are rubbing their chins while thinking about making the switch. The buffer philosophy was almost enough to sell one person who was sick of tabs in IDEs.
It's not so much about age I don't think - those that are considering emacs are the ones that are forward thinking enough to realize that is has powerful enough features / ideas that the learning curve is / might be worth it.
I'm 22 year old emacs user and I cry whenever I have to leave it to do something on other IDEs.
I'm 21 and I use vim. It's a real step up from the other programming editors I had been using, and I would recommend anyone else in computer science courses to try it out.
I'm 23 and emacs was taught in our Operating Systems course as the "C editor you should use." I used it for the course, but have moved on to other IDEs that better suit my workflow and day to day development environment.
Edit Because my original post was not altogether helpful.
I used emacs through a command terminal inside of PuTTY and that is my extent of using it. I didn't mind it as an editor and got good enough with the shortcuts to be quite productive. I haven't really explored the emacs editor anymore than that because I was already using eclipse and really liked it.
Now, I use eclipse day to day because it is an extensible language that I have to develop with Java, ActionScript, JavaScript, PHP, CSS, HTML, and even Scheme. I also have a custom eclipse extension that I'm perfecting that helps me be more productive in my full time niche (WordPress development). Eclipse provides FTP and SSH services and I've been familiar with the interface for longer than any other IDE, and that is why I use it.
I was born in 1970*, but came (back) to programming about 6 years ago, starting with Visual Basic 6 (ay-yi-yi!). A co-worker would hard-code all his Perl in a text-editor (INCLUDING forms), which boggled my mind, but did not entrance. Slowly, I started using humble MS notepad for... notes while on the phone, open tasks throughout the day, etc. And slowly, I started wanting more. A number of other factors (desire to work closer to regexes, old desire to learn LISP [I came of age in the 80s, if you know what I mean]) lead me through a couple of editors, and finally to Emacs.
Now, I get frustrated in IDEs that I can't key-navigate and tweak to my heart's content.
*okay, so I may no longer be a "young people" -- but when I started using Emacs I was in my early-mid 30s, and identified as such.
I'm 26 and I'm using VIM for several years now for C++ development. All my team mates use either VIM or Emacs (50% vs 50%, we have great flames from time to time), our lead is also using VIM. It's a best choice for us on Solaris.
However for large MS APIs like DirectX I use VS... its sometimes pain to switch but it's much easier to tackle this kind of monster :)
I barely step out of my VIM these days and on those applications where I find myself forced into an IDE, I quickly remember why. I have become so accustomed to the VIM hotkeys for selection, replacement, folding, etc. that my productivity gets floored.
Like others, I rarely work in compiled languages anymore, so I've setup shortcuts that run my Perl/PHP paste the interpreters to find syntax errors. In some cases, I've even set up VIM to run available unit tests through the same interface. It's also very easy to alt-tab back to a browser (preferably on another monitor) and hit "Control-R" for a refresh, all without touching the mouse.
I'm 21 and I use vim for now 3 or 4 years...
I once tried emacs when one of my teacher told me it was better than Vim...but I prefered my workflow with vim...
I tried to use emacs last week because I had problem indenting html files...But my teamate lost me when he started talking about key combination or something like that. My guess is that vim or emacs are two great editor...It's better than most of the IDE I know.
Thumbs up to everyone.
I'm 20 and I started using Emacs last summer when I have to code c++ on linux, and Emacs was the only editor I can stand on openSUSE (Kate is horrible, horrible! - especially my work machine is kinda slow). Then I was won over; there is really nothing better in the world for a mouse-hater. Now I use emacs (yeah on Windows...) for all kind of thing including doing file operations with dired and playing tetris ;)
That being said I still code c# in Visual Studio (occasion switch to emacs for major refactoring and boilerplate work, which is much^100 easier in emacs). IF emacs has intellisense (that works) then I'll dump the text editor in VS studio (I will still use the GUI designer though, nothing replaces that); as of now, having to look up classes is too much a pain for me to code c#.NET in emacs.
I'm a 19 year old college student who uses Emacs - I started using it about a year ago and haven't looked back.
I've only been using emacs for about 10 years now. At one point I took a decided turn to learn it (and vi) to be more comfortable editing directly on servers.
When it comes to writing code quickly and with little red flags when the syntax is wrong in realtime, using an IDE is like wearing gloves when handling thorny plants: you don't have to be as careful. (It's also like using a word processor with automatic spelling fixes and grammar checks compared to using, well, emacs for writing.)
So, I mostly use Eclipse/Xcode/other-required-IDE except when it comes to quick changes, direct edits on a server, or other remote/fast editing scenarios.
What I haven't done is looked around to see if there are any good modes for emacs that allow it to provide such quick editing help as other IDEs (though, the default modes do help quite a bit, anyway -- this isn't raw text editing, really).
I also had a pleasant surprise recently when I realized much of the Mac OS UI can use emacs commands in a similar way to how unix command line editing can be done with emacs commands. How cool is that?
I am under 30 and I use emacs.
Currently, I has to interface with computer through software speech recognition.
Nothing beats emacs because various commands are easy to program for recognition and create aliases.
now, it took me some time to get comfortable with programming in elisp, but I think benefit was worth it. I have tried using eclipse, but there is something about emacs, particularly extensibility, that it's hard to replace.
Mostly I use gedit. Simple and sweet. I'm 20 and always hated IDEs (I got my start with Netbeans in high school).
Emacs is all right; it doesn't quite do everything I like jEdit to do, but I'm not interested in spending time writing macros and plug-ins for my editor - I like getting stuff done instead. If I needed my editor to do something that different, I'd get another editor or install someone else's plugin.
I've used jEdit, Visual Studio, notepad++, TextWrangler. I abhor VIM.
Ironic....
I use emacs full-time now. Several months after the above answer I was doing a lot of remote logins into Linux and nano got too constricting. And, yes, I've spent time writing macros and plug-ins for emacs. jEdit is still pretty good, but emacs is quite better. Still don't use vim(yet?).
I'm 17 and I started using Emacs when I was 14, and VIM when I was 15. I use Emacs for SLIME and ERC mostly now, preferring GVim for editing files and such.
Each time I approached a respected guru type about Emacs, they would warn me away. Most of them didn't like it, either. I took that as a clue.
OTOH, I was interested in TECO a long time ago (now you know my age), and I hear Emacs grew out of that. So, I still wonder...
You can have my copies of Eclipse, NetBeans and Visual Studio when you pry them from my cold, dead hands!
I tried to learn how to use Emacs when I started my degree, but I eventually gave up. Part of that is because I have a poor memory, and its keyboard shortcuts are unconventional compared to what I am use to.
I do almost all my coding in TextMate (which has been dubbed the Emacs of Macs). If I'm in a command-line environment then ViM does the trick.
I code J2me in Windows, where my company doesn't impose me on certain IDE. And guess what, I return to my Old friend, Emacs...
I am 31 now, and I first learning emacs ca 23. But, the situation makes me change IDE alots : Netbeans, VS.NET, Eclipse, etc.
You know, Emacs still beat other, in some perspective :)