What is the best document search engine (perhaps Plucene?) to integrate into Perl code that allows customizing and tuning the search algorithm?
You should also look at swish-e. Really fast, really easy to setup and really flexible. I've used it in lots of projects successfully and it has lots of CPAN support too:
Consider using KinoSearch instead. Then, read its tutorial.
Just to suggest something else: I've enjoyed sphinx. One of the next releases is supposed to get proper "real time updates"; but until then it's rebuilding its indexes very fast.
First up, seriously consider Lucene instead - it's much faster and the files it generates are more compatible with other implementations of lucene. There's a dependency on the clucene library but it's worth it if you can.
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Lucene
What platform? What resources are available? Is this monolithic or something that is deployed. Does this have to handle issues lke revision control as well?
Related
I'm a computer engineer student and i've got a basically simple assignment but i'd like to make it a little more interesting :). Basically I have to create a simple multiuser, online document versioning system using Java or .NET. Because I'm more a .NET guy I'm gonna use ASP.NET or Silverlight (it's not yet decided).
Anyway the intersting part: I want to use MongoDB to store the documents (they can be virtually anything, video, audio, simple MSOffice files, plain text), each version of them and the related metadata (which library, folder they're in etc). I'd like to put anything else, like users, permissions etc.(the specs are not yet completed) in to an ordinary relational database. The question is what do you think about this? Do you think this makes any sense or I'm just trying to over complicate the whole thing? Would it be simpler to use only mongodb for everything or leave the nosql thingy entirely out of it? Is there any conventions for this kind of stuff? :)
BTW. under any other circumstences I'd use some free, battle tested solution for doc versioning, but I have to design and implement this myself, and I'm trying to do it at least a little unconventionally :).
Thanks for every comment:), any help appreciated:)
Greets
If you were using something like Mongoid on Rails, this would be trivial. http://mongoid.org/docs/extras.html Look for Versioning. The ODM has it built in for you. I've yet to use Mongo in the .NET world, it's always been something like Raven, so I'm not sure if the libraries for it easily work like Mongoid does.
Mongo handles relational data as well. Things you want normalized (e.q. user records) can have references to other documents in the DB. And of course what ever magic document you want to store works as well.
Doing things unconventionnaly is usually a good way to discover new ways (better ways ?) so it's a good idea.
Using mongodb is a good idea too because of the schemaless property.
USing a relationa database for storing extra information is quite weird and will add more complexity without any advantage (IMO)
I'm net-java developer with some small projects implemented. I'm going to start a new project which is portal with many typical features (posts, comments, messaging, users, catalog, news, galleries, etc).
I believe the best solution would be use any mature CMS (joomla, drupal...) and customize it where needed. The problem is that I'm not familiar with PHP (CMS written on PHP has far better set of features, plugins, community, information I believe) I'm not planning to learn PHP, I want to improve my java-net skills.
So the question for me is:
write all by myself, improving my programming skills and risking to finish my project in relatively long period
on the other hand
I could spend some time learning tools and languages, which I think while, I don't need in the future and more likely finish my project in some shorter time
what would you advise?
Learning another language will not hurt you, and as most of the differences are in syntax and supporting libraries, you would be surprised at how quickly you can pick up a new language.
Your choice should be on what language is best for the task, not simply the one you know.
So, my suggestion is - learn PHP and go with a mature CMS.
A LOT of effort goes into developing a CMS, so writing your own will likely take some time. Put together a project plan and work out how long it would take you to develop something from scratch, then do some research on existing CMS packages and how they fit your needs.
I'm a .NET developer but have used Joomla in the past - it's actually quite easy to put together a website even if you're not too familiar with PHP.
Better yet, find a CMS package in your preferred language - they oughta be some out there.
i.e.
http://java-source.net/open-source/content-managment-systems
Learning new tools is seldom a waste of time. Especially not when it comes to such well known and world wide spread languages such as php. I would say it's best using the tools most suited for the project you're up to, rather than reinventing the wheel.
You should take a good look at your requirements. If you're sure you can get them all from a CMS, that makes most sense. Take a good look at the compatibility and reliability of all components.
Otherwise, you might be better served by a .net or java CMS.
Writing your own CMS without having extensive experience in the current available ones is not going to lead to a good result, except for you learning some programming skills.
If you don't have a "due date" for your project write it by yourself.
Or take a look at http://www.opencms.org/en/ ;)
There are a lot of opensource CMS written in Java ;)
Even if you don't write in PHP again, the benefit of knowing another programming language is going to give you some valuable perspective on net-java.
The task of learning a new language is going to be an asset. Learning to learn something. Identifying what you need to know and how to find the answers is a transferable skill.
Your job will be to complete your project in the most efficient manner with the highest quality output practical. Use the tool that is going to best help you achieve this. The language it's written in should be largely irrelevant.
Hello I'm trying to improve my ruby knowledge by reading The Ruby Programming Language book. Reading Coders at work I saw that lot of the interviewees suggest to dive into a project source code
to learn best practices
to be aware of bad habits
and of course to take new inspirations for how to do things.
I decided to pick a project as more self contained as I could find. My choice was Sinatra since It's 1000 LOC.
Is It a good project to learn?
Do you suggest another one more simple (i.e. less LOCs)?
I've tried to see rails machinery before but I came out scared from It.
I'm not that much into Ruby (although I've played a little bit with Sinatra), but I want to say that the Coders at Work advice should rather be read as "read source code not only from one project, but from many". We learn best by comparison. That's also how we're able to spot patterns and abstract them away.
So maybe you can choose some topic from Sinatra, see how it is implemented, then compare it with the way it's done in Rails.
The more sources you consider the better you understand a particular subject.
Reading the Sinatra code is a good start. You might also want to read up on Rack, the HTTP interface Sinatra uses. Not necessarily for coding practices but just to understand how Sinatra fits in the whole stack.
Adding to Ionuț's answer, Rails also uses Rack, so if you decide to look at both Sinatra and Rails, you can compare how they use Rack.
Try typing in gem list to list all the gems you've installed. Pick one that's relevant to your domain.
I learn best by taking apart something that already does something and figuring out why decisions were made in which manner.
Recently I've started working with Perl's CGI::Application framework, but found i don't really get along well with the documentation (too little information on how to best structure an application with it). There are some examples of small applications on the cgi-app website, but they're mostly structured such that they demonstrate a small feature, but contain mostly of code that one would never actually use in production. Other examples are massively huge and would require way too much time to dig through. And most of them are just stuff that runs on cgiapp, but isn't open source.
As such I am looking for something that has most base functionality like user logins, db access, some processing, etc.; is actually used for something but not so big that it would take hours to even set them up.
Does something like that exist or am i out of luck?
CGI::Application tends to be used for small, rapid-development web applications (much like Dancer, Maypole and other related modules). I haven't seen any real examples of open-source web apps built on top of it, though perhaps I'm not looking hard enough.
You could look at Catalyst. The wiki has a list of Catalyst-powered software and there are a large number of apps there - poke around, see if you like the look of the framework. Of this, this is Perl, so some of those apps will be using Template::Toolkit, some will use HTML::Mason... still, you'll get a general idea.
Try looking at Miril CMS. Although I don't know in which state it is.
I am the same with code, and had the same request. When I did not find a solution I created my own. which is https://github.com/alexxroche/Notice
I hope that it is a good solution to this request.
Notice demonstrates:
CGI::Application
CGI::Application::Plugin::ConfigAuto
CGI::Application::Plugin::AutoRunmode
CGI::Application::Plugin::DBH
CGI::Application::Plugin::Session;
CGI::Application::Plugin::Authentication
CGI::Application::Plugin::Redirect
CGI::Application::Plugin::DBIC::Schema
CGI::Application::Plugin::Forward
CGI::Application::Plugin::TT
It comes with an example mysql schema, but because of DBIC::Schema it can be used with PostgreSQL, (or anything else that DBIx::Class supports.)
I use Notice in all of my real life applications since 2007. The version in github is everything except the branding and the content.
Check out the Krang CMS.
I'm looking at introducing multi-lingual support to a mature CGI application written in Perl. I had originally considered rolling my own solution using a Perl hash (stored on disk) for translation files but then I came across a CPAN module which appears to do just what I want (i18n).
Does anyone have any experience with internationalization (specifically the i18n CPAN module) in Perl? Is the i18n module the preferred method for multi-lingual support or should I reconsider a custom solution?
Thanks
There is a Perl Journal article on software localisation. It will provide you with a good idea of what you can expect when adding multi-lingual support. It's beautifully written and humourous.
Specifically, the article is written by the folks who wrote and maintain Locale::Maketext, so I would recommend that module simply based upon the amount of pain it is clear the authors have had to endure to make it work correctly.
If you have the time then do take a look at the way the I18N is done in the Jifty framework - although initially quite confusing it is very elegant and usable.
They overload _ so that you can use _("text to translate") anywhere in the code. These strings are then translated using Locale::Maketext as normal.
What makes it really powerful is that they defer the translation until the string is needed using Scalar::Defer so that you can start adding the strings at any time, even before you know which language they will be translated into. For example in config files etc. This really make I18N easy to work with.