I'm starting out in iPhone development, and I'm trying to do a Contacts-style controller to add items to a table. I've got the two controllers designed, but I can't seem to figure out how to pass data between them. How can I get data from the modal controller to its parent?
Just trying to call methods on parentViewController won't work (and results in compiler warnings and crashes). I've considered moving the data out of the controller itself (which is going to happen anyway, I'm just trying to keep things as simple as possible for now), but even then I still have to somehow tell the parent view to refresh its data. Again, how can I do this?
I've considered moving the data out of the controller itself (which is going to happen anyway
I think now may be the time to follow that consideration and create a separate "ContactList" model object to store your data.
Your modal view controller just adds new "Contacts" into the "ContactList".
Your TableViewController should observe the same "ContactList". As items are added/removed to/from the "ContactList" your TableViewController will simply add and remove rows from its tableView.
In this way you will keep each ViewController independent, your code will be more flexible and adding/removing single rows will be much more efficient than reloading an entire tableView.
You either keep a link to the sub view you create and ask it for data that has changed on return, or else ad yourself as a delegate of a subview and have it call you back directly (which does work if you have a valid reference).
I had the same question and found this sample code: http://developer.apple.com/iphone/library/samplecode/LocateMe/Introduction/Intro.html
Helped me a ton and was pretty easy to figure out from the code.
In short, use delegate.
I would suggest you have a look at Lecture 11: Text input, Presenting content modally (May 6) - iPhone App Programming course offered by Stanford. Search for it on iTunes U.
Download this sample app if you want to know how to implement delegate: http://www.stanford.edu/class/cs193p/downloads/11-Pickers.zip
Related
I have a very large form to build in my ipad application and I'm note sure which approach( between create multiple views in or multiple viewcontrollers ) to follow. Well, I have decided to split may form in logical sections, so I want use a splitviewcontroller with a root( a tableviewcontroller with the sections) and multipleviecontrollers for each sections. When the user select a row in tableview I will show the correspondent viewcontroller. I'm saving a reference for each viewcontroller in my app_delegate and the app_delegate also is the responsible for change the viewcontrollers. Is this the best approach? There is other approach to follow? About the multiple view I was thinking to put multiple view in the same xib file and then choose based in tag as the use tap the row in rootviewcontroller's tableview.
Thanks in advance. And sorry for my bad english.. Learning!
I will say this on the subject: currently, having multiple view controllers on the screen at the same time can be problematic if you're not using one of Apple's existing classes, such as a UISplitViewController.
The main issue is that important events your view controllers will want to respond to (rotation events, etc) won't be passed down to them. It's not a huge pain, it's just something to need to take into account - you'd typically create your own parent view controller that could pass these events down to its children.
Now, you are using a split view controller, so alls well on that front. There is no provided way for detail and master controllers in a split view controller to communicate with each other, but Apple recommend you employ a standard delegation pattern. If your application is fairly simple this could certainly happen in your app delegate as you do now.
If you're targeting iOS 5 only there are some changes that are relevant regarding multiple controllers on the screen at the same time, but I can't discuss them on here because of the NDA. You should go to Apple's developer forums (devforums.apple.com) to learnmore.
Sounds like I'm trying to do the same thing as you (large insurance forms here, how about your project?) Unfortunately I can't help out as you're a bit ahead of me. I've been able to flip back and forth between 8 detail views by tapping on the 8 rows in my UITableViewController, without keeping a reference to either the current or previous one anywhere. The data I enter into various TextFields stays where it should.
I currently have a xxxViewController.h/.m and corresponding .xib file for each detail view. That's an awful lot of code, but I couldn't see any other way to do it. Now I'm having a problem getting my button pressed handlers to fire. Also I've still got to put a database behind these screens.
Were you able to overcome your issue?
Thanks,
Jeff in Alabama
I have a program that displays a list (a TableView).
When the user clicks an item, it's detail is shown.
On the detail view, the user can ask to modify it so a modify window is shown.
Here, the user can ask to delete the item.
I would like at this time return to the list with the item deleted from the list and from the data source.
There may be thousands of methods to do this, but I wonder which is the best / good one.
Could you help me, and/or give me a good reference to read about this ?
I think he ask how to get from view number 3 back to first view.
Then you can put your three views inside a UINavigationController and call on the last view popToRootViewControllerAnimated:
at least Two options:
Delegation - Create a protocol called something like: TableDetailModifierDelegat
and add methods like modifierDidChangedItem:(id)item
or modifierDidDeleteItem:(id)item
and to the modifying view controller add instance variable id so when you done editing or deleting you will call the appropriate methods.
of course you will need to make your table view controller implement the protocol you created. if you modified or deleted an item you should update your data source and reload the data to the table.
also pass the Table View Controller as the delegate when creating the Modifying View Controller.
Passing The Data Model.
This is much more simple to implement.
you can simply pass your data model to the modifying view controller, and make the changes directly to the data model.
You should keep the data model as Instance Variable in the modifying view controller.
when you done, dont forget to reload the data to your table.
In this instance, you could simply remove the data from the data source the UITableView is using and then call the reloadData method on the table. (As you're editing the data in question, you'll presumably have a suitable method/reference by which to delete it.)
As a bit of reading, I'd recommend Apple's Table View Programming Guide for iOS - this provides a lot of useful background information.
I'm diving into iOS development and am getting familiar with navigation view controllers. I'm trying to build a simple app with a table view that allows me to add objects to it. So far, I have a table view with an add "+" button in the nav bar that allows me to load my CreateObjectView and display it modally so the user can define the new object, but when they click the save button, I don't know how to send that object data back to the parent view that created the CreateObjectView that contains the object data.
When I create the child view (CreateObjectView), I could pass into it a pointer to the current view before I push it onto the nav stack, but this just feels dirty and circular.
I was reading about protocols and delegates and I could use that approach as well, but it also feels circular.
This question seems like it would be a common design issue to any tableview-based or nav-based app, how should I probably access the view that is one level up from my current view in a nav-based iOS app?
Thanks so much in advance for all your help!
It feels circular at first, but it is the right way. Before the UINavigationController pushes the new view controller you should set the delegate to the current view controller - assuming that's the object you wish to communicate with. Of course you could set it somewhere else instead, such as to a central Core Data handler. Then when you need to communicate call the delegate with the method you have defined. I've done several navigation apps like this after seeing Apple's cookbook example, and it really works well.
I'm learning how to develop my own iPhone apps but I'm having a tough time understanding certain concepts.
First, am i right to say that for every view, there must be a view controller for it? And for every view controller, must there be a delegate for it?
Also, what is the role of mainWindow.nib? Most of the tutorials that i've read don't seem to touch that nib at all. What always happens is the setting up of a NavigationController as the root controller, which pushes another ViewController onto the stack and this ViewController will have another nib associated with it.
So can i assume that i can safely ignore the main window nib?
It's all about MVC (Model View Controller), innit?
The Model, well that's up to you - what does your app do? Think of it as the backend, the engine of your app, free of the cruft of font size decisions and touch events.
The View, Apple pretty much wrote that for you. You use their Textfields and tables and imageViews. You assemble them together using Interface Builder into your GUI (packaged as a .nib). You rarely, if ever need to subclass the standard view elements (in a game you want a custom View to draw to, as all your drawing is probably custom). You can break different parts of your GUI into different .nib files if this helps you manage them. It's entirely up to you.
The Controller, so you have probably got some work todo to enable your GUI to represent your model. You need Some Controllers. How many? However many is manageable by you. If you had a view containing 2 subviews would they each need a view controller? Nah, probably not. How complicated is your code to hook up the view to the model?
Some GUI patterns are so common that Apple even wrote the Controller code for you. EG the controller for a UINavigationBar, UINavigationController. So, if your app has hierarchical views that you need to navigate around and you need to display a navigation bar you can use an instance of UINavigationController instead of writing your own class. Yay!
Surely tho, the UINavigationController code (or any other viewController) can't magically know how to integrate with our model, with our view, can it? NO, it can't. In general in Cocoa if there is some class of object that mostly works off the shelf but also has optionally configurable behavoir - allowing us to tailor it to our needs - it is done by Delegation. ie Instead of subclassing UINavigationController we tell the specific instance of it where to find (for want of a better term) it's custom behavoir.
Why? Let's say you have a navigationController, a tableView and a textfield. UINavigationController mostly take care of your navigation needs but you have to have a crazy QUACK sound play each time the user moves to a new view. UITableView is mostly exactly everything you need from a table, EXCEPT you really want the third row in the table on the front page be twice the height of the other rows. And the standard, off -the-shelf UITextField pretty much takes care of your textfield needs EXCEPT you need your textfield to only be editable when the user is facing North. One way to handle this would be to create 3 new classes, a custom UINavigationController, a custom tableView and a custom textfield, and to use these instead. With delegation we could use the classes as they are and have one object be the delegate of all 3 instances - much cleaner.
Delegation is mostly optional, the docs will tell you when, and it's down to you and whether you need that custom behavoir.
I've Created a UITableViewController subclass. Do I only need one controller? Do I just instantiate multiple instances of that one subclass?
The iPhone App I'm building will start with a Table of a list of people. If the user taps a person, a new table will be pushed in with a list of Companies they've worked for. If the user then taps a company, they'll see a list of Job Positions. And if they tap a position they'll see a list of people holding those positions.
This could go on forever, and the user could always back up the list.
The App Delegate instantiates the Navigation Controller and the Table View Controller and then pushes it onto the Navigation Controller. But when a user taps a row, now the TVC is creating another TVC.
Is that right or should the
AppDelegate be instantiating all
TVC's? Or does it work out since
they all get pushed onto the Nav
Controller anyway?
Does each Table View instance
need to have a different name or can
they all be called 'mainTVC' or
something like that?
tableViewController *mainTVC = [[tableViewController alloc] init];
Won't I run out of memory? Do i
need to start dropping Table Views
when they're 2 or 3 levels away from
current, and then re-create it if
the user backs up to it?
No need to create multiple TableView's, what I've done in the past is simply re-bind to a different datasource. So keep one TableView and have a datasource for people, then companies, etc...
I'd create a view controller for each type. Presumably you'll want to have special display characteristics like a custom tableview cell to display job positions slightly differently then you would people names.
Other then that, #Ben Gottlieb's answer should work quite well. Use lots of view controllers and handle the didReceiveMemoryWarning: method.
One more thing, if the user drills down so far that you want to say they'll never go all the way back (sort of like having an undo stack) you can use the setViewControllers:animated: UINavigationController method to reset the stack to a certain size (say 15 to implement an 'undo buffer' of 15). With this method you can make sure that the first view controller is always your root view controller and the rest are all drilldown instances.
Option number (2) looks good. You can push quite a lot of view controllers onto the stack before memory becomes an issue. The system will clean up most of the heavyweight memory hogs (ie, the views) in the didReceiveMemoryWarning: method. If you're creating a lot of in-memory structures, you may want to clean them up in that method (be sure to call the inherited method).
To answer your third question, as long as you don't have huge data stores in memory, memory shouldn't be an issue. You SHOULD NOT under any circumstances "drop" tableviews - this would lead to crashes(and there's no way to do non-FILO additions/removals to the navigation stack anyway). Under memory pressure, you should only free "nonessential" items like caches. However, this shouldn't be an issue.
Also, if you have more than 3 or so levels, chances are you need to rethink your UI. If users are drilling down 10 levels, it will be tedious to navigate the stack back.