GWT compiles the Java source into Javascript, and names the files according to a hash of their contents. I'm getting a new set of files every compile, because the javascript contents are changing, even when I don't change the source at all.
The files are different for OBF and PRETTY output, but if I set it to DETAILED, they're no longer different every compile. In PRETTY, I can see that all/most of the differences between compiles are in the value parameters for typeId. For example, a funciton called initValues() is called with different values for it's typeId parameter.
In PRETTY mode, the differences you see are allocation of Java Classes to TypeIds. It's how GWT manages run time type checking. You'll notice a table at the bottom of each script essentially mapping each typeId to all compatible superclasses. This is how GWT can still throw ClassCastException in JavaScript (though you should run into this very rarely!).
In OBF mode, the differences are due to the allocation of minified function names.
In both cases, it's due to the order the compiler is processing the code. Some internal symbol tables might be using a non-ordered collection store symbols for processing. It can happen for lots of reasons.
As far as I know, GWT will compile a new version every time you compile it, this is a feature ;)
You can use ant to control it though, so that it only builds the GWT section of your application if it's actually changed:
http://wiki.shiftyjelly.com/index.php/GWT#Use_The_Power_of_Ant_to_Build_Changes_Only
Related
As far as I know current usage for compiler plugin is to define the attribute for compiler to recognize and then the compiler will invoke the code defined and registered in the plugin.
I am thinking if it is possible to build a compiler plugin that have a post processor. I can some how first register the structs encountered by proc_macro_derive in a data structure within the plugin, then the post processor can generate code according to the plugin data structure populated before.
My intention is to generate a symbol table form derived structs, so I can do some experiment for dynamic typing in rust. I am not sure if it is possible to achieved in compile time without manually register them one by one in runtime.
I've been given the task of researching whether one can use Powershell to automate the managing of References in VB6 application and then compile it's projects afterwards.
There are 3 projects. I requirement is to remove a specific reference in each project. Then, compile projects from bottom up (server > client > interface) and add reference back in along the way. (remove references, compile server.dll >add client reference to server.dll, compile client.dll > add interface reference to client.dll, compile interface.exe)
I'm thinking no, but I was still given the task of finding out for sure. Of course, where does one go to find this out? Why here of course, StackOverflow.
References are stored in the project .VBP files which are just text files. A given reference takes up exactly one line of the file.
For example, here is a reference to DAO database components:
Reference=*\G{00025E01-0000-0000-C000-000000000046}#5.0#0#C:\WINDOWS\SysWow64\dao360.dll#Microsoft DAO 3.6 Object Library
The most important info is everything to the left of the path which contains the GUID (i.e., the unique identifier of the library, more or less). The filespec and description text are unimportant as VB6 will update that to whatever it finds in the registry for the referenced DLL.
An alternate form of reference is for GUI controls, such as:
Object={BDC217C8-ED16-11CD-956C-0000C04E4C0A}#1.1#0; tabctl32.ocx
which for whatever reason never seem to have a path anyway. Most likely you will not need to modify this type of reference, because it would almost certainly break forms in the project which rely on them.
So in your Powershell script, the key task would be to either add or remove the individual reference lines mentioned in the question. Unless you are using no form of binary compatibility, the GUID will remain stable. Therefore, you could essentially hardcode the strings you need to add/remove.
Aside from all that, its worth thinking through why you need to take this approach at all. Normally to build a VB6 solution it is totally unnecessary to add/remove references along the way. Also depending on your choice of deployment techniques, you are probably using either project or binary compatibility which tends to keep the references stable.
Lastly, I'll mention that there are existing tools such as Kinook's Visual Build Pro which already know how to build groups of VB6 projects and if using a 3rd party tool like that is an option, could save you a lot of work.
I use Delphi 7 and I encountered a very annoying thing. One of my projects has gone quite large and a form I used in one of the units became obsolete. I decided to get rid of it. It seems I can't. The IDE always asks for .dfm file, no matter what i tried (and I think i was very thorough).
Here's what I did:
First, I used the IDE's Remove from Project to remove the whole thing from the project. Then I commented out all sections that used anything in that unit and compiled, bulit and ran the project. It went without any errors or warnings. I saved all files and closed the Delphi IDE, started up a Notepad and removed the form's declaration from the unit, then deleted every associated file, except the .pas (with this, it became like any other regular unit).
Then I searched every file in the project's folder with Total Commander to see if any of them contained the name of the removed unit. None did.
I started Delphi and loaded the project.
With this I felt satisfied and added the unit's name to the uses list and pressed Compile.
IT STILL LOOKS FOR THE DAMNED DFM!!
If someone knows, please explain this to me. What did I miss?
If the compiler is looking for the .dfm file it will be because the compiler is including a unit that contains this:
{$R *.dfm}
That is what tells the compiler to link the .dfm file with the same name as the unit.
It seems likely that you still refer to the unit somewhere in your project. The compiler must be finding either a .pas file or a compiled .dcu file for your unit. Search for all files named <UnitName>.pas and <UnitName>.dcu. Remove these files. Then you will encounter compiler errors whenever you have code that attempts to use those units. Deal with those by removing the unit from the uses clause that names it. Then you should be done.
I am working on an Eclipse JDT plugin that requires parsing large numbers of source files,
so I am hoping to use the batch method ASTParser.createASTs(). The parsing executes without errors, but within the CompilationUnit instances it produces, many of the org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.SourceTypeBinding instances have had their scope field set to null. This setting to null is occurring in the CompilationUnitDeclaration.cleanUp() methods, which are invoked on a worker thread that is unrelated to my plugin's code (i.e., my plugin's classes do not appear on the cleanUp() method call stack).
My parsing code looks like this (all rawSources are within the same project):
ASTParser parser = ASTParser.newParser(AST.JLS3);
parser.setResolveBindings(true);
parser.setStatementsRecovery(true);
parser.setBindingsRecovery(true);
parser.setIgnoreMethodBodies(false);
parser.setProject(project);
parser.createASTs(rawSources.values().toArray(new ICompilationUnit[0]), new String[0], this, deltaAnalyzer.progressMonitor);
Alternatively, I can execute the parsing this way, and no such problems occur:
for (ICompilationUnit source : rawSources.values())
{
parser.setResolveBindings(true);
parser.setStatementsRecovery(true);
parser.setBindingsRecovery(true);
parser.setIgnoreMethodBodies(false);
parser.setProject(project);
parser.setSource(source);
CompilationUnit ast = (CompilationUnit)parser.createAST(deltaAnalyzer.progressMonitor);
parsedSources.add(deltaAnalyzer.createParsedSource(source, ast));
}
This issue occurs in both Helios and Indigo (the very latest release build). I filed a bug in Eclipse Bugzilla, but if anyone knows of a way to work around this--or if I am using the API wrong--I would greatly appreciate your help.
Byron
Without knowing exactly what your exception is, I can still offer 2 suggestions:
Have a look at org.eclipse.jdt.ui.SharedASTProvider. If you are not making any changes to ASTs, this class may provide a more robust way of getting the ASTs.
Play around with some of the settings that you are using. Do you really need bindingsRecovery set to true? What about statementRecovery? Setting these to false may help you.
I have a workspace built using MS-Visual Studio 2005 with all C code.In that i see many functions which are not called but they are still compiled(they are not under any compile time macro to disable them from compiling).
I set following optimization settings for the MS-VS2005 project to remove that unused code:-
Optimization level - /Ox
Enable whole program optimization - /GL
I tried both Favor speed /Ot and Favor Size /Os
Inspite of all these options, when i see the linker generated map file, I see the symbols(unsed functions) names present in the map file.
Am I missing something? I want to completely remove the unused code.
How do I do this?
The compiler compiles C files one-at-a-time. Therefore, while compiling a C-file that does contains an unused function, the compiler cannot be sure that it will not be called from another file and hence it will compile that function too. However, if that function were declared as static (file-scope), then the compiler would know it is not used and hence remove it.
Even with whole program optimization, I think it would still not be done since the compilation could be for a library.
Linkers do something similar to what you are looking for. If your code links against a library containing multiple objects, then any objects that do not contain functions used by your code (directly or indirectly) would not be included in the final executable.
One option would be to separate your code into individual libraries and object files.
PS - This is just my guess. The behavior of the compiler (with whole program optimization) or linker essentially depends on the design choices of that particular compiler or linker
On our projects we have a flag set under the project properties\Linker\Refrences. We set it to Eliminate Unreferenced Data (/OPT:REF), according to the description this is supposed to remove function calls or data that are never used. I am just going by the description, I have never tested this or worked with it. But I just happened to see it within the last hour and figured it might be something you could try.