How do I get both source and target navigation property names for a given RelatedEnd?
Assuming I need the target reference given a navigation property called 'prop'
// Get all related ends and find the reference for this FK
IEnumerable<IRelatedEnd> relEnds =
((IEntityWithRelationships)position).RelationshipManager.GetAllRelatedEnds();
EntityReference er =
relEnds.First(re => re.TargetRoleName == prop) as EntityReference;
You don't need an entity instance.
Because the line below gives the NavigatioProperty List.
var list=this.ObjectContext.EntitiesName.EntitySet.ElementType.NavigationProperties
And the below line returns the list of dependent properties. It can be more than one property.
list[0].GetDependentProperties()
https://stackoverflow.com/a/4988123/413032
Related
Is there a method to call in Entity Framework to see the data that has changed (in memory) and would be written to disk when SaveChanges is called?
I'd like to display something to the user indicating that there is an unsaved change. Table level is ok, but I'd prefer to know if a particular field/column has an unsaved change.
For example, add this method to your context:
IEnumerable<(string Key, string Entity, EntityState state,
IEnumerable<(string Property, object OriginalValue, object CurrentValue)> Properties)> GetChanges()
{
var states = new[] { EntityState.Added, EntityState.Modified, EntityState.Deleted };
return this.ChangeTracker.Entries().Where(c => states.Contains(c.State))
.Select(entry =>
(
string.Join(",", entry.Metadata.FindPrimaryKey()
.Properties.Select(p => p.PropertyInfo.GetValue(entry.Entity))),
entry.Metadata.ClrType.Name,
entry.State,
entry.Properties
.Where(p => p.IsModified == (p.EntityEntry.State == EntityState.Modified))
.Select(prop =>
(
prop.Metadata.PropertyInfo.Name,
prop.OriginalValue,
prop.CurrentValue
)
)));
}
It returns added, modified or deleted entity objects, listing their class names (not table names) and their properties, with original and current values. The key values are also included to be able to make a distinction between objects of the same type.
Of modified entities only the changed properties are listed.
Simply enumerate the ChangeTracker.Entries to examine all the tracked entities, and their EntityEntry.State.
Im new to Caché and got a problem: I want to save a value into the Relation Column in Class B via Class A and thats not working ...
Currently I am doing it like this
In Class A:
set Obj1 = ##class(This.Is.Class.B).%New()
set Obj1.PID = ..id
set Obj1.PName = ..name
set status = Obj1.%Save(0)
Its saving the PName into Class B but not the PID which I defined as Relationship [One to Many] in Class B
Connection objects in a relationship are bidirectional. But in any case, you can't just set id to such property. You should set object or insert object depending on which side you want to do it. In your case you do it like
do obj1.PIDSetObjectId(..id)
To get more information read the documentation.
I've seen sample code for reading an Entity Framework EdmProperty's StoreGeneratedPattern property (computed, identity, or none) in at least 2 places (here & here), but it doesn't work with my model. My context is an ObjectContext, the version is EF5; maybe this code broke with EF5? When I look at the properties for this property/column in the model, it shows identity.
Here is my code:
using ( var context = new MyApplicationEntities() )
{
var entityType = ( (EntityConnection)context.Connection )
.GetMetadataWorkspace() // can't call context.MetadataWorkspace - storage model will not be present
.GetType( "MyEntityTypeWithIdentityColumn", "MyApplicationModel.Store", DataSpace.SSpace ) as EntityType;
EdmMember identityColumn = entityType.Members["MyIdentityColumn"];
Facet item;
// All I get here for Facets is Nullable & DefaultValue
if ( identityColumn.TypeUsage.Facets.TryGetValue( "StoreGeneratedPattern", false, out item ) )
{
var value = ( (StoreGeneratedPattern)item.Value ) == StoreGeneratedPattern.Identity;
}
}
Pawel's question led me to examine the edmx and discover the answer. I said in my question that I could look at the model (UI) and see that the column in question was an identity column. In fact, it was not. In any case I expected the StoreGeneratedPattern property to exist since the enumeration contains all possible values (Identity, Computed, None).
My actual goal was to detect all entities whose primary key column/property was not identity.
I discovered through subsequent testing that the StoreGeneratedPattern property only exists for identity & computed; if the column is not store generated, it doesn't exist (StoreGeneratedPattern.None is never referenced). Thus, the sample code above is fine as long as it's modified to handle the absence of the property (which seems strange to me).
I am trying to update a resource as follows:
public void Update(Resource resource) {
Resource _resource = _resourceRepository.First(r => r.Id == resource.Id);
_resource.Content = resource.Content;
_resource.Description = resource.Description;
_resource.Locked = resource.Locked;
_resource.Name = resource.Name;
_resource.Restrictions.ToList().ForEach(r => _resource.Restrictions.Remove(r));
foreach (Restriction restriction in resource.Restrictions)
_resource.Restrictions.Add(new Restriction { Property = _propertyRepository.First(p => p.Id == restriction.Property.Id), Value = restriction.Value });
} // Update
I have something similar, and working, to create a resource with only one difference: I do not remove the Restrictions.
I am getting the following error:
A relationship from the
'Restrictions_ResourceId_FK'
AssociationSet is in the 'Deleted'
state. Given multiplicity constraints,
a corresponding 'Restrictions' must
also in the 'Deleted' state.
What am I missing?
EF did exactly what you told him to do. Removing item from parent object navigation collection only removes relation between parent and child object. It means it only sets ResourceId in Restriction to null which is not allowed by your entity model.
If your Restriction can't exist without related resource you should model relation as Identifying. It means that Restriction primary key will also contain ResourceId column. When you then remove restriction from parent object collection, EF will delete restriction instead of setting ResourceId to null.
I was having similar problems since the opposite of Add() obviously seemed Remove().
You must use the DeleteObject() function instead to delete child items.
Thanks.
I've a collection of a class' properties and would like to update each one's value by iterating over the collection through the index.
1) I create the collection of properties this way
private PropertyInfo[] GetPropertiesOfMyClass()
{
Type myType = (typeof(myClass));
PropertyInfo[] PropertyInfoArray = myType.GetProperties(
BindingFlags.Public |
BindingFlags.Instance);
return PropertyInfoArray;
}
2)Now, I'd like to set up the value of each one depending on the index this way
public void UpdateProperty(MyClass instanceOfMyClass, string valueToUpdate, int index)
{
//TODO:
//1. Get an individual property from the GetPropertyOfMyClass() using index
//2. Update the value of an individual property of the instanceOfMyClass
}
I'd like to be able to call UpdateProperty from a Controller like this:
UpdateProperty(instanceOfMyClass, valueToUpdate, indexOfTheProperty);
Honestly, I do not know how to involve the instanceOfMyClass in the game as GetProperty only plays with myClass.
Since I saw that I can use Name, PropertyType, ... to get information on the property. So, I've tried also GetPropertyOfMyClass()[index].SetValue(...), but I was lost in the arguments of its constructor, so I abandoned.
What I want is to be able to update the value of a property in my collection just by using the index.
Thanks for helping
Your guess was correct. You use SetValue() to update the value - this is how to do it:
GetPropertyOfMyClass()[index].SetValue( instanceOfMyClass, valueToUpdate, null);
The last argument can be null:
Optional index values for indexed properties. This value should be null for non-indexed properties.