I'm trying to find some info on the best and most common RESTful url actions.
for example, what url do you use for displaying the details of an item, for editing the item, updating, etc.
/question/show/<whatever>
/question/edit/<whatever>
/question/update/<whatever> (this is the post back url)
/question/list (lists the questions)
hmm. thanks to anyone helping out :)
Use URLs to specify your objects, not your actions:
Note what you first mentioned is not RESTful:
/questions/show/<whatever>
Instead, you should use your URLs to specify your objects:
/questions/<question>
Then you perform one of the below operations on that resource.
GET:
Used to obtain a resource, query a list of resources, and also to query read-only information on a resource.
To obtain a question resource:
GET /questions/<question> HTTP/1.1
Host: whateverblahblah.com
To list all question resources:
GET /questions HTTP/1.1
Host: whateverblahblah.com
POST:
Used to create a resource.
Note that the following is an error:
POST /questions/<new_question> HTTP/1.1
Host: whateverblahblah.com
If the URL is not yet created, you should not be using POST to create it while specifying the name. This should result in a resource not found error because does not exist yet. You should PUT the resource on the server first. You could argue that by creating a new question, you are also updating the /questions resource as it would now return one more question in its list of questions.
You should do something like this to create a resource using POST:
POST /questions HTTP/1.1
Host: whateverblahblah.com
Note that in this case the resource name is not specified, the new objects URL path would be returned to you.
DELETE:
Used to delete the resource.
DELETE /questions/<question> HTTP/1.1
Host: whateverblahblah.com
PUT:
Used to create a resource, or overwrite it, while you specify the resources URL.
For a new resource:
PUT /questions/<new_question> HTTP/1.1
Host: whateverblahblah.com
To overwrite an existing resource:
PUT /questions/<existing_question> HTTP/1.1
Host: whateverblahblah.com
...Yes, they are the same. PUT is often described as the 'edit' method, as by replacing the entire resource with a slightly altered version, you have edited what clients will GET when they next do.
Using REST in HTML forms:
The HTML5 spec defines GET and POST for the form element.
The method content attribute is an enumerated attribute with the following keywords and states:
The keyword GET, mapping to the state GET, indicating the HTTP GET method.
The keyword POST, mapping to the state POST, indicating the HTTP POST method.
Technically, the HTTP specification does not limit you to only those methods. You are technically free to add any methods you want, in practice though, this is not a good idea. The idea is that everyone knows that you use GET to read the data, so it will confuse matters if you decide to instead use READ. That said...
PATCH:
This is a method that was defined in a formal RFC. It is designed to used for when you wish to send just a partial modification to a resource, it would be used much like PUT:
PATCH /questions/<new_question> HTTP/1.1
Host: whateverblahblah.com
The difference is PUT has to send the entire resource, no matter how big it is compared to what's actually changed, whilst PATCH you can send just the changes.
Assuming /questions/10 is a valid question then the method is used to interact with it.
POST to add to it
PUT to create or replace it
GET to view/query it
and DELETE to well.. delete it.
The url doesn't change.
I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that you what you mean is what are standard controllers for MVC when you say "RESTful" urls, since your examples could be considered non-"RESTful" (see this article).
Since Rails really popularized the URL style you seem to be interested in, I offer below the default controller actions produced by the ScaffoldingGenerator in Ruby on Rails. These should be familiar to anyone using a Rails application.
The scaffolded actions and views are:
index, list, show, new, create, edit,
update, destroy
Typically you would construct this as:
http://application.com/controller/<action>/<id>
Here is a mapping of your current URLs using the REST principle:
/question/show/<whatever>
If you identify the question as a resource, then it should have a unique URL. Using GET to display it (retrieve it) is the common practice. It becomes:
GET /question/<whatever>
/question/edit/<whatever>
Now you want your user to have another view of the same resource that allows him to edit the resource (maybe with form controls).
Two options here, your application is an application (not a website), then you may be better using JavaScript to transform the resource into an editable resource ono the client side.
If this is a website, then you can use the same URL with additional information to specify another view, the common practice seems to be:
GET /question/<whatever>;edit
/question/update/<whatever> (this is the post back url)
This is to change the question, so PUT is the correct method to use:
PUT /question/<whatever>
/question/list (lists the questions)
The list of question is actually the parent resource of a question, so it naturally is:
GET /question
Now you may need some more:
POST /question (create a new question and returns its URL)
DELETE /question/<whatever> (deletes a question if this is relevant)
Tada :)
Your four examples could be:
GET /questions/123
POST (or PUT) /questions/123 q=What+is+the+meaning+of+life
POST (or PUT) /questions/123 q=What+is+the+meaning+of+life
GET /questions
To add a question:
POST /questions q=What+is+the+meaning+of+life
The server would respond:
200 OK (or 201 Created)
Location: /questions/456
Related
I have customers and I want to activate and cancel their plans. I am trying to be as RESTful as possible.
Should the action to perform 'active' or 'suspend' be part of URI ?
1) POST customers/{customerId}/activatePlan/{planName}
2) POST customers/{customerId}/suspendPlan/{planName}
My problem is that both activate and cancel are verbs or actions. They do not have any equivalent HTTP action ( GET, POST, PATCH etc.)
Are my URL's restful ? if not, how to make them REST ful.
Everything is a resource on the RESTful paradigm and these resources are manipulated with one of the HTTP methods (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, etc ...).
You can create a plan with POST:
POST customers/{customerId}/{planName}
once a plan is created we have to activate or deactivate it and here we have a couple of choices:
Using the action in the URI. We use PUT in this case as the planName resource exists (so it is an update):
PUT customers/{customerId}/{planName}/activate
Set a property on the planName resource (still a PUT as it is an update on the planName resource). The activate property in the body of the HTTP PUT request (i.e.: activate=true or activate=false):
PUT customers/{customerId}/{planName}
then you can use GET to return the status of the planName resource
GET customers/{customerId}/{planName}
and DELETE if you want to remove planName from a customer:
GET customers/{customerId}/{planName}
Are my URL's restful ?
All URI are RESTful -- REST doesn't care what spelling conventions you use for your resource identifiers.
Notice, please, that both of the following URI work exactly as you would expect them to:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/activate
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cancel
My problem is that both activate and cancel are verbs or actions. They do not have any equivalent HTTP action ( GET, POST, PATCH etc.)
There are a couple of different answers. Perhaps the easiest is to think about how you would design a web site that allowed you to activate and cancel plans. You would probably have a web page for this customers enrollment, and on that page might be a link with some hint, like "cancel". Clicking the link would load a new web page, with a form on it, including a bunch of fields for the customer to fill in. When the customer submits the form, the browser looks at the form, and its meta data, and figures out what request to send to the server.
A "REST API" isn't about putting your domain model on the web - it's about putting your interaction model on the web. We create a collection of documents (resources) that describe the domain, and we get useful work done by moving those documents around the network. See Jim Webber 2011.
Because we are working in the language of documents, REST interfaces are usually based on one of the following ideas
Here is a document; make local edits to your copy of the document, and send it back to the server (GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE are the primary method tokens you see in this style)
Here is a form; fill in the details and submit it (GET and POST are the method tokens you see in these cases)
If you are unhappy with the use of POST, it may help to review Fielding 2009
POST serves many useful purposes in HTTP, including the general purpose of “this action isn’t worth standardizing.”
I'm designing a restful api, and trying to really do it right for the first time.
I've defined some nested resources (comments in a blog post), and that choice mirrors the fact that comments are nested within the blog post document in mongo.
I'm not interested in serving individual comments out of context, so I've deferred implementing GETs for the nested resources. However, it makes sense to implement POSTing to the comments collection, and PUTting to a comment uri.
Specific questions:
1) Does it make sense to respond to a POST with a 201 and a Location header set to the parent resource? If not, how do I communicate the parent location to inform navigation choices on the client?
2) Similar question for PUT, how do I best communicate to the client that it should look to the parent resource to locate its update? (preferably without the client having to make assumptions about my uri scheme). Is the Location header reasonable on a 200?
Although I have never done it myself, I have heard of people using the Content-Location header for this purpose. Content-Location is used to identify the location of the resource that is represented by the returned entity.
In the case of your PUT and POST, you may not actually want to return the entire blog post, so I'm not sure how valid it is to return a Content-Location header even when you are not returning a representation in the response.
Having said that, I can't think of any negative effects, so here is what I'm suggesting:
PUT /Blog/343/Comment/23
=>
200 OK
Content-Location: /Blog/343
POST /Blog/343/Comments
=>
201 Created
Location: /Blog/343/Comment/24
Content-Location: /Blog/343
Pardon the simple question, but it seems most searches try to tell me which methods are designed for what actions. Eg, create & edit is PUT, create from plural (articles) is POST, and so on. (If you disagree with this, i was just using it as an example. :)
With that said, how do you initiate a resource edit? To create a resource, with a known url you preform a GET on an non-existing URL. Eg, GET:mysite/resource_one. This then returns a form, and the form submits a PUT to the same address and bam, the resource is created.
Now how do you edit that same resource? With 4 Methods, designed for CRUD, i am having issues because i can only seem to think of one way. To go to a new resource. Eg, GET:mysite/resource_one/edit. This then presents a form with existing data, you edit it, and then the data is submitted to GET:mysite/resource_one. This seems odd to me in a system that seems to be designed to allow full CRUD to be preformed on a resource, without leaving said resource.
So.. what is the proper method? I mean, if GET:mysite/resource_one/edit is right, then why not GET:mysite/resource_one/delete, GET:mysite/resource_two/create, and so on..
Replies much appreciated!
The URL always represents the resource, not the action. Thus, while mysite/resource_one/edit might be a proper URL to a page that initiates editing a resource, it's not a part of the REST API itself, it's part of the web app that uses that REST API to manipulate that resource. Moreover, in that example mysite/resource_one would be a confusing representation of the resource.
To create a new resource, you use POST on the parent resource, with the body of the request containing the data for the new resource. The response contains the URL for the newly created resource.
To update an existing resource, you use PUT on the resource URL, with the body of the request containing either full or partial update of the resource data.
Just wanted to get feedback on how I am planning to architect my API. Dummy methods below. Here's the structure:
GET http://api.domain.com/1/users/ <-- returns a list of users
POST http://api.domain.com/1/users/add.xml <-- adds user
POST http://api.domain.com/1/users/update.xml <-- updates user
DELETE (or POST?) http://api.domain.com/1/users/delete.xml <-- deletes user
Questions:
Is it OK to use just GET and POST?
Is it a good idea that I plan to rely on the filename to indicate what operation to do (e.g. add.xml to add)? Would it be better to do something like this: POST http://api.domain.com/1/users/add/data.xml?
What's a good way to keep these resources versioned? In my example, I use a /1/ after domain name to indicate version 1. Alternatives would be: http://api1.domain.com... or http://api-1.domain.com... or http://apiv1.domain.com... or http://api-v1.domain.com... or http://api.domain.com/v1/... or
What's the best way to authenticate?
Before you dig into REST, here are some terms you really need to grasp:
Resource - The things/data you want to make available in your API (in your case a "User")
URI - A universally unique ID for a resource. Should mention nothing about the method being performed (e.g. shouldn't contain "add" or "delete"). The structure of your URI however doesn't make your app any more or less RESTful - this is a common misconception.
Uniform Interface - A fixed set of operations you can perform on your resources, in most cases this is HTTP. There are clear definitions for the purpose of each of these HTTP methods.
The most unrestful thing about your URIs as they are right now is that they have information about the operation being performed right in them. URIs are IDs and nothing more!
Let's take a real world example. My name is Nathan. "Nathan" could be considered my ID (or in restful terms URI – for the purpose of this example assume I'm the only "Nathan"). My name/ID doesn't changed based on how you would like to interact with me, e.g. My name wouldn't change to "NathanSayHello" when you wanted to greet me.
It's the same for REST. Your user identified by http://api.domain.com/users/1 doesn't change to http://api.domain.com/users/1/update.xml when you want to update that user. The fact that you want to update that user is implied by the method you're using (e.g. PUT).
Here is my suggestion for your URIs
# Retrieve info about a user
GET http://api.domain.com/user/<id>
# Retrieve set all users
GET http://api.domain.com/users
# Update the user IDed by api.domain.com/user/<id>
PUT http://api.domain.com/user/<id>
# Create a new user. The details (even <id>) are based as the body of the request
POST http://api.domain.com/users
# Delete the user ID'd by api.domain.com/user/<id>
DELETE http://api.domain.com/user/<id>
As for your questions:
Use PUT and DELETE when appropriate and avoid overloading POST to handle these functions as it breaks HTTP's definition of POST. HTTP is your uniform interface. It is your contract with the API user about how they can expect to interact with your service. If you break HTTP, you break this contract.
Remove "add" altogether. Use HTTP's Content-Type header for specifying the mime-type of posted data.
Are you referring to the version of your API or the version of the resource? ETag and other response headers can be used to version the resources.
Many options here. Basic HTTP Auth (easy but insecure), Digest Auth, custom auth like AWS. OAuth is also a possibility. If security is of main importance, I use client side SSL certs.
1) On your design probably not. POST is not idempotent! So you should not use for the update or the delete, instead use PUT and DELETE from Rest
2) A better choice is to use the header Content-Type on the WS call, like: application/xml
3) Also on the header Content-Type u can use it: application-v1.0/xml
4) Not sure if it is the best, but probably the easiest way is to use HTTP's built-in authentication mechanisms in RFC 2617. An example: AWS Authentication
In REST, the HTTP "verb" is used to denote the operation type: you won't be able to express all the CRUD operations with only "GET" and "POST"
no: the URL of the resource is usually where the "document identifier" should appear
The version of the "document" can be transmitted in an HTTP response header upon creation/modification of the said resource. It should be the duty of the server to uniquely identify the resources - trying to do this on the client side will prove a daunting challenge i.e. keeping consistency.
Of course, there are many variations on the topic...
I did authentication based on headers. Something like
X-Username:happy-hamster
X-Password:notmyactualpassword
If you're concerned about security - do it through SSL.
Other implementations exist, of course. For instance, Amazon with their S3:
http://docs.amazonwebservices.com/AmazonS3/2006-03-01/index.html?RESTAuthentication.html
If you don't have ability to make PUT and DELETE requests, it's considered a good practice to tunnel them through POST. In this case the action is specified in URL. If I recall correctly, RoR does exactly this:
POST http://example.com/foos/2.xml/delete
or
POST http://example.com/foos/3.xml/put
...
<foo>
<bar>newbar</bar>
</foo>
It's a bit offtop, but in regards to versioning and REST overall you might want to take a look at CouchDB. Here is a good book available on-line
Using post for create and delete functionality is not a good rest api design strategy. Use Put to create, post to update and delete to delete the resources.
For more information on designing rest apis follow the link - best practices to design rest apis
We are trying to implement a REST API for an application we have now. We want to expose read/write capabilities for various resources using the REST API. How do we implement the "form" part of this? I get how to expose "read" of our data by creating RESTful URLs that essentially function as method calls and return the data:
GET /restapi/myobject?param=object-id-maybe
...and an XML document representing some data structure is returned. Fine.
But, normally, in a web application, an "edit" would involve two requests: one to load the current version of the resources and populate the form with that data, and one to post the modified data back.
But I don't get how you would do the same thing with HTTP methods that REST is sort of mapped to. It's a PUT, right? Can someone explain this?
(Additional consideration: The UI would be primarily done with AJAX)
--
Update: That definitely helps. But, I am still a bit confused about the server side? Obviously, I am not simply dealing with files here. On the server, the code that answers the requests should be filtering the request method to determine what to do with it? Is that the "switch" between reads and writes?
There are many different alternatives you can use. A good solution is provided at the microformats wiki and has also been referenced by the RESTful JSON crew. As close as you can get to a standard, really.
Operate on a Record
GET /people/1
return the first record
DELETE /people/1
destroy the first record
POST /people/1?_method=DELETE
alias for DELETE, to compensate for browser limitations
GET /people/1/edit
return a form to edit the first record
PUT /people/1
submit fields for updating the first record
POST /people/1?_method=PUT
alias for PUT, to compensate for browser limitations
I think you need to separate data services from web UI. When providing data services, a RESTful system is entirely appropriate, including the use of verbs that browsers can't support (like PUT and DELETE).
When describing a UI, I think most people confuse "RESTful" with "nice, predictable URLs". I wouldn't be all that worried about a purely RESTful URL syntax when you're describing web UI.
If you're submitting the data via plain HTML, you're restricted to doing a POST based form. The URI that the POST request is sent to should not be the URI for the resource being modified. You should either POST to a collection resource that ADDs a newly created resource each time (with the URI for the new resource in the Location header and a 202 status code) or POST to an updater resource that updates a resource with a supplied URI in the request's content (or custom header).
If you're using an XmlHttpRequest object, you can set the method to PUT and submit the data to the resource's URI. This can also work with empty forms if the server supplies a valid URI for the yet-nonexistent resource. The first PUT would create the resource (returning 202). Subsequent PUTs will either do nothing if it's the same data or modify the existing resource (in either case a 200 is returned unless an error occurs).
The load should just be a normal GET request, and the saving of new data should be a POST to the URL which currently has the data...
For example, load the current data from http://www.example.com/record/matt-s-example and then, change the data, and POST back to the same URL with the new data.
A PUT request could be used when creating a new record (i.e. PUT the data at a URL which doesn't currently exist), but in practice just POSTing is probably a better approach to get started with.