Jeditable: how to set parameters based on dom element attributes - jeditable

Often I find that I need to use jeditable on several areas each requiring different parameter settings.
For example I use jeditable with autosuggest input type, and then I need to pass different data sources to the different inputs.
I wanted to use just one instance of the editable plugin, and have tried to assign attr-values to the script, but obviously this does not work the way I'm approaching it..
I'm hoping someone can guide me a bit..
Essentially I would like to be able to set a jeditable parameter value based on the value of an ttribute of the dom element it is manipulating.
something like:
$('.editme').editable('savedata.php',{
loadurl : 'loaddata.php',
loaddata : { handle: $(this).attr('rel') }
});
then I could simply specify different load sources with:
<div id="fruits" class="editme" rel="myfruits">apples</div>
I didn't find the keyword this to work in this way..
How can I access the attributes of the dom element being manipulated dynamically for each jeditable binding?
here is another example of what I want to do:
authorsList = "".split(",");
// extend jeditable with autocomplete
$.editable.addInputType('autoc', {
element: function(settings, original) {
var input = $("<input />").autocomplete(settings.mdata, settings.autoc);
$(this).append(input);
return input; }
});
$('.editable.authors').editable('savedata.php',{
type : "autoc",
mdata : $(this).attr('rel'), // should hold the name 'authorsList'
onblur : 'ignore',
autoc : { multiple: true,
multipleSeparator: ',' },
loadurl : 'loaddata.php',
loadtype : 'POST',
loaddata : {handle: function(){ return eval($("#objhandle").val())}, lookuptype: 'mirror'},
submit : 'save',
cancel : 'cancel',
tooltip : "Click to edit",
style : "inherit",
cssclass : 'jedi',
id : "field",
name : "data",
submitdata : {
storetype: 'mirror',
handle: function(){return eval($("#objhandle").val())},
timestamp: function(){return eval($("#objtimestamp").val())}
}
});

Warning, totally untested code but something like following should work:
$('.editme').each(function() {
$(this).editable('savedata.php',{
loadurl : 'loaddata.php',
loaddata : { handle: $(this).attr('rel') }
});
});
This way the score of this should be correct when initializing Jeditable on the element.

this worked for me
$(this).data('rel)
and for the html
<div id="fruits" class="editme" data-rel="myfruits">apples</div>

Related

Perform action after TinyMCE rendered in DOM

I'm using TinyMCE 4 and setting it up as follows:
tinyMCE.init({
mode : "specific_textareas",
editor_selector : "basicTinyMCE",
theme : "modern",
readonly : false,
...});
I want to call a function after it has been rendered in the DOM.
I came across this and tried:
tinyMCE.init({
mode : "specific_textareas",
editor_selector : "basicTinyMCE",
theme : "modern",
readonly : false,
setup : function(ed) {
ed.onPostRender.add(function(ed,cm) {
console.log('After render: ' + ed.id);
});
}
});
I get the following error:
SCRIPT5007: Unable to get property 'add' of undefined or null reference
Any ideas if this is the correct way to achieve what I want?
And if so, why is the error appearing?
You've got two options:
Use configuration init_instance_callback http://www.tinymce.com/wiki.php/Configuration:init_instance_callback
Use new way to add callbacks
ed.on('postRender', function(e) {
console.log('postRender');
});
I found the "Dirty" event was what I wanted, only triggered after the user makes a change to the contents of the editor
https://www.tiny.cloud/docs/advanced/events/

How to add ColumnListItem to a table inside a page in MVC from other page controller

I have a SAPUI5 application written in MVC
I have a view called oPage4:
var landscapePage = new sap.m.Page({
title : "Landscape Name",
showNavButton : true,
navButtonPress : [oController.back,oController],
footer : new sap.m.Bar({
id : 'landscapePage_footer',
contentMiddle : [
new sap.m.Button({
}),
new sap.m.Button({
})
]
}),
});
oLandscapePageTable = new sap.m.Table("landscape", {
inset : true,
visible : true,
getIncludeItemInSelection : true,
showNoData : false,
columns : [ new sap.m.Column({
styleClass : "name",
hAlign : "Left",
header : new sap.m.Label({
})
}) ]
});
landscapePage.addContent(oLandscapePageTable);
return landscapePage;
then inside page1 controller I want to add a columnlistitem to the table of page 4.
var oPage4 = sap.ui.getCore().byId("p4");
var landscapePageRow = new sap.m.ColumnListItem({
type : "Active",
visible : true,
selected : true,
cells : [ new sap.m.Label({
text : something
}) ]
});
oPage4.getContent().addItem(landscapePageRow);
it doesn't work. please show me how to do so?
Ok, I think I understood your problem now. In general I would avoid calling the page and doing manipulations on it from another view. However, it is absolutely possible:
Additional functions in your view
You can extend your page4 with some more functions that can be called from outside like this:
sap.ui.jsview("my.page4", {
createContent : function() {
this.table = ...
...
},
addColumnListItem : function(columnListItem) {
// add it to the table calling this.table ...
}
}
From another view you´re now able to call this function like this:
var page4 = sap.ui.jsview("my.page4");
page4.addColumnListItem(page4, columnListItem);
Attention: The page4 object itself doesn´t point to the control you´re returning but to the the view instance itself. You will notice this, if you log the page4 object to the console. This is why you have to add functions like described.
Some other approaches would be to use the EventBus like described here to publish and subscribe to events. Since you´ve asked for it let me show you how you could do it:
Using the EventBus
The main intention is, that one can subscribe to a particular event and others can publish such events to the eventbus. Let me give you an example:
Subscribing to the EventBus:
var eventBus = sap.ui.getCore().getEventBus();
eventBus.subscribe("channel1", "event1", this.handleEvent1, this);
Of course you can name your channel and events as you wish. The third parameter indicates the function, that will be called in case of published events. The last paramter is the scope 'this' will point to in the given function.
Your handleEvent1 function could look like this:
handleEvent1 : function(channel, event, data) {
var listItem = data.listItem
}
Publishing events to the EventBus:
var columnListItem = ...
var eventBus = sap.ui.getCore().getEventBus();
eventBus.publish("channel1", "event1",
{
listItem : columnListItem
}
);
One more option you have is to make the columnListItems depending on a model. Like everytime it depends on your actual architecture and data.
Let me know if this solved your problem or if you need some more information.

Reload Next JSON Data Grid ExtJS with Value from Ext Form

I'm trying to create grid data view from ExtJS with pagination.
Actually there's no issue when I create a simple data grid.
Then I want to create a "filter/search" function using Ext Form.
It's only work for page one. Here is my Ext Form Code below :
var winFilter = Ext.create('widget.window',{
title : 'Filter',
width : 400,
height : 200,
modal : true,
closeAction : 'hide',
items : frmFilter,
layout : 'fit',
bodyPadding: 5,
buttons:[
{
text : 'Filter',
handler: function(btn){
var win = btn.up('window');
var form = win.down('form');
tempProductID = form.getForm().findField('Product_ID').getSubmitValue();
tempDescription = form.getForm().findField('Description').getSubmitValue();
store.load({
params: {
start: 0,
limit: itemsPerPage,
productid: form.getForm().findField('Product_ID').getSubmitValue(),
description: form.getForm().findField('Description').getSubmitValue()
}
});
winFilter.hide();
}
},
{
text : 'Close',
handler: function(){
winFilter.hide();
}
}
]});
for the next page, my JSON return all data without using filtering value that I used before (Product ID and Description).
Please if any advice
Thanks bud.
params (when used as an argument of load method) are applied only once. If you want to apply these params to each request you have to modify proxy extraParams property:
Ext.apply(store.proxy.extraParams, {
productid: form.getForm().findField('Product_ID').getSubmitValue(),
description: form.getForm().findField('Description').getSubmitValue()
}, {});
store.load();
Else you can use store filter method (store.remoteFilter should be set to true):
store.filter([
{property: "productid", value: form.getForm().findField('Product_ID').getSubmitValue()},
{property: "description", value: form.getForm().findField('Description').getSubmitValue()
]);
But note that the filter part of request url has different form when filter approach is used. In this case filter part looks something like ?filter=[{'property':'productid','value':2}]&limit=10.... Whereas when params approach is used url looks something like ?productid=2&limit=10.... So when filter approach is used backend should parse filter property of request.

Truncated text with jEditable

So I have an editable line of text on my website. Whenever the text is changed and is above a certain length, I truncate the text.
Simplified jsfiddle here - http://jsfiddle.net/3kwCr/1/
On subsequent clicks on the text to edit, the truncated value with ellipsis is picked up. How do I get jEditable to pick up the actual value which is present as an attribute in the div?
data: function() { $('.editable-value').attr('value') }
will not work as I have several of these editable lines of text
I need something like
data: function() { this.attr('value') }
where this would the div object to which .editable has been applied to.
Just wrap this into jQuery object so you can use jQuery methods on it. Below is updated code. I also updated the example jsFiddle.
$('.editable').editable(function(value, settings) {
$(this).attr('value', value);
if (value.length > 10) {
return(value.slice(0,10)) + '...';
} else {
return(value);
}
}, {
data : function(value) { return($(this).attr('value')); },
type : 'text',
submit : 'OK'
});

How to create custom ExtJS form field component?

I want to create custom ExtJS form field components using other ExtJS components in it (e.g. TreePanel). How can I do it most easily?
I've read docs of Ext.form.field.Base but I don't want to define field body by fieldSubTpl. I just want to write code which creates ExtJS components and maybe some other code which gets and sets values.
Update: Summarized purposes are the followings:
This new component should fit in the
form GUI as a field. It should have
label and the same alignment (label,
anchor) of other fields without need
of further hacking.
Possibly, I have
to write some getValue, setValue
logic. I'd rather embed it into this component than making separated code which copies things into further hidden form fields that I also have to manage.
To extend #RobAgar 's answer, following a really simple Date Time field that I wrote for ExtJS 3 and it's quickport that I made for ExtJS 4. The important thing is the use of the Ext.form.field.Field mixin. This mixin provides a common interface for the logical behavior and state of form fields, including:
Getter and setter methods for field values
Events and methods for tracking value and validity changes
Methods for triggering validation
This can be used for combining multiple fields and let act them as one. For a total custom fieldtype I recommend to extend Ext.form.field.Base
Here is the example that I mentioned above. It should shoe how easy this can be done even for something like a date object where we need to format the data within the getter and setter.
Ext.define('QWA.form.field.DateTime', {
extend: 'Ext.form.FieldContainer',
mixins: {
field: 'Ext.form.field.Field'
},
alias: 'widget.datetimefield',
layout: 'hbox',
width: 200,
height: 22,
combineErrors: true,
msgTarget: 'side',
submitFormat: 'c',
dateCfg: null,
timeCfg: null,
initComponent: function () {
var me = this;
if (!me.dateCfg) me.dateCfg = {};
if (!me.timeCfg) me.timeCfg = {};
me.buildField();
me.callParent();
me.dateField = me.down('datefield')
me.timeField = me.down('timefield')
me.initField();
},
//#private
buildField: function () {
var me = this;
me.items = [
Ext.apply({
xtype: 'datefield',
submitValue: false,
format: 'd.m.Y',
width: 100,
flex: 2
}, me.dateCfg),
Ext.apply({
xtype: 'timefield',
submitValue: false,
format: 'H:i',
width: 80,
flex: 1
}, me.timeCfg)]
},
getValue: function () {
var me = this,
value,
date = me.dateField.getSubmitValue(),
dateFormat = me.dateField.format,
time = me.timeField.getSubmitValue(),
timeFormat = me.timeField.format;
if (date) {
if (time) {
value = Ext.Date.parse(date + ' ' + time, me.getFormat());
} else {
value = me.dateField.getValue();
}
}
return value;
},
setValue: function (value) {
var me = this;
me.dateField.setValue(value);
me.timeField.setValue(value);
},
getSubmitData: function () {
var me = this,
data = null;
if (!me.disabled && me.submitValue && !me.isFileUpload()) {
data = {},
value = me.getValue(),
data[me.getName()] = '' + value ? Ext.Date.format(value, me.submitFormat) : null;
}
return data;
},
getFormat: function () {
var me = this;
return (me.dateField.submitFormat || me.dateField.format) + " " + (me.timeField.submitFormat || me.timeField.format)
}
});
Now that's cool. The other day, I created a fiddle to answer another question before realizing I was off-topic. And here your are, finally bringing to my attention the question to my answer. Thanks!
So, here are the steps required in implementing a custom field from another component:
Creating the child component
Render the child component
Ensuring the child component is sized and resized correctly
Getting and setting value
Relaying events
Creating the child component
The first part, creating the component, is easy. There's nothing particular compared to creating a component for any other usage.
However, you must create the child in the parent field's initComponent method (and not at rendering time). This is because external code can legitimately expect that all dependent objects of a component are instantiated after initComponent (e.g. to add listeners to them).
Furthermore, you can be kind to yourself and create the child before calling the super method. If you create the child after the super method, you may get a call to your field's setValue method (see bellow) at a time when the child is not yet instantiated.
initComponent: function() {
this.childComponent = Ext.create(...);
this.callParent(arguments);
}
As you see, I am creating a single component, which is what you'll want in most case. But you can also want to go fancy and compose multiple child components. In this case, I think it would be clever to back to well known territories as quickly as possible: that is, create one container as the child component, and compose in it.
Rendering
Then comes the question of rendering. At first I considered using fieldSubTpl to render a container div, and have the child component render itself in it. However, we don't need the template features in that case, so we can as well bypass it completely using the getSubTplMarkup method.
I explored other components in Ext to see how they manage the rendering of child components. I found a good example in BoundList and its paging toolbar (see the code). So, in order to obtain the child component's markup, we can use Ext.DomHelper.generateMarkup in combination with the child's getRenderTree method.
So, here's the implementation of getSubTplMarkup for our field:
getSubTplMarkup: function() {
// generateMarkup will append to the passed empty array and return it
var buffer = Ext.DomHelper.generateMarkup(this.childComponent.getRenderTree(), []);
// but we want to return a single string
return buffer.join('');
}
Now, that's not enough. The code of BoundList learns us that there's another important part in component rendering: calling the finishRender() method of the child component. Fortunately, our custom field will have its own finishRenderChildren method called just when that needs to be done.
finishRenderChildren: function() {
this.callParent(arguments);
this.childComponent.finishRender();
}
Resizing
Now our child will be rendered in the right place, but it will not respect its parent field size. That is especially annoying in the case of a form field, because that means it won't honor the anchor layout.
That's very straightforward to fix, we just need to resize the child when the parent field is resized. From my experience, this is something that was greatly improved since Ext3. Here, we just need to not forget the extra space for the label:
onResize: function(w, h) {
this.callParent(arguments);
this.childComponent.setSize(w - this.getLabelWidth(), h);
}
Handling value
This part will, of course, depend on your child component(s), and the field you're creating. Moreover, from now on, it's just a matter of using your child components in a regular way, so I won't detail this part too much.
A minima, you also need to implement the getValue and setValue methods of your field. That will make the getFieldValues method of the form work, and that will be enough to load/update records from the form.
To handle validation, you must implement getErrors. To polish this aspect, you may want to add a handful of CSS rules to visually represent the invalid state of your field.
Then, if you want your field to be usable in a form that will be submitted as an actual form (as opposed to with an AJAX request), you'll need getSubmitValue to return a value that can be casted to a string without damage.
Apart from that, as far as I know, you don't have to worry about the concept or raw value introduced by Ext.form.field.Base since that's only used to handle the representation of the value in an actual input element. With our Ext component as input, we're way off that road!
Events
Your last job will be to implement the events for your fields. You will probably want to fire the three events of Ext.form.field.Field, that is change, dirtychange and validitychange.
Again, the implementation will be very specific to the child component you use and, to be honest, I haven't explored this aspect too much. So I'll let you wire this for yourself.
My preliminary conclusion though, is that Ext.form.field.Field offers to do all the heavy lifting for you, provided that (1) you call checkChange when needed, and (2) isEqual implementation is working with your field's value format.
Example: TODO list field
Finally, here's a complete code example, using a grid to represent a TODO list field.
You can see it live on jsFiddle, where I tries to show that the field behaves in an orderly manner.
Ext.define('My.form.field.TodoList', {
// Extend from Ext.form.field.Base for all the label related business
extend: 'Ext.form.field.Base'
,alias: 'widget.todolist'
// --- Child component creation ---
,initComponent: function() {
// Create the component
// This is better to do it here in initComponent, because it is a legitimate
// expectationfor external code that all dependant objects are created after
// initComponent (to add listeners, etc.)
// I will use this.grid for semantical access (value), and this.childComponent
// for generic issues (rendering)
this.grid = this.childComponent = Ext.create('Ext.grid.Panel', {
hideHeaders: true
,columns: [{dataIndex: 'value', flex: 1}]
,store: {
fields: ['value']
,data: []
}
,height: this.height || 150
,width: this.width || 150
,tbar: [{
text: 'Add'
,scope: this
,handler: function() {
var value = prompt("Value?");
if (value !== null) {
this.grid.getStore().add({value: value});
}
}
},{
text: "Remove"
,itemId: 'removeButton'
,disabled: true // initial state
,scope: this
,handler: function() {
var grid = this.grid,
selModel = grid.getSelectionModel(),
store = grid.getStore();
store.remove(selModel.getSelection());
}
}]
,listeners: {
scope: this
,selectionchange: function(selModel, selection) {
var removeButton = this.grid.down('#removeButton');
removeButton.setDisabled(Ext.isEmpty(selection));
}
}
});
// field events
this.grid.store.on({
scope: this
,datachanged: this.checkChange
});
this.callParent(arguments);
}
// --- Rendering ---
// Generates the child component markup and let Ext.form.field.Base handle the rest
,getSubTplMarkup: function() {
// generateMarkup will append to the passed empty array and return it
var buffer = Ext.DomHelper.generateMarkup(this.childComponent.getRenderTree(), []);
// but we want to return a single string
return buffer.join('');
}
// Regular containers implements this method to call finishRender for each of their
// child, and we need to do the same for the component to display smoothly
,finishRenderChildren: function() {
this.callParent(arguments);
this.childComponent.finishRender();
}
// --- Resizing ---
// This is important for layout notably
,onResize: function(w, h) {
this.callParent(arguments);
this.childComponent.setSize(w - this.getLabelWidth(), h);
}
// --- Value handling ---
// This part will be specific to your component of course
,setValue: function(values) {
var data = [];
if (values) {
Ext.each(values, function(value) {
data.push({value: value});
});
}
this.grid.getStore().loadData(data);
}
,getValue: function() {
var data = [];
this.grid.getStore().each(function(record) {
data.push(record.get('value'));
});
return data;
}
,getSubmitValue: function() {
return this.getValue().join(',');
}
});
Heh. After posting the bounty I found out that Ext.form.FieldContainer isn't just a field container, but a fully fledged component container, so there is a simple solution.
All you need to do is extend FieldContainer, overriding initComponent to add the child components, and implement setValue, getValue and the validation methods as appropriate for your value data type.
Here's an example with a grid whose value is a list of name/value pair objects:
Ext.define('MyApp.widget.MyGridField', {
extend: 'Ext.form.FieldContainer',
alias: 'widget.mygridfield',
layout: 'fit',
initComponent: function()
{
this.callParent(arguments);
this.valueGrid = Ext.widget({
xtype: 'grid',
store: Ext.create('Ext.data.JsonStore', {
fields: ['name', 'value'],
data: this.value
}),
columns: [
{
text: 'Name',
dataIndex: 'name',
flex: 3
},
{
text: 'Value',
dataIndex: 'value',
flex: 1
}
]
});
this.add(this.valueGrid);
},
setValue: function(value)
{
this.valueGrid.getStore().loadData(value);
},
getValue: function()
{
// left as an exercise for the reader :P
}
});
I've done this a few times. Here is the general process/pseudo-code I use:
Create an extension of field that provides the most useful re-use (typically Ext.form.TextField if you just want to get/set a string value)
In the afterrender of the field, hide the textfield, and create a wrapping element around this.el with this.wrap = this.resizeEl = this.positionEl = this.el.wrap()
Render any components to this.wrap (e.g. using renderTo: this.wrap in the config)
Override getValue and setValue to talk to the component(s) you rendered manually
You may need to do some manually sizing in a resize listener if your form's layout changes
Don't forget to cleanup any components you create in the beforeDestroy method!
I can't wait to switch our codebase to ExtJS 4, where these kinds of things are easy.
Good luck!
Since the question was asked rather vague - I only can provide the basic pattern for ExtJS v4.
Even if it's not too specific, it has the advance that it's rather universal like this:
Ext.define('app.view.form.field.CustomField', {
extend: 'Ext.form.field.Base',
requires: [
/* require further components */
],
/* custom configs & callbacks */
getValue: function(v){
/* override function getValue() */
},
setValue: function(v){
/* override function setValue() */
},
getSubTplData: [
/* most likely needs to be overridden */
],
initComponent: function(){
/* further code on event initComponent */
this.callParent(arguments);
}
});
The file /ext/src/form/field/Base.js provides the names of all configs and functions that can be overridden.
Following the documentation at http://docs.sencha.com/ext-js/4-0/#/api/Ext.form.field.Base
This code will create a reusable TypeAhead/Autocomplete style field for selecting a language.
var langs = Ext.create( 'Ext.data.store', {
fields: [ 'label', 'code' ],
data: [
{ code: 'eng', label: 'English' },
{ code: 'ger', label: 'German' },
{ code: 'chi', label: 'Chinese' },
{ code: 'ukr', label: 'Ukranian' },
{ code: 'rus', label: 'Russian' }
]
} );
Ext.define( 'Ext.form.LangSelector', {
extend: 'Ext.form.field.ComboBox',
alias: 'widget.LangSelector',
allowBlank: false,
hideTrigger: true,
width: 225,
displayField: 'label',
valueField: 'code',
forceSelection: true,
minChars: 1,
store: langs
} );
You can use the field in a form simply by setting the xtype to the widget name:
{
xtype: 'LangSelector'
fieldLabel: 'Language',
name: 'lang'
}
Many of the answers either use the Mixin Ext.form.field.Field or just extends on some already made class that suits their needs - which is fine.
But I do not recommend fully overwriting the setValue method, that is IMO really bad form!
A lot more happens than just setting and getting the value, and if you fully overwrite it - well you will for instance mess up the dirty state, processing of rawValue etc..
Two options here I guess, one is to callParent(arguments) inside the method you declare to keep things streamlined, or to at the end when you are done apply the inherited method from where ever you got it (mixin or extend).
But do not just overwrite it with no regards for what that already made method does behind the scenes.
Also remember that if you use other field types in your new class - then do set the isFormField property to false - otherwise your getValues method on the form will take those values and run with em!
Another solution could be this tree-field implementation.
It behaves just like a normal form field:
https://github.com/wencywww/Ext.ux.form.field.Tree
Here is an example of a custom panel that extends an Ext Panel. You can extend any component, check the docs for the fields, methods and events you can play with.
Ext.ns('yournamespace');
yournamespace.MyPanel = function(config) {
yournamespace.MyPanel.superclass.constructor.call(this, config);
}
Ext.extend(yournamespace.MyPanel, Ext.Panel, {
myGlobalVariable : undefined,
constructor : function(config) {
yournamespace.MyPanel.superclass.constructor.apply(this, config);
},
initComponent : function() {
this.comboBox = new Ext.form.ComboBox({
fieldLabel: "MyCombo",
store: someStore,
displayField:'My Label',
typeAhead: true,
mode: 'local',
forceSelection: true,
triggerAction: 'all',
emptyText:'',
selectOnFocus:true,
tabIndex: 1,
width: 200
});
// configure the grid
Ext.apply(this, {
listeners: {
'activate': function(p) {
p.doLayout();
},
single:true
},
xtype:"form",
border: false,
layout:"absolute",
labelAlign:"top",
bodyStyle:"padding: 15px",
width: 350,
height: 75,
items:[{
xtype:"panel",
layout:"form",
x:"10",
y:"10",
labelAlign:"top",
border:false,
items:[this.comboBox]
},
{
xtype:"panel",
layout:"form",
x:"230",
y:"26",
labelAlign:"top",
border:false,
items:[{
xtype:'button',
handler: this.someAction.createDelegate(this),
text: 'Some Action'
}]
}]
}); // eo apply
yournamespace.MyPanel.superclass.initComponent.apply(this, arguments);
this.comboBox.on('select', function(combo, record, index) {
this.myGlobalVariable = record.get("something");
}, this);
}, // eo function initComponent
someAction : function() {
//do something
},
getMyGlobalVariable : function() {
return this.myGlobalVariable;
}
}); // eo extend
Ext.reg('mypanel', yournamespace.MyPanel);
Could you describe the UI requirements that you have a bit more? Are you sure that you even need to do build an entire field to support the TreePanel? Why not set the value of a hidden field (see the "hidden" xtype in the API) from a click handler on a normal tree panel?
To answer your question more fully, you can find many tutorials on how to extend ExtJS components. You do this by leveraging the Ext.override() or Ext.Extend() methods.
But my feeling is that you may be over-complicating your design. You can achieve what you need to do by setting a value to this hidden field. If you have complex data, you can set the value as some XML or JSON string.
EDIT Here's a few tutorials. I highly recommend going with the KISS rule when it comes to your UI design. Keep It Simple Stupid!
Extending components using panels