To automatically add a column in a second table to tie it to the first table via a unique index, I have a rule such as follows:
CREATE OR REPLACE RULE auto_insert AS ON INSERT TO user DO ALSO
INSERT INTO lastlogin (id) VALUES (NEW.userid);
This works fine if user.userid is an integer. However, if it is a sequence (e.g., type serial or bigserial), what is inserted into table lastlogin is the next sequence id. So this command:
INSERT INTO user (username) VALUES ('john');
would insert column [1, 'john', ...] into user but column [2, ...] into lastlogin. The following 2 workarounds do work except that the second one consumes twice as many serials since the sequence is still auto-incrementing:
CREATE OR REPLACE RULE auto_insert AS ON INSERT TO user DO ALSO
INSERT INTO lastlogin (id) VALUES (lastval());
CREATE OR REPLACE RULE auto_insert AS ON INSERT TO user DO ALSO
INSERT INTO lastlogin (id) VALUES (NEW.userid-1);
Unfortunately, the workarounds do not work if I'm inserting multiple rows:
INSERT INTO user (username) VALUES ('john'), ('mary');
The first workaround would use the same id, and the second workaround is all kind of screw-up.
Is it possible to do this via postgresql rules or should I simply do the 2nd insertion into lastlogin myself or use a row trigger? Actually, I think the row trigger would also auto-increment the sequence when I access NEW.userid.
Forget rules altogether. They're bad.
Triggers are way better for you. And in 99% of cases when someone thinks he needs a rule. Try this:
create table users (
userid serial primary key,
username text
);
create table lastlogin (
userid int primary key references users(userid),
lastlogin_time timestamp with time zone
);
create or replace function lastlogin_create_id() returns trigger as $$
begin
insert into lastlogin (userid) values (NEW.userid);
return NEW;
end;
$$
language plpgsql volatile;
create trigger lastlogin_create_id
after insert on users for each row execute procedure lastlogin_create_id();
Then:
insert into users (username) values ('foo'),('bar');
select * from users;
userid | username
--------+----------
1 | foo
2 | bar
(2 rows)
select * from lastlogin;
userid | lastlogin_time
--------+----------------
1 |
2 |
(2 rows)
Related
Given the following (simplified) schema:
CREATE TABLE period (
id UUID NOT NULL DEFAULT uuid_generate_v4(),
name TEXT
);
CREATE TABLE course (
id UUID NOT NULL DEFAULT uuid_generate_v4(),
name TEXT
);
CREATE TABLE registration (
id UUID NOT NULL DEFAULT uuid_generate_v4(),
period_id UUID NOT NULL REFERENCES period(id),
course_id UUID NOT NULL REFERENCES course(id),
inserted_at timestamptz NOT NULL DEFAULT now()
);
I now want to add a new column client_ref, which identifies a registration unique within a period, but consists of only a 4-character string. I want to use pg_hashids - which requires a unique integer input - to base the column value on.
I was thinking of setting up a trigger on the registration table that runs on inserting a new row. I came up with the following:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION set_client_ref()
RETURNS trigger
LANGUAGE plpgsql
AS $function$
DECLARE
next_row_number integer;
BEGIN
WITH rank AS (
SELECT
period.id AS period_id,
row_number() OVER (PARTITION BY period.id ORDER BY registration.inserted_at)
FROM
registration
JOIN period ON registration.period_id = period.id ORDER BY
period.id,
row_number
)
SELECT
COALESCE(rank.row_number, 0) + 1 INTO next_row_number
FROM
period
LEFT JOIN rank ON (rank.period_id = period.id)
WHERE
period.id = NEW.period_id
ORDER BY
rank.row_number DESC
LIMIT 1;
NEW.client_ref = id_encode (next_row_number);
RETURN NEW;
END
$function$
;
The trigger is set-up like: CREATE TRIGGER set_client_ref BEFORE INSERT ON registration FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE FUNCTION set_client_ref();
This works as expected when inserting a single row to registration, but if I insert multiple within one statement, they end up having the same client_ref. I can reason about why this happens (the rows don't know about each other's existence, so they assume they're all just next in line when retrieving their row_order), but I am not sure what a way is to prevent this. I tried setting up the trigger as an AFTER trigger, but it resulted in the same (duplicated) behaviour.
What would be a better way to get the lowest possible, unique integer for the rows to be inserted (to base the hash function on) that also works when inserting multiple rows?
When using table inheritance, I would like to enforce that insert, update and delete statements should be done against descendant tables. I thought a simple way to do this would be using a trigger function like this:
CREATE FUNCTION test.prevent_action() RETURNS trigger AS $prevent_action$
BEGIN
RAISE EXCEPTION
'% on % is not allowed. Perform % on descendant tables only.',
TG_OP, TG_TABLE_NAME, TG_OP;
END;
$prevent_action$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
...which I would reference from a trigger defined specified using BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE OR DELETE.
This seems to work fine for inserts, but not for updates and deletes.
The following test sequence demonstrates what I've observed:
DROP SCHEMA IF EXISTS test CASCADE;
psql:simple.sql:1: NOTICE: schema "test" does not exist, skipping
DROP SCHEMA
CREATE SCHEMA test;
CREATE SCHEMA
-- A function to prevent anything
-- Used for tables that are meant to be inherited
CREATE FUNCTION test.prevent_action() RETURNS trigger AS $prevent_action$
BEGIN
RAISE EXCEPTION
'% on % is not allowed. Perform % on descendant tables only.',
TG_OP, TG_TABLE_NAME, TG_OP;
END;
$prevent_action$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
CREATE FUNCTION
CREATE TABLE test.people (
person_id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
last_name text,
first_name text
);
psql:simple.sql:17: NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence "people_person_id_seq" for serial column "people.person_id"
psql:simple.sql:17: NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index "people_pkey" for table "people"
CREATE TABLE
CREATE TRIGGER prevent_action BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE OR DELETE ON test.people
FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE test.prevent_action();
CREATE TRIGGER
CREATE TABLE test.students (
student_id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY
) INHERITS (test.people);
psql:simple.sql:24: NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence "students_student_id_seq" for serial column "students.student_id"
psql:simple.sql:24: NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index "students_pkey" for table "students"
CREATE TABLE
--The trigger successfully prevents this INSERT from happening
--INSERT INTO test.people (last_name, first_name) values ('Smith', 'Helen');
INSERT INTO test.students (last_name, first_name) values ('Smith', 'Helen');
INSERT 0 1
INSERT INTO test.students (last_name, first_name) values ('Anderson', 'Niles');
INSERT 0 1
UPDATE test.people set first_name = 'Oh', last_name = 'Noes!';
UPDATE 2
SELECT student_id, person_id, first_name, last_name from test.students;
student_id | person_id | first_name | last_name
------------+-----------+------------+-----------
1 | 1 | Oh | Noes!
2 | 2 | Oh | Noes!
(2 rows)
DELETE FROM test.people;
DELETE 2
SELECT student_id, person_id, first_name, last_name from test.students;
student_id | person_id | first_name | last_name
------------+-----------+------------+-----------
(0 rows)
So I'm wondering what I've done wrong that allows updates and deletes directly against the test.people table in this example.
The trigger is set to execute FOR EACH ROW, but there is no row in test.people, that's why it's not run.
As a sidenote, you may issue select * from ONLY test.people to list the rows in test.people that don't belong to child tables.
The solution seems esasy: set a trigger FOR EACH STATEMENT instead of FOR EACH ROW, since you want to forbid the whole statement anyway.
CREATE TRIGGER prevent_action BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE OR DELETE ON test.people
FOR EACH STATEMENT EXECUTE PROCEDURE test.prevent_action();
Say I have a table, created as follows:
CREATE TABLE test_table (id serial, unique_id varchar(50) primary key, name varchar(50));
test_table
----------
id | unique_id | name
In that table, I would like to update the unique_id field with the newly inserted id concatenated with the inserted name in a single go.
Usually this is accomplished by two queries. (PHP way)
$q = "INSERT INTO table (unique_id,name) values ('uid','abc') returning id||name as unique_id;";
$r = pg_query($dbconn,$q);
$row = pg_fetch_array($r);
$q1 = "UPDATE test_table set unique_id =".$row['unique_id']." where unique_id='uid'";
$r1 = pg_query($dbconn,$q1);
Is there any way to do the above in a single query?
You can have several options here, you could create a AFTER trigger which uses the generated ID for an direct update of the same row:
CREATE TRIGGER test_table_insert ON AFTER INSERT ON test_table FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE test_table_insert();
And in your function you update the value:
CREATE FUNCTION test_table_insert() RETURNS TRIGGER AS $$
BEGIN
UPDATE test_table SET uniqid = NEW.id::text || NEW.name WHERE id = NEW.id;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
You need to add the function before the trigger.
An other option would be to do it directly in the insert:
INSERT INTO table (id, unique_id, name) values (nextval('test_table_id_seq'), 'abc', currval('test_table_id_seq')::text || 'abc') returning id;
But as a_horse_with_no_name pointed out, I think you may have a problem in your database design.
I currently have a parent table:
CREATE TABLE members (
member_id SERIAL NOT NULL, UNIQUE, PRIMARY KEY
first_name varchar(20)
last_name varchar(20)
address address (composite type)
contact_numbers varchar(11)[3]
date_joined date
type varchar(5)
);
and two related tables:
CREATE TABLE basic_member (
activities varchar[3])
INHERITS (members)
);
CREATE TABLE full_member (
activities varchar[])
INHERITS (members)
);
If the type is full the details are entered to the full_member table or if type is basic into the basic_member table. What I want is that if I run an update and change the type to basic or full the tuple goes into the corresponding table.
I was wondering if I could do this with a rule like:
CREATE RULE tuple_swap_full
AS ON UPDATE TO full_member
WHERE new.type = 'basic'
INSERT INTO basic_member VALUES (old.member_id, old.first_name, old.last_name,
old.address, old.contact_numbers, old.date_joined, new.type, old.activities);
... then delete the record from the full_member
Just wondering if my rule is anywhere near or if there is a better way.
You don't need
member_id SERIAL NOT NULL, UNIQUE, PRIMARY KEY
A PRIMARY KEY implies UNIQUE NOT NULL automatically:
member_id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY
I wouldn't use hard coded max length of varchar(20). Just use text and add a check constraint if you really must enforce a maximum length. Easier to change around.
Syntax for INHERITS is mangled. The key word goes outside the parens around columns.
CREATE TABLE full_member (
activities text[]
) INHERITS (members);
Table names are inconsistent (members <-> member). I use the singular form everywhere in my test case.
Finally, I would not use a RULE for the task. A trigger AFTER UPDATE seems preferable.
Consider the following
Test case:
Tables:
CREATE SCHEMA x; -- I put everything in a test schema named "x".
-- DROP TABLE x.members CASCADE;
CREATE TABLE x.member (
member_id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY
,first_name text
-- more columns ...
,type text);
CREATE TABLE x.basic_member (
activities text[3]
) INHERITS (x.member);
CREATE TABLE x.full_member (
activities text[]
) INHERITS (x.member);
Trigger function:
Data-modifying CTEs (WITH x AS ( DELETE ..) are the best tool for the purpose. Requires PostgreSQL 9.1 or later.
For older versions, first INSERT then DELETE.
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION x.trg_move_member()
RETURNS trigger AS
$BODY$
BEGIN
CASE NEW.type
WHEN 'basic' THEN
WITH x AS (
DELETE FROM x.member
WHERE member_id = NEW.member_id
RETURNING *
)
INSERT INTO x.basic_member (member_id, first_name, type) -- more columns
SELECT member_id, first_name, type -- more columns
FROM x;
WHEN 'full' THEN
WITH x AS (
DELETE FROM x.member
WHERE member_id = NEW.member_id
RETURNING *
)
INSERT INTO x.full_member (member_id, first_name, type) -- more columns
SELECT member_id, first_name, type -- more columns
FROM x;
END CASE;
RETURN NULL;
END;
$BODY$
LANGUAGE plpgsql VOLATILE;
Trigger:
Note that it is an AFTER trigger and has a WHEN condition.
WHEN condition requires PostgreSQL 9.0 or later. For earlier versions, you can just leave it away, the CASE statement in the trigger itself takes care of it.
CREATE TRIGGER up_aft
AFTER UPDATE
ON x.member
FOR EACH ROW
WHEN (NEW.type IN ('basic ','full')) -- OLD.type cannot be IN ('basic ','full')
EXECUTE PROCEDURE x.trg_move_member();
Test:
INSERT INTO x.member (first_name, type) VALUES ('peter', NULL);
UPDATE x.member SET type = 'full' WHERE first_name = 'peter';
SELECT * FROM ONLY x.member;
SELECT * FROM x.basic_member;
SELECT * FROM x.full_member;
One of my tables has the following definition:
CREATE TABLE incidents
(
id serial NOT NULL,
report integer NOT NULL,
year integer NOT NULL,
month integer NOT NULL,
number integer NOT NULL, -- Report serial number for this period
...
CONSTRAINT PRIMARY KEY (id),
CONSTRAINT UNIQUE (report, year, month, number)
);
How would you go about incrementing the number column for every report, year, and month independently? I'd like to avoid creating a sequence or table for each (report, year, month) set.
It would be nice if PostgreSQL supported incrementing "on a secondary column in a multiple-column index" like MySQL's MyISAM tables, but I couldn't find a mention of such a feature in the manual.
An obvious solution is to select the current value in the table + 1, but this obviously is not safe for concurrent sessions. Maybe a pre-insert trigger would work, but are they guaranteed to be non-concurrent?
Also note that I'm inserting incidents individually, so I can't use generate_series as suggested elsewhere.
It would be nice if PostgreSQL supported incrementing "on a secondary column in a multiple-column index" like MySQL's MyISAM tables
Yeah, but note that in doing so, MyISAM locks your entire table. Which then makes it safe to find the biggest +1 without worrying about concurrent transactions.
In Postgres, you can do this too, and without locking the whole table. An advisory lock and a trigger will be good enough:
CREATE TYPE animal_grp AS ENUM ('fish','mammal','bird');
CREATE TABLE animals (
grp animal_grp NOT NULL,
id INT NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
name varchar NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (grp,id)
);
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION animals_id_auto()
RETURNS trigger AS $$
DECLARE
_rel_id constant int := 'animals'::regclass::int;
_grp_id int;
BEGIN
_grp_id = array_length(enum_range(NULL, NEW.grp), 1);
-- Obtain an advisory lock on this table/group.
PERFORM pg_advisory_lock(_rel_id, _grp_id);
SELECT COALESCE(MAX(id) + 1, 1)
INTO NEW.id
FROM animals
WHERE grp = NEW.grp;
RETURN NEW;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql STRICT;
CREATE TRIGGER animals_id_auto
BEFORE INSERT ON animals
FOR EACH ROW WHEN (NEW.id = 0)
EXECUTE PROCEDURE animals_id_auto();
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION animals_id_auto_unlock()
RETURNS trigger AS $$
DECLARE
_rel_id constant int := 'animals'::regclass::int;
_grp_id int;
BEGIN
_grp_id = array_length(enum_range(NULL, NEW.grp), 1);
-- Release the lock.
PERFORM pg_advisory_unlock(_rel_id, _grp_id);
RETURN NEW;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql STRICT;
CREATE TRIGGER animals_id_auto_unlock
AFTER INSERT ON animals
FOR EACH ROW
EXECUTE PROCEDURE animals_id_auto_unlock();
INSERT INTO animals (grp,name) VALUES
('mammal','dog'),('mammal','cat'),
('bird','penguin'),('fish','lax'),('mammal','whale'),
('bird','ostrich');
SELECT * FROM animals ORDER BY grp,id;
This yields:
grp | id | name
--------+----+---------
fish | 1 | lax
mammal | 1 | dog
mammal | 2 | cat
mammal | 3 | whale
bird | 1 | penguin
bird | 2 | ostrich
(6 rows)
There is one caveat. Advisory locks are held until released or until the session expires. If an error occurs during the transaction, the lock is kept around and you need to release it manually.
SELECT pg_advisory_unlock('animals'::regclass::int, i)
FROM generate_series(1, array_length(enum_range(NULL::animal_grp),1)) i;
In Postgres 9.1, you can discard the unlock trigger, and replace the pg_advisory_lock() call with pg_advisory_xact_lock(). That one is automatically held until and released at the end of the transaction.
On a separate note, I'd stick to using a good old sequence. That will make things faster -- even if it's not as pretty-looking when you look at the data.
Lastly, a unique sequence per (year, month) combo could also be obtained by adding an extra table, whose primary key is a serial, and whose (year, month) value has a unique constraint on it.
I think I found better solution. It doesn't depends on grp Type (it can be enum, integer and string) and can be used in a lot of cases.
myFunc() - function for a trigger. You can name it as you want.
number - autoincrement column which grows up for each exists value of grp.
grp - your column you want to count in number.
myTrigger - trigger for your table.
myTable - table where you want to make trigger.
unique_grp_number_key - unique constraint key. We need make it for unique pair of values: grp and number.
ALTER TABLE "myTable"
ADD CONSTRAINT "unique_grp_number_key" UNIQUE(grp, number);
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION myFunc() RETURNS trigger AS $body_start$
BEGIN
SELECT COALESCE(MAX(number) + 1, 1)
INTO NEW.number
FROM "myTable"
WHERE grp = NEW.grp;
RETURN NEW;
END;
$body_start$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
CREATE TRIGGER myTrigger BEFORE INSERT ON "myTable"
FOR EACH ROW
WHEN (NEW.number IS NULL)
EXECUTE PROCEDURE myFunc();
How does it work? When you insert something in myTable, trigger invokes and checks if number field is empty. If it is empty, myFunc() select MAX value of number where grp equals to new grp value which you want to insert. It returns max value + 1 like auto_increment and replaces null number field to new autoincrement value.
This solution is more unique than Denis de Bernardy cause it doesn't depend on grp Type, but thanks to him, his code helps me write my solution.
Maybe it's too late to write answer, but i can't found unique solution for this problem in stackoverflow, so it can help someone. Enjoy and thanks for help!
I think this will help:
http://www.varlena.com/GeneralBits/130.php
Note that in MySQL it is for MyISAM tables only.
PP I have tested advisory locks and found them useless for more than 1 transaction in same time. I am using 2 windows of pgAdmin. First is as simple as possible:
BEGIN;
INSERT INTO animals (grp,name) VALUES ('mammal','dog');
COMMIT;
BEGIN;
INSERT INTO animals (grp,name) VALUES ('mammal','cat');
COMMIT;
ERROR: duplicate key violates unique constraint "animals_pkey"
Second:
BEGIN;
INSERT INTO animals (grp,name) VALUES ('mammal','dog');
INSERT INTO animals (grp,name) VALUES ('mammal','cat');
COMMIT;
ERROR: deadlock detected
SQL state: 40P01
Detail: Process 3764 waits for ExclusiveLock on advisory lock [46462,46496,2,2]; blocked by process 2712.
Process 2712 waits for ShareLock on transaction 136759; blocked by process 3764.
Context: SQL statement "SELECT pg_advisory_lock( $1 , $2 )"
PL/pgSQL function "animals_id_auto" line 15 at perform
And database is locked and can not be unlocked - it is unknown what to unlock.