I am trying to write a test case where I have to access UI Thread.
Does Nunit provide a way to access the ui thread or is there anyway I can execute some code on UI Thread in my test case.
Thanks
Update: I'm using winform. The usual way is to have the presentation layer and write the test cases against it but in this situation I have a grid that I need to work with and to populate it, its DataSource property needs to be set on UI Thread.
That very much depends on which technology you are using for your UI. Depending on that it might be possible to setup the NUnit runner thread to act as your UI thread.
Genrally though, it is recommended to make the actual UI layer as thin as possible to reduce the amount of UI-code to test.
If you really need to have a live WinForms control on your NUnit thread, consider using Application.DoEvents() which will handle all currently pending events in the message queue. Be aware that doing so might bring you other problems though.
You could try NUnit Forms, but I'd second David's recommendation to take as much logic as possible out of the UI layer.
There is a 'RequiresSTA' attribute you can specify on the test that will run it in the same thread as the NUnit UI.
I discovered this when trying to write a test for a TIBCO Rendezvous message. The listener has to be set up in the main UI thread (blame TIBCO, not me!), otherwise the call to getAutoDispatchQueueGroup returns an error "Object cannot complete the requested operation".
I tried using WindowsFormsSynchronizationContext and BeginInvoke, and neither worked.
For NUnit 3+, I got this working by declaring on a test class with [TestFixture, Apartment(ApartmentState.STA)] or on a test method with [Test, Apartment(ApartmentState.STA)].
Also see this related question.
NUnit has no builtin support AFAIK. You can execute code in your UI thread of course, but the 'how' depends on the UI technology you use (WPF or Winforms)
Look for something like BeginInvoke() and pass an anonymous delegate to it that you can define in your unit test
Related
I'm new to iOS development (and Obj-C), and I'm trying to port an existing C program to iOS.
The C program usually runs in the console, but I want to make a UI for it on the iPhone. I've already ported the C code, and when the simulator is run I can get the printf output in the console window. I want to avoid changing the original code as much as possible, so this is my plan:
The program takes some time to execute, so I think I need to run it on a seperate thread. It look likes I'll only need an NSInvocationOperation to call it's main method.
I will redirect stdout to a pipe.
On another thread, I will read from the pipe, and throw this to the UI. I'm not sure what might be the best concurrancy API to use for this.
Is this a good strategy for the iOS, or is there a better alternative for porting this? Are there any pitfalls I should look out for?
For concurrency, use the dispatch queues for quickest programming. See this guide: http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#documentation/General/Conceptual/ConcurrencyProgrammingGuide/Introduction/Introduction.html
To print to the screen, you could do this in many different ways, but just use a UILabel if you just want get text up there right away. You can also format it nicely later.
Main pitfalls for multithreading are like on any OS - locking any data models that have simultaneous read/write. You can use #synchronize or make your dispatch queues thread safe by using dispatch barriers also noted in the linked guide above.
Need your help.
In my application, i want to implement a background process which keeps running continuously and downloads the updated data and stores it in document folder.
And my main thread should keep checking the document folder and display the updated data in view control.
The child thread should end once the view disappears. and start again once the view appears.
What is the best way to do it? NSThread or NSOperationQueue? What precautions are required?
I also have to access few variables of the class. So is should be thread safe.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
If you do not need to update a progress bar or something in iOS5 there is one great API method + sendAsynchronousRequest:queue:completionHandler: that allows you to run async download as a block inside NSOperationQueue. If not you should look into third party libs such as ASIHTTP request or https://github.com/AFNetworking/AFNetworking(probably better the last one) or you need to build you own download manager, not a simple task
there are two ways to do it..
First: You use NSOperationQueue which is a bit bulkier as it is build on GCD but does have some extra features.
Second: You use GCD (grand central dispatch) looking at requirements I would say GCD seems fine as you can easily access any thread(main or background) this would be slightly quicker.
You can have a look at - (void)performSelectorInBackground:(SEL)aSelector withObject:(id)arg This method creates a new thread in your application, putting your application into multithreaded mode if it was not already. In your viewDidDisappear, you can stop the task when your view disappears
From Apple Docs. Apple encourages to investigate the alternative Mac OS X technologies for implementing concurrency. This is especially true if you are not already familiar with the design techniques needed to implement a threaded application. These alternative technologies simplify the amount of work you have to do to implement concurrent paths of execution and offer much better performance than traditional threads.
https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/Multithreading/AboutThreads/AboutThreads.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/10000057i-CH6-SW2
First of all, I am a a very new Objective C/Cocoa iOS Developer but I've written C/C++ applications before.
So I managed to run the Rabbitmq-c (http://hg.rabbitmq.com/rabbitmq-c/) client inside my iPhone App, and I can connect to Rabbitmq directly from my app and even consume a queue item. So all's good.
Now my problem is, my iPhone app needs to use the rabbitmq-c library to poll for incoming messages in from the server. Probably there will be, an almost infinite while loop.
Do I have to take this to a new thread? Ideally, I want to wrap the rabbitmq-c class as an Async objective C class and use NSNotification (or something similar) to notify my UI. I'm a bit leery of creating a new thread, as I read about stuffs like Runloop etc can solve a lot of problems without using an extra thread.
What is the best way for me to go about this? Any examples of code or directions would be helpful. Please remember, I am not dealing with an Objective C code/Coca rabbitmq library here, I'm using C code inside my iPhone app.
Thanks
Subrat
don't block the main thread with your server polling.
since the operation never ends, create your own thread and run loop for this server polling. you can potentially use the run loop (each thread has one) instead of the infinite while. the alternatives involve regularly spawning threads. it's easiest to just use one thread for this.
once you have an update, post the notification (if you choose NSNotification) from the main thread -- UIKit is meant to operate from the main thread only.
for samples, i'd begin with samples related to NSRunLoop and CFRunLoop.
good luck
You can also create custom delegates for updating the UI, or the stuff related to UIKit.
Notifications might be a little easier to code and offer the advantage that multiple objects can observe one notification. With delegates, such a thing cannot be done without modifying the delegating object (and is unusual).
Some advantages of delegating:
The connection between delegating object and delegate is made clearer, especially if implementing the delegate is mandatory.
If more than one type of message has to be passed from delegatee to delegate, delegating can make this clearer by specifying one delegate method per message.
Or other way is to write method to receive messages. This method can have infinite loop.
Later you can put this method in background thread like this.
[self performSelectorInBackground:#selector(receiveMessages) withObject:nil];
I have a web application that I am adding workflow functionality to using Windows Workflow Foundation. I have based my solution around K. Scott Allen's Orders Workflow example on OdeToCode. At the start I didn't realise the significance of the caveat "if you use Delay activities with and configure active timers for the manual scheduling service, these events will happen on a background thread that is not associated with an HTTP request". I now need to use Delay activities and it doesn't work as is with his solution architecture. Has anyone come across this and found a good solution to this? The example is linked to from a lot of places but I haven't seen anyone else come across this issue and it seems like a bit of a show stopper to me.
Edit: The problem is that the results from the workflow are returned to the the web application via HttpContext. I am using the ManualWorkflowSchedulerService with the useActiveTimers and this works fine for most situations because workflow events are fired from the web app and HttpContext still exists when the workflow results are returned and the web app can continue processing. When a delay activity is used processing happens on a background thread and when it tries to return results to the web app, there is no valid HttpContext (because there has been no Http Request), so further processing fails. That is, the webapp is trying to process the workflow results but there has been no http request.
I think I need to do all post Delay activity processing within the workflow rather than handing off to the web app.
Cheers.
You didn't describe the problem you are having. But maybe this is of some help.
You can use the ManualWorkflowSchedulerService with the useActiveTimers and the workflow will continue on another thread. Normally this is fine because your HTTP request has already finished and it doesn't really matter.
If however you need full control the workflow runtime will let you get a handle on all loaded workflows using the GetLoadedWorkflows() function. This will return acollection of WorkflowInstance objects. usign these you can can call the GetWorkflowNextTimerExpiration() to check which is expired. If one is you can manually resume it. In this case you want to use the ManualWorkflowSchedulerService with the useActiveTimers=false so you can control the last thread as well. However in most cases using useActiveTimers=true works perfectly well.
I have some slow internet task to save and load file, I'd like to do those slow tasks in some background thread. I am wondering whether that's doable, and if it is, any sample code?
Then after it is finished, I'd like it to notice back to the main thread, so that I could update the UI.
Take a look at NSURLConnection. It will load an NSURL (using NSURLRequest) in the background, and send delegate methods regarding its status.
Ultimately the device you are running your code on has a single processor and cannot possibly load large quantities (gigabytes) of data. The best route, by is likely that suggested by Ben (NSURLConnection asynchronously) which gives you the added advantage of being able to cleanly cancel and handle error messages. While it isn't technically threaded in the way you probably think you want it to be, it is well integrated with the event loop and is non-blocking. If that is still not enough, I would suggest looking at NSOperation and NSOperationQueue. You can fire off an NSOperation sub-class object and perform the download there (I would still advise doing it asynchronously there so as to enable canceling, pausing, etc).
Log in to the iPhone Developer Center and search for Introduction to Threading Programming. Or, maybe you can log in and use this link:
http://developer.apple.com/iphone/library/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/Multithreading/Introduction/chapter_1_section_1.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/10000057i-CH1-SW1
If you do decide you need a background thread even after using asynchronous HTTP calls to gather the data, don't forget to wrap the background thread code in a new NSAutoReelasePool and then release it at the end.