I could have sworn there was a way to keep a local ignore file in an hg repo, i.e. a file similar in function to .hgignore, but not checked into the repo. This could be used to ignore changes to an IDE project file if different IDEs are being used, for example. I'm having trouble finding how it's done. Does anyone recall the details?
This is what I was looking for.
Add the following to the repo's .hg/hgrc:
[ui]
ignore = /path/to/repo/.hg/hgignore
and create a new file .hg/hgignore beside it. This new file will be
untracked, but work the same as the versioned .hgignore file for this
specific working copy. (The /path/to/repo bit is unfortunate but
necessary to make it work when invoking 'hg' from within a subdir of
the repo.)
In version 3.5, setting the ignore property under the ui section changes the global ignore file. To add additional files to be ignored, follow the advice of Jeroen Dierckx and set the ignore.local property to get the same effect as adding to .git/info/exclude in a git repository.
[ui]
ignore = .hgignore
ignore.local = .hg/hgignore
Just make an .hgignore file and add .hgignore to the .hgignore file itself.
Related
my problem is quite simple: there is a folder in my project which I want versioned, but not pushed along with the rest of the project when I push updates. The situation is that I made an Android app stub along with the project, and I don't want to push it until it is actually somewhat functioning. It's a pretty bulky folder.
I do not want to make a separate branch for that folder, because of two problems: firstly, updating that branch whenever I pull from remote will require a merge; secondly, swapping between the two branches requires noticeable waiting time as the thousands of Android files are created/deleted, and this is very annoying to me.
I was thinking about editing .hgignore in some way, but I think it is wrong that the remote repo will then have my local folder as ignored.
Any suggestions?
You can add this snippet to your repo's hgrc file:
[ui]
ignore = /path/to/.hg/hgignore
where the point about this hgignore file is that it is non-versioned and local to you. The contents hgignore can be anything that would also be suitable for the (versioned) .hgignore. e.g:
syntax: glob
/directory/to/ignore
The name of the file, hgignore, can be called anything, but it's what I use.
You can use the configuration [defaults] section to add some "--exclude" options to usual commands (see my answer to Mercurial hg ignore does not work properly ) for more details. You can even specify which files you do not want to commit in your directory, e.g., stub/**.c for all C files in the hierarchy of directories below stub.
But.. be careful that it is dangerous to silently ignore modifications to files and also that this [defaults] section has been marked as deprecated (it is still present in 2.9.2).
If this is a temporary situation, it would solve your problem though: you would just have to remove the --exclude parts when you feel ready to commit and push your stub.
I am using a Git Repository to manage my project,
Now when i try to commit i see there are some impoertant file like content/image , scripts , etc files in untrack files
Why?
Is there any way to resolve this?
Regards,
vinit
You have to use "git add [wildcard or directory or file(s)]" first to add your files to the versioning system GIT. Manual page is here: https://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-add.html
And the git book is worth a read.
Also I liked gitready very much.
Happy coding
If your Git repo has been initialized on GitHub (and then cloned), it is likely to come with a .gitignore (as well as a README.md, and even a LICENSE file).
Check if those files aren't ignored by the rules in the .gitignore.
You can do that with:
git check-ignore -v scripts
You can edit that file to remove the rules you don't want, then a git add . will add:
the modified .gitignore files
the files that were previously ignored.
Adding files to .hgignore will prevent them from being tracked. But we have some files that we want to be in the repository - we just don't want users to ever commit changes. Is there a way to ignore changes to these files, so they won't get committed in an hg commit.
That cannot be done in Mercurial — a file is either tracked or untracked (and then optionally ignored). You should instead version a template file and then ignore the real file.
So add config.template to version control and add config to .hgignore. Ask your developers to copy the template to the real name and customize it as needed.
I'm wondering where to put .hgignore file; in the main repository or each programmer should have it on his cloned copy?
Please clarify. Thanks.
You should put the file at the root of your repository.
See :
https://www.selenic.com/mercurial/hgignore.5.html
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/.hgignore
It says:
These files can be ignored by listing them in a .hgignore file in the root of the working directory. The .hgignore file must be created manually. It is typically put under version control, so that the settings will propagate to other repositories with push and pull.
Also another advantage is that, you might be working on multiple projects. Each having it's own set of pattern of files to ignore. For example, working on a Visual Studio project or a simple C++ project or a Python project. This ensures that patterns to ignore are relevant to the project.
How ever, you may not want to replicate these patterns in every ignore files. In such a case Mercurial configuration file can reference a set of per-user or global ignore files.
Example for global ignore files
in ~/.hgrc1:
[ui]
ignore = ~/.hgignore
in ~/.hgignore:
syntax: glob
*.tex
*.R
1 On Windows: %USERPROFILE%\mercurial.ini, ~ refers to %USERPROFILE% on Windows.
I've never seen it anywhere but the main repository.
How are you going to ignore the .hgignore without an .hgignore file in the repositry to ignore it ;P
Seriously.. it should probably be in the repository, since the files to be ignored are respositry-specific; a user can of course specify their own ignores additionally in a file specified in their .hgrc
you can have a global one inside your ~/.hgrc directory or a project specific one inside
the project's root directory
It belongs in the top folder of the repository. It is not meant for personal ignores but for project-wide ignores (i.e. applying for everyone). However, usually developers will add e.g. their faviourite editor's temp. files to that file - doesn't hurt anyone.
If you want to ignore something others probably do NOT want to ignore, put it in your personal ignore in ~/.hgrc.
I have a file with database settings in my project which I have set to some defaults. The file is tracked by Mercurial and checked in. Since this file will be edited with different values various developer machines, is there a way I can tell Mercurial to ignore new changes to this file?
I tried adding the file to the .hgignore file, but since the file is tracked it isn't ignored. This is alright and good in other situations, but I am wondering if there is something I can do here?
Using a file template is definitely the best solution.
For example, if you have a database.ini file, commit a database.ini.template file and ignore database.ini in .hgignore
If you always want to ignore the file, you can add the -X option as a default for commit to your .hg/hgrc configuration file:
[defaults]
commit = -X program.conf
We wrote an extension for this called exclude. It will automatically add the -X options on the commands that support them -- so hg status and hg commit wont see the modified file. It works by reading a .hgexclude file from the root of your repository, just like the .hgignore file. You add the files that you want to exclude there:
syntax: glob
db.conf
The extension works quite well, but there is a known situation where it fails: merges and the commit that follows a merge (this is documented on the wiki). It would need to be improved so that it would save the modifications away to a temporary file and then restore them afterwards. Please get in contact if you need this feature.
There is no truly automated process, but you can try (as in this SO question) the -X option on hg commit:
% hg stat
M myfile
% hg commit -X 'myfile'
(other solutions might involve shelve or hq)
However, this is not the "right" solution. I would rather recommend versioning:
a file template
a script able to generate the final file (that you modify but can ignore altogether)
If you are using TortoiseHG, open the Settings for the repo, go to the Commit section (2nd icon down on the left) & add the file name(s) to the Auto Exclude list on the right (~ 3rd from the bottom in the list).
From https://tortoisehg.readthedocs.io/en/latest/settings.html#commit
Typically you would check in a reference copy of the file and track it then have the developers make a copy of that for local development, you wouldn't really want developers editing the source controlled file for their own environments.
If your configuration system supports it, it's even easier if you can use an override file that simply override values in the reference copy (e.g. the database connection string). That way devs only have to keep a very minimal local set of override values.
If the file is already being tracked, you can issue the Forget command to the file. If you're using TortoiseHg just right click the file during commit and select Forget. The file must also be already in the ignore list.
I had the same problem as yours, I file keeps on appearing on every commit even-though its already in the ignore list. I tried the Forget command and it did the trick.
You can try hg forget.
For more details, see the official manual about the same command.
It worked for me.
I think, something like this is closer to a correct answer to the original question Mercurial: How to ignore changes to a tracked file, rather than the others suggesting a template, etc.