iPhone: Can my Leaking App harm other apps? - iphone

So, I finished writing my first iPhone App, and I have sent it out to a group of beta testers.
Everybody is happy, except for this one guy who noticed that after having run my app, another app is not starting up anymore.
Not knowing too much about memory management, I started looking at the Leaks graphs in Instruments, and noticed, that there are some leaks going on in my app.
Three questions:
Are leaks always bad? The biggest leak is 15k on a total of 5,1 MB allocated memory.
Will Apple refuse my app because of leaks?
Is not all the memory automatically freed up as soon as my app quits? Could it be that my leaking app is harmful to other apps?
Thanks
Sjakelien

Each app is supposed to run in its own "sandbox," and is by design not supposed to affect any other app installed on the phone. If your reviewer found a case where your app really did affect another app, that's definitely not your fault, although I'd love to know how that was accomplished ;).
My guess is, though, that your reviewer's other app broke completely independently of your app, and he/she is spuriously attributing the fault to your app. Ask him to try to reproduce the problem (uninstall both apps, install the other app, install your app).

what the other two answers say i agree with, however nobody has answered the first question ("Are leaks always bad") directly. i would say that yes they are. it's true that your program can possibly run with them for long periods of time without issue. and the OS should clean up the memory after termination (unless there's a bug in the OS, as said before). but eventually the leak will become an issue for someone at some point when they run long enough. also, even if it doesn't become an issue, it's probably a best practice to always fix memory leaks that you know about.

Any leak that persists beyond the exit of your application is an OS bug, and hence Apple's problem.
It would be unfair to reject your app on this basis.
I don't know if that's any comfort to you.
For the record, my app provokes a leak in mediaserverd.
The leak is a tiny bit smaller in the 3.0GM.
Another incorrect usage of an API crashed mediaserverd.
Also 3.0GM. Nasty. I'd have preferred an error code, however
this could theoretically be used to work around the leak.

It depends on what "memory" you are leaking. Are you using device storage space to cache something? In theory then it's possible that you've used up enough space the other app cannot start because it needs a certain amount of free space.
If we're talking physical memory, then no. When your app is dead it is dead. You could ask them to restart the device and see if they have the same issue.

Apple does approve apps that have memory leaks.
That said, we thoroughly check that none of "our code" leaks before submitting to Apple because users don't like having an app suddenly shut down on them. I say "our code" because there are memory leaks in the framework that are not your doing. Thus Apple approves apps with memory leaks.
Also, I am doubtful your app has adversely affected the user's other app. I have not seen that behavior.

Related

Memory size was keep on increasing while running application in Xcode 5 with iOS 7

I am implementing an iPhone application and when I ran this app initially it was showing memory size was 5.3MB
and after 10 min it was showing memory size was 185.3 MB.
I'm releasing objects manually and also analyzed my app, I have only one memory leak(that to return object in class method). What was the problem? is it harm to app while apple approve it?. Please help me. Thanks in advance.
No, you really shouldn't release it with this kind of a leak (or memory accretion). It will lead to crashes and that will cause data loss and upset users.
Heapshot analysis is designed to track down these kinds of problems. That is, use the Allocations Instrument to track memory growth over time iteratively and then eliminate the large memory consumers.
Apple will probably approve it as long as it is not crashing within the review time.
But no you should not release the app if you have a memory leak like this. Your app will have poor user experience and might crash if the users device memory runs full. You will get a low app store rating.
I would suggest you find out which object is taking up so much memory and fix it. If at all possible switch to ARC, this will take away some leaks.
I have same problem too. NSZombieEnabled flag work for me. I think this might be helpful to cope up with ARC. I have followed this link: How do I set up NSZombieEnabled in Xcode 4?

Concerns about testing an app on actual iphone

I would like to start testing my application on my iPhone. However, I have one concern.
What if my app has many memory leaks? If i ran such an app on the iPhone multiple times, wouldn't that result in a crash on my iPhone? i.e memory keeps getting allocated but never deallocated?
should i worry about accidentally creating unnecessary files on my iphone such that each time I run i somehow create a file that i dont delete, and it keeps taking up a few kb of space. I test the app many times and after a while i have no space left on my iphone. can such a thing happen? can testing on an actual device damage my phone???
Thanks!
What if my app has many memory leaks? If i ran such an app on the
iPhone multiple times, wouldn't that result in a crash on my iPhone?
i.e memory keeps getting allocated but never deallocated?
Memory leaks are only a problem as long as the memory is still allocated for your application. As soon as your application closes, or crashes, its memory is deallocated and returned to the OS. If you are running iOS 4 you can double click the home button and close the application to free up memory.
should i worry about accidentally creating unnecessary files on my
iphone such that each time I run i somehow create a file that i dont
delete, and it keeps taking up a few kb of space. I test the app many
times and after a while i have no space left on my iphone. can such a
thing happen?
Yea you should take care to create as few files as possible. However, because all files created by your app are contained in a little sandbox that is associated with your app they are deleted when your app is uninstalled. If you feel like your test app is taking up too much space simply uninstall it and then install it again using Xcode. Although I wouldn't worry too much about this as you would have to create A LOT of large test files before they started filling up your phone.
can testing on an actual device damage my phone???
I highly doubt its possible. That is one of the reasons that apple restricts which API's you can and can't use. If you jailbreak your phone and start doing things apple doesn't want you to do all bets are off.
I wouldn't worry too much about messing up your phone by developing on it. I've never heard of someone damaging their phone doing this and if for some reason you phone starts acting up just restore it in iTunes.
Here's a tip. Use Analyze tool in Xcode. Find leaks and remove them. And check the performance using Instruments. Fix your memory leaks using that as well. Once you do both diligently, there should be no reason to worry about leaks anymore. Your other concerns are a bit unnecessary. If you are using only the public cocoa touch APIs, your device should be perfectly safe :)
Also be sure to clean up any unused resources, etc. When you send it to the background, it only does so much. Make sure you release objects you own, and release the resources. Set autorelease when you can.

App Store Rejection - Memory pop-up

My team is developing an iPhone app which is very demanding in terms of memory. In order for a better user experience we are thinking of presenting a pop-up to the user upon startup stating the memory requirements and also a pop-up upon low memory.
Has anyone had a problem with such a solution, in terms of being rejected from the app store?
Thanks
It's simple, don't show any UIAlertView in a memory warning.
The user is not responsible to manage the memory for you. You need to take actions in memory pressure by releasing caches or other less important information.
iOS itself will release memory and kill other apps when it's needed.
To answer your question, I don't know if Apple reject apps for that reason, but they repeated more then once to not to do so.
IMHO, on iOS systems, specifying the memory requirements to the user is not relevant. Most smartphone users won't know the available memory and don't want to be bother by technical aspects. To be successful, your app need to be robust and that also means memory adaptive.
As far as i remember you can ask the system to give you the amount of free memory. Try to manage your memory consumption using it. There are many strategies. Common ones are to ask it periodically or ask it lazily only when you are going to load big data.
When you receive memory warning, try to reduce your memory footprint the more you can
I'm not sure anyone can say anything sensible about whether this behavior will be acceptable in the app store. I've never heard of an app trying it.
Philosophically, it seems counter to the HIG. Memory management is your job, not the user's. You could maybe give them some "usage information" on first launch asking them to close backgrounded apps when using this one, but putting a memory alert in front of the user just feels inappropriate.
Apple might not be happy with an alert, but possibly some kind of subtle ui graph showing available memory abstractly would be ok, and probably a nicer experience as the user could see how what they were doing affects memory.

SpringBoard memory allocation (iPhone/iPad)

I have an application under development that uses a large amount of memory for images and OpenGL textures.
I have noticed that occasionally, in fact frequently on some devices, SpringBoard, the application which manages the home screen for the iPhone and iPad can take up excessive amounts of memory, sometimes twice as much as normal.
When this happens, it sends my application in to memory warnings and even crashes. My images do get released as soon as possible, but I believe that due to the sheer volume, it simply isn't good enough and still results in crashing...
I can't find much in the Apple docs about SpringBoard, but it's pissing me off.
Any ideas or pointers on figuring out what causes SpringBoard to be so aggressive?
Your application shouldn't crash in these situations -- it should shut itself down gracefully when the OS tells it to quit. Apple won't document Springboard very much because there's not much they can tell you about it that should affect what you do as a programmer, which boils down to "use as little memory as possible; don't leak memory; quit as quickly as possible when told to quit".
In short, if you're spending any more time worrying about Springboard's behaviour, instead of fixing the crashes in your app, you're not using your time wisely.
The answer was that MKAnnotationViews, despite being autoreleased, were pooling up in the memory footprint of SpringBoard, as opposed to my own app, and were not manifesting themselves very clearly in Instruments.
This is a fairly deceptive thing on Apple's part, particularly in that they allow you to autorelease and never use an object, but it will never actually be released... therefore it is technically not a leak in the eyes of Instruments and static analysis, but can still easily lead to memory related crashes.

iPhone: leaks from other Apps taking up RAM?

I'm reading some people stating that if another (3rd party) app on someone's iPhone has been leaking memory, that this may reduce the (mystery) amount of RAM your app would otherwise have available.
This confuses me -- does not all app memory get released when the app is closed by the user? And only one app is open at a time on iPhone?
Normally, any memory that your application allocates will be freed when it exits. However, many of Apple's applications continue running after they're "closed", so memory leaks in Mail, for instance, can affect available memory.
In addition, there are apps out there that claim to free up allocated memory. They really don't do anything other than force some dirty pages out of the buffer cache, but they appear to do something, so people believe they must be doing something useful.
On a jailbroken phone - yes, third party apps can be running at the same time as yours. Running out of memory is common with people who like to have many apps running at once hence the need for task managers, killing tasks etc.
On an unhacked phone - no. Yours is the only non-apple app that is running, no others can run at the same time.
So what can you do? All you can do is try to use the minimum memory possible which you're probably already doing. Realistically you can only test with a factory, unhacked phone, unless you are going to spend hours trying to please everyone. If you think you are maybe using too much you could identify the larger allocations using the instruments tools ("Run with performance tool >" from within Xcode) and then post that chunk of code here to get ideas of how to reduce it.
You should run Instruments and then add the instrument "Memory Monitor" to see the memory use of all of the other processes on your phone. (Add with Window -> Library , then drag the Memory Monitor instrument to the instrument panel.
What I'm still trying to determine is why is iOS releasing memory from MY app, and not all of the other memory pig apps that are not currently running.