How can I setup a view controller to refresh the fields in the view only it is pushed on a navigation controller and releases the objects when it is popped from navigation controller views.
My goal is that for a view controller:
Refresh display only when it is pushed on the navigation controller stack
releases data when it is popped from the navigation controller stack
reuse the controller as much as possible (to eliminate xib files loading/unloading overhead)
Are there any delegate methods for viewWillBePushed: and viewWillBePopped:?
Example
Let's say I have three layers of views:
Movies (MovieListController)
--> Movie Basic Info (MovieInfoController)
--> Movie Credits (MovieCreditsController)
Assume we have a class Movie to represent each movie.
Here, I want to only have three UIViewControllers, one instance of each in the runtime of the program. So I can reuse the same MovieInfoController for different movies and similarly MovieCreditsController.
However, I would also like MovieInfoController to only update its view fields (e.g. title, release date, etc) only when it is pushed on the stack. Implementing the display in viewWillAppear will force it to update fields even when MovieCreditsController is popped.
Also, I want MovieInfoController to release its reference to Movie, when it is popped, and any potentially large object (e.g. cover image). Implementing this logic in viewWillDisappear will cause it to release the data when it is pushing MovieCreditsController on the stack.
Is there reasonable? Am I going about it the wrong way?
You're 90% there because you created a Movie object. MovieListController should own a single MovieInfoController. It should call -setMovie: prior to pushing it onto the navigation controller. The call to -setMovie: should be what updates your fields.
Similarly, MovieInfoController should own a single MovieCreditsController, and should call -setMovie: on it before pushing it onto the nav controller.
In MovieListController and MovieInfoController, you can call [subController setMovie:nil] in their -viewDidAppear: to free up memory.
Related
My Initial View Controller of the storyboard load another view controller using performSegue:withIdentifier method which in turn loads some other controller using same performSegue:withIdentifier method.
However, neither the initial view controller nor the second view controller are deallocating. They both tend to have a reference count of 1 as seen via instruments.
I need to send user back to first controller when he logs out of application. The only way I have figured so far is to use performSegue:withIdentifier method and send the user back to initial controller.
However, it concerns me that previous controllers will not have been deallocated thus, resulting in re-creation same view controllers.
Since I need to logout a user back to first screen, I want to make sure that all previous view controllers have been deallocated.
When you perform a push or modal segue, it will not (and should not) release the view controller from which you're seguing. It needs to keep it so that when you pop/dismiss back to it, it will still be there. The exception to this rule is when using a split view controller and you use a replace segue. But that's a special case.
If you want to go back to the first scene, if you're using a navigation controller and using only push segues, you can use popToRootViewControllerAnimated. (For iOS 5 targets, I'll always use navigation controller, and hide the navigation bar if I don't want it visible, for that reason. It's convenient to be able to pop back multiple levels. It's cumbersome to achieve the same effect with modal segues.) In iOS 6, you can use an unwind segue, in which you can pop/dismiss back an arbitrary number level of scenes, for example, to return to your initial scene.
Looping with performSegue is not a good idea..
If you have to go back in your VC hierarchy, you should either use a UINavigationController with pushing/poping VCs, or presenting/dismissing a modal VC. You can combine both by modally presenting a UINavigationController.
Prior to iOS 6 A UIViewController will stay alive but its more expensive UIView will be deallocated to save memory. The UIViewController itself is pretty light compared to a UIView.
Since iOS 6 you should according to the documentation override didReceiveMemoryWarning
Docs for UIViewController:
Memory Management
Memory is a critical resource in iOS, and view controllers provide
built-in support for reducing their memory footprint at critical
times. The UIViewController class provides some automatic handling of
low-memory conditions through its didReceiveMemoryWarning method,
which releases unneeded memory.
Prior to iOS 6, when a low-memory warning occurred, the
UIViewController class purged its views if it knew it could reload or
recreate them again later. If this happens, it also calls the
viewWillUnload and viewDidUnload methods to give your code a chance to
relinquish ownership of any objects that are associated with your view
hierarchy, including objects loaded from the nib file, objects created
in your viewDidLoad method, and objects created lazily at runtime and
added to the view hierarchy. On iOS 6, views are never purged and
these methods are never called. If your view controller needs to
perform specific tasks when memory is low, it should override the
didReceiveMemoryWarning method.
As long as you manage you correctly react (depends on the iOS Version) and dealloc the view I see no problems here.
I'm creating an app using the iPhone Utility App framework, and I'm trying to use a navigation controller on the flipside view, as there will be a lot of drilldown options on this view. When I'm done with this view, I call the following code:
- (IBAction)done:(id)sender
{
[self dismissModalViewControllerAnimated:YES];
}
When I dismiss this view, I want to be able to go back to the place in the navigation I was currently at when I reopen this view again. However, when I dismiss this view using this method, the vc gets deallocated, therefore the menu starts back at the beginning when I try to go back to the menu.
Thoughts?
You'll need to retain a reference to the object (I'm calling it the options controller). I would say the easiest way is to create an iVar in the presenting view controller that references the options controller. Then, when you go to present the options controller again, just present the referenced options controller rather than creating a new controller. If different view controller objects can present the options controller, you'll need to either pass that reference around, or store it in some object that all the other view controllers have access to.
Hmm not much code so maybe I'm misunderstanding your setup, but...
You could use the AppDelegate to store (as a property) your current position (index) in the views collection of the Navigation controller, and then write a method that pushes to that (stored) position when you re-visit it later.
Might be an easier way to do it though..
So what you want is to flip from a view to another view? If you want to keep the navigation bar status between flipping, I recommend you use only one view controller to control this 2 views. you can use + transitionFromView:toView:duration:options:completion: of UIView to flip views.
I have a navigation controller which I push a new tableviewcontroller for each received question to be asked to the user, so in stack it builds up to 30 controllers if there has been 30 question is asked.
The difficulty is that in some of the tableviewcontrollers I want to get the input from user by using another navigation controller inside that tableview: for example in the tableview(which is one the many views in the stack) there may be uitablecell with an arrow on the right saying choose the books you want to order, and when he clicks arrow a new tableview will slide in which includes the books to be choosen multiply with a checkmark, and then he will choose and back to main tableview and continue the main navigation there.
How can implement a new navcontroller inside the main navigation controller? or any better ideas?
EDIT: That can be an idea to push the detail view to the same controller, but then they will get popped immdidatly when user "backs" but I want to show the books (which are chosen in detail view) the main table, and when user clicks again to that cell, detailview will come with previous selected books. is this a good approach
Putting an UINavigationController inside a UINavigationController is a bad idea. What you seem to really want is persistence of state data after popping some of the view controllers off your navigation controller's stack.
I would put that state information into a persistent object. If it's a tiny amount of state data I may add that data to an existing object that I know is persistent, such as the app delegate or the root view controller. I would save a more complicated set of persistent data to a custom object. This object would be retained by the root view controller, and a reference would be given to each successive view controller. This object would have the data that may have been collected by a controller that was popped off the navigation stack and therefore no longer exists.
I don't really get why you dont just push the detailview of the uitableviewcontrollers to the main UINavigationController..
Could you explain that a little bit more detailed?
I have no rights to comment your question, so I am afraid I have to post this as an answer.
MfG,
SideSwipe
Ok. this one's a challenge.
I have a tableview within a navigation controller.
I push it from the root, where I have an add action that allows me to add a new record. That works fine.
Now what I've tried to do is add this tableview to a tab bar view (without a tab bar controller cuz that won't work) but within the same navigation controller.
So what I want to do is this: Root > TabBarView (loads Tableview) > add new record.
The problem lies in the managed object context, I get the whole "can't find entity error" but I have no idea how to fix it.
I've managed to get the AddRecord modal view controller to show up from the tabBarView, but it presents itself without a navigationbar, whereas if I try to add a record in the solitary tableView (outside of the tabbar) its no problem.
I'm now calling my methods from the TabBarView's navigationBarbuttons, routing through to the tableviews methods.
I know my methods have to be called from the tabBarView instead of the actual tableview now, and they do fire, but I don't know how to manage the MOC when its in a tabView.
Oh, and this is based on coredata recipes and books, so when the add record method is fired, it creates a new MOC to create it, then reintegrates back in the main MOC when you're done.
Any ideas?
It sounds like you have a couple of problems.
"Can't find entity" error -- this depends on which Managed Object Context you're using. If you created a separate MOC to manage the object you're editing (which is a good idea, by the way), make sure you assign it a Persistent Store Coordinator. This is how an MOC discovers what objects are available. If you're using the MOC created in the App Delegate, make sure you're spelling the name of the entity correctly.
No Navigation Bar in sheet -- When you push a view controller onto a navigation controller, its navigationItem is used to populate the navigation bar. When you present a view controller as a sheet, only the view controller is displayed. It is not embedded in a navigation controller. In order to get the navigation item to display, you'll need to create a new navigation controller with your view controller as the root, and then present the navigation controller's view.
As far as the main MOC goes, views and controllers should be irrelevant. Obtain a reference to the MOC in whatever controller you are using and operate with that MOC. If your application delegate creates the main MOC, make it a property of that delegate and access that from your view or tab controller.
I don't quite follow what navigation problem you're having, but if there's no navigation bar when you need one, I suspect you need to create and add a UINavigationController somewhere that you're adding a UIViewController subclass. Make the subclass the root of the new UINavigationController and put the controller into the tab or whatever.
Your managed object context (MOC) should not be dependent on navigation or views. It's part of the model. (Although as you know, a 2nd MOC for a cancelable edit view would be dependent on navigation to the extent that you create it for use by the editor.)
The root question is "how many UIViewControllers can you push on the navigation stack?" without causing memory warnings or earning a watchdog termination.
Suppose I have an application that is basically a database for three entities where each can have a relationship with some other entity, and the relationship is shown on a UIViewController. Users can follow those relationships and each one brings up a new controller - If the entities are A, B and C and A->B->C->B->C->A then each kind of view is on the stack twice. I understand how to push and pop, how to push back to a particular controller, and I think rather than just extend the navigation stack indefinitely it might be best to reuse a view controller in the navigation stack.
To do this, every time I wanted a FirstEntityViewController I could scan the navigation stack to find an object where [self isKindOfClass:[FirstEntityViewController class]]; and then call methods designed to rejig that view for what I currently want to see - just refreshing the data in the same way you do when reusing a UITableViewCell.
This is fine except for the effect it might have on the NavigationController. If I use UINavigationController:popToViewController:animated: I think it is going to discard everything above the view I'm popping to, including the view which the user expects to find on tapping "Back" in the navigation bar. So user taps a relationship, taps back and goes "huh?"
If I remove the matching controller from the navigation stack and then pop it on to the top of the stack the back behavior remains OK as long as the user doesn't go back as far as the instance of FirstEntityViewController that was moved or else again navigation will seem inconsistent.
Is the right solution to remove the controller from the stack, and somehow hold a place in the stack so that when the reused controller is popped it can be replaced back where it came from? Should I maintain my own list of view kind and data display so that when popping I can replace the view below the view about to pop to, staying one step ahead of back navigation?
Or is that just getting too complicated? Is there no need to even worry about this situation because the OS reuses much of the view controllers in the same way as UITableViewCells are reused, and there is no real memory or performance impact in having a 50-deep navigation stack?
ViewController instances remain in the UINavigationController's stack, but any view except for the top view may be unloaded at any time (the view controller is notified via the viewDidUnload message).
In other words, the views underneath the top view do not hang around and will eventually be unloaded in low-memory conditions, so there's no need for you to attempt to re-use your view controllers.
Last I checked you can't push a viewcontroller that's already on a navcontroller stack back onto it again. You'll have to create a fresh viewcontroller and push it onto the stack and each back button will pop that one off the stack. The best you can do is make a cache of viewcontrollers and dole them out as-needed -- as long as they're popped off the navcontroller stack. But it probably won't buy you much by way of memory savings.
UITableViews are a bit different in that there's only a relatively small number of cells in view at any given time and as soon as the cell goes offscreen it's removed and returned back into the pool. If you can guarantee that the maxdepth of your chain is fixed, then you can pull a similar windowing scheme. If not, you may have to stick with going deep and be vigilant about releasing memory as soon as you can.