I have a module Routines.pm:
package Routines;
use strict;
use Exporter;
sub load_shortest_path_matrices {
my %predecessor_matrix = shift;
my %shortestpath_matrix = shift;
...
}
From another script I call the sub in the module, passing in arguments which happen to have the same name:
use Routines;
use strict;
my %predecessor_matrix = ();
my %shortestpath_matrix =();
&Routines::load_shortest_path_matrices($predecessor_matrix, $shortestpath_matrix);
However, this doesn't compile and I get
Global symbol "$predecessor_matrix" requires explicit package name
type of errors. Is it not possible to give the same name to variables in different scopes like this in Perl? (I'm from a C background)
$predecessor_matrix is a scalar and %predecessor_matrix is a hash. Different types in Perl (scalar, array, hash, function, and filehandle) have different entries in the symbol table, and, therefore, can have the same name.
Also, you have a problem in your function. It expects to be able to get two hashes from #_, but a hash in list context (such as in the argument list of a function) yields a list of key value pairs. So, both %predecessor_matrix and %shortestpath_matrix will wind up in the %predecessor_matrix of the function. What you need to do here is to use references:
package Routines;
use strict;
use Exporter;
sub load_shortest_path_matrices {
my $predecessor_matrix = shift;
my $shortestpath_matrix = shift;
$predecessor_matrix->{key} = "value";
...
}
and
use Routines;
use strict;
my %predecessor_matrix;
my %shortestpath_matrix;
Routines::load_shortest_path_matrices(
\%predecessor_matrix,
\%shortestpath_matrix
);
However, passing in structures to load as arguments is more C-like than Perl-like. Perl can return more than one value, so it is more common to see code like:
package Routines;
use strict;
use Exporter;
sub load_shortest_path_matrices {
my %predecessor_matrix;
my %shortestpath_matrix;
...
return \%predecessor_matrix, \%shortestpath_matrix;
}
and
use Routines;
use strict;
my ($predecessor_matrix, $shortestpath_matrix) =
Routines::load_shortest_path_matrices();
for my $key (keys %$predecessor_matrix) {
print "$key => $predecessor_matrix->{$key}\n";
}
you are declaring the hash %predecessor_matrix but are trying to pass the scalar $predecessor_matrix. The hash exists, the scalar doesn't.
Maybe you want to pass references to the hashes?
Routines::load_shortest_path_matrices(\%predecessor_matrix, \%shortestpath_matrix);
Here's another way to code it:
use strict;
use warnings;
use Routines;
my $predecessor_matrix = {};
my $shortestpath_matrix ={};
Routines::load_shortest_path_matrices( $predecessor_matrix
, $shortestpath_matrix
);
package Routines;
use strict;
use Exporter;
sub load_shortest_path_matrices {
my $predecessor_matrix = shift;
my $shortestpath_matrix = shift;
...
}
you can access the contents of the hashes like this
my $foobar=$shortestpath_matrix->{FOOBAR};
Related
I want to create a dynamic subroutine name in perl, Here is trial code , I am getting error "Bad name after feed_load::"
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
BEGIN {
push #INC, '/freespace/attlas/data/bin/genericLoader /FeedLoaderLib/'
}
use feed_load;
my type ="L";
my $tempTablefunct = "Create".$type."Temp_Table";
feed_load::&$tempTablefunct->($tablename); ### pass a dynamic sub name HERE ###
&{ $pkg_name."::".$sub_name }(#args)
or
( $pkg_name."::".$sub_name )->(#args)
These will fail, however, because you asked Perl to forbid you from doing this by placing use strict; in your program. You can disable use strict; locally
my $ref = do { no strict 'refs'; \&{ $pkg_name."::".$sub_name } };
$ref->(#args)
But it turns out that \&$sub_name is already exempt from strictures.
my $ref = \&{ $pkg_name."::".$sub_name };
$ref->(#args)
If instead of sub call, you needed a method call, you can use
my $ref = $o->can($method_name);
$o->$ref(#args)
or just
$o->$method_name(#args)
I would like to ask you for advice on writing a Perl module. We have three files.
(1) main.pl : uses my_function()
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
use MyClass;
require "./subroutines.pl";
my $instance = MyClass->new({});
$instance->my_method("a");
MyClass::my_function("b"); # This works.
my_function("c"); # Undefined subroutine &main::my_function called
exit;
(2) MyClass.pm : defines MyClass class. my_method() uses my_function() which is defined in "subroutines.pl".
package MyClass;
use strict;
use warnings;
require "./subroutines.pl";
sub new {
my $class = shift;
my $self = shift;
return bless $self, $class;
}
sub my_method{
my $self = shift;
my $text = shift;
my_function($text);
}
1;
(3) subroutines.pl : defines my_function().
use strict;
use warnings;
sub my_function {
print "[$_[0]] My function is working!\n";
}
1;
The problem is that my_function() is not working in main.pl, even though the source code has require "./subroutines.pl", while MyClass::my_function() works.
[a] My function is working!
[b] My function is working!
Undefined subroutine &main::my_function called at main.pl line 11.
Because my_function() is useful for me, I want to use it in both main.pl and MyClass.pm, but the subroutine is so general that it is quite strange to define it as a method in MyClass.pm. But it is also strange (to me) that we have to write MyClass:: before my_function(), because the subroutine does not depend on MyClass.
My question is: is it possible to modify the above codes so that my_function() works in main.pl without adding MyClass:: before the function call?
require only executes a given file once, so you would need do, but that would created two copies of the subroutine. Use a proper module instead, and use Exporter to export the symbol.
Subroutines.pm:
package Subroutines;
use strict;
use warnings;
use Exporter qw( import );
our #EXPORT = qw( my_function );
sub my_function {
print "[$_[0]] My function is working!\n";
}
1;
and
use Subroutines;
I have 2 perl file and i want to use value of one variable in another perl file as input so how i can do it is there any concept like java we can declare it as public and use it.
any help appreciated thank you!
In this answer, I'll skip the discussion about whether it is the right decision to use OOP or not and just assume you want to do it the OOP-way.
In short, all variables of an object in Perl can be considered public. In fact, the problem is often the opposite - to make some of them private. Anyway, if you have a file Obj.pm which defines an object with a field foo which looks like this:
package Obj;
sub new {
my $class = shift;
my $self = {foo => "bar"};
bless $self, $class;
return $self;
}
you can access the foo variable as if it were public:
use Obj;
my $obj = Obj->new();
print $obj->{foo};
For perhaps a more pleasant OOP in Perl, look at the Moose package which gives you more flexibility.
As #user2864740 pointed you don't need "OO" in perl to share variables.It is one way, Let's say you have two files
Foo.pm(package):
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
use Exporter;
package Foo;
our #ISA = qw(Exporter);
our #EXPORT = qw( blat); #exported by default
our #EXPORT_OK = qw(bar );#not exported by default
our $x="42";#variable to be shared should be "our" not "my"
sub bar {
print "Hello $_[0]\n"
}
sub blat {
print "World $_[0]\n"
}
1;
Access that variable from other file as
bar.pl :
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
use Foo;
print "$Foo::x";#imported variable
blat("hello");#imported subroutine
If you want to import listed functions then:
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
use Foo qw(bar blat);# import listed subs
print "$Foo::x";#imported variable
blat("hello ");#imported subroutine
bar("hi");#this also get imported
i tried several hours to store a sub array into an object and failed. maybe someone of you can show me how to store a deep copy with perl.
sry i dont know if this question is clear, but should be easy to solve...
here the example.
here the object class
package obj;
use strict;
use warnings;
require Exporter;
our #ISA = qw(Exporter);
sub new(\#){
my $class=shift;
my $this={};
$this->{"array"}=shift;
return bless($this,$class);
}
sub getArray(){
my $this=shift;
return $this->{"array"};
}
and the test class
use strict;
use warnings;
use obj;
my #a=(1,2);
push #a,3;
my $ob=obj->new(\#a);
#a=();
print #{$ob->getArray()};
this returns nothing - does not shift dereference the array?
so how to do this?
thx
Deference what array? The only array involved in the shift is #_? $_[0] is a scalar, not an array.
A (shallow) array copy is done using:
#dst = #src;
so you want
#{ $this->{"array"} } = #{ shift };
If you truly want an deep copy (though there's no need for it in your example), use
use Storable qw( dclone );
$this->{"array"} = dclone(shift);
I have two Perl packages: pack_hash and pack_run
package pack_hash;
$VERSION = '1.00';
#ISA = qw( Exporter );
#EXPORT_OK = qw( %hashInfo );
$hashInfo{abc} = ['a', 'b', 'c'];
1;
package pack_run;
use stricts;
use warnings;
use Data::Dumper;
use pack_hash qw( %hashInfo );
somethingDoing();
sub somethingDoing {
my $var1 = \%pack_hash::hashInfo; # getting the hash reference
print Dumper($var1);
...
...
}
1;
Can anyone please let me know, whether it is possible to replace the name of the hash-package (pack_hash), by using any variable, like:
my $pakVar = "pack_hash";
my $var1 = \%$pakVar::hashInfo;
I, know it is WRONG/NOT_CORRECT, but I want this kind of symbolic ref transformation, when I'm using strictures.
I also wanted to know, whether it is possible to do the thing with eval. But I want a final variable, here $var1, which will refer the particular hash (hashInfo);
No, that is not possible. But this is:
use strict;
use warnings;
use Symbol qw<qualify_to_ref>;
my $pakVar = 'pack_hash';
my $var1 = *{ qualify_to_ref( 'hashInfo', $pakVar ) }{HASH};
qualify_to_ref takes the name of a package variable and the package name and returns a GLOB reference pointer, then you just access the HASH slot of the GLOB. You can also do it this way:
my $var1 = \%{ qualify_to_ref( 'hashInfo', $pakVar ) };
But it is just as easy to turn off strict in a very tight do as well;
my $var1
= do {
no strict;
\%{ $pakVar . '::hashInfo' };
};
I understand that some coding cultures consider turning off strict or warnings as "cheating". I know that I've had code review questions about turning off one class of warning in a small block like this. I knew which warnings I was going to get, so I didn't need it. The reviewer didn't see it this way.
For this reason some veteran Perl-ers think nothing about turning off strict. But if you can't because it makes the natives restless--you can use Symbol. However, some shops have rules against package variables, so it never becomes an issue.
If you have a class method that returns a reference to the hash:
package pack_hash;
use strict;
use warnings;
our %hashInfo;
$hashInfo{abc} = ['a', 'b', 'c'];
sub hashInfo { \%hashInfo }
then you can easily get the reference:
use strict;
use warnings;
my $pakVar = 'pack_hash';
my $hashInfo = $pakVar->hashInfo();
print #{ $hashInfo->{'abc'} };