Is there any method to execute foo2.pl from foo1.pl in Perl, and append the foo2.txt to the foo1.txt then create foo3.txt? thanks.
i.e.
foo1.pl
print "Hello"; # output to foo1.txt;
foo2.pl
print "World"; # output to foo2.txt;
How to create foo3.txt file based on foo1.pl.
foo3.txt
Hello
World
Something like append foo2.txt to foo1.txt.
As i know, I can open foo1.txt and foo2.txt, then include the lines in foo3.pl.
print FOO3_TXT (<FOO1_TXT>);
print FOO3_TXT (<FOO2_TXT>);
Is there any good method?
Update my test (ActivePerl 5.10.1)
My foo.pl
#!C:\Perl\bin\perl.exe
use strict;
use warnings;
print "world\n";
my hw.pl (foo.pl and hw.pl at the same directory)
#!C:\Perl\bin\perl.exe
use strict;
use warnings;
print 'hello ';
print `./foo.pl`;
Output
**D:\learning\perl>hw.pl
hello '.' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.**
If hw.pl updated {}:
#!C:\Perl\bin\perl.exe
use strict;
use warnings;
print q{hello }, qx{./foo.pl};
Now Output. (a little different for the loacation of hello)
D:\learning\perl>hw.pl
'.' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
hello
[Update].
Fixed. see answer,
run this as a script
perl foo1.pl > foo3.txt;
perl foo2.pl >> foo3.txt;
contents of foo1.pl
!#/bin/perl
print "Hello";
contents of foo2.pl
!#/bin/perl
print "World";
or
simply use the cat command if you are running linux to append foo2.txt to foo1.txt.
Just in case you are being literal about execute foo2.pl from foo1.pl in Perl then this is what you can do:
print 'hello ';
print qx(perl foo2.pl);
qx is another way to run system commands like backticks. Thus perl foo2.pl is run with the output being sent back to your calling perl script.
So here the same using backticks. Also it uses a direct call to script (which is better):
print 'hello ';
print `./foo2.pl`;
And if you are expecting lots of output from the script then its best not to load it all into memory like above two examples. Instead use open like so:
print 'hello ';
open my $foo2, '-|', './foo2.pl';
print <$foo2>;
close $foo2;
And you can wrap this up into one print statement for "hello world" example:
print 'hello ', do {
open my $foo2, '-|', './foo2.pl';
<$foo2>;
};
/I3az/
Using a shell script (for example, a .bat file on Windows) to run various Perl scripts and combine their output is one way to solve the problem. However, I usually find that Perl itself provides a more powerful and flexible environment than shell scripts. To use Perl in this way, one place to start is by learning about the system and exec commands.
For example:
# In hello.pl
print "Hello\n";
# In world.pl
print "World\n";
# In hello_world.pl.
use strict;
use warnings;
system 'perl hello.pl > hello_world.txt';
system 'perl world.pl >> hello_world.txt';
You can use the following code also
file1.pl
use strict;
use warnings;
open (FH,">file") or die "$! can't open";
print FH "WELCOME\n";
file2.pl
use strict;
use warnings;
open (FH,">>file") or die "$! can't open";
print FH "WELCOME2\n";
The file content is
WELCOME
WELCOME2
If you know beforhand that the script you want to execute from inside the other script is also Perl, you should use do EXPR (https://perldoc.perl.org/functions/do.html).
This executes the contents of the file EXPR in the context of the running perl process and saves you from starting new cmd.exe and perl.exe instances.
hello.pl:
print "Hello";
do "world.pl";
wordl.pl:
print "World";
Related
I wrote a routine to "safely" execute some command, and I wanted to capture STDOUT and STDERR in string variables using open(STDOUT, '+<', \$stdout) and similar for STDERR.
I verified via print "Test\n" and print STDERR "Test2\n" that the redirection works inside the routine (I can find the outputs in $stdout and $stderr).
However when I run the command through system() (Perl's version), the output still goes to the terminal.
So I wonder: Is opening a scalar value available for Perl's own I/O only?
And if so, how would I capture the STDOUT and STDERR from the system() call without using temporary files (having their own issues)?
(I've seen https://stackoverflow.com/a/109672/6607497 already)
The preferred solution (if such exists) should use as few extra packages as possible, and it should run with SLES 12 or SLES 15 (openSUSE Leap 15.2).
Those distributions only offer a limited set of Perl modules.
You can easily do this using IPC::Run to capture output.
Test script that writes to standard output and error:
#!/bin/sh
# demo.sh
echo "To Standard Output"
echo "To Standard Error" >&2
and perl script that runs it:
#!/usr/bin/env perl
use warnings;
use strict;
use IPC::Run qw/run/;
my ($out, $err);
run ["sh", "demo.sh"], \undef, \$out, \$err;
print "Standard output: ", $out;
print "Standard error: ", $err;
gives the following output:
$ perl demo.pl
Standard output: To Standard Output
Standard error: To Standard Error
Alternative using IPC::Run3 (Which might be more desirable if you don't need any of IPC::Run's more advanced features):
#!/usr/bin/env perl
use warnings;
use strict;
use IPC::Run3;
my ($out, $err);
run3 ["sh", "demo.sh"], \undef, \$out, \$err;
print "Standard output: ", $out;
print "Standard error: ", $err;
I am new to perl.
I am executing a set of batch files in a perl script. I need to send the output(print statements and errors) of the batch file to a log file. The same log file that will have the output of my perl script.
I have found many ways to put the output of the perl script to a log file but the output of the batch process that is called from the perl script is still not going to the logs.
My script looks something like this:
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
use File::Path;
use File::Copy;
.
.
Print "abc";
.
my #args= ('C:\SBS\Install\UpgradeSBSDB_Oracle.bat');
open (FHU,"|#args") or die "Fail to open Upgrade.batch file: $!";
print FHU "\n";
.
.
Print " xyz";
.
.
The output in log looks like
abc
xyz
I also need the output of the batch file called in the logs
Try to start your system call with backticks:
my $output = `'C:\SBS\Install\UpgradeSBSDB_Oracle.bat`;
print FHU $output."\n";
So I have:
test.pl > test.log
is there a way to know inside test.pl that I am outputing to 'test.log'? At the end of my script I want to do some manipulation of test.log without hardcoding the name.
Maybe. The following works on Linux, but will not be very portable to other systems...
#!/usr/bin/env perl
use strict;
use warnings;
my $out = readlink("/proc/$$/fd/1");
print STDERR "I am being output to $out\n";
Naturally, this is probably a bad idea. Better to explicitly open the file and write to it in Perl, rather than having the shell set up redirections.
You can redirect standard output from perl, with minimal changes to your script,
test.pl test.log
my ($file) = #ARGV;
if (#ARGV) {
open STDOUT, ">", $file or die $!;
}
print "output is redirected to $file\n";
# use $file at the end
i am trying to put some word in tempfile via commandline
temp file creat but word not past in tempfile
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
system ('clear');
$TMPFILE = "mktemp /tmp/myfile/devid.XXXXXXXXXX";
$echo = "echo /"hello world/" >$TMPFILE";
system ("$TMPFILE");
system ("$echo");
Please Help to Solve This
To capture the name output by mktemp, do this instead:
chomp($TMPFILE = `mktemp /tmp/myfile/devid.XXXXXXXXXX`);
But Perl can do all the things you are doing without resorting to the shell.
Avoid using external commands from perl script as much as possible.
you can use: File::Temp module in this case, see this
Here's a specific demonstration of the advice that others have given you: where possible, use Perl directly rather than invoking system. Also, you should get in the habit of including use strict and use warnings in your Perl scripts.
use strict;
use warnings;
use File::Temp;
my $ft = File::Temp->new(
UNLINK => 0,
TEMPLATE => '/tmp/myfile/devid.XXXXXXXXXX',
);
print "Writing to temp file: ", $ft->filename, "\n";
print $ft "Hello, world.\n";
Say I have this perl "program" called simple.pl:
#!/usr/bin/perl
use xyz; # xyz is bogus and doesn't exist
And I also have this "program", called simple2.pl:
#!/usr/bin/perl
system("simple.pl");
my $abc = `simple.pl`;
printf("abc %s\n", $abc);
for both system and backtick, I get this message:
Can't exec "simple.pl": No such file or directory at scripts/perl/simple2.pl line 7.
Can't exec "simple.pl": No such file or directory at scripts/perl/simple2.pl line 9.
Not very useful for the user calling simple2.pl. Is there a way to get a more useful message?
Note. simple.pl does exist in the current directory. The real problem is that simple.pl doesn't compile. simple2 responds by saying simple doesn't exist. it's a misleading message.
If I had a way to even capture the compile message that would be a start.
This means system couldn't find an executable named "simple.pl" on your PATH. If your simple.pl is in the current directory, you could try to change "simple.pl" to "./simple.pl".
Actually, I don't see how to make this message more descriptive. If you were perl, how would you report this error?
BTW, I wouldn't try to run "simple2.pl" from inside of simple2.pl :)
Yes, check to see if the file exists and is executable, and if it isn't, print a more descriptive message.
unless (-ex $filename) {
print "I am unable to execute file $filename.";
}
If perl say it can't find the file, then it can't find the file. And the problem is more your code. Look at this example.
sidburn#sid:~/perl$ cat test.pl
#!/usr/bin/env perl
use strict;
use warnings;
use xyz;
sidburn#sid:~/perl$ cat test2.pl
#!/usr/bin/env perl
use strict;
use warnings;
system('test.pl');
sidburn#sid:~/perl$ cat test3.pl
#!/usr/bin/env perl
use strict;
use warnings;
system('./test.pl');
If you execute test2.pl you get:
sidburn#sid:~/perl$ ./test2.pl
Can't exec "test.pl": No such file or directory at ./test2.pl line 4.
If you execute test3.pl you get:
sidburn#sid:~/perl$ ./test3.pl
Can't locate xyz.pm in #INC (#INC contains: /home/sidburn/perl510/lib/5.10.1/i686-linux /home/sidburn/perl510/lib/5.10.1 /home/sidburn/perl510/lib/site_perl/5.10.1/i686-linux /home/sidburn/perl510/lib/site_perl/5.10.1 .) at ./test.pl line 4.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at ./test.pl line 4.
If you don't provide a relative or absolute path then perl lookup the command in your $PATH environment variable. If it is not there it can't find the file.
You need to provide "./" if it is in the current directory. But note "current directory" doesn't mean the directory where your script relies.
If you want the later then you probably want to do a
use FindBin;
with this you can do something like this:
#!/usr/bin/env perl
use strict;
use warnings;
use FindBin;
use File::Spec::Functions;
my $exe = catfile($FindBin::RealBin, 'test.pl');
print $exe, "\n";
system($exe);
if you want to check if system returns correctly, you need to check the return value from the system() command or $? later that holds the value.
if ( $? != 0 ) {
die "Cannot execute $exe.\n";
}
if you want to suppress messages from your program you need to redirect STDOUT, STDERR before starting your program with system().
Or use something like IPC::System::Simple
Or IPC::Open3 (in the core).
Bonus points for enabling the warnings pragma! Have an upvote!
You want to use backticks or qx// to capture the output of an external program, not system. To substitute your own error message that will make sense to your users (more points for you!), then you might do something as in
#! /usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
no warnings 'exec';
chomp(my $abc = `simple2.pl`);
if ($? == 0) {
printf("abc %s\n", $abc);
}
else {
die "$0: unable to calculate abc\n";
}
In case you're unfamiliar, $? is
$CHILD_ERROR
$?
The status returned by the last pipe close, backtick command, successful call to wait or waitpid, or from the system operator.
When $? is zero, it indicates success.
Remember that the warnings pragma is lexical, so rather than disabling the warning for the whole program, you might do it for just one sub:
sub calculate_abc {
no warnings 'exec';
# ...
}
If you are trying to execute something you know is a Perl script, why not invoke the interpreter directly rather than dealing with the system knowing how to execute the file?
my $file = 'simple.pl';
-e $file or die "file '$file' not found";
system "perl $file";
# or
print `perl $file`;
to run with the same installation of perl that is running your current script:
system "$^X $file"; # or `$^X $file`
$^X is a special Perl variable that contains the file name of the running interpreter.
I had the exact same issue and figured out that perl wasn't installed. So the bash script was trying to execute the perl without an interpreter.
ls /usr/bin/perl
Try specifying the full path to the "simple.pl" file.