EXC_BAD_ACCESS when debugging - iphone

I'm getting this error when trying to see the contents of a NSMutableArray:
Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory.
Reason: KERN_PROTECTION_FAILURE at address: 0x00000021
0x94d5a688 in objc_msgSend ()
ViewController.h:
#interface PeopleViewController : UITableViewController {
NSMutableArray *people;
}
#property (nonatomic, retain) NSMutableArray *people;
ViewController.m:
#implementation PeopleViewController
#synthesize people;
In viewDidLoad:
- (void)viewDidLoad {
[super viewDidLoad];
// initialize our people array with an autoreleased object
people = [NSMutableArray array];
... Populate the people array with Person objects.
}
When I'm at the point where I'm modifying the contents of a cell in the tableview, I'm unable to access the people array in gdb when typing 'po self.people':
Person *person = [[Person alloc] init];
person = [self.people objectAtIndex: indexPath.row]; // <--- 'po self.people' called
cell.textLabel.text = person.personName;
Any ideas why I can't access it?

The line
people = [NSMutableArray array];
returns an autoreleased array that will be released on the next iteration of the current run loop. You should retain that:
people = [[NSMutableArray array] retain];
and of course release it in your dealloc method.
However: Apple engineers have often mentioned in conferences to avoid autoreleased instances like this whenever possible in the iPhone, for performance reasons. Try using alloc/init instead:
people = [[NSMutableArray alloc] initWithCapacity:1];
with the corresponding release in the dealloc method. In this case you don't even need to retain (init returns an instance with a retain count of 1, which is what you need).
And justin's comment is correct: you should do this instead:
Person *person = [people objectAtIndex:indexPath.row];
cell.textLabel.text = person.personName;
and this should work.

is indexPath.row > [people count]?
Also, why are you doing this:
Person *person = [[Person alloc] init]
You're allocating memory, and then pointing to completely different memory.

You can avoid having to fuss with retaining properties by using the self notation to call the accessor and setter methods created by the #synthesize directive.
When you set the people property directly in viewDidLoad it sets the property but does nothing for memory management. However, if you set it with self.people you actually call the synthesized setter method that because of the retain setting of the #property directive will automatically retain the assigned array.
As an aside, I would recommend always using -[NSMutableArray initWithCapacity:] instead of a bare init. It is the actual initializer for the class. You can call it with just '1' if you don't know how big it will be. In the past, I have seen odd problem arise from just using bare init.

Related

removeAllObjects for NSMutableArray that populates UITableView crashes with ARC

I have a property of
#property (nonatomic, strong) NSMutableArray *timesArray;
It is used to populate the data in my UITableView. When I want to clear my view, I do this:
- (void)clearView {
self.nameField.text = #"";
self.noteField.text = #"";
if ([_timesArray count] > 0) {
[self.timesArray removeAllObjects];
[self.customTableView reloadData];
}
}
The removeAllObjects causes a crash. I am not sure why. I looked around and a lot of posts talk about an object being overreleased. How is that happening if I'm using ARC and not calling retain/release on any objects. My _timesArray just holds NSDate objects I get from a UIDatePicker.
My stack trace looks like:
My insertPill looks like:
- (void)insertPill:(id)sender {
//[[NSNotificationCenter defaultCenter] postNotificationName:InsertPillNotification object:self];
[self clearView];
}
If I don't removeAllObjects, and just do:
NSMutableArray *emptyArray = [[NSMutableArray alloc] initWithCapacity:0];
self.timesArray = emptyArray;
This works. But I'd still like to know why by removing the objects it does not work.
Edit: I initialize the array in viewDidLoad:
_timesArray = [[NSMutableArray alloc] initWithCapacity:0];
When I want to add a new object to the array, I do this:
NSMutableArray *tempUnsortedArray = [[NSMutableArray alloc] initWithArray:_timesArray];
[tempUnsortedArray addObject:_datePicker.date];
self.timesArray = tempUnsortedArray;
I'm not sure if the way I'm adding data the array is causing the issue or not.
You're getting a doesNotRecognizeSelector: exception. This probably means that the object you think is a NSMutableArray is not really one. It is probably an NSArray. Where are you assigning the object?
To start debugging the issue, po the object before calling removeAllObjects. What type of object is it reported as?
Otherwise it could be possible that there is a non NSObject element in timesArray.
#property (nonatomic, strong) NSMutableArray *timesArray;
if ([_timesArray count] > 0)
It seems, you syntesize your property like this:
#syntesize timesArray = _timesArray;
You chacking count of _timesArray, but removing object from timesArray. I never set new name for my properties and don't sure how it works, but I dont like it.

iOS - resetting NSMutable Array causes crash

I have an NSMutableArray I'm trying to reload after an async call. The first time it loads like this:
self.sessionProcList = [NSMutableArray arrayWithArray:[result records]];
After the user does some interaction, the same line will be reached to reload the NSMutableArray. This causes the crash
Header file has:
#interface...
NSMutableArray *sessionProcList;
... }
#property (nonatomic, retain) NSMutableArray *sessionProcList;
Say you do:
NSMutableArray *a = [NSMutableArray arrayWithObject: [[NSObject alloc] init]];
NSObject *o = [a objectAtIndex: 0];
[a removeAllObjects];
[o description]; // *BOOM*
The above will [generally -- sometimes not but only by coincidence] crash because o has been deallocated by the time the description method is invoked.
If you have a reference to an object in an array, but have not retained said reference, then said object may be deallocated out from under you when you empty the array.
(And nonatomic vs. atomic is irrelevant.)
If I had to guess, I would say that elements in that array are being referenced from somewhere else. Resetting the array causes the items using the references to crash.
I would check your application for other variables, properties, or UI elements using those variables that have not been release before resetting it.
Because arrayWithArray is a convenience method it gets initialised with an autorelease flag.
You haven't mentioned what the crash / error message is but I am guessing your NSMutableArray is getting released before your second iteraction with it starts.
Try and retain the array for however long you need it with:
self.sessionProcList = [NSMutableArray arrayWithArray:[result records]];
[sessionProcList retain];
And then release it when you're done with it:
[sessionProcList release];
I hope it helps.
Rog

Memory management - how best to initialise an instance declared in the header

I've read a few posts on this, but there's still one thing that's not clear for me. I know this might be rather a n00b question, but I've actually got rather far into development without quite grasping this fundamental issue. A symptom of being self taught I guess.
You declare a variable in your header, like so:
#interface SomeClass : NSObject {
NSMutableArray *anArray;
}
#property (nonatomic, retain) NSMutableArray *anArray;
end
And then in your main file you synthesise it and set it to an initial value:
#implementation SomeClass
#synthesize anArray
- (SomeClass *)init{
if (self = [super init]) {
self.anArray = [[NSMutableArray alloc] initWithCapacity:10];
}
[return self];
And release it when your Class deallocs:
- (void)dealloc {
[anArray release];
[super dealloc];
}
Now, when I run instruments, the line
self.anArray = [[NSMutableArray alloc] initWithCapacity:10];
is identified as a memory leak. Is it a memory leak because when you define the variable anArray in the header it allocates memory? (Because I thought it was a null pointer.) Therefore when you want to initialise it, and you call [[NSMutableArray alloc] initWithCapacity:10], you are reallocating the memory, and losing the pointer to the original allocation?
So instead, I use the convenience class method:
#implementation SomeClass
#synthesize anArray
- (SomeClass *)init{
if (self = [super init]) {
self.anArray = [NSMutableArray arrayWithCapacity:10];
}
[return self];
This is no longer identified as a memory leak in instruments. And since it's a convenience method, anArray is autoreleased. However, if I am to assume that the instance declaration in the header allocates memory, which would explain the previous issue, then should I still release anArray? Does setting the initial values in this way retain it perhaps?
I understand the difference between
NSMutableArray *anArray = [[NSMutableArray alloc] initWithCapacity:10];
and
NSMutableArray *anArray = [NSMutableArray arrayWithCapactiy:10];
but what I'm not sure I understand is when you've declared NSMutableArray *anArray in your header, which of the two approaches you should use and why. And whether or not if you use the second approach, you should still release anArray when you call dealloc.
I might add that I've found the following posts/links useful:
Suggest the best way of initialization of array ( or other objects )
What is the cost of using autorelease in Cocoa?
http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/MemoryMgmt/MemoryMgmt.html
What is the difference between class and instance methods?
alloc'ing an object starts it off with a reference count of 1.
Setting a property that has the 'retain' attribute also increases the reference count.
So, that means this is usually bad:
#property (nonatomic, retain) Object * variable;
...
self.variable = [[Object alloc] init];
Because variable now has a reference count of 2.
When setting a object's member variable, just do this:
variable = [[Object alloc] init];
You should also realize that this works
self.anArray = [NSMutableArray arrayWithCapacity:10];
Because "arrayWithCapacity" (and other similar factor methods) autoreleases the object it returns, so after you set the property, it essentially has a reference count of 1.
It's not the instance that allocates the memory. You're right to assume that in Objective-C (at least on all Apple-based operating systems), newly initialized classes have all their ivars set to 0 (or nil or NULL as appropriate).
The problem you're seeing is that you're using the property, not the ivar in your initialization. Since you declared your property as retain, using the property accessor to set it automatically retains it.
So, when you initialize you either have to take ownership and set the ivar directly, or do like you're doing and use the property accessor to set the property and then relinquish ownership in the init method (by either releasing an object you own or, as you did in your second instance, using the convenience constructor so that you never owned the returned instance).
So just remember, if you ever use the property accessors, even within the class itself, you will get the features you set on the property (e.g., nonatomic, retain, etc.). You use the property accessors whenever you do one of the following:
// in these cases the property takes ownership through the
// retain keyword, so you must not take ownership yourself
self.anArray = something;
[self setAnArray:something];
[self setValue:something forKey:#"anArray"];
You would access your ivar directly like:
anArray = something; // in this case you must take ownership

Memory Leaks in Cocoa

I'm working on an iphone application and having some trouble with memory leaks. I've read some docs about garbage collection that it make it sound simple but I must be missing something. I've got a viewController that needs access to an array which may need to repopulated from time to time. Here is a simplified version of what I have:
//AppDelegate.m
- (NSMutableArray *)getMathFacts {
//Some database stuff
NSMutableArray * arr = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init];
while (sqlite3_step(math_fact_statement) == SQLITE_ROW) {
[arr addObject:[[NSNumber numberWithInt:sqlite3_column_int(math_fact_statement, 0)] autorelease]];
}
return arr;
}
//ViewController.h
#interface ReviewViewController : UIViewController {
NSMutableArray *reviewArr;
}
#property (retain, nonatomic) NSMutableArray *reviewArr;
//ViewController.m
- (void)viewDidLoad {
[super viewDidLoad];
[self loadMathFacts];
}
- (void)loadMathFacts {
self.reviewArr = [appDelegate getMathFacts];
}
- (void)loadAllMathFacts {
self.reviewArr = [appDelegate getAllMathFacts];
}
-(IBAction) getAll {
[reviewArr release];
[self loadAllMathFacts]
}
GetAllMathFacts is similar to getMathFacts, it just has a different SQL statement.
When I run this checking for Leaks it is like a sieve. It seems like something simple, but I feel like I've tried everything and it just moves the leak around.
Any advice would be appreciated.
Thanks
The iPhone OS actually doesn't have garbage collection. What you're doing with retain/release is called reference counting.
The solution to your problem is probably to make getMathFacts return an autoreleased object (change return arr; to return [arr autorelease];), because the definition of the property reviewArr is probably something like #property (retain) NSArray *reviewArr;, which means every time you call self.reviewArr = something;, something is retained, which means after you set reviewArr in loadMathFacts and loadAllMathFacts, reviewArr is retained one time too much.
In getMathFacts, you do a
NSMutableArray * arr = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init];
that array is owned by you. It has a retain count of 1. Later when
- (void)loadMathFacts {
self.reviewArr = [appDelegate getMathFacts];
}
that same array is now retained by reviewArr and the retain count goes to 2.
When you then do a
-(IBAction) getAll {
[reviewArr release];
[self loadAllMathFacts]
}
in the first release statement, your array is now getting released once and the retain count goes to 1. In [self loadAllMathFacts]
- (void)loadAllMathFacts {
self.reviewArr = [appDelegate getAllMathFacts];
}
self.reviewArr will release the the array, before retaining a new array. After this release the retain count is down to 0. I don't see a leak here. Maybe in -getAllMathFacts?
Now, one thing I would change to make things look a little better is this:
- (void)loadMathFacts {
NSMUtableArray array = [appDelegate getMathFacts];
self.reviewArr = array;
[array release];
}
- (void)loadAllMathFacts {
NSMUtableArray array = [appDelegate getAllMathFacts];
self.reviewArr = array;
[array release];
}
-(IBAction) getAll { // you don't need to release in here
[self loadAllMathFacts]
}
Plus you should rename your get method calls to use "new" instead of "get" since the convention is that if you return something that is owned by the caller, it should have new or copy in the name of the method.
As another answerer said, you could use autorelease, although I'd rather use autorelease in other situations. But if you were to do it with autorelease this is how I'd do it:
//AppDelegate.m
- (NSMutableArray *)getMathFacts {
//Some database stuff
NSMutableArray * arr = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init];
while (sqlite3_step(math_fact_statement) == SQLITE_ROW) {
[arr addObject:[[NSNumber numberWithInt:sqlite3_column_int(math_fact_statement, 0)] autorelease]];
}
return [arr autorelease];
}
do the same with -getAllMathFacts. You should still change the code to be more like above, except you don't have to release after doing the self.reviewArray, and you don't have to change the name of the methods. What you have to remember is that if even autoreleased objects can leak if you call retain on them and then forget about them. The nice thing about autorelease is that the object is kept around for the duration of a runloop, long enough to hand it to some other object and let them decide whether they want to retain it or let it expire.
I hope I haven't missed anything. Go through my logic, and feel free to poke holes in it or ask questions. I can easily have missed something.
By the way, self.reviewArr when you have:
#property (retain, nonatomic) NSMutableArray *reviewArr;
does the following:
- (void)setReviewArr:(NSMutableArray*)array
{
NSMutableArray* oldReviewArr = reviewArr;
reviewArr = [array retain];
[oldReviewArr release];
}
As of Xcode 3.2 there is support for running the Clang analyzer. To do this choose Build->Build & Analyze. This will run the analyzer which is really a wonderful tool for finding reference counting issues.
For Xcode prior to 3.2, this might help: Using Clang Static Analyzer from within XCode

NSMutableArrays

I have an NSMutableArray as a member variable for a class.
In the .h file:
#interface bleh {
NSMutableArray *list;
}
#property (readonly, assign) NSMutableArray *list;
#end
In the .m file:
#implementation bleh
#synthesize list;
-(void)init;
{
list = [NSMutableArray arrayWithCapacity:30];
}
#end
Now, I'm not really an objective-C programmer, so maybe I'm missing some of the nuances, but when I do the following:
NSMutableString *listItem = [NSMutableString stringWithString:#"Foobar"];
[list addObject:listItem];
I'm getting strange behavior. Namely, I'm using this to keep a list of files that I eventually want to attach to an email and then open the picker. I'm getting a SIGABRT, and upon debugging, I find out that whenever I operate on list, I'm getting nothing. addObject messages don't increase the size of the NSMutableArray at all.
Am I missing something? Can someone show me a full implementation of setting up an NSMutableArray to be manipulated within a class in Objective C?
Thanks.
PS - Assume that I'm smart enough to put the manipulations of the NSMutableArray inside of a member function for the class containing the member variable.
in the latest release of the SDK arrayWithCapacity is bad practice.
but in your code you creating a array that no one is owner , clam your array properly.
don't forget initialize your array
NSMutableArray *array = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init];
fix the (readonly,assign),
How are you actually creating your array? Is it possible that it's being autoreleased and going away? Remember, if you create it with a convenience method (like array or something) you need to retain it.
You're creating the array with arrayWithCapacity:, which returns an array you don't own, and you're never claiming ownership over it. Use a property accessor to retain the array:
self.list = [NSMutableArray arrayWithCapacity:30];
I would recommend reading the Cocoa memory management docs. Once you know the rules in there, it will be clear what to do in this sort of situation. They're not very hard, but they are very necessary if you're going to be programming Cocoa.
Your list variable has been auto-released and de-allocated, therefore your program crashes when you try to access it.
There are two ways to create objects in Cocoa:
NSMutableArray* array1 = [[NSMutableArray alloc] initWithCapacity:10];
NSMutableArray* array2 = [NSMutableArray arrayWithCapacity:10];
array1 was created using alloc+init, therefore you own it. It will stick around until you release it.
array2 was not created using alloc+init, therefore you do not own it. You're not responsible for releasing it, but it will go away on its own. You must retain array2 if you want it to stick around.
Your list property declaration is keeping you from properly retaining the NSMutableArray. By calling arrayWithCapacity you're effectively putting the array in an autorelease pool, which means it could be deallocated at any time if no object interested in keeping it around. While you are, the way you have things declared doesn't reflect that:
#property (readonly, assign) NSMutableArray *list;
The above declaration simply sets this pointer to be a copy of another pointer - it does no memory management for you. Instead it should read:
#property (readonly, retain) NSMutableArray *list;
... and you should assign the list like so:
self.list = [NSMutableArray arrayWithCapacity:64];
Because you specify the retain attribute for the property, whenever it is assigned a new value the retain message will be sent to that new value, communicating to the memory manager that you don't want this object deallocated. In order to bring this full circle, you'll need to release the object when you containing class is deallocated:
- (void)dealloc
{
[list release];
[super dealloc];
}
Are you initializing your list properly? Ie do you have something like the following in your code?
list = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init];
Problem ehre (assuming you initing your array properly) could be that #"Foobar" assings an NSString not an NSMutableString so its failing because if distinct types you should do
NSMutableString *listItem = [NSMutableString stringWithString:#"Foobar"];
[list addObject:listItem];
or
NSString *listItem =#"FooBar";
[list addObject:listItem];
It doesn't look as though you've actually initialized the NSMutableArray.
In the init event of the object, just say
[self setList:[[NSMutableArray alloc] initWithCapacity:10]]];
(I would just say init, but I don't remember if that works. It doesn't matter what capacity you start with)
Before actually allocating the array, the variable "list" will have a value of nil.