I've been messing with this for far too long, and managed to get IE8 working, but IE7 has me stumped.
I've got a table, and for each column, I am trying to extract a number of divs. I am only extracting divs which match specific selectors, not all divs in the column.
My original jquery selector was
jQuery('div.a1, div.a3, div.a4, div.a7','table#a'+tableId+' td:nth-child('+columnNum+')').each(function(){
alert(jQuery(this).attr('id'));
});
This worked great in FF, but didn't trigger the .each function at all in IE.
After messing around for a bit, I got to
jQuery('td:nth-child('+columnNum+') > div.a1, td:nth-child('+columnNum+') > div.a3, td:nth-child('+columnNum+') > div.a4,td:nth-child('+columnNum+') > div.a7', table#a+'tableId).each(function(){
alert(jQuery(this.attr('id'));
});
Not so nice, but works in IE8.
I had tried all sorts of combinations using .eq(+'columnNum+') but nothing else was working.
Now I go and test in IE7, and again the .each isn't being triggered.
What is the nicest way (and cross-browser compatible) to work with this sort of .each element?
--------------addition--------------
After further testing and playing around with suggestions from DrJ and bdukes, I've found that the table#'+tableId breaks the function in both IE7&8.
I've gone back to my original code
jQuery('div.a1, div.a3, div.a4, div.a7','table#a'+tableId+' td:nth-child('+columnNum+')').each(function(){
alert(jQuery(this).attr('id'));
});
as that seems to me the most efficient.
If I remove 'table#a'+tableId, i get the correct response in all browsers, except that it is adding up the results from all tables, and I need to be able to get only the results from one table at a time.
I have also tried 'table#a'+tableId+'>td:nth-child('+columnNum+')').each, but that doesn't work either.
The first function i've used works perfectly in firefox.
----------------the html being selected---------------------------
The tables are being created dynamically in javascript so I can't really copy and past it, but here is what the output looks like. It ends up looking kinda like a gantt chart on a table.
<table id="a1">
<tr>
<th colspan="5">
Group Name
</th>
</tr>
<tr class="rowId1" >
<td>
<div class="a1" id="a43" style="margin-left:13px; width:60px" ></div>
</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>
<div class="a3" id="a93" style="margin-left:4px; width: 80px" ></div>
<div class="a2" id="a94" style="margin-left:4px; width: 30px" ></div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="a1" id="a24" style="margin-left: 15px; width: 65px;" ></div>
</td>
<td>
</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr class="rowId1" >
<td>
<div class="a7" id="a24" style="margin-left:10px; width:60px" ></div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="a2" id="a15" style="margin-left:14px; width: 22px" ></div>
</td>
<td>
;
<div class="a2" id="a105" style="margin-left: 8px; width: 50px" ></div>
</td>
<td>
</td>
<td>
<div class="a4" id="a102" style="margin-left: 5px; width: 45px;" ></div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
It turns out this was an issue with IE failing when two different elements have the same ID. Apparently this breaks the .each function.
I had two tables
table.notes#a1 & table.inputs#a1
The .each function should have gone through each table but instead found neither.
jQuery also wouldn't run in ie with
jQuery('div.a1, div.a3, div.a4, div.a7','table.inputs#a'+tableId+' td:nth-child('+columnNum+')').each(function(){
alert(jQuery(this).attr('id'));
});
which it should have done, as I am them pointing directly to a specific table even if the id is not unique.
I'm using id's retrieved from the database for the id, and IE doesn't like id's that start with numbers, so I just added an 'a' to the beginning of the id.
However, it apparently doesn't like that either, so now I'm adding the first letter of the class and then the '1' or whatever the id number is.
This solves the issue.
Related
I am using angular-datatables 13.0.1 in my angular application. I displayed a table using the following code in my UI. It was working.
Html:
<table datatable class="datatable table table-striped table-condensed h5" [dtOptions]="dtOptions" [dtTrigger]="dtTrigger" bFilter=false>
<tfoot>
<tr>
<td colspan="8">
<div class="center-cont-block">
<mfBootstrapPaginator [rowsOnPageSet]="[50,100,500]"></mfBootstrapPaginator>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tfoot>
</table>
.ts file
this.dtOptions = {
pagingType: 'full_numbers',
pageLength: 50
};
dtTrigger: Subject<any> = new Subject<any>();
I used this link http://l-lin.github.io/angular-datatables/#/welcome to learn how to display an angular-datatable.
I haven't changed any of the libraries related to this. Surprisingly when I try to implement the same logic in another screen, nothing works.
Either the table developed before or new table.
Pagination is not displayed or the sorting. It is not applying any of the angular-datatables properties. When I inspect the code, many of the properties are missing few them are:
2. aria-controls
For some reason, TinyMCE is allowing an invalid attribute from Google Sheets.
Here is an example:
<tr style="height: 21px;">
<td data-sheets-hyperlink="link" data-sheets-formula="link">Foo</td>
<td data-sheets-hyperlink="link" data-sheets-formula="link">Bar</td>
<td data-sheets-hyperlink="link" data-sheets-formula="link">Foo</td>
<td data-sheets-hyperlink="link" data-sheets-formula="link">Bar</td>
<td data-sheets-hyperlink="link" data-sheets-formula="link">Foo</td>
</tr>
I already tried to set data-sheets-hyperlink and data-sheets-formula as invalid attributes using valid_elements and invalid_elements, but TinyMCE still allows it.
Any idea on how to remove these attributes as they are not useful and can be an issue for big tables?
Thanks.
It seems that TinyMCE is not removing data-* attributes
Try this fiddle with [TinyMCE][1] configured to parse as full XHTML and fill it's source code with:
<a dir="" style="color: red;" href="https://google.com" data-v-test="">TEST</a>
<ul>
<li tabindex="2" dir>List element</li>
</ul>
Output is
<p>TEST</p>
<ul>
<li>List element</li>
</ul>
Check this [answer][2].
I am creating a custom MailChimp template but having issues when using the mc:repeatable element. I have it on a wrapped around a block of code and in the editor when creating a campaign, it works fine, I can spawn a new version of the parent block and move it around in the template, but when I preview, or send the email, the child block that was spawned from the parent sits below it's parent and not where I have placed it following spawning it from the parent block... Something seems to be wrong? (Heavily simplified) Code example below... Anyone any ideas on the fix???
<!-- BLOCK A -->
<div style="width:100%" mc:repeatable="CONTENTBLOCK_A">
<p>This is block A</p>
</div>
<!-- end of BLOCK A -->
<!-- BLOCK B -->
<div style="width:100%" mc:repeatable="CONTENTBLOCK_B">
<p>This is block B</p>
</div>
<!-- end of BLOCK B -->
So, when creating a new campaign, if I duplicate BLOCK A and position the duplicated BLOCK A below BLOCK B - in the preview within the campaign editor it looks fine, but when I click to view it into PREVIEW MODE, or send a PREVIEW EMAIL - the duplicated BLOCK A sits above BLOCK B and below its original spawned parent BLOCK A element...
Any ideas? Are the HTML COMMENTS (e.g. < !-- --> ) The issue perhaps?
Very late, but I was able to find success using this:
<table mc:repeatable="content" mc:variant="variant_1">
<tr>
<td mc:edit="section_1">
Variant 1 Content
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<table mc:repeatable="content" mc:variant="variant_2">
<tr>
<td mc:edit="section_2">
Variant 2 Content
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<table mc:repeatable="content" mc:variant="variant_3">
<tr>
<td mc:edit="section_3">
Variant 3 Content
</td>
</tr>
</table>
More in depth explanation can be found here: Create Editable Content Areas with MailChimp’s Template Language
I did a template for our email marketing campaing. But on gmail, msn (browser based) are good but on outlook is bad. How can i solve the problem ?
A piece of my code:
<td valign="top" width="194" class="rightColumnContent">
<!-- // Begin Module: Top Image with Content \\ -->
<table border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="0" width="194px" height="194px" style="background-color:#fafafa; margin-top:20px;">
<tr mc:repeatable>
<td valign="top">
<img src="http://cdn.popsbuy.com/emailing/y/images/arama.png" style="max-width:69px;float:left;margin-right:15px;" mc:label="image" mc:edit="tiwc200_image01" /><h4 class="h4" style="float: left;">ARAMA</h4>
<div mc:edit="tiwc200_content01" style="text-align:center; margin-top:10px;clear:both;"><br />
Aradığın ürüne, siteye, markaya doğrudan Popsbuy hesabınla erişebilirsin.
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<!-- // End Module: Top Image with Content \\ -->
</td>
You need to re-declare your font stack in every table cell.
Also, avoid margin, instead use padding in <td> tags.
Float is also not widely supported. If you want to float, you should be using align="left" instead, but for your example, it is better to keep it in tables.
Your code should look something like this:
<table width="200" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tr>
<td width="60">
<img src="http://cdn.popsbuy.com/emailing/y/images/arama.png" mc:label="image" mc:edit="tiwc200_image01" />
</td>
<td width="140" style="font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; color: #000000; font-weight:bold; padding-left:15px; font">
ARAMA
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" colspan="2" style="font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; color: #000000;">
<div mc:edit="tiwc200_content01" style="text-align:center; margin-top:10px;clear:both;"><br />
Aradığın ürüne, siteye, markaya doğrudan Popsbuy hesabınla erişebilirsin.
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
I set the table width 200, you could change it to percentage based if you prefer.
Getting HTML emails to look great across all clients is something that pretty much everyone who has tried to do email marketing runs into. There is no simple answer to your question, but I would start by following some of this advice and testing your email templates with a tool like litmus.
Float simply will not work in Outlook 2007+. Versions of Outlook for Windows from 2007+ use Office as the rendering engine, and thus won't render standard HTML properly.
Align will often work, but the safest course of action is to create a two-column table with the image on the left and the text on the right. The image column should have an explicitly set width. (Don't try to make the table more than one row. In email HTML, it's better to nest a series of simple tables than to create one complex one.)
Make sure that you use the appopriate old-style pre-HTML 4 tag attributes in your table tags. In particular, to get your layout, make sure that the table cells have "valign='middle'".
If you're sending through one of the major email service providers, such as Mailchimp or Campaign Monitor (and you should be, to protect the integrity of your list), it will inline all your style code for you -- so you don't actually need to redeclare the styles for every table cell, you can simply use an embedded stylesheet.
I'm working on a small problem where I'm trying to show/hide a panel based on two criteria
A specific data field must not be blank
The specific data filed must also not equal "Not Relocatable"
Unfortunately this doesn't seem to be working for me (note that setting either one or the other criteria works just fine.)
<asp:Panel runat="server" Visible='<%#If(Not String.IsNullOrEmpty(DataBinder.Eval(Container.DataItem, "_236")) Or Not DataBinder.Eval(Container.DataItem, "_236") = "Not Relocatable", True, False)%>'>
<tr>
<td>
</td>
<td class="align-right lightgreen">
Buyer would consider relocating a business, if it is:
</td>
<td>
</td>
<td colspan="3">
<%#DataBinder.Eval(Container.DataItem, "_236")%>
</td>
<td>
</td>
</tr>
</asp:Panel>
Can anyone lend a hand to rectify this problem for me?
The syntax <%# %> is a data binding syntax, not an inline expression syntax. You cannot use procedural code inside of it like you can in the inline code <% %> tags.
Data binding tags must contain a single Eval or Bind function. If you need to do conditional branching based on those functions, you will need to do it using inline code around the binding tags.