I am using the return from the following call as the datasource for a grid.
public object GetPropertyDataSourceWithCheckBox( )
{
return (
from p in LocalProperties
join c in GetCities( ) on p.CityID equals c.CityID
orderby p.StreetNumber
select new { Selected = false, p.PropertyID, p.StreetNumber, p.StreetName, c.CityName } ).ToList( );
}
I get a checkbox in the grid, but it is READ-ONLY. [For the record, the grid is DevExpress.] Is there a way around this, short of creating a non-anonymous class?
Continuing research tells me that, in fact, anonymous classes returned by linq are always read-only, so, apparently, creating an actual class is best (only?) solution.
Related
I have this DbContext:
public class DataContext : DbContext
{
public DbSet<Base> Bases {get;set}
public DbSet<Sub> Subs {get;set}
}
Sub is a subclass of Base.
When I'm querying the list of Base entities like so:
Context.Bases.ToListAsync()
It returns me every entities, either Base or Sub.
How can I configure my model context to get only the entities that are of Base type and not the ones that derives from it.
The best (or least worst) solution I found is to directly use the shadow property:
Context.Bases.Where(b => EF.Property<string>(b, "Discriminator") == "Base")).ToListAsync();
It works but needs to be repeted now and then, each time I need to query Bases. I'd have prefered a solution in the OnModelCreating method.
I'll accept this answer unless someone else find a better solution.
You'd have to use OfType<T>:
var basesOnly = await _context.Bases.OfType<Base>().ToListAsync();
UPDATE
Sorry, then. I could have sworn the above works, but it doesn't. The next best method I can think of is to simply filter out the types you don't want. It's not ideal, because it requires specifying all subtypes in your query, which then means you need to remember to update it if you add more subtypes.
var basesOnly = await _context.Bases.Where(x => !(x is Sub)).ToListAsync();
How can I configure my model context to get only the entities that are
of Base type and not the ones that derives from it.
You cannot. Every Sub is a Base. So querying all Bases includes all Subs. Eg code like the following must succeed:
Base b = db.Bases.Where(i => i.Id == 1).Single();
if (b is Sub)
begin
Sub s = (Sub)b;
. . .
end
else //other Sub
begin
Sub2 s = (Sub2)b;
. . .
end
You can fetch an anonymous type with the just the base class properties.
And asking this question suggests that inheritance might is not the right modeling technique for your scenario.
If what you want it to fetch the Entities of type Base, but not the subtype Sub, then you can do that with a query like:
var q = from b in db.Bases
where !(b is Sub)
select b;
Which translates to :
SELECT [b].[Id], [b].[Discriminator], [b].[Name], [b].[Size]
FROM [Bases] AS [b]
WHERE [b].[Discriminator] IN (N'Sub', N'Base')
AND NOT ([b].[Discriminator] = N'Sub')
But you can't (currently) exclude all subtypes without enumerating them. Eg this query:
var q2 = from b in db.Bases
where b.GetType() == typeof(Base)
select b;
Will not be completely translated to SQL, and will filter out the subtypes on the client.
This is the query I am trying to run in PostgreSQL:
SELECT * FROM message WHERE id IN (
SELECT unnest(message_ids) "mid"
FROM session_messages WHERE session_id = '?' ORDER BY "mid" ASC
);
However, I am not able do something:
create.selectFrom(Tables.MESSAGE).where(Tables.MESSAGE.ID.in(
create.select(DSL.unnest(..))
Because DSL.unnest is a Table<?>, which makes sense since it is trying to take a List-like object (mostly a literal) and convert it to table.
I have a feeling that I need to find a way to wrap the function around my field name, but I have no clue as to how to proceed.
NOTE. The field message_ids is of type bigint[].
EDIT
So, this is how I am doing it now, and it works exactly as expected, but I am not sure if this is the best way to do it:
Field<Long> unnestMessageIdField = DSL.field(
"unnest(" + SESSION_MESSAGES.MESSAGE_IDS.getName() + ")",
Long.class)
.as("mid");
Field<Long> messageIdField = DSL.field("mid", Long.class);
MESSAGE.ID.in(
ctx.select(messageIdField).from(
ctx.select(unnestMessageIdField)
.from(Tables.CHAT_SESSION_MESSAGES)
.where(Tables.CHAT_SESSION_MESSAGES.SESSION_ID.eq(sessionId))
)
.where(condition)
)
EDIT2
After going through the code on https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOQ/blob/master/jOOQ/src/main/java/org/jooq/impl/DSL.java I guess the right way to do this would be:
DSL.function("unnest", SQLDataTypes.BIGINT.getArrayType(), SESSION_MESSAGES.MESSAGE_IDS)
EDIT3
Since as always lukas is here for my jOOQ woes, I am going to capitalize on this :)
Trying to generalize this function, in a signature of sort
public <T> Field<T> unnest(Field<T[]> arrayField) {
return DSL.function("unnest", <??>, arrayField);
}
I don't know how I can fetch the datatype. There seems to be a way to get DataType<T[]> from DataType<T> using DataType::getArrayDataType(), but the reverse is not possible. There is this class I found ArrayDataType, but it seems to be package-private, so I cannot use it (and even if I could, it does not expose the field elementType).
Old PostgreSQL versions had this funky idea that it is OK to produce a table from within the SELECT clause, and expand it into the "outer" table, as if it were declared in the FROM clause. That is a very obscure PostgreSQL legacy, and this example is a good chance to get rid of it, and use LATERAL instead. Your query is equivalent to this one:
SELECT *
FROM message
WHERE id IN (
SELECT "mid"
FROM session_messages
CROSS JOIN LATERAL unnest(message_ids) AS t("mid")
WHERE session_id = '?'
);
This can be translated to jOOQ much more easily as:
DSL.using(configuration)
.select()
.from(MESSAGE)
.where(MESSAGE.ID).in(
select(field(name("mid"), MESSAGE.ID.getDataType()))
.from(SESSION_MESSAGES)
.crossJoin(lateral(unnest(SESSION_MESSAGES.MESSAGE_IDS)).as("t", "mid"))
.where(SESSION_MESSAGES.SESSION_ID.eq("'?'"))
)
The Edit3 in the question is quite close to a decent solution for this problem.
We can create a custom generic unnest method for jOOQ which accepts Field and use it in jOOQ query normally.
Helper method:
public static <T> Field<T> unnest(Field<T[]> field) {
var type = (Class<T>) field.getType().getComponentType();
return DSL.function("unnest", type, field);
}
Usage:
public void query(SessionId sessionId) {
var field = unnest(SESSION_MESSAGES.MESSAGE_IDS, UUID.class);
dsl.select().from(MESSAGE).where(
MESSAGE.ID.in(
dsl.select(field).from(SESSION_MESSAGES)
.where(SESSION_MESSAGES.SESSION_ID.eq(sessionId.id))
.orderBy(field)
)
);
}
I'm using the ListDataProvider example here as a guide. The columns are sorting fine as expectd based on the provided comparators. I'm trying to programatically apply a sort as alluded to on this line from the example:
// We know that the data is sorted alphabetically by default.
table.getColumnSortList().push(nameColumn);
What this does, is it makes the cell column appear to be sorted with the carrot sort indicator. However, the underlying data isn't sorted. Is there a way to get the table to actually apply the sort progarmatically. I suppose I could use this in conjunction with actually sorting the data via Collections.sort(), but I'd like to avoid that and do it in one place.
You can apply sorting on a column programatically with little exta code. The following code snippet does that -
When ever u set data to the cellTable you have to initialize the ListHandler as below code does -
cellTable.addColumnSortHandler( createColumnSortHandler() );
private ListHandler<T> createColumnSortHandler()
{
final ListHandler<T> listHandler = new ListHandler<T>(listDataProvider.getList());
listHandler.setComparator( sortColumn, comparator );
return listHandler;
}
And when u want to fire the SortEvent execute the following code snippet -
ColumnSortInfo columnSortInfo = new ColumnSortInfo( sortColumn, sortDirection );
cellTable.getColumnSortList().push( columnSortInfo );
ColumnSortEvent.fire( cellTable, cellTable.getColumnSortList());
you have to call setData on grid again.....
I have a situation where I'm trying to filter a LINQ select using a derived sub class.
ctx.BaseEntity.OfType<SubClass>() - this works fine.
However I'd like to do this using a string value instead. I've come across a performance barrier when I have lots (>20) Sub Classes and selecting an Entity without using OfType just isn't an option. I have a generic UI that renders from the base class, so I don't know what Class Type will be returned at compile time.
So what I'd like to do is this:
Perform a projected Select where I
return just the SubClassType from
the database
Perform a second select
using this value as the OfType to
only select the relevant related
entity from the database (No mass
unions generated)
int id = 1;
var classType = (from c in ctx.BaseClass.Include("ClassType")
where c.id == id
select new
{
c.ClassType.TypeName
}).First();
BaseClass caseQuery = ctx.BaseClass.OfType<classType.TypeName>()
.Include("ClassType")
.Include("ChildEntity1")
.Include("ChildEntity2")
.Where(x => x.id== id);
But obviously this won't work because OfType requires a Type and not a string.
Any ideas on how I can achieve this?
Update:
As a side note to the original question, it turns out that the moment you project a query that uses a Navigation Property - it builds the monster SQL too, so I've ended up using a stored procedure to populate my ClassType entity from the BaseClass Id.
So I've just got it to work using eSQL, which I'd never used before. I've posted the code here just in case it helps someone. Has anyone else got a more strongly typed solution they can think of?
BaseClass caseQuery = ctx.BaseClass.CreateQuery<BaseClass>("SELECT VALUE c FROM OFTYPE(Entities.[BaseClass],namespace.[" + classType.TypeName + "]) as c")
.Include("ClassType")
.Include("ChildEntity1")
.Include("ChildEntity2")
.Where(x => x.id== id).FirstOrDefault();
To answer the headline question about calling OfType with a string / runtime type, you can do the following:
// Get the type, assuming the derived type is defined in the same assembly
// as the base class and you have the type name as a string
var typeToFilter = typeof(BaseClass)
.Assembly
.GetType("Namespace." + derivedTypeName);
// The use reflection to get the OfType method and call it directly
MethodInfo ofType = typeof(Queryable).GetMethod("OfType");
MethodInfo ofTypeGeneric = method.MakeGenericMethod(new Type[] { typeToFilter });
var result = (IQueryable<Equipment>)generic.Invoke(null, new object[] { equipment });
Combine this with your stored procedure to get the class name and you (should?) avoid the massive join - I don't have table-per-type implementation to play with so I can't test.
I have a very simple mapping function called "BuildEntity" that does the usual boring "left/right" coding required to dump my reader data into my domain object. (shown below) My question is this - If I don't bring back every column in this mapping as is, I get the "System.IndexOutOfRangeException" exception and wanted to know if ado.net had anything to correct this so I don't need to bring back every column with each call into SQL ...
What I'm really looking for is something like "IsValidColumn" so I can keep this 1 mapping function throughout my DataAccess class with all the left/right mappings defined - and have it work even when a sproc doesn't return every column listed ...
Using reader As SqlDataReader = cmd.ExecuteReader()
Dim product As Product
While reader.Read()
product = New Product()
product.ID = Convert.ToInt32(reader("ProductID"))
product.SupplierID = Convert.ToInt32(reader("SupplierID"))
product.CategoryID = Convert.ToInt32(reader("CategoryID"))
product.ProductName = Convert.ToString(reader("ProductName"))
product.QuantityPerUnit = Convert.ToString(reader("QuantityPerUnit"))
product.UnitPrice = Convert.ToDouble(reader("UnitPrice"))
product.UnitsInStock = Convert.ToInt32(reader("UnitsInStock"))
product.UnitsOnOrder = Convert.ToInt32(reader("UnitsOnOrder"))
product.ReorderLevel = Convert.ToInt32(reader("ReorderLevel"))
productList.Add(product)
End While
Also check out this extension method I wrote for use on data commands:
public static void Fill<T>(this IDbCommand cmd,
IList<T> list, Func<IDataReader, T> rowConverter)
{
using (var rdr = cmd.ExecuteReader())
{
while (rdr.Read())
{
list.Add(rowConverter(rdr));
}
}
}
You can use it like this:
cmd.Fill(products, r => r.GetProduct());
Where "products" is the IList<Product> you want to populate, and "GetProduct" contains the logic to create a Product instance from a data reader. It won't help with this specific problem of not having all the fields present, but if you're doing a lot of old-fashioned ADO.NET like this it can be quite handy.
Although connection.GetSchema("Tables") does return meta data about the tables in your database, it won't return everything in your sproc if you define any custom columns.
For example, if you throw in some random ad-hoc column like *SELECT ProductName,'Testing' As ProductTestName FROM dbo.Products" you won't see 'ProductTestName' as a column because it's not in the Schema of the Products table. To solve this, and ask for every column available in the returned data, leverage a method on the SqlDataReader object "GetSchemaTable()"
If I add this to the existing code sample you listed in your original question, you will notice just after the reader is declared I add a data table to capture the meta data from the reader itself. Next I loop through this meta data and add each column to another table that I use in the left-right code to check if each column exists.
Updated Source Code
Using reader As SqlDataReader = cmd.ExecuteReader()
Dim table As DataTable = reader.GetSchemaTable()
Dim colNames As New DataTable()
For Each row As DataRow In table.Rows
colNames.Columns.Add(row.ItemArray(0))
Next
Dim product As Product While reader.Read()
product = New Product()
If Not colNames.Columns("ProductID") Is Nothing Then
product.ID = Convert.ToInt32(reader("ProductID"))
End If
product.SupplierID = Convert.ToInt32(reader("SupplierID"))
product.CategoryID = Convert.ToInt32(reader("CategoryID"))
product.ProductName = Convert.ToString(reader("ProductName"))
product.QuantityPerUnit = Convert.ToString(reader("QuantityPerUnit"))
product.UnitPrice = Convert.ToDouble(reader("UnitPrice"))
product.UnitsInStock = Convert.ToInt32(reader("UnitsInStock"))
product.UnitsOnOrder = Convert.ToInt32(reader("UnitsOnOrder"))
product.ReorderLevel = Convert.ToInt32(reader("ReorderLevel"))
productList.Add(product)
End While
This is a hack to be honest, as you should return every column to hydrate your object correctly. But I thought to include this reader method as it would actually grab all the columns, even if they are not defined in your table schema.
This approach to mapping your relational data into your domain model might cause some issues when you get into a lazy loading scenario.
Why not just have each sproc return complete column set, using null, -1, or acceptable values where you don't have the data. Avoids having to catch IndexOutOfRangeException or re-writing everything in LinqToSql.
Use the GetSchemaTable() method to retrieve the metadata of the DataReader. The DataTable that is returned can be used to check if a specific column is present or not.
Why don't you use LinqToSql - everything you need is done automatically. For the sake of being general you can use any other ORM tool for .NET
If you don't want to use an ORM you can also use reflection for things like this (though in this case because ProductID is not named the same on both sides, you couldn't do it in the simplistic fashion demonstrated here):
List Provider in C#
I would call reader.GetOrdinal for each field name before starting the while loop. Unfortunately GetOrdinal throws an IndexOutOfRangeException if the field doesn't exist, so it won't be very performant.
You could probably store the results in a Dictionary<string, int> and use its ContainsKey method to determine if the field was supplied.
I ended up writing my own, but this mapper is pretty good (and simple): https://code.google.com/p/dapper-dot-net/