Similar to this question I have a custom subclass of UITableViewCell that has a UITextField. Its working fine except the keyboard for doesn't go away when the user touches a different table view cell or something outside the table. I'm trying to figure out the best place to find out when something outside the cell is touched, then I could call resignFirstResponder on the text field.
If the UITableViewCell could receive touch events for touches outside of its view then it could just resignFirstResponder itself but I don't see any way to get those events in the cell.
EDIT: I tried this (below) in my UITableViewCell subclass but it doesn't work, I think because touchesBegan:withEvent: doesn't get called if the event was handled by a control. I think I need to catch the events before they get send down the responder chain somehow.
The solution I'm considering is to add a touchesBegan:withEvent: method to the view controller. There I could send a resignFirstResponder to all tableview cells that are visible except the one that the touch was in (let it get the touch event and handle it itself).
Maybe something like this pseudo code:
- (void)touchesBegan:(NSSet *)touches withEvent:(UIEvent *)event {
CGPoint touchPoint = // TBD - may need translate to cell's coordinates
for (UITableViewCell* aCell in [theTableView visibleCells]) {
if (![aCell pointInside:touchPoint withEvent:event]) {
[aCell resignFirstResponder];
}
}
}
I'm not sure if this is the best way to go about this. There doesn't seem to be any way for the tableviewcell itself to receive event notifications for events outside its view.
EDIT2: I thought I had an answer (I even posted it as an answer) using hitTest:withEvent: but that didn't work out. It doesn't always get called. :-(
[Edited: removed previous attempt which didn't always work, this one does]
OK, I finally figured a solution that fully works. I subclassed UITableView and overrode the hitTest:withEvent: method. It gets invoked for all touches anywhere in the table view, the only other possible touches are in the navbar or keyboard and the tableview's hitTest doesn't need to know about those.
This keeps track of the active cell in the table view, and whenever you tap a different cell (or non-cell) it sends a resignFirstResponder to the cell going inactive, which gives it a chance to hide its keyboard (or its datepicker).
-(UIView*) hitTest:(CGPoint)point withEvent:(UIEvent*)event
{
// check to see if the hit is in this table view
if ([self pointInside:point withEvent:event]) {
UITableViewCell* newCell = nil;
// hit is in this table view, find out
// which cell it is in (if any)
for (UITableViewCell* aCell in self.visibleCells) {
if ([aCell pointInside:[self convertPoint:point toView:aCell] withEvent:nil]) {
newCell = aCell;
break;
}
}
// if it touched a different cell, tell the previous cell to resign
// this gives it a chance to hide the keyboard or date picker or whatever
if (newCell != activeCell) {
[activeCell resignFirstResponder];
self.activeCell = newCell; // may be nil
}
}
// return the super's hitTest result
return [super hitTest:point withEvent:event];
}
In my UITableViewCell subclasses that have a UITextField, I add the following code to get rid of the keyboard (or date picker, which slides up just like the keyboard):
-(BOOL)resignFirstResponder
{
[cTextField resignFirstResponder];
return [super resignFirstResponder];
}
Yay!
I think you're on the right track, but touchesBegan:withEvent: is a UIResponder method, so you'd actually have to override it in a UIView subclass rather than in your UIViewController subclass. Your options are:
If you're already subclassing UITableViewCell, override touchesBegan:withEvent: there.
If you're using a standard UITableViewCell, implement tableView:didSelectRowAtIndexPath in your UITableView's delegate.
That is a very good solution, the best I've found on the net. The only glitch I've discovered is that if you go from one cell with a textfield to another, the keyboard dismisses and reappears resulting in a jerky type animation.
Related
I would like to make an extra button in the iPhone keyboard left bottom corner like on the photo bellow. Is it possible to do this ?
the only way to customize those buttons is to rebuild the keyboard itself.
http://www.raywenderlich.com/1063/ipad-for-iphone-developers-101-custom-input-view-tutorial
Ray has always got some good tutorials on iphone dev. being able to customize your inputView is only half the battle tho. You will then need to build the custom view. Likely you will want to emulate the existing keypad, with your custom button obviously.
as a side note. to dismiss the keyboard you need to resignFirstResponder via the first responder.
When you get that far, here is the code I use to do exactly that
#implementation UIView (FindAndResignFirstResponder)
- (BOOL)findAndResignFirstResponder
{
UIView *responder = [self findFirstResponder];
if (responder) {
[responder resignFirstResponder];
return YES;
}
return NO;
}
- (UIView*)findFirstResponder
{
if (self.isFirstResponder) {
return self;
}
for (UIView *subView in self.subviews) {
UIView *responder = [subView findFirstResponder];
if (responder != nil)
return responder;
}
return nil;
}
#end
call the if you have a hold of the superview of all your inputs, you can call findAndResignFirstResponder on that view.
Or as you can see the findAndResignFirstResponder calls resignFirstResponder on the "found" firstResponder. therefore if you have the first responder you can just resign it
No it is not. The Keyboard is owned by the system. You can change the kind of keyboard (normal, numeric, twitter etc), but you can't customise it. It is a question which is worth a +1
I have an app which I add a subview to (and remove the same subview based on user interactions). I am looking for a way to check whether the subview is present or not at any given time.
For example:
In the current view (UIView *viewA) I add a subview (UIView *viewB). I then want a way of checking whether viewB is being displayed at any given time.
Sorry if this isn't very clear, it's quite hard to describe.
an UIView stores its superview and is accessible with the superview-property just try
if([viewB superview]!=nil)
NSLog(#"visible");
else
NSLog(#"not visible");
But the better approach is to use the hidden-property of UIView
I went through the same issue and consulted Apple Documentation and came up with this elegant solution:
if([self.childView isDescendantOfView:self.parentView])
{
// The childView is contained in the parentView.
}
I updated to Swift4, Thanks a lot to #Shinnyx and #thomas.
if viewB.superview != nil{
print("visible")
}
else{
print("not visible")
}
if selfView.isDescendant(of: self.parentView) {
print("visible")
}
else{
print("not visible")
}
func isDescendant(of: UIView)
Returns a Boolean value indicating whether the receiver is a subview of a given view or identical to that view.
Here's a method I put in the appDelegate so that I can display the entire subview hierarchy from any point.
// useful debugging method - send it a view and it will log all subviews
// can be called from the debugger
- (void) viewAllSubviews:(UIView *) topView Indent:(NSString *) indent {
for (UIView * theView in [topView subviews]){
NSLog(#"%#%#", indent, theView);
if ([theView subviews] != nil)
[self viewAllSubviews:theView Indent: [NSString stringWithFormat:#"%# ",indent]];
}
}
call it with a string with one character and it will indent for you. (i.e. [appDelegate viewAllSubviews:self.view Indent:#" "];)
I find it useful to clear the debug pane first, then call this from the debugger, and copy it into a text editor like BBEdit that will show the indents.
You can call it using the mainWindow's view and see everything on your screen.
I have a UITableView with a custom cell that has a TextField. I have the DecimalPad comes up, and as we all know, there is no done key. I previously had resolved this type of issue when I had a "Decimal only" textfield on a normal UIView by handling the TouchesEnded event and then checking to see if the TextField was the first responder and if so, it would then resign, but if that technique could work now then I'm not able to figure out who's TouchesEnded I should be using (The UIView that everything is presented on, the UITableView, the Cell, the CellControler, the TextField.. I think I've tried everything).
I'm hoping there's another, cleaner way of dealing with this.
Anyone?
I think David has the best idea - here is some Monotouch code to get you started. You will need to put this in the View Controller where the decimal pad is being shown:
UIView dismiss;
public override UIView InputAccessoryView
{
get
{
if (dismiss == null)
{
dismiss = new UIView(new RectangleF(0,0,320,27));
dismiss.BackgroundColor = UIColor.FromPatternImage(new UIImage("Images/accessoryBG.png"));
UIButton dismissBtn = new UIButton(new RectangleF(255, 2, 58, 23));
dismissBtn.SetBackgroundImage(new UIImage("Images/dismissKeyboard.png"), UIControlState.Normal);
dismissBtn.TouchDown += delegate {
textField.ResignFirstResponder();
};
dismiss.AddSubview(dismissBtn);
}
return dismiss;
}
}
If you're targeting iOS 4.0 or greater you can create an inputAccessoryView containing a Done button to attach to the keyboard that will dismiss the keyboard when tapped. Here is an example from the documentation on creating a simple inputAccessoryView.
You could dismiss it when the user taps on the background; I think that's the most intuitive way.
In Interface Builder, change your View's class to UIControl. This is a subclass of UIView, so your program will work the same way, but you also get the standard touch events.
From here it's simple, create a method for the Touch Down event:
[numberField resignFirstResponder]
Of course it might be slightly different with MonoTouch -- unfortunately I don't know much about it, but wanted to help.
Hopefully you can use the concept, and modify your code accordingly.
Or you may just add some gesture to your main view.
For example:
//Just initialise the gesture you want with action that dismisses your num pad
-(void)textFieldDidBeginEditing:(UITextField *)textField
{
UISwipeGestureRecognizer *swipeToHideNumPad = [[UISwipeGestureRecognizer alloc] initWithTarget:self action:#selector(hideNumPad:)];
swipeToHideNumPad.delegate = self;
swipeToHideNumPad.direction = UISwipeGestureRecognizerDirectionDown;
[swipeToHideNumPad setNumberOfTouchesRequired:1];
[self.view addGestureRecognizer:swipeToHideNumPad];
}
//action
- (void)hideNumPad:(UIGestureRecognizer *)gestureRecognizer
{
[self.amountTextField resignFirstResponder];
}
I've got a UISearchBar in my interface and I want to customise the behaviour of the the small clear button that appears in the search bar after some text has been entered (it's a small grey circle with a cross in it, appears on the right side of the search field).
Basically, I want it to not only clear the text of the search bar (which is the default implementation) but to also clear some other stuff from my interface, but calling one of my own methods.
I can't find anything in the docs for the UISearchBar class or the UISearchBarDelegate protocol - it doesn't look like you can directly get access to this behaviour.
The one thing I did note was that the docs explained that the delegate method:
- (void)searchBar:(UISearchBar *)searchBar textDidChange:(NSString *)searchText;
is called after the clear button is tapped.
I initially wrote some code in that method that checked the search bar's text property, and if it was empty, then it had been cleared and to do all my other stuff.
Two problems which this though:
Firstly, for some reason I cannot fathom, even though I tell the search bar to resignFirstResponder at the end of my method, something, somewhere is setting it back to becomeFirstResponder. Really annoying...
Secondly, if the user doesn't use the clear button, and simply deletes the text in the bar using the delete button on the keyboard, this method is fired off and their search results go away. Not good.
Any advice or pointers in the right direction would be great!
Thanks!
Found the better solution for this problem :)
- (void)searchBar:(UISearchBar *)searchBar textDidChange:(NSString *)searchText{
if ([searchText length] == 0) {
[self performSelector:#selector(hideKeyboardWithSearchBar:) withObject:searchBar afterDelay:0];
}
}
- (void)hideKeyboardWithSearchBar:(UISearchBar *)searchBar{
[searchBar resignFirstResponder];
}
The answer which was accepted is incorrect. This can be done, I just figured it out and posted it in another question:
UISearchbar clearButton forces the keyboard to appear
Best
I've got this code in my app. Difference is that I don't support 'live search', but instead start searching when the user touches the search button on the keyboard:
- (void)searchBarTextDidBeginEditing:(UISearchBar *)searchBar {
if ([searchBar.text isEqualToString:#""]) {
//Clear stuff here
}
}
Swift version handling close keyboard on clear button click :
func searchBar(searchBar: UISearchBar, textDidChange searchText: String) {
if searchText.characters.count == 0 {
performSelector("hideKeyboardWithSearchBar:", withObject:searchBar, afterDelay:0)
}
}
func hideKeyboardWithSearchBar(bar:UISearchBar) {
bar.resignFirstResponder()
}
You could try this:
- (void)viewDidLoad
{
[super viewDidLoad];
for (UIView *view in searchBar.subviews){
for (UITextField *tf in view.subviews) {
if ([tf isKindOfClass: [UITextField class]]) {
tf.delegate = self;
break;
}
}
}
}
- (BOOL)textFieldShouldClear:(UITextField *)textField {
// your code
return YES;
}
I would suggest using the rightView and rightViewMode methods of UITextField to create your own clear button that uses the same image. I'm assuming of course that UISearchBar will let you access the UITextField within it. I think it will.
Be aware of this from the iPhone OS Reference Library:
If an overlay view overlaps the clear button, however, the clear button always takes precedence in receiving events. By default, the right overlay view does overlap the clear button.
So you'll probably also need to disable the original clear button.
Since this comes up first, and far as I can see the question wasn't really adequately addressed, I thought I'd post my solution.
1) You need to get a reference to the textField inside the searchBar
2) You need to catch that textField's clear when it fires.
This is pretty simple. Here's one way.
a) Make sure you make your class a , since you will be using the delegate method of the textField inside the searchBar.
b) Also, connect your searchBar to an Outlet in your class. I just called mine searchBar.
c) from viewDidLoad you want to get ahold of the textField inside the searchBar. I did it like this.
UITextField *textField = [self.searchBar valueForKey:#"_searchField"];
if (textField) {
textField.delegate = self;
textField.tag = 1000;
}
Notice, I assigned a tag to that textField so that I can grab it again, and I made it a textField delegate. You could have created a property and assigned this textField to that property to grab it later, but I used a tag.
From here you just need to call the delegate method:
-(BOOL)textFieldShouldClear:(UITextField *)textField {
if (textField.tag == 1000) {
// do something
return YES;
}
return NO;
}
That's it. Since you are referring to a private valueForKey I can't guarantee that it will not get you into trouble.
Best solution from my experience is just to put a UIButton (with clear background and no text) above the system clear button and than connect an IBAction
- (IBAction)searchCancelButtonPressed:(id)sender {
[self.searchBar resignFirstResponder];
self.searchBar.text = #"";
// some of my stuff
self.model.fastSearchText = nil;
[self.model fetchData];
[self reloadTableViewAnimated:NO];
}
Wasn't able to find a solution here that didn't use a private API or wasn't upgrade proof incase Apple changes the view structure of the UISearchBar. Here is what I wrote that works:
- (void)viewDidLoad {
[super viewDidLoad];
UITextField* textfield = [self findTextFieldInside:self.searchBar];
[textfield setDelegate:self];
}
- (UITextField*)findTextFieldInside:(id)mainView {
for (id view in [mainView subviews]) {
if ([view isKindOfClass:[UITextField class]]) {
return view;
}
id subview = [self findTextFieldInside:view];
if (subview != nil) {
return subview;
}
}
return nil;
}
Then implement the UITextFieldDelegate protocol into your class and overwrite the textFieldShouldClear: method.
- (BOOL)textFieldShouldClear:(UITextField*)textField {
// Put your code in here.
return YES;
}
Edit: Setting the delegate on the textfield of a search bar in iOS8 will produce a crash. However it looks like the searchBar:textDidChange: method will get called on iOS8 on clear.
I have a UIScrollView with 2 pages, and I can scroll horizontally between them. However, on one of my pages, I have a UIDatePicker, and the scroll view is intercepting the vertical touch events so I can no longer manipulate the date picker (except by clicking or tapping). Is there some way to tell the ScrollView to send the vertical touch events to the date picker, but send the horizontal touch events to the scroll view to switch pages?
Actually, there is a much simpler implementation than what Bob suggested. This works perfectly for me. You will need to subclass your UIScrollview if you haven't already, and include this method:-
- (UIView*)hitTest:(CGPoint)point withEvent:(UIEvent *)event
{
UIView* result = [super hitTest:point withEvent:event];
if ([result.superview isKindOfClass:[UIPickerView class]])
{
self.canCancelContentTouches = NO;
self.delaysContentTouches = NO;
}
else
{
self.canCancelContentTouches = YES; // (or restore bool from prev value if needed)
self.delaysContentTouches = YES; // (same as above)
}
return result;
}
The reason I use result.superview is that the view which gets the touches will actually be a UIPickerTable, which is a private API.
Cheers
I think there's two parts to this problem. The first is determining the user's intent, and the second is getting the correct control to respond to that intent.
Determining Intent
I think it's important to be clear about what the user intends. Imagine this scenario: The user starts touching the screen and moves his finger far to the left, but also up a little. The user probably intended to scroll the view, and didn't intend to change the date at all. It would be bad to both scroll the view and change the date, especially just as it moves off-screen. So to determine what the user intends I suggest the following algorithm:
When the user starts touching the screen, record the starting position. As the user's finger starts to move away from that position, the controls should not react at all. Once the touch moves past a certain threshold distance from the starting position, determine whether it moved more horizontally or vertically.
If it moved vertically, the user intends to change the date, so ignore the horizontal portion of the movement and only change the date.
If it moved more horizontally, the user intends to scroll the view, so ignore the vertical portion of the movement and only scroll the view.
Implementation
In order to implement this, you need to handle the events before the UIScrollView or date picker do. There's probably a few ways to do this, but one in particular comes to mind: Make a custom UIView called ScrollingDateMediatorView. Set the UIScrollView as a child of this view. Override the ScrollingDateMediatorView's hitTest:withEvent: and pointInside:withEvent: methods. These methods need to perform the same kind of hit testing that would normally occur, but if the result is the date picker, return self instead. This effectively hijacks any touch events that were destined for the date picker, allowing the ScrollingDateMediatorView to handle them first. Then you implement the algorithm described above in the various touches* methods. Specifically:
In the touchesBegan:withEvent method, save the starting position.
In touchesMoved:withEvent, if the user's intent isn't known yet, determine whether the touched has moved far enough away from the starting position. If it has, determine whether the user intends to scroll or change the date, and save that intent.
If the user's intent is already known and it's to change the date, send the date picker the touchedMoved:withEvent message, otherwise send the UIScrollView the touchesMoved:withEvent message.
You'll have to do some simliar work within touchesEnded:withEvent and touchesCancelled:withEvent to make sure the other views get the appropriate messages. Both of these methods should reset the saved values.
Once you have it properly propagating events, you'll probably have to try some user testing to tune the movement threshold.
Awesome help Sam! I used that to create a simple category that swizzles the method (because I was doing this in a UITableViewController and thus would have had to do some really messy stuff to subclass the scroll view).
#import <UIKit/UIKit.h>
#interface UIScrollView (withControls)
+ (void) swizzle;
#end
And the main code:
#import </usr/include/objc/objc-class.h>
#import "UIScrollView+withControls.h"
#define kUIViewBackgroundImageTag 6183746
static BOOL swizzled = NO;
#implementation UIScrollView (withControls)
+ (void)swizzleSelector:(SEL)orig ofClass:(Class)c withSelector:(SEL)new;
{
Method origMethod = class_getInstanceMethod(c, orig);
Method newMethod = class_getInstanceMethod(c, new);
if (class_addMethod(c, orig, method_getImplementation(newMethod),
method_getTypeEncoding(newMethod))) {
class_replaceMethod(c, new, method_getImplementation(origMethod),
method_getTypeEncoding(origMethod));
} else {
method_exchangeImplementations(origMethod, newMethod);
}
}
+ (void) swizzle {
#synchronized(self) {
if (!swizzled) {
[UIScrollView swizzleSelector:#selector(hitTest:withEvent:)
ofClass:[UIScrollView class]
withSelector:#selector(swizzledHitTest:withEvent:)];
swizzled = YES;
}
}
}
- (UIView*)swizzledHitTest:(CGPoint)point withEvent:(UIEvent *)event {
UIView* result = [self swizzledHitTest:point withEvent:event]; // actually calling the original hitTest method
if ([result.superview isKindOfClass:[UIPickerView class]]) {
self.canCancelContentTouches = NO;
self.delaysContentTouches = NO;
} else {
self.canCancelContentTouches = YES; // (or restore bool from prev value if needed)
self.delaysContentTouches = YES; // (same as above)
}
return result;
}
#end
Then, in my viewDidLoad method, I just called
[UIScrollView swizzle];