I'm considering Wordpress as my CMS platform for a client site I'm doing at the moment.
However, I need to create a couple of custom 'modules'. One of these modules is a form that people will be able to complete and have a quote, and once submitted, in a special place in the Wordpress panel (like a menu or something), there will be a listing of all the submitted quotes (just fetching it from a table in my database).
Another one is to manage a cafeteria menu, so the client can add a different meal to each day of the week.
I know perfectly how to do this kind of things using some kind of MVC framework and doing it 'by-hand', but I'm just wondering if this would be possible to do with WP and if yes, what kind of tools I'll have to use.
Thanks
Quite simply, yes, WordPress would be a more-than-capable asset to your criteria. But it's whether the learning curve in getting to know WP outweighs using a framework you're clearly already familiar with?
Personally, it sounds you like you're pretty solid with PHP, and considering the fact that, in my opinion, what you're planning on doing is relatively easy, I'd say WordPress is an excellent solution.
I'd recommend reading about WordPress 3.0's new custom post type API, and skimming the basics of hooks and filters in the Plugin API.
Submitted quotes would merely be a custom post type. You'd be better off writing the front-end code (like handling the form, UI etc.) yourself, either within a theme or plugin, then using wp_insert_post and let WordPress handle all the database administration. In fact, WP will go one step further and set up the entire admin for viewing, editing and deleting quotes.
Post meta (also known as custom fields) is also there for you if you need to store additional information about a quote that doesn't quite fit the post's table structure.
For the menu, this is even easier. I'd say just create a post category called 'Menu', and the client can publish 'dishes' to it as you would with a blog or any similar rolling format.
I've only licked the surface here. Get stuck in with the above, then check out some other goodies like meta boxes and custom taxonomies!
If you want to try a plugin instead of writing something yourself, Flutter might work. It's a little unpolished sometimes but it makes this sort of thing an absolute breeze.
Related
I've looked around the site to see if there are any people who have changed the CKAN API interface so that instead of uploading documents and databases, they can directly type onto the site, but I haven't found any use cases.
Currently, we have a page where people upload data sets through excel forms that they've filled out, but we want to make it a bit more user friendly by changing the API so that they can fill out a form on the page rather than downloading the template, filling it out and then uploading it.
Does CKAN have the ability to support this? If so, are there any examples or use cases of websites that have use forms rather than uploads?
This is certainly possible.
I'm not aware of any existing extensions that provide that functionality, but you can check the official list of CKAN extensions if there's anything that fulfills your needs.
If there is no existing extension that suits you then you could write your own, see the extension guide for details on how to do that.
Adding an API function to CKAN's API is possible, but probably not what you want in this case: the web UI usually does not interact with CKAN via the API but via Flask/Pylons controllers. Hence, you would add your add controller which first serves your form and then processes the submitted inputs.
You can take a look at the ckanext-pages extension, which does exactly that (for editing static pages instead of datasets, but your code would be similar).
I'm starting with Laravel and I've some doubts about the external components.
I've already used the laravel collective and the adamwathan/bootforms and the both show me advantage and disadvantage. I've searched for information or discussion about this and a I didn't find anything
For example, I can build forms extremely fast with these components, but I got limited sometimes.
According with the about session of the laravel Collective they say:
The Laravel Collective is a community organization designed to maintain components that have been removed from the Laravel Framework core
So, if the form is removed from the core, should I continue using this component?
And in the readme from the Bootform, they say
Probably not perfect for your super custom branded ready-for-release apps, but a huge time saver when you are still in the prototyping stage!
What do you think about using external components? Do you think it's a good ideia to use or do you prefer the original core from the Laravel?
After 3 weeks working with Laravel. I've learned somethings:
If you want to build easy forms without html, I recommend you to use the AdamWathan bootform or Laravel collective. The only problem is: These tools doesn't has a good option with you want a very customizable field.
Bootform
Pros
Bootform has more components and functions
Reduced Boilerplate
Automatic Validation State
Some custom forms, like the horizontal forms
Cons
Some difficulties with documentation
Laravel Collective
Pros
All necessary things to build a laravel form, like the CSRF Protection and hidden fields.
What I do
Actually, I'm working with Collective and html. I use a mix of the both, when I need a simple field or specific fields (csrf protection, for example) I use collective and if I need a more customizable field, like a button with an icon or a special element in bootstrap, I use just HTML.
Recently I've had the same dilemma, so I decided to examine Laravel Collective Html package.
I wanted to share my thoughts, therefore I created the following post: Is it beneficial to add Laravel Collective Html into your Laravel Project
Hope you will find it useful.
It comes down to personal preference, Laravel Collectives gives you ease of pre selecting select inputs, csrf out of the box, etc... I found myself using it less and less and then eventually just stopped pulling it in altogether.
I often need to create similar, but very long HTML forms for a client. The forms contain some inter-dependent fields and lot of validations. Some images also need to be uploaded.
Then the client needs to check the database in the CPanel and export it from there.
I want to create something with easy interface which can create complicated forms. Also, client is asking for easy-to-operate back end. The CMS option looks like an overkill. I want to keep the site as lightweight as possible because of performance requirement.
Please suggest me the best path I should take. Should I try to develop everything from scratch? Should I use a CMS? Is there any particular CMS more suitable for the task?
We use ChronoForms along with Joomla 3.1 to create such forms. It has two modes, an easier one that limits the functionality but creation of forms is much easier. The other one offers the full capabilities of the engine but requires manual steps to do even simple things.
Having said that, ChronoForms is the most powerful web based forms designer I have come across. It seems they also support Wordpress now.
They have a drag-drop mechanism to design the forms. Validations are easy to do via check boxes for the standard ones. You can save the results into database tables, send emails, redirect users to specific pages, add captchas.
The backend allows you to view the records and create new tables based on the fields of the form. You can also export the result as CSV.
I'm developing a site in Symfony, and I'm not sure what the best way is to handle this scenario.
I'm creating a party bookings system. Anyone can go to my frontend app and submit a new booking. Once they're finished, they'll just get a confirmation screen, they can't edit it. Easy.
Only certain users will be able to get to the admin app (it might be secured simply by being on an intranet, but that's not important, just assume it will be only accessible by admin users). They'll be able to view the list of submitted bookings. Easy.
My problem is around code re-use when allowing admin users to edit existing bookings. When you do generate-module in Symfony, the generated module (which as a newbie I'm assuming is a good example of structuring things) creates the form as a partial. I've had to customize this form a lot for my usage (lots of Javascript, etc), so of course I want to re-use this code, to be able to load an existing booking into this form. But there doesn't seem to be a way to share this partial between the apps (I've seen people mention making a plugin...but this seems complicated for this use).
I considered using an IFrame to load the form from the frontend and just passing an "id" parameter to load it in edit mode, but this would mean that the edit mode is not secure - anyone could go to the form on the frontend and pass this parameter to edit a booking.
I also considered putting all of the form display code (HTML, Javascript, etc) in a method on the form object, but this doesn't seem very MVC - all of the display code is then in the form. But this is only because I'm thinking of the form in the same way as a model - is that right?
I feel like this should be a common situation. You can share models and forms between apps, why can't you share this common form display code too?
Thanks!
You should reconsider having 2 applications in the first place. Not only you run into the code reuse problem, but also i18n, testings and other issues. I find it much easier to have 1 application with different bunch of modules for frontend and backend users. You can configure security per module. You can have one sign in form for all users and redirect them to appropriate module based on their credentials.
You can reuse partials between modules inside the same application, but you seem to be talking about two different applications (frontend and backend) so as far as i know the only way is to copy & paste the partial from one application to the other...
I am in the process of building a website content management system for one of my clients. It's a highly customized system, so I cannot use any "of the shelve" solution.
I need to allow my client to add pages to the website on the fly. I have two options here:
(1) Create a database driven page in the format of www.mycompany.com/page.aspx?catID=5&pageID=3 (query the database with the category and page ID's, grab the data and show it on the page) - or -
(2) Allow the management system to create static pages, something like www.mycompany.com/company/aboutus.aspx and www.mycompany.com/company/company_history.aspx , etc.
I believe that, while the former is much easier to implement, the latter is a better both for the user AND for Google.
My questions are (finally): (1) Would you agree that the latter is a better solution, and (2) What is the best way to implement such a solution? Should I create and update each file using the FileSystem (i.e. - the site's management system requires the user to supply a page/file name, page title and content, and creates the page on the fly based on these parameters)? Is there a better way?
Thank you!
It's entirely possible to have database driven pages with nice URLs. StackOverflow itself is a great example - this question's URL is http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1119274/adding-pages-on-the-fly-with-a-cms-system, but the page is built from the database, not static HTML.
I would use the first solution, but mask the addresses using a custom request handler. Basically, give each of your pages a unique string ID (such as about-us) and then, with your request handler that takes all requests, find this particular page in the database and render it.
See this article for some additional info (found it when googling for custom http handlers in ASP.NET.) In that article, it has the following handler added:
<add verb="*" path="*.piechart" type="PieChartHandler"/>
You would probably want to catch all paths (*), excluding certain media paths used for CSS, images and JavaScript.
More resources:
Custom HTTP Handler
HttpHandler in ASP.Net
I'd stay clear of static pages if I where you. Dynamic Data, MVC and some good planning should take you a long way!
What you need to do is to create some or many templates that each view/controller in mvc can use. Let whoever is responsible for the content handle it through dynamic data entities.
I would use the first idea, but work out a better URL scheme. If the system doesn't provide nice URLs (without ?), you'll have trouble getting the search engines to parse the whole site. Also using numbers instead of words make it hard on users to pass around URLs.
If you start to have performance problems you could add caching that would generate static pages from time to time. I would avoid doing that until you have to; caching can cause many headaches along the way to getting it right.
Although the existing advice is more-or-less sound, the commentators have failed to consider one factor which, admittedly, you haven't given much detail on. Are these pages that they'll edit once they're built, or a they one-shot creations? If the latter, your plan of generating static pages isn't quite so bad as they suggest. Why bother even having to think about database schemas and caching, when you can just serve flat content.
It will probably make for pretty lifeless, end-of-the-road pages, but if that's what you want ...