Generally i call my other class view by creating a pointer of delegate and then call the other class by using its link as below:-
First Way :-
Mydelegate *ptr = (Mydelegate *)[[UIApplication sharedApplication]delegate];
[self.navigationController pushViewController:ptr.NextClasspointer animated:YES];
Second Way :-
Create a pointer of that class which u want to call :--
NextClass *nextptr = [[NextClass alloc]initWithnibName:#"NextClass" bundle:nil];
[self.navigationController pushViewController:nextptr animated:YES];
[nextptr release];
nextptr = nil;
These above two methods i generally used but my problem is that which one is best for big project so that my stack problem will be removed I mean memory issue will be solved.And
is it necessary to release pointer in first and second case is the way i release is correct or wrong
Please help me
Thanks in Advance
In terms of memory management, there isn't a difference between these two - both enable you to either have memory leaks or not depending on the rest of your code!
However, bear in mind for either of these, each time your user wants to "drill down" another level in the navigation it will have to load the view from the nib file; conversely, each time they go "back up" the navigation stack these will be unloaded. Generally if my users are likely to be going up and down the navigation stack all the time I retain a single instance of the "child" view controller and push that back onto the stack whenever the user wants to go to it.
If you are having memory problems, I think it is likely caused by objects used by your NextClass not being released properly on unload/release. Double check that all objects that you're synthesizing/alloc'ing in the the NextClass object are being released in the ViewDidUnload method.
Related
I have read that UINavigationController are best option when you want to jump from n number of screen to first screen. It takes following code to do so:
NSMutableArray *array=[[NSMutableArray alloc]initWithArray:self.navigationController.viewController];
[array removeObjectAtIndex:1];
[array removeObjectAtIndex:1];
[array removeObjectAtIndex:1];
self.navigationController.ViewController=array;
[self.navigationController popViewController:YES];
by using this code I can go directly from fourth screen to first screen directly .
If I don't using navigation controller then also by making the object of firstSCreen in fourth screen I can achieve the same thing within couple of lines.Then why one should go for navigation controller? If answer is for memory optimization then we are autoreleasing the the object of firstViewController and now we are using auto referencing.
first thing this is wrong approach to pop. true one is
[self.navigationController popToRootViewController:YES];
and second thing is that if you are at 4 screen, then by poping to a specific viewcontroller will no pop all screens. here is memory issue.
another issue is that some times you don't want to lose parent screens data. if you use method of pop to specific viewcontroller, the data will be lost as the object having data is released. you made a new one.
point is that this depends on your conditions what is suit able in your scenario. but the normal and usual approach is that don't use specific popout techniqu as it may cause problems
You can use
[self.navigationController popToViewController:(UIViewController *) animated:(BOOL)];
You just need to pass ViewController's object on which you want to move directly... And between view controller's will pop-out automatically
Hope this helps you...
agreed with 'The Saad'
one more thing is that if you have various screens with the data coming from server.
it will be quite difficult to render(user interection) screen second while loding data on first.
same with all other sibling views.
I have a simple app with a tabbar navigation interface.
It has three view (A, B and C) and a modal view. Each view has its own view controller and nib . They are all designed and connected in the interface builder.
I'd like to release views which are not visible.
Tried release and nil them when another view appears such as
[[[self.navigationController.viewControllers objectAtIndex:0] view] release];
[[self.navigationController.viewControllers objectAtIndex:0] view] = nil;
etc.
It doesn't cause any issues but when I run instruments it does not make any difference. I don't see any drop in memory usage
I would appreciate your help
as #Daryl Teo wrote you should release and recreate in viewWillDis/Appear and (thats why I write this answer) you have a method called didReceiveMemoryWarning, use it!
You can simply log out whenever it gets called and test it with the Simulator included memory warning test function.
Simply open a tab, open another tab and call that test function. Your debug console should print out the log. If not you should double check if you have released all objects maybe someone is over-retained (which again should be released in viewWillDisappear).
The drop in memory usage might not be significant, depending on what the released viewController holds on to. I sugest you out a NSLog into the 'dealloc' of the viewController to see if it really gets dealloced or if there is some other object still holding on to it. Remember that release won't free the memory, it will only do so (by calling dealloc) if the objects retain count reached 0.
You don't want to do this. Let the TabBarController handle your view controllers for you. (It will already retain your viewController internally so whatever you do will only make retain count go out of sync)
You may be able to make it more memory efficient if you release objects in viewWillDisappear. Then rebuild the data again in viewWillAppear.
I have been developing iphone applications for around 3months now and theres a few things that stump me and i don't really have an idea how to work round them.
I have a navigation controller controlling the views in my application however every screen that is loaded, used then pushed back loses all the information as it seems to be reinstantiated... I believe this is a possible memory management issue?
But how to i create an app that navigates and retains all information in its views until the application is closed.
Thanks :)
Possible you didn't keep a reference to the view controller, the issue is for UIVIewController not to be released.
Make the view controller an ivar you will instanciate only one time when you push it on stack.
// in .h
MyViewController *mVC;
// in .m
// maybe when the user selects a row in a tableview
if(mVC == nil) {
// first time use, alloc/init
mVC = [[MyViewController ....];
}
// then push on the stack
[self.navigationController ....];
Of course don't forget to release it later.
In this part:
MyViewController *myViewController=[MyViewController alloc] initWithNibName:#"myView" bundle:nil];
[[self navigationController] pushViewController:myViewController animated:YES];
[myViewController release];
You will probably have something like this... Instead, make your myViewController a class's property so you have a reference to it. And drop the [myViewController release]; statement.
Possibly your app is receiving a didReceiveMemoryWarning.
In such cases, when the super class is called, the framework does memory cleaning by unloading all the views that are not currently displayed. This could explain the behavior you are seeing.
To check it further, override didReceiveMemoryWarning in one of your view controllers or applicationDidReceiveMemoryWarning in your app delegate, and put a breakpoint in it. Don't forget to call [super...] appropriately, otherwise pretty soon your app will be killed. What you should see in this way is that the views do not disappear before hitting the breakpoint, and do disappear after that.
If the hypothesis is correct, you should find a way to save the state of your view in viewDidUnload and restore it in viewDidLoad. Look also at didReceiveMemoryWarning reference.
Try to save data in NSUserDefaults it its small or use plist or it its too small like 5-10 objects save in in some variable in appDelegate, and if its too large use sqlite and for saving something like images of files like xml use Document directory
The UINavigationController works like a stack: you push and pop UIViewControllers on it. That means when a UIViewController get popped, it will have its retain count decremented by 1, and if no other object holds a reference to it, it will be deallocated. You can avoid the UIViewControllers getting dealloced by keeping a reference to them yourself by calling -retain on the objects, for instance in your appDelegate.
You can use NSUserDefaults to save the states of the UIControls in the view.
So whenever u r loading a view, set the values to the controls so that it looks like it resume from the place where we left.
i am using UIviewcontroller subclasses. In my main view i have 3 buttons, each button will load a different nib. and each new nib is having one back button to come back to main view.
when i click one the back button of any view to move to the main view the dealloc of that view is not getting called? i didnt understood this.
can anyone explain when those views dealloc will be called?
if the dealloc method hasn't been called, it means that your retained your viewController object by hands. for example, in this case dealloc will not be called after clicking back button to return
MyViewController *controller = [[MyViewController alloc] init];
[self.navigationController pushViewController:controller animated:YES];
You should add
[controller release];
to this code to be sure that your instance of viewController will be deallocated. If you are absolutely sure, that you had sent equal number of alloc(or any message that increases object's retainCount) and release messages for your object and dealloc method doesn't be called anyway, it will be more complex. I hope that this answer will help. If you will find that your situation is "more complex", post a comment, then I'll try to explain with more details.
I too would like to dive deeper into understanding memory management details (below surface level) where it comes to controllers being pushed on and off of the stack. I built my framework from the text, "Beginning iPhone 3 Development" by Mark and LaMarche, but that text effectively re-uses sub-controllers and their dealloc methods never get called.
I have noticed that repeated use of a sub-controller with a NIB containing a UIWebView that calls Google's web directions url ... eventually results in a memory warning and my data is lost. This involves repeated "reuse" of the sub-controller.
If you can point me as well to in depth text that goes into nav controller and sub view memory management, that would be excellent.
what are best pratices to reuse UIViewControllers? In many apps (including Apple's own examples: e.g. SQLiteBooks), UIViewControllers are allocated and initialized everytime, a UIViewController is pushed to the stack. This increases the use of memory with every new controller, because the objects stay in memory and aren't used again.
How to make it better?
This increases the use of memory with
every new controller, because the
objects stays in the memory and aren't
used again.
It should be released when the stack is popped though, as long as you have not got something else holding on to it. Check your dealloc methods are getting called.
Also if it is pushed to the stack, then you need to keep it around at least until it is popped (which automatically happens if you follow the standard patterns). So it is used again.
So following the standard pattern should already keep your memory usage as small as you can get away with.
This is what I do when creating a new viewcontroller and the memory is released when the view is removed from the window
MyViewController *mvc = [[[MyViewController alloc] initWithNibName:#"MyView" bundle:nil] autorelease];
[[self navigationController] pushViewController:mvc animated:YES];
Do you actually have a memory issue that you are trying to address or is this a case of premature optimization? I would say that unless there is a specific resource issue then the best practice would be to follow the standard view controller patterns.
Put a breakpoint in your view controller's dealloc function, and make sure it is called when you remove the view controller from the window. The memory shouldn't keep building up. If you're properly creating and autoreleasing your controllers (as LostInTransit shows above), the memory for each controller should be released when it is removed.
If you see that dealloc is not getting called, it means that somewhere in the app a reference to the view controller still exists.
Don't forget that a View Controller is not your view.
Views held by a view controller can unload, so view controllers themselves are very lightweight. If you want to keep the footprint really light you could nullify any other data the controller has allocated in viewDidUnload (mostly called when there's a memory warning - it's a 3.0 only thing though).
As noted mostly view controllers will be deallocated when you leave them (hit back) so there aren't generally that any hanging around anyway. But sometimes I find it handy to leave a reference around if I want to re-open that view in the same state the user left it (does not work between app launches).