How can I do a partial update (i.e., get isolated changesets) from subversion with subclipse? - eclipse

If a file is committed several times with various changes, how can I fetch one change at a time, i.e., one changeset at a time?
I use eclipse, subversion, and subclipse, and I can't change the former two for the time being (or the MS platform..).
In my Team/Synchronization view in eclipse (using subclipse), choosing the changeset model, a file seems to be listed only in the latest relevant changeset even if all changesets are listed. So an earlier changeset doesn't necessarily show the full set of files in the original commit, nor the original diff for a file in a commit.
Update: I'm thinking about using changesets for simplified code review, so I'd like the partial update represented for all the files commited in one changeset. It's easy to get diffs and specific revisions for specific files in eclipse, but I'd like to step through all the changes in one specific commit/ changeset in a practical manner.


As I'm sure you know, svn up will by default grab the latest revision of the file.
However, you can use the -r parameter to svn up to grab a particular revision of a file. So if you know a file was committed in revisions 5, 7, and 9, you could do this:
svn up -r5 myfile
svn up -r7 myfile
svn up -r9 myfile
I believe (but I don't have an installation of it in front of me) that Subclipse has a similar option, labeled something like "Update to Revision..."


Subversion does not support atomic changesets.
(Note: If anyone can prove me wrong, I'll happily switch accepted answer.)
I've compared Git and Subversion using TortoiseGit and TortoiseSVN (and looked at what is possible on the command line).
With both Svn and Git I can update to a certain revision, or see and update to different versions of only one file at a time.
With both Tortoise clients can I see individual commits (revisions) from the repository and look at changes between a revision and the previous revision. (Note that I can't seem to do this in Eclipse, ref the question.)
Only with Git, however, can I update to or cherry-pick an isolated commit. The closest I've seen to this functionality in Subversion is to update to head and then revert a certain revision with a "subtractive merge"...
Test setup: make a project, check out or clone the project, make 2 separate commits to repository from elsewhere, including at least one file that is modified in both commits.
Then, with Git: fetch remote changes.
Then, with both Git and Subversion: look at the log.

Related

Comments in git (egit)

We recently moved to git from svn (both using Eclipse). I am in the (perhaps bad) habit of writing my Java code first, getting everything to work and then going back and adding comments. In SVN this was easy. I would just create a Fisheye review with my Jira task. The review would have a list of all the files I changed and methods I added or modified. I would note it and abandon the review. Then I would edit all the files listed and add the comments.
However, Fisheye does not (I believe) work with git. I could do a git status to see the files I changed but the local branch is already updated so it will not list any files. And all it does is tell me I am something like one commit ahead of the remote branch but does not list any files.
Is there some way to see a lit of the files I have changed with git so I can add comments? And when I say I wait for my comments I really mean mostly for added classes and methods. If I do something like add a line or two to a method I will generally add the comment too.

changing comments on git commits is not that easy. Each git commit has a sha-checksum which also includes the previous git commit. If you change a commit you change the current commits sha-checksum. therefore you create a new commit. All following commits of your branch must now be rebased on top of this new commit.
The command line provides the git rebase -i [commitid] where you can do lots of modifications including changing comments on commits. I never did this with a GUI but egit might support that too. Just refer documentation on egits rebase feature.

I found out how to do this.
The "Synchronize Workspace" in eclipse appears to show all the changed files not yet pushed remotely. I have not done any pushes, so this showed me what files changed.

Timestamp-based automatic merge in Mercurial

I want to use Mercurial for a email-based sync system (see this question).
I have played around with sending bundles back and forth ad applying them to the repositories to be synced. But I often get merge conflicts which I have to resolve manually.
But they could be resolved easily automatically: I just want the newer file to replace the older one.
Is it possible to set up a merge-tool in Mercurial that does exactly that: When I hg pull a bundle it updates to the file with the newer time stamp?

When you pull or unbundle new changesets in repository must not intersect with done in parallel (you'll get new head only) - I can't see why you can have merge on pull (uncommited local changes? Commit before pull!)
If your merge-conflicts appear on merge heads (when you merge local head into tip after pull) and you prefer to have tip version of conflicted files and abandon local changes you can use merge with --tool=internal:local option
If you prefer dummy-merge, i.e abandon all local changes from all files, you can use this trick from Mercurial wiki

cvs: updates fail to merge

I've just discovered, a surprising for me behavior of cvs.
I change file1 localy
During this time people change other unrelated parts of the same file, and commit to the repository
I update my local copy from repository
At this point I expect my local copy of file1 to contain all changes made by others to this file, unless the update above reported a conflict. However, when I do now diff with head, I discover lot's of differences coming from changes made by others in parts of the file that I did not touch at all.
Any ideas? Is this just the limited abilities of cvs to merge? Any wrong setting? Something in my workflow?

CVS has very limited merge facilities. Switch to a modern system such as Git (perhaps via git-cvsimport if the repo maintainer is uncooperative) if you want a better merge experience. See also Best practices for using git with CVS

The final solution is :
1. Save your local code to another place manually
2. Revert the files which may has conflict to the HEAD (most latest) version on CVS server.
3. Add back your change to the Reverted file.
The concept for above solution is to CLEAR UP all the possible issue by REVERT and get a 100% clean version from repository then add back our changes.
It can resolve below issues which caused by code out of date / code base messed up.
CVS commit had a conflict and has not been modified
CVS update failed
CVS not sync

What is the best way to merge specific changes in several branches and trunk?

I used SVN/CVS for a long time just as a place where my code stored is. But now I came to a point where I need a "best way to do".
We have several branches.
For Example:
Release1 (shipped),
Release2 (not finished, contains new features),
Fix1 (contains bug fixes for Release1 and will be shipped after customer tests),
Fix2/trunk (The trunk is our current development state with Fix2).
And now we come to my problem.
I cannot say if Release 2 is shipped before Fix1 or Fix2 and I have now a Hotfix for Release1. Just a few files, but it was urgent.
What is now the best way to get the changes in all branches?
Auto merge will also merge differences that are branch specific. Is the best way to merge it by hand?
There has to be a way like: I mark my change with ID "abc" and say merge only changes of abc in all branches.
Btw. I am using Eclipse with Subversive. Maybe a tool outside eclipse will be better!?

I use Subclipse plugin for Eclipse. You can probably do this with svn command line also. If your fix is isolated to a single revision number then you can merge just that revision to the trunk(or any other branch).
branch1 (revision 103) -hotfix
trunk (revision 100)
Using Subclipse, you can right click the file then choose "Team"->"Merge." Select either "Merge a range of revision" or "Merge two different trees" option then provide the source url and revision to merge to the target tree.
From command line... given that your current working directory is the trunk:
svn merge -r 103:103 http://svn/branches/branch1
You probably can't merge to multiple branches and that's probably better because you want to be careful with the merge process.

Rolling back bad changes with svn in Eclipse

Let's say I have committed some bad changes to Subversion repository. Then I commit good changes, that I want to keep.
What would be easiest way to roll back those bad changes in Eclipse, and keep the good changes? Assuming that files relating to bad changes are not same as those relating to the good changes. How things change if good changes were made to same files as bad changes?
I am mostly looking a way to do this via Eclipse plugins (Subclipse or Subversive) but commandline commands are also interesting.

In Eclipse Ganymede (Subclipse)
Select project/file that contains bad change, and from pop-up menu choose:
Team -> Show History
Revisions related to that project/file will be shown in History tab.
Find revision where "bad changes" were committed and from pop-up menu choose:
Revert Changes from Revision X
This will merge changes in file(s) modified within bad revision, with revision prior to bad revision.
There are two scenarios from here:
If you committed no changes for that file (bad revision is last revision for that file), it will simply remove changes made in bad revision. Those changes are merged to your working copy so you have to commit them.
If you committed some changes for that file (bad revision is not last revision for that file), you will have to manually resolve conflict. Let say that you have file readme.txt with, and bad revision number is 33. Also, you've made another commit for that file in revision 34. After you choose Revert Changes from Revision 33 you will have following in your working copy:
readme.txt.merge-left.r33 - bad revision
readme.txt.merge-right.r32 - before bad revision
readme.txt.working - working copy version (same as in r34 if you don't have any uncommitted changes)
Original readme.txt will be marked conflicted, and will contain merged version (where changes from bad revision are removed) with some markers (<<<<<<< .working etc). If you just want to remove changes from bad revision and keep changes made after that, then all you have to do is remove markers. Otherwise, you can copy contents from one of 3 files mentioned above to original file. Whatever you choose, when you are done, mark conflict resolved by
Team - Mark Resolved
Temporary files will be removed and your file will be marked changed. As in 1, you have to commit changes.
Note that this does not remove revision from revision history in svn repository. You simply made new revision where changes from bad revision are removed.

You have two choices to do this.
The Quick and Dirty is selecting your files (using ctrl) in Project Explorer view, right-click them, choose Replace with... and then you choose the best option for you, from Latest from Repository, or some Branch version. After getting those files you modify them (with a space, or fix something, your call and commit them to create a newer revision.
A more clean way is choosing Merge at team menu and navigate through the wizard that will help you to recovery the old version in the actual revision.
Both commands have their command-line equivalents: svn revert and svn merge.

If you want to do 1 file at a time you can go to the History view for the file assuming you have an Eclipse SVN plugin installed. "Team->Show History"
In the History view, find the last good version of that file, right click and choose "Get Contents". This will replace your current version with that version's contents. Then you can commit the changes when you've fixed it all up.

In Eclipse using Subversive:
Right click your project > Team > Merge
In the merge window, select the revisions you want to revert as normally but also enable checkbox "Reversed merge".
Merge as normally.

I have written a couple of blog posts on this subject. One that is Subclipse centric: http://markphip.blogspot.com/2007/01/how-to-undo-commit-in-subversion.html and one that is command-line centric: http://blogs.collab.net/subversion/2007/07/second-chances/

The svnbook has a section on how Subversion allows you to revert the changes from a particular revision without affecting the changes that occured in subsequent revisions:
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.4/svn.branchmerge.commonuses.html#svn.branchmerge.commonuses.undo
I don't use Eclipse much, but in TortoiseSVN you can do this from the from the log dialogue; simply right-click on the revision you want to revert and select "Revert changes from this revision".
In the case that the files for which you want to revert "bad changes" had "good changes" in subsequent revisions, then the process is the same. The changes from the "bad" revision will be reverted leaving the changes from "good" revisions untouched, however you might get conflicts.

I have same problem but CleanUp eclipse option doesn't work for me.
1) install TortoiseSVN
2) Go to windows explorer and right click on your project directory
3 Choice CleanUp option (by checking break lock option)
It's works.
Hope this helps someone.