I've been asked to find out a sensible way to make the majority of popular websites detect our browser - which is functionally complete, but is running on rather constrained hardware - as a "mobile" browser. The idea is that the heaviest popular websites seem to have mobile versions, which render much faster and fit better on the screen.
I've looked at the inverse question, which tells me that there isn't an obvious standard way of doing it - http://www.brainhandles.com/techno-thoughts/detecting-mobile-browsers is a case in point. This is borne out by looking at a variety of User-Agent strings from popular mobile and desktop browsers.
So far the best idea we can come up with is to add "Mobile" to the string somewhere, since this is the main visible difference between Safari for iPad/iPhone and for Windows/Mac. Does anyone have a better idea?
If uniquely identifying yourself is unimportant you could simply copy the important parts of the User Agent string for a popular mobile device... one which would be an obvious omission from any mobile detection script.
So far the best idea we can come up with is to add "Mobile" to the string somewhere, since this is the main visible difference between Safari for iPad/iPhone and for Windows/Mac. Does anyone have a better idea?
This won't work. The vast majority of mobile phones don't include "Mobile" in their user agents. Here's a fairly huge list of mobile user agents. As you can see, there's no consistency. On top of that, new user agents are being added to the market on a weekly basis.
Related
We are going to redevelop one website we developed as an ASP.NET website to be a mobile one.
So, I'm wondering how does the development of a mobile website differ from a normal one?
Also, what is the best approach to do this taken in consideration that this mobile website will be browsed mainly from iPhone?
There are a number of differences between a mobile device and a standard computer.
The screens are much smaller (fewer pixels to display your page). You should put fewer elements on each page.
They are typically viewed in portrait mode (narrow display - narrow page). You should plan on using the full width of the screen instead of setting a fixed page width like most people do on standard web pages.
People use finger gestures to manipulate the page instead of a mouse (buttons/links should be larger)
They can include additional features such as geo-location, telephone, etc. that you can incorporate into your app to be easier to use. There are some libraries available to help you use these, such as jQuery Mobile.
Users are concerned about battery life plus the CPU tends to be slower. Make sure you keep animations and client side processing to a minimum.
Users are concerned about data usage. Keep ajax calls to a minimum (don't ask the server for data every few seconds!) and use graphics sparingly (it's better to use html/CSS to make the page attractive).
Flash isn't supported on iPhone and is not well supported on other devices. However, most mobile devices have decent support for HTML5, so you can typically use that instead.
Users on smartphones are used a different experience.
In addition to Brian's answer I'd add:
Screens are not resized but scrolled, however sides scrolling is not generally a good experience
Screens orientations can change, but the same scrolling rules apply
Consumers are used App like behaviour and as such less information with backwards and forwards between pages is common and between sites
Consumers generally have data concerns so data traffic needs to be minimised
Controls/buttons/selections/data entry need to optimised for hand gestures - for example think of what happens with the keyboard pops up to allow data entry, how much screen is available - can the see all their input easily if they need to?
I suggest that for developing a mobile website is to use the target smartphone for a few weeks to understand how the device is used in the real world.
I'm afraid you cannot use current asp-View to mobile especially for iPhone. There's special control set for iphone development - componentone.
If you web application is based on MVC or MVP patterns then moving will be not difficult.
Recently we have developed a site for iphone users, we are using asp.net/sql for normal site.
But when you look at mobile sites, mobile normally have small screens and some time optimization problem.
We use jqtouch for mobile development. A JQuery plugin for mobile web development on the iPhone,Android, iPod Touch, and other forward-thinking devices.
Learning Video
Getting started
Establish the context for the mobile site: is there subset of information that is more relevant to your mobile users? Maybe your regular site has apps that are irrelevant on mobile devices? Either way, you should create your mobile site separately in a mobile folder! You can then use a sub-domain to reach it: for example, http://m.mysite.com
You can use a combination of CSS Media Queries and 51degrees.Mobi to detect browser features and render the correct size layout depending on which type of device the user has.
http://html5boilerplate.com/
http://www.modernizr.com/ (this is included in HTM5 Boilerplate)
http://51degrees.codeplex.com/
Do not make the stupid mistake of following current fads like "Responsive Web Design" which attempts to squeeze a desktop version of a website into a mobile screen. Above links should get you started.
I am working on iPhone app development currently (primarily native app using Obj-C and some web app using jQTouch). My question is regarding the future of this space;
In say 3 years time, what do you think would be preferred (native or web app) ?
What are the strengths going to be for native app (I know for certain types like Games, people prefer native than browser-based, but will that remain that way forever)
Some people say HTML5 will replace native app development, as it will be "code once, run anywhere" kind of thing (like common for iPhone, Android, BB phones). So do you think HTML5 can completely eliminate native app development.
I know the mobile space is constantly changing with new technologies coming up regularly and hence one cannot say with certainty what the situation will be 3 years forward. But I think there are projections being made by many agencies. So are there any reputed ones which can give a general idea or some sense of what might happen in future.
My main aim is what exactly should be my focus (like what technology/platform/native-web apps), if I want to look at the mobile space for the next 5-10 years.
Please provide as many responses as possible.
My 2c.
The popularity of web based apps will continue to grow. Whether it will pass native apps I don't know. For them to be on par in terms of numbers in 3 years doesn't seem unrealistic.
Native apps have the following benefits:
Better performance (potentially)
Fewer restrictions on accessing device resources
Greater control of execution of application
HTML5 won't completely eliminate the need for native apps (see point 2 above). Even Google who are creating an entirely web based OS (ChromeOS) don't seem to be looking to get rid of Java/Dalvik for Android based dev.
"code once, run anywhere" is very unlikley for anything but the simplest of apps/functionality.
"Code once, compile for each supported platform then test everywhere" is much more realistic.
I'd recommend focusing your education on what makes a great mobile regardless of platform and looking at web based development.
1: Native. It will always be preferred, as it is the most convenient type of app. Personally, I only have one web-app on my phone.
2: The iOS-framework. It is really the largest upside of the native apps. And the fact that they are easily downloadable through the App Store.
When i create web app for all mobile devices, what are all things need to follow,
Is it enough to create single html app for all device?
Or, create every single app for a device based on web browser?
Is there any Framework has overcome above mentioned issues?
Thanks in advance,
sri
No - different phone browser have different levels of HTML compliance. Compare iPhone/Android browser with, say, a 3 year old Nokia phone (that most corporate users probably have to use)
No - there are far too many browser/device/operator combinations for you to write individual web apps. This is known as the mobile web fragmentation problem.
Luckily yes - have a look at http://wurfl.sourceforge.net/ or http://deviceatlas.com/. These frameworks let you write one web app (within some limits). These frameworks will recognise the browser (through the User Agent) and output the most appropriate HTML for that device. They can also deal with issues like resizing images for lower end devices.
You need to be aware of the screen size as i think it's bad form to have to scroll left and right as well as up and down.
also, keep the page sizes small as your page may not be the only one open so you want to give users the ability to open more than a single page. also helps in speed and keeping the cost for the user down.
remember to have text size at a readable scale as mobiles are used not only stationary but also when in motion and being bumped around.
My wish is to know how I can program a mobile website, that fit to all mobile phones.
Are there any special approaches to recognize a device and render the code according to it?
Which tools and coding languages are required?
My first thought was to hold the website in XML, which would be parsed depending on the device.
You have to consider old phones, even devices with only wap support.
For example: The mobile website has to recognize Nokia N75 and render/send the code that looks optimal for this device. Same thing with an iPhone or a Motorola Razr.
There are all sorts of problems associated with developing mobile websites. Doing it well takes a lot of time and effort, as phones have such varying support of web standards. There are tools that do it for you, such as the Mobile Web Toolkit and Vodafone's PartnerMl. These tend to force you to write your pages using dedicated XML tags which describe a limited set of elements and styles that can be rendered on the page. The phone requests these xml pages, and the server side software intercepts the request, examines the type of phone (the User Agent), and serves back markup appropriate to that phone. The disadvantage of this system is that it is very inflexible; you are limited to the set of XML elements that the tool supplies, rather than the full flexibility of HTML.
If you want to do it yourself, essentially, you have to do the following.
Using server-side code, examine the User Agent in the Http Header. This tells you what kind of phone/browser made the request
Output appropriate markup and CSS for that user agent.
Useful tools are the User Agent Switcher add-in for Firefox. Using this, you can, for instance, visit the BBC's website, pretending to be various devices. You will see that the BBC outputs 3 or 4 versions of its markup, as well as 3 or 4 different versions of the CSS, depending on the user agent.
mobiForge contains useful information. WURFL and DeviceAtlas are databases that allow you to determine the capabilities of the device that has made the request.
You will quickly realise that you will have to keep your design simple, and it's best not to rely on Javascript, as only the most modern phones can handle it well.
XML is the way to go.
From there, you mosey on to parsing out and acting upon the Agent tags in the request.
From there you can choose (assuming the device supports it), having the device render it via XSLT, or you can apply the XSLT on your end and stream down the appropriate markup language for the device.
In the end, you end up with a specific "rendering" per device. Ideally, the more compatible the devices are with normal browsers, the close the final XSLT is to each other. But you'll still likely have a version for each device that you support.
The beauty of this is that you can add devices incrementally, as time and demand permits. And as devices converge, you gain value by being able to converge your renderings. Also, your back end stays the same no matter what.
Finally, it also works great for non-mobile as well.
Yea, it's a burden to support the different devices, but that's just a truth of the marketplace.
One way is to use strict html with very clear semantics and minimum of css tricking. Do only use relative measures (for example em and %). Trust the browsers default values, because they are in one way optimal for every device, more or less.
Nowadays there isn't exist good tools to do this.
A good practice is to respect the different W3C standards about the accessibility (like the WCAG, the XHTML, etc).
If you made your web site the most accessible as possible it'll be more adaptable. (independently from device, screen size, with or without screen touch...)
If you want more information you can read one of my article about the web accessibility here if you want: Guideline to move a website on a mobile device.
However you can use some meta tags to allow the web browser of the phone to adjust the content like this for the iPhone:
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width">
You might wanna check out WURFL
I want to allow our main application to generate document files that can be easily read on the iphone, or other smart phones. The easiest way to do this, I think, is to create a simple HTML file and use javascript to show / hide different bits of it. For example, when the user clicks / touches "section 1", the section expands to show its full details; otherwise, it will remain collapsed to save space.
What guidelines should I follow when creating this file? I've done a little research and arrived at the following:
The iphone has a native resolution of 320x480, but only about 320x400 is visible for a web page.
Other smartphones have resolutions from 160x120 (probably not high enough to bother with) up to 320x240 and some even have 480x640.
These are useful for deciding how to style and arrange the HTML output, for example. Are there any other useful guidelines to work with? For example:
1) How big / small should I make things to let the user have a large enough 'target area'?
2) How can I get the file onto the iphone? Would the user have to drag and drop it via USB?
3) What size of fonts can I use before it gets too small to read?
etc etc. I don't actually have an iphone to test on, which makes this a little more problematic.
Thanks for your help!
I don't know about other smart phones, but the only way your file is going to get onto the iPhone is via the web browser, email, or a custom application that you write. There is no general mechanism for uploading files to the iPhone.
It's surprisingly easy to read even fairly small text on the iPhone, and the gesture-based zooming makes it very easy to zoom in and out.
If you're going to provide your documents through ASP.NET you might want to check this out:
http://mdbf.codeplex.com/.
It allows you to detect what kind of smartphone did the request, you can then check out the capabilities (screen-resolution, color-display, screen-pixels height... etc.)
Most mobile browsers render XHTML-MP (XHTML Mobile Profile). You can get away with rendering that.
iPhones (and other WebKit phones like Android) support the viewport meta tags which can make the experience more tailored to that phone screen size. You can learn about these in the iPhone web page creation docs from Apple.
If you are really interested in supporting a wide range of handsets, you should look at a "multi-serving" technology like WURFL, which will let you abstract a lot of the complexity away from supporting hundreds of handsets. It's sort of yesterday's technology though, since modern mobile browsers render most web pages just fine.
I'm not sure how current this is, but Yahoo says that one of the restrictions for an iPhone is that it won't cache files larger that 25k uncompressed. This doesn't affect your display necessarily, but it could affect your performance and so you may want to take it into consideration for your design.