My Zend application is going to get an command line php script that should email reports. There generation depends on Zend_View, Zend_Layout and is currently already working fine in the web interface.
How can I reuse this whole MVC functionality in the command line?
Should I add a new controller CommandLineController and call this somehow from the commandline?
How can I kick of such a Controller manually, without having a HTTP request?
I would recommend to check out this excelent tutorial for the Zend Framework from the command line:
Tutorial
Related
I'm trying to create a standard WebAPI project in .NET 6. I notice that the standard ApiController route doesn't have the leading api route that I like to have. When I add it, the controller breaks. It doesn't give me a 404 (not found), it just gives me that index page that says that I have to enable javascript. I'm really at a loss at what I have to do to make my app work where I can put api at the start of my routes:
[Route("api/[controller]")]
I've tried adding it to the default controller route map in different combinations. I've tried adding the UseEndpoints method in the Program class. I'm just not sure what to differently in 6.
For those who want to "see my code", I'm just using the standard WebAPI project w/ React (NO Redux!).
Check the new setupProxy.js file image description inside the ClientApp folder, you need to configure the backend routes in the proxy config, I had a similar issue with the ASP.NET Core 6.0 with Angular project template, you can find more information here link 1 link 2
Doing some research with regards to application framework used on the SUT am going to LoadTest using Loadrunner I fond the application is developed using wickets.
I have generated script using web http/html protocol against a wicket
application and there was some calls recorded in the following
format,script is failing at this URL when i ran the script in VUGen.
http://somem/nnnweb/main/ ?
wicket:interface= :1:someSearchForm :someSearchForm :searchInfo: :IActi
vePageBehaviorListener :0:&wicket: ignoreIfNotActiv e=true&random=
0.038901654740178815",
I find out like when i generate the script which has just views(
viewing tabs) is working fine, but when i edit somefileds and submit
the script is generating the above calls ( http://xxx...) and failing
This guy has explained just the same issue here:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/LoadRunner/message/27295
I hope it is ok to refer other sites in Stackoverflow?
General question. Does loadrunner support testing of wicket application and is TruClient the best choice here? I actually got it to work with TruClient, but as I understand there are drawbacks with memory footprint using TruClient, but maybe it is time to move on to next generation protocol given my project has decided to use wicket framework?
I am looking for an example of how to configure an ASP.NET MVC2 project to use CastleWindsor container to do IoC.
I keep running into problems setting it up, and for every problem there seems to be a solution on-line, but in the end I make so many changes and end up with such a verbose setup to get IoC working using CastleWindsor, that I thought it best to ask this question.
I am looking for the minimum configuration required in the Global.asax page, the Web.config, and if required, what other changes and extension classes are required.
I am not looking to inject into actionfilters at this stage, so just the basics. Preferably not using XML files, but doing it in .NET programatically.
Thank you in advance...
This is as basic as it gets:
Start a MVC2 project from VS2010
Download MvcContrib for MVC2 (the one that says "extra binaries")
In your project, add a reference to (all these DLLs are included in MvcContrib):
Castle.Core.dll
Castle.DynamicProxy2.dll
Castle.MicroKernel.dll
Castle.Windsor.dll
MvcContrib.dll
MvcContrib.Castle.dll
In your Application_Start(), add these lines (and whatever namespaces are needed):
var container = new WindsorContainer();
container.RegisterControllers(typeof(HomeController).Assembly);
ControllerBuilder.Current.SetControllerFactory(new WindsorControllerFactory(container));
I have an application that started life as an MVC (1.0) app in Visual Studio 2008 Sp1 with a bunch of Silverlight 3 projects as part of the site. Nothing fancy at all. Using Ninject for dependency injection (first version 2 beta, now the released version 2 with the MVC extensions).
With the release of .Net 4.0, VS2010, MVC2 etc., we decided to move the application to the newest platform. The conversion wizard in VS2010 apparently took care of everything, with one exception - it didn't change references to mvc1 to now point to mvc2, so I had to do that manually. Of course, this makes me think about other MVC2 things that could be missing from my app, that would be there if I did File -> New Project... But that is not the focus of this question.
When I deploy this application to the IIS 7.5 server (running on Win2008 R2 x64), the application as such works. However, images, scripts and other static content doesn't seem to exist. Of course they are there on disk on the server, but they don't show up in the client web browser.
I am fairly new to IIS, so the only trick I knew is to try to open the web page in a browser on the server, as that could give me more information. And here, finally, we meet our enemy. If I try to go directly to the URL of one of the images (http://server/Content/someimage.jpg for instance), I get the following error in the browser:
The IControllerFactory 'Ninject.Web.Mvc.NinjectControllerFactory' did not return a controller for a controller named 'Content'.
Aha. The web server tries to feed this request to MVC, who with its' default routing setup assumes Content to be a controller, and fails.
How can I get it to treat Content/ and Scripts/ (among others) as non-controllers and just pass through the static content? This of course works with Cassini on my developer machine, but as soon as I deploy, this problem hits.
I am using the last version of Ninject MVC 2 where the IoC tool should pass missing controllers to the base controller factory, but this has apparently not helped. I have also tried to add ignore routes for Content etc., but this apparently has no effect either. I am not even sure I am addressing the problem on the right level.
Does anyone know where to look to get this app going? I have full control of the web server so I can more or less do whatever I want to it, as long as it starts working.
Thanks!
I had a similar problem with StructureMap and favorite.ico what I ended up doing was to add a route to ignore that path.
routes.IgnoreRoute("{resource}.axd/{*pathInfo}");
routes.IgnoreRoute("favicon.ico");
Keep in mind that I have absolutely no idea really but another thing that changed is the need for Default.aspx, also if you have any custom pages those would need to mapped. That's the only two problems I had with routing.
routes.RouteExistingFiles = false;
EDIT: I meant that the RouteExistingFiles should be false otherwise I get that exception in MVC2 :)
Turns out this was caused by some account settings - I was unaware of the IIS AppPool\sitename account automatically being created by IIS in Win2008 R2 server. After trying "everything", I came across this information, gave the proper rights, and stuff magically started working.
Pretty hard thing to debug, especially for someone (me) with very limited IIS experience.
I am working on a ASP .NET MVC2 project where i have to load data using $.get() but it doesn't works. Although if i call same method with $.post() even giving [AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Post)] above of my controller method or not it works. So i just want to ask Does Microsft has put a restriction inn calling $.get() with ASP .NET MVC2. If yes then whats the reason behind it security or anything else.
What do you mean it doesn't work? What http status code do you get? Is there an error message? Try using firebug and open the net tab to watch the result to see any errors and to also make sure it is calling the url you are expecting. Also, have you tried using jQuery $.ajax() instead of $.get()?
Are you using .Net Framework 3.5 ?
Maybe you should consider creating an Ajax enabled WCF service,
the asp postback and autopostback model can be the reason why
it doesn't work nicely .
Firebug / fiddler is your friend