I wanted to make a web application through which :
user(end user) can create his own
web application online.
which will be integrated with the
databases and application/web
servers
and user can also publish that
application withing that application
only...
Doing some research i come to know it goes under category of PaaS(Platform as a Service)
But i am confuse how can i do that ?
I want to build that application using Java/J2EE.
Can any one explain me from where should i start ?
Or which framework / technology is better to implement it in Java ?
Waiting for your helpful reply....
There are several options as far as choosing a PaaS - each PaaS vendor has its pros and cons, so you need to consider a range of issues:
Language support - Do you want just Java or maybe additional languages/frameworks?
Hosting - Are you going to use a cloud computing provider like Amazon Web Services? Or are you using your own hardware? Or do you want multiple options?
DB support - You mentioned using a central DB. Do you plan on installing/administering this DB yourself, or use a hosted DB service? Do you need the PaaS to support the particular DB you want? Perhaps you need multiple Databases to provide scalability and separation among clients?
There are several good comparisons of PaaS vendors out there. This might be a good place to start: Looking for PaaS providers recommendations
Full disclosure: I work for Cloudify, an Open-Source PaaS provider.
I think while choosing a PaaS you should think of the below points.
It should be easy to deploy, scale and manage
Scaling
Flexible topology
Data safety
No vendor lock in
Open software stack
I suggest you, before going to any big vendor try a new player in town Jelastic. I recently used their services and continue to do so and they are just awesome. Their web UI is best in class and has no drama of API, SDK or downloadable software. Let me know if you use them so that I can also have some feedback before I migrate all our apps to them.
Surya
As far as i understand, you are looking for a solution that Viravis is currenlty implemented.
But believe me it is not an easy task to build that kind of platform. i strongly suggest you to look at some PaaS providers to get involved and build a business relationship to achieve your goal. They are just exists for this purpose. Provide platform for people who just want to develop a single online application or some professional who want to build an SaaS business.
I think it is better to hire the platform rather than build it from scratch (ofcourse if you dont have to...)
A web application consists of language, framework, database and Web-server.
If you want to make a web application in java, you should try GRAILS framework.
Its fast and web development is very easy and you can use java code as it is, in it.
Secondly you can choose database from MySQL, PostgreSQL etc or if you want to use No-SQL dbs, you can choose from MOngoDB, CouchDB etc.
Web-Servers can be tomcat, jetty etc.
After creating you application, you would like to host your application on web, Here PaaS comes to play. It helps you to deploy and host your application on web. So what you have to do is only to focus on your application and then deploy your app on any PaaS providers.
There are many PaaS providers in market, you can choose any.
Related
I need some help with deciding on the architecture of my project (a web app for unlocking discounts). I am first planning on creating the website (React for the front-end & Django for the back-end, PostgreSQL database). In the future, I may create a mobile app too for Android & iOS (unsure what front-end framework yet).
So I have decided I want the front-end and back-end to be completely separated so the back-end is a REST api. This will allow me to not have to create multiple back-ends for mobile apps.
But, after researching, I have found that this could be quite expensive in terms of server costs. This is a new business and I am the only developer so funding isn't high. So I was thinking that I could deploy the front-end & back-end on the same server but as separate apps that talk via nginx?
I have 4 questions about this:
If I do this, would it still be possible to reuse the back-end as a REST api for the mobile apps or is that a no because it's linked to the web front-end?
If it is possible, would I be able to host the mobile front-end in the same server (so have everything hosted on 1 server)?
Is this a stupid idea - would I just be better off deploying everything into separate servers in the long-run (to reduce load)?
Should I just worry about this in the future? And for now just deploy the separated web front-end & back-end to the same server.
I have never really deployed anything into a real life production environment so I'm sorry if my questions seem silly. I haven't started development yet but I want to think about scalability & future extensibility before I start. Thank you.
Nowadays I'd go with a serverless approach. Instead of having servers to maintain you can focus on your app functionalities.
There are a lot of options. You can check, for example, AWS Amplify (https://aws.amazon.com/amplify/) or Netlify (https://www.netlify.com/) for a more "full-stack" approach.
In AWS, you also can keep separated projects, having your backend in lambdas and your frontend served through S3 + CloudFront. You also don't have servers to care about.
There are only examples of how you can solve your problem without servers, but answering your questions:
You can reuse your APIs regardless of the way your app is deployed. It will be more related to how you designed them;
Yes, you can host everything in a single server if you want, but I really don't recommend that;
If you don't want to pay for 24/7 servers, you can go for a serverless approach;
As I told you before, you can do what you want without worrying about servers.
Your main point of focus is to keep the cost lower and to implement a good solution also. My suggestion would be to look for AWS Lightsail. Lightsail offers fixed price VM which you can configure yourself, and it starts from $3.5 / month at the time of writing this answer.
My answers to your questions
If I do this, would it still be possible to reuse the back-end as a REST api for the mobile apps or is that a no because it's linked to the web front-end?
Yes, it's possible. Keep the frontend and backend in different repo, and you can deploy it as docker instances on the same server. You will have 1 frontend docker container and 1 backend docker container, and they can communicate with each other.
If it is possible, would I be able to host the mobile front-end in the same server (so have everything hosted on 1 server)?
For mobile, you will develop a mobile application which you can publish to playstore or deploy to smartphone. Your app can then call the backend service and get the JSON in response. So you have to design your backend in such a way that it can serve data to both requests.
Is this a stupid idea - would I just be better off deploying everything into separate servers in the long-run (to reduce load)?
For long term and design perspective, you need to consider factors like scalability, maintainability, security etc.., so its always better to have multiple server to avoid single point of failure.
Should I just worry about this in the future? And for now just deploy the separated web front-end & back-end to the same server.
My advice to you will be to think carefully now, so you don't get nightmares in the future. Invest your time now and design a stable solution which could help you in long-term. As you mentioned that its a small business, but your solution should be able to easy handle growth.
My suggestion
As suggested by the Paulo, S3 + CloudFront looks good for frontend. You can get 1 year free CDN using Lightsail.
For Backend, you should at least have 2 (I will suggest minimum 3) servers and deploy backend docker containers. You can use docker compose to automate the deployment. If you want to orchestrate then Docker Swarm Mode is best. With this you will avoid single point of failure. You can get very affordable servers from Amazon Lightsail
For database, you need to make it scalable. To ensure scalability and High Avalability we should have replicated DB. Minimum 3 DB instances will be good starting point. MongoDB is a good choice. With simple configuration you can enable DB replication. 1 Master 2 slaves instances.
1 Load-balancer in front of your servers to distribute the load. To save the cost you can configure the Load-balancer yourself but this will add learning curve and you will have to spent time and understanding the details. The better solution is to use a managed load balancer. Lightsail offers Load Balancer for $18 / month at the time writing this answer.
The above mentioned solution is cost-effective and will give you long-term benefit and also you can estimate the cost based on your solution.
Obviously, this can still be improved but I tried to cover the necessary aspects of the question asked.
We have a python based server that uses mongodb database. Our server programs uses RabbitMQ to exchange request/reply packets with many Android apps and perform actions accordingly. In addition to this, now we also need to create a web portal for the admin staff to let them manipulate the database, upload/download files, view data/statistics and trigger actions for android clients. So, the database is going to be common for the portal and the existing server programs.
For the web portal development, I got a recommendation for using Plone. We are comfortable in using traditional Node.js. Could anybody guide me on the use of Plone within this context. Is plone able to communicate with mongodb and existing server side programs?
Plone is a CMS designed around managing web based content and is tightly integrated for storage of its data in the ZODB, a NoSQL database. If data is very custom and isn't all about webpages and website nagivation etc, or if you have a need for the data to live in a different kind of DB then Plone probably isn't the right tool for you. This isn't to say it can't be made to do these these things but you would have to learn a lot about it's internals to make it do these things.
I'm planning to make web application which allows users to upload music/audio files and host them etc, i'm wondering what the best method would be to go about this, i have used cloudinary in previous projects for image hosting but nothing for audio.
What do companies like Soundcloud use if not there own service which i am assuming is the case.
What would you recommend? It will be vital when it comes to building a scalable and reliable service so I don't want to go into this project uneducated.
ps. I will be using meteor and mongodb to build the application.
I'd recommend getting started with edgee:slingshot in your app. It's much lighter on your Meteor server since uploads and downloads go straight to the storage system. There you have several choices including S3, Google Cloud Storage, and Rackspace Cloud. You could also use CollectionFS but slingshot seems architecturally better suited to this class of problem.
I've been ramping up on Azure Mobile Services over the past week. There are definitely some PROs and CONs in using them over a standard Azure Web Site where I can write APIs that hit SQL DB, etc.
One of the biggest negatives I see is developing the server side code and DB structures ON THE SERVER. I've watched lots of videos from launch and beyond, read lots of blog posts about tips and tricks around WAMS, but nobody seems to talk about the downside of developing the code (server scripts) and database structures on the server, at your live URL.
This is all great for developing the first version of your mobile app and associated mobile services. But once it's all deployed, how do you ever build version 2? Real apps hitting real APIs and data, but now I want to develop/change/play with the server scripts and database schema?
With Azure Web Sites, I can develop locally and only publish code and DB changes to the server on my schedule.
Have any of you seen or heard of the "v2 development story" around Azure Mobile Services?
Only thing I can think of would be to create another set of tables and APIs around them, most likely "virtual tables" that allow me to write APIs against the original set of data. Seems like a huge hassle, since the client code would now have to know about the original set of tables and the new set of tables... that's only for v2...
Thanks for any thoughts / insight.
You should have two services, one dev and one production and use scripts to promote your code from dev to production (pretty similar to how most workflows go, in moving from a test setup to a production one).
http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Build/2013/3-511
I am developing a c# web application that will be hosted in Windows Azure and use Table Data Storage (TDS).
I want to architect my application such that I can also (as an option) deploy the application to a traditional IIS server with some other NoSql back-end. Basically, I want to give my customers the option to either pay me in the software as a service model, OR purchase a license of my application that they can install on a (non-azure) production server of their own.
How can I best architect my data layer and middle tier to achieve both goals?
I will likely need a Windows Azure Worker Role and an Azure Queue. How complicated is to replicate these? Can I substitue a custom Windows Service and some other queuing technology?
How I can the entities in my data model be written such that I can deploy to Azure TDS or some other storage when not deploying to Azure? Would MongoDB or similar be useful for this?
Surely there is a way to architect for Azure without being married to it.
I will likely need a Windows Azure Worker Role and an Azure Queue. How complicated is to replicate these? Can I substitue a custom Windows Service and some other queuing technology?
Yes - a Windows service with some other queuing technology would fit this reasonably well - and worker roles have a main/Run loop which is easy to use within a Windows Service.
How I can the entities in my data model be written such that I can deploy to Azure TDS or some other storage when not deploying to Azure? Would MongoDB or similar be useful for this?
NoSql is a general term encapsulating lots of different technologies. I think Azure TDS currently belongs to the Key-Value store family of NoSql, while MongoDB is more of a document database offering much richer functionality than TDS - see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NoSQL_(concept). For mimmicking Azure TDS I think maybe a variant of something like Redis might work (although I believe Redis itself has wider functionality then TDS currently)
In general, it depends on the shape of your data, but I suspect if you can fit it in Azure TDS, then you'll be able to fit it into your choice of other storage too.
Surely there is a way to architect for Azure without being married to it.
Yes - as you've suggested in your question, you can architect your app so it can work on other technologies instead. In fact, this is quite a similar challenge to the traditional SQL data abstraction methods. However, I think there are a few places where you'll find TDS pushing you in certain
directions which won't fit well with other stores - e.g. Azure pushes you much more towards data replication; has very specific rules on keys; offers high performance using very specific mechanisms; and offers limited transaction integrity in very specific situations. These factors may mean that you do have to indeed change some middle tier layers as well as some data layers in order to get the most out of your app in both its Azure and non-Azure variations.
One other thought - It might be easier to offer your clients a multitenant SaaS version on Azure, and a singletenant version hosted on Azure - but this does depend on the clients!
I found a viable solution. I found that I can use EF Code First with SQL Server or SQL CE if I design my entities with the same PartitionKey & RowKey compound key structure that Azure Table Storage requires.
With a little help from Lokad Cloud (http://code.google.com/p/lokad-cloud/) to perform the interaction with Azure Table Storage, I was able to craft a common DataContext that provides crud operations against either EF's DbContext OR Lokad's TableStorageProvider.
I even found a nice way to manage relationships between entities and lazy-load them properly.
The solution is a bit complex and needs more testing. I will blog about it and post the link here when ready.