Consider the below code snippet
string src = "ibm,tcs";
string dest = src.Split(',').Select(i => i + "();,").ToArray().Aggregate((s, i) => s + i);
dest = dest.Substring(0, dest.Length - 1);
What I am doing is that, the Source string(src here) will have the string list in comma separated way.
The final output will be: ibm();,tcs();
As we can make out that, my program is doing so.
But I am taking the help of dest.Substring(0, dest.Length - 1); for eliminating the last "," that I am building in the Select Extension method.
I don't like this approach of mine.
Is there any other beautiful / elegant way of doing so? I am sure that someone will definitely approach in a better way :)
Also I will be happy if I get a solution using Lambda & Extension Method.
I am using C# 3.0 and dot net framework 3.5
Thanks
Just use string.Join instead of Aggregate, and don't include the comma in the Select clause:
string dest = string.Join(",", src.Split(',')
.Select(i => i + "();")
.ToArray());
In .NET 4 you wouldn't even need the ToArray() call (as extra overloads have been added to string.Join).
Or, as a completely alternative approach:
string dest = src.Replace(",", "();,") + "();";
string dest = string.Join(",", src.Split(',').Select(i => i + "();").ToArray());
or
string dest = string.Join(",", Array.ConvertAll(src.Split(','), s => s + "();"));
Related
I'm trying to use LinQ Intersect (or equivalent) into an IQueryable method but it seems like I'm doing it wrong.
I have some PRODUCTS that match some SPECIFITY (like colors, materials, height...), those specifications have different values, for example:
color : blue, red, yellow
height : 128cm, 152cm...
I need to get the products that match ALL the list of couple specifityId / specifityValue I provide.
Here what I'm trying to do:
// The list of couple SpecifityID (color, material..) / SpecifityValue (red, yellow, wood...)
List<string> SpecId_SpecValue = new List<string>();
SpecId_SpecValue.Add("3535a444-1139-4a1e-989f-795eb9be43be_BEA");
SpecId_SpecValue.Add("35ad6162-a885-4a6a-8044-78b68f6b2c4b_Purple");
int filterCOunt = SpecId_SpecValue.Count;
var query =
Products
.Include(pd => pd.ProductsSpecifity)
.Where(z => SpecId_SpecValue
.Intersect(z.ProductsSpecifity.Select(x => (x.SpecifityID.ToString() + "_" + x.SpecifityValue)).ToList()).Count() == filterCOunt);
I got the error : InvalidOperationException: The LINQ expression 'DbSet() could not be translated. Either rewrite the query in a form that can be translated, or switch to client evaluation explicitly by inserting a call to 'AsEnumerable', 'AsAsyncEnumerable', 'ToList', or 'ToListAsync'. See https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=2101038 for more information. which mean it can't be translated to SQL and I need to ToList before my filter.
The problem is, I don't want to call ToList() because I got huge number of products in my Database and I don't want to load them in memory before filtering them.
Is there an other way to achieve what I need to do?
I ended up using a solution found in the link #Gert Arnold provide here.
I used BlazarTech.QueryableValues.SqlServer #yv989c's answers
Here's what is now working like a charm :
// The list of couple SpecifityID (color, material..) / SpecifityValue (red, yellow, wood...)
Dictionary<Guid, string> SpecId_SpecValue = new Dictionary<Guid, string>();
SpecId_SpecValue.Add(new Guid("3535a444-1139-4a1e-989f-795eb9be43be"), "BEA");
SpecId_SpecValue.Add(new Guid("35ad6162-a885-4a6a-8044-78b68f6b2c4b"), "Purple");
// BlazarTech.QueryableValues.SqlServer
var queryableValues = DbContext.AsQueryableValues(SpecId_SpecValue);
var query = Products.Include(pd => pd.ProductsSpecifity)
.Where(x => x.ProductsSpecifity
.Where(e => queryableValues
.Where(v =>
v.Key == e.SpecifityID &&
v.Value == e.SpecifityValue
)
.Any()
).Count() == dynamicFilter.Count);
The query expresses "products of which all x.SpecifityID.ToString() + "_" + x.SpecifityValue combinations exactly match some given combinations".
Set combination operators like Except often don't play nice with EF for various reasons I'm not going into here. Fortunately, in many of these cases a work-around can be found by using Contains, which EF does support well. In your case:
var query = Products.Include(pd => pd.ProductsSpecifity)
.Where(z => z.ProductsSpecifity
.Select(x => x.SpecifityID.ToString() + "_" + x.SpecifityValue)
.Count(s => SpecId_SpecValue.Contains(s)) == filterCount);
Please note that the comparison is not efficient. Transforming database values before comparison disables any use of indexes (is not sargable). But doing this more efficiently isn't trivial in EF, see this.
I'm using the code below to try and strip the file extension off the incoming file and replace it with "ACK";
Can't use .lastIndexOf as it's not available in Rhino.
var _filename = String(sourceMap.get('originalFilename'));
pos = -1;
var search = ".";
for(var i = 0; i < _filename.length - search.length; i++) {
if (_filename.substr(i, search.length) == search) {
pos = i;
}
}
logger.info('_pos:' + _pos);
Every time I get a pos value of -1
i.e. Last full stop position not found.
BUT if I hardcode the filename in as "2020049.259317052.HC.P.F3M147-G" it works perfectly.
Is it something to do with the sourceMap.get('originalFilename') supplying a non-string or different
character set ?
This was tested on mirth 3.5. Rhino does, in fact, have String.prototype.lastIndexOf for all mirth versions going back to at least mirth 3.0. You were correctly converting the java string from the sourceMap to a javascript string, however, it is not necessary in this case.
Java strings share String.prototype methods as long as there is not a conflict in method name. Java strings themselves have a lastIndexOf method, so that is the one being called in my answer. The java string is able to then borrow the slice method from javascript seamlessly. The javascript method returns a javascript string.
If for some reason the filename starts with a . and doesn't contain any others, this won't leave you with a blank filename.
var filename = $('originalFilename');
var index = filename.lastIndexOf('.');
if (index > 0) filename = filename.slice(0, index);
logger.info('filename: ' + filename);
That being said, I'm not sure why your original code wasn't working. When I replaced the first line with
var originalFilename = new java.lang.String('2020049.259317052.HC.P.F3M147-G');
var _filename = String(originalFilename);
It gave me the correct pos value of 22.
New Answer
After reviewing and testing what agermano said he is correct.
In your sample code you are setting pos = i but logging _pos
New answer var newFilename = _filename.slice(0, _filename.lastIndexOf('.'))
Older Answer
First, you are mixing JavaScript types and Java types.
var _filename = String(sourceMap.get('originalFilename'));
Instead, do
var _filename = '' + sourceMap.get('originalFilename');
This will cause a type conversion from Java String to JS string.
Secondly, there is an easier way to do what you are trying to do.
var _filenameArr = ('' + sourceMap.get('originalFilename')).split('.');
_filenameArr.pop() // throw away last item
var _filename = _filenameArr.join('.') // rejoin the array with out the last item
logger.info('_filename:' + _filename)
I have this string: "C:\Procesos\rrhh\CorteDocumentos\Cortados\10001662-1_20060301_29_1_20190301.pdf" and im trying to get this part : "20190301". The problem is the lenght is not always the same. It would be:
"9001662-1_20060301_4_1_20190301".
I've tried this: item.ToString.Substring(66,8), but it doesn't work sometimes.
What can I do?.
This is a code example of what I said in my comment.
Sub Main()
Dim strFileName As String = ""
Dim di As New DirectoryInfo("C:\Users\Maniac\Desktop\test")
Dim aryFi As FileInfo() = di.GetFiles("*.pdf")
Dim fi As FileInfo
For Each fi In aryFi
Dim arrname() As String
arrname = Split(Path.GetFileNameWithoutExtension(fi.Name), "_")
strFileName = arrname(arrname.Count - 1)
Console.WriteLine(strFileName)
Next
End Sub
You could achieve this using a simple regular expressions, which has the added benefit of including pattern validation.
If you need to get exactly eight numbers from the end of file name (and after an underscore), you can use this pattern:
_(\d{8})\.pdf
And then this VB.NET line:
Regex.Match(fileName, "_(\d{8})\.pdf").Groups(1).Value
It's important to mention that Regex is by default case sensitive, so to prevent from being in a situations where "pdf" is matched and "PDF" is not, the patter can be adjusted like this:
(?i)_(\d{8})\.pdf
You can than use it directly in any expression window:
PS: You should also ensure that System.Text.RegularExpressions reference is in the Imports:
You can achieve it by this way as well :)
Path.GetFileNameWithoutExtension(Str1).Split("_"c).Last
Path.GetFileNameWithoutExtension
Returns the file name of the specified path string without the extension.
so with your String it will return to you - 10001662-1_20060301_29_1_20190301
then Split above String i.e. 10001662-1_20060301_29_1_20190301 based on _ and will return an array of string.
Last
It will return you the last element of an array returned by Split..
Regards..!!
AKsh
I'm new to using FakeItEasy and rather stuck at my first attempt. The interface i want to fake has a method like this:
byte[] ReadFileChunk(string path,int offset,int count,out long size);
I would like to see how the arguments are passed on, so I'm using ReturnsLazily. Here is my attempt:
long resSize;
A.CallTo(() => dataAttributesController
.ReadFileChunk(A<string>.Ignored, A<int>.Ignored, A<int>.Ignored, out resSize))
.ReturnsLazily((string path, int offset, int count) =>
{
return Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes("You requested: " + path + "(" + offset + "," + count + ")");
})
.AssignsOutAndRefParameters(123);
This compiles, but when ran it generates this exception:
The faked method has the signature (System.String, System.Int32, System.Int32, System.Int64&), but returns lazily was used with (System.String, System.Int32, System.Int32).
Which is correct, but i can't figure out how to add the out parameter. If I change the ReturnLazily part to this:
.ReturnsLazily((string path, int offset, int count, out long size) =>
{
size = 0;
return Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes("You requested: " + path + "(" + offset + "," + count + ")");
})
it will not compile, and I don't understand the errors:
error CS1593: Delegate 'System.Func<FakeItEasy.Core.IFakeObjectCall,byte[]>' does not take 4 arguments
error CS1661: Cannot convert lambda expression to delegate type 'System.Func<string,int,int,long,byte[]>' because the parameter types do not match the delegate parameter types
error CS1677: Parameter 4 should not be declared with the 'out' keyword
For a novice like me, this reads like it doesn't like 4 parameters nor understands what to do with 'out'. Can someone please explain me how I should be reading these errors? A working example would be very welcome as well :-)
Thanks a lot!
--- EDIT ---
This seems to work:
A.CallTo(() => dataAttributesController
.ReadFileChunk(A<string>.Ignored, A<int>.Ignored, A<int>.Ignored, out resSize))
.ReturnsLazily(x =>
Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes("You requested: " + x.Arguments.Get<string>(0) + "(" + x.Arguments.Get<int>(1) + "," + x.Arguments.Get<int>(2) + ")"))
.AssignsOutAndRefParameters((long)123);
A bit less readable then I was hoping for, is this anywhere near the intended use of ReturnsLazily?
Is that interface under your control?
byte[] ReadFileChunk(string path, int offset, int count, out long size);
if so: Isn't out long size just the same as the size of the returning byte[]?
In that case I would just remove the size parameter from the interface method and use the "nice-to-read" ReturnsLazily method as you intended first.
Update: the issue I mention below was fixed in FakeItEasy release 1.15, so update to the latest version and you shouldn't have to worry about the out/ref specifiers on the methods when using ReturnsLazily.
Sorry for the delay. I'm glad you found a solution that at least functions for you.
I agree that the syntax you landed on isn't the most readable, but it does appear to be the correct one. The "convenience" versions of ReturnsLazily won't work with out/ref parameters because the lambda can't take the out/ref modifiers.
It doesn't help you today, but I've created FakeItEasy issue 168 to deal with the problem. If you have additional opinions, please drop by and comment or something.
I'm creating a query to search the db using EF. TdsDb being the EF context.
string searchValue = "Widget";
TdsDb tdsDb = new TdsDb();
IQueryable<Counterparty> counterparties;
I can do exact match:
counterparties = tdsDb.Counterparties.Where(x => x.CounterpartyName == searchValue);
or wildcard match:
counterparties = tdsDb.Counterparties.Where(x => x.CounterpartyName.Contains(searchValue));
But I want to be able to do both i.e. (psudo code)
counterparties = tdsDb.Counterparties.Where(x =>
if (searchValue.EndsWith("%"))
{
if (searchValue.StartsWith("%"))
{x.CounterpartyName.Contains(searchValue)}
else
{x.CounterpartyName.StartsWith(searchValue)}
}
else
{x => x.CounterpartyName == searchValue}
);
Now clearly I can't put an if statement in the where clause like that. But I also can't duplicate the queries: shown here they are hugely dumbed down. The production query is far longer, so having multiple versions of the same long query that vary on only one clause seems very unhealthy and unmaintainable.
Any ideas?
You should be able to use the ternary operator:
bool startsWithWildCard = searchValue.StartsWith("%");
bool endsWithWildCard = searchValue.EndsWith("%");
counterparties = tdsDb.Counterparties.Where(x =>
endsWithWildCard
? (startsWithWildCard
? x.CounterpartyName.Contains(searchValue)
: (x.CounterpartyName.StartsWith(searchValue)))
: (x.CounterpartyName == searchValue));
Did you test btw if querying by a searchValue that has an % at the beginning or end works as you expect? It might be possible that % will be escaped as a character to query for because StartsWith and Contains will prepend/append % wildcards to the generated SQL search term anyway. In that case you need to cut off the % from the searchValue before you pass it into StartsWith or Contains.